Intracorporeal Robot-Assisted Microsurgical Vasovasostomy for the Treatment of Bilateral Vasal Obstruction Occurring Following Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repairs with Mesh Placement

Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy-assisted microsurgical vasovasostomy for the treatment of obstructive azoospermia caused by pediatric bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy

BACKGROUND

Pediatric inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common cause of obstructive azoospermia (OA). Yet, the surgical treatment for this kind of OA remains difficult with poor fertility outcome.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy-assisted microsurgical vasovasostomy (VV) in the treatment of OA caused by pediatric bilateral IHR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Totally, 37 patients with OA caused by pediatric bilateral IHR were enrolled in this study from March 2015 to December 2020 in Shanghai General Hospital. The clinical data and fertility outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients enrolled had a history of bilateral IHR at the age of 1-10 years old. The mean age of patients was 27 ± 4.31 (range: 18-35) years. Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy (TEP) was applied in 31 patients for the exploration and retrieval of pelvic vas deferens end, and 30 of them underwent microsurgical VV successfully. Among the six cases where TEP was not applied, five cases underwent microsurgical anastomosis. Intraoperative exploration revealed that the location of vas deferens injuries included scrotum (2.70%, 1/37), inguinal canal (5.41%, 2/37), pelvic cavity (78.37%, 29/37), and multiple sites (13.51%, 5/37). The mean operation time was 339 ± 96.73 min (range: 130-510 min). There were no surgical complications. Thirty-three cases were followed up for 5-48 months with four cases lost to follow-up. The overall patency rate, pregnancy rate, and natural pregnancy rate were 75.86% (22/29), 46.67% (14/30), and 36.84% (7/19, 3 patients without family planning), respectively. And seven couples conceived through the assisted reproductive technique, two of which using fresh sperm in the ejaculate.

CONCLUSION

TEP laparoscopy-assisted microscopic VV is an effective treatment for patients with OA caused by pediatric bilateral IHR.

[Surgery to improve male fertility]

BACKGROUND

At a time when increasing attention is being paid to the limitations and risks of in vitro fertilisation techniques, surgeries to improve male fertility are attracting growing interest.

METHODS

Systematic review based on a Pubmed search of surgeries to improve male fertility.

RESULTS

Vasovasostomy (VV) gives patency rates of 70-97% and pregnancy rates of 30-76%. Vasoepididymostomy (VE) gives patency rates of 80-84%, with pregnancy rates of 40-44%. The duration of obstruction and the age of the partner are 2 predictive parameters for the occurrence of a natural pregnancy. In cases of obstructive azoospermia due to pelvic obstruction (prostatic cyst, obstruction of the ejaculatory ducts), several surgical procedures may be proposed. Transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts leads to an improvement in sperm parameters in 63-83% of patients, with spontaneous pregnancy occurring in 12-31% of cases. Microsurgical cure of varicocele by the subinguinal route is a benchmark technique with recurrence rates of less than 4%. It improves live birth and pregnancy rates, both naturally and by in vitro fertilization, as well as sperm count, motility and DNA fragmentation rates.

CONCLUSION

Whenever possible, the urologist should present the surgical options for improving male fertility to the ART team and to the couple, discussing the benefit/risk balance of the operation as part of a personalized approach.

Combined robotic and subinguinal microsurgical vasovasostomy for vasal obstruction after inguinal hernia repair

Obstruction of the vas deferens may occur after inguinal hernia repair with mesh and lead to infertility. In cases where natural conception is desired and after obtaining test results that suggest the presence of spermatogenesis, surgical reconstruction can be attempted but may be difficult. Several approaches have been reported, including the laparoscopic mobilisation of the pelvic vas deferens, as well as mobilisation and passage of the scrotal vas deferens intra-abdominally for robot-assisted vasovasostomy. We describe a novel approach that used the surgical robot and a no-touch technique to mobilise the pelvic vas deferens and deliver it to the subinguinal region for subinguinal microsurgical vasovasostomy. This approach appeared to be feasible and safe, allows for simultaneous bilateral repair if needed, and was associated with rapid postoperative convalescence.

Intra-abdominal robot-assisted vasovasostomy of obstructive azoospermia in an Asian population following multiple bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy in childhood: a case report and literature review

Iatrogenic injury to the vas deferens is an indication for vasovasostomy (VV). Various surgical approaches, including pure microsurgical VV (MVV), pelviscrotal laparoscopic-assisted VV (LAVV), and intra-abdominal robot-assisted VV (RAVV), have been reported to restore vasal patency. MVV is often faced a formidable challenge to provide tension-free VV due to an inadequate vas deferens length. Alternatively, pelviscrotal LAVV is much more effective for the identification and retrieval of the pelvic vas deferens prior to performing MVV. However, vasal laparoscopic mobilization could still be limited by insufficient vasal length for extracorporeal transfer in some cases. The addition of robotic assistance, on the other hand, allows the performance of “in-situ” vasal anastomoses and offers unique features compared with pure MVV/LAVV. However, few such approaches have been described in the literature. This study presents the initial results and validation of robot-assisted VV in an Asian population who had undergone triple herniorrhaphy. Briefly, Intra-operative findings demonstrated a large defect of the vas deferens, and a two-layer bilateral tension-free RAVV was performed to pursue the possibility of naturally achieved pregnancy. With our promising results, intra-abdominal RAVV may be described as a practical approach for cases with iatrogenic large defects of the vas deferens within the inguinal canal.

Robot-assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Current status and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Microscope-assisted vasovasostomy (MAVV) is a standard procedure used to reverse vasectomies. Robotic surgery has been established primarily for technically demanding urological procedures and has also been recently implemented in male reproductive surgery. We aimed to review the current evidence of robot-assisted vasovasostomy (RAVV) and robot-assisted vasoepididymostomy (RAVE).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed to identify relevant original articles. We identified 2017 records through database search, and after removing duplicates, 782 records remained for further analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 12 human and three animal studies were selected. Reported vasal patency rate ranges were 88%-100% for RAVVs and 55%-61% for RAVEs. The sperm count and postoperative pregnancy rates of RAVV ranged between 8.4 × 10⁶-120 × 10⁶ sperm/mL and 65%, respectively. Finally, procedure times in the human studies, recorded for extracorporeal RAVVs and RAVEs ranged from 97 to 238 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted vasal reversal is feasible with similar patency rates as for the microsurgical approach and showing comparable outcomes. Additional benefits of this technique include improved vision and movement precision.

The management of obstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion

Infertility due to obstructive azoospermia may be treated effectively by surgical reconstruction or by retrieval of sperm from the epididymis or testis, followed by in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. This replaces the ASRM documents titled "Sperm retrieval for obstructive azoospermia" and "The management of infertility due to obstructive azoospermia," last published in 2008.

Crossover transseptal vasovasostomy: alternative for very selected cases of iatrogenic injury to vas deferens

Inguinal herniorraphy is a possible cause of iatrogenic seminal tract obstruction. Diagnosing and correcting these vasal injuries can be challenging. Successful re-anastomosis is technically challenging, with relatively low success rates. An uncommon alternative for selected cases is the crossover transseptal vasovasostomy. We herein report a case of a 36-year-old male patient with vas deferens injury after herniorraphy and a contralateral hypotrophic testis. He was successfully treated through microsurgical crossover transseptal vasovasostomy, with spontaneous pregnancy achieved, and the technique is presented in details.

Various surgical techniques for the repair of injured vas deferens in rat experiments

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the different vasovasostomy techniques can be performed using only the operating loupe in a rat model. The secondary aims were to evaluate the patency rate and inflammation of the vas deferens (VD) after contusion and the different vasovasostomy repair techniques.

METHODS

A total of 40 male rats were divided into 4 groups based on the type of surgery: 1. contusion of the VD; 2. cutting of the VD and vasovasostomy with absorbable sutures; 3. cutting and joining of the VD using absorbable sutures with an intraluminally situated lead fibre; and 4. cutting and joining of the VD using non-absorbable sutures with an intraluminally situated lead fibre. Ninety days after the surgery the VD was resected, patency and histopathological signs of inflammation in the VD were evaluated.

RESULTS

All vasovasostomy techniques were successfully performed in all animals using only the operating loupe. The patency rate was 100% in the subgroup with contusion. Differences in the patency rates were found among the subgroups with vasovasostomy (P=0.007). The patency rate was higher in the subgroup that underwent group 3. Compared with vasovasostomies, contusion was associated with lower rates of inflammation (P=0.02) and severe inflammation (P=0.003). No differences were found among the subgroups of vasovasostomy techniques.

CONCLUSION

Contusion of the VD was not related to impairment in terms of patency. Vasovasostomy with an intraluminally situated lead fibre resulted in the highest patency rate among the standard vasovasostomy techniques.

Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade

BACKGROUND

In the era of improving assisted reproductive technology (ART), patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA) have 2 options: vasal repair or testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Vasal repair, including vasovasostomy (VV) and vasoepididymostomy (VE), is the only option that leads to natural conception.

METHODS

This article reviews the surgical techniques, outcomes, and predictors of postoperative patency and pregnancy, with a focus on articles that have reported over the last 10 years, using PubMed database searches.

MAIN FINDINGS

The reported mean patency rate was 87% and the mean pregnancy rate was 49% for a patient following microscopic VV and/or VE for vasectomy reversal. Recently, robot-assisted techniques were introduced and have achieved a high rate of success. The predictors and predictive models of postoperative patency and pregnancy also have been reported. The obstructive interval, presence of a granuloma, and intraoperative sperm findings predict postoperative patency. These factors also predict postoperative fertility. In addition, the female partner's age and the same female partner correlate with pregnancy after surgery.

CONCLUSION

In the era of ART, the physician should present and discuss with both the patient with OA and his partner the most appropriate procedure to conceive by using these predictors.

Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility

Objectives

To present the current state of the art in various robot-assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertility and review the latest literature, as the technology in infertility procedures has substantially developed since the incorporation of the Vinci® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Materials and methods

The search strategy in this review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane electronic databases (from 2000 to present) to identify studies that included both robotic and male infertility.

Results

In all, 23 studies were found, 12 of which met our inclusion criteria. Articles were excluded if the study did not include both male infertility and robotics.

Conclusions

Robotic assistance for microsurgical procedures in male infertility appears to be safe and feasible. It has several advantages including elimination of tremor, multi-view magnification, additional instrument arms, and enhanced dexterity with articulating instrument arms. It also has a short learning curve with a small skin incision. However, larger, prospective studies are needed to establish the clinical benefits over standard microsurgery.

Expanding the Utilization of Robotic Procedures in Urologic Surgery

Although the word "robot" was coined in 1921, only close to 70 years later were robotic devices developed to assist during surgery. Urology has always been at the forefront of endoscopic, minimally invasive, and robotic developments in medicine. Robotic prostatectomy signaled the emerging role of robotic surgery in urology, but since then it has been applied to every urologic laparoscopic procedure.

Vasectomy reversal: A review of the evaluation, techniques, and outcomes

This review highlights the evaluation and treatment of men who have undergone vasectomy and desire vasectomy reversal to father children. For surgeons offering this treatment, the appropriate evaluation and treatment are crucial for acceptable outcomes. Although variations on surgical approaches have evolved over the years, one constant is the need for a high level of training and skill in microsurgical techniques.

Robotic microsurgery in male infertility and urology-taking robotics to the next level

The initial reports of robotic assisted microsurgery began to appear in the early 1990s. Animal and early human studies were the initial publications. Larger series papers have recently been published from a few institutions. The field of robotic assisted microsurgery is still in evolution and so are adjunctive tools and instruments. It is clearly a different and unique skill set-is it microsurgery or is it robotic surgery, or both. It is clear from history that the art of surgery evolves over time to encompass new technology as long as the outcomes are better for the patient. Our current robotic platforms may not be ideal for microsurgery, however, the use of adjunctive tools and instrument refinement will further its future potential. This review article presents the current state of the art in various robotic assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertility and urology. Some novel applications of taking microsurgery to areas not classically accessible (intra-abdominal vasovasostomy) and adjunctive tools will also be presented.

Robotic-assisted microsurgery for an elective microsurgical practice

Robotic-assisted microsurgery can be utilized for either intracorporal or extracorporeal surgical procedures. Three-dimensional high-definition magnification, a stable ergonomic platform, elimination of physiologic tremor, and motion scaling make the robotic platform attractive for microsurgeons for complex procedures. Additionally, robotic assistance enables the microsurgeon to take microsurgery to challenging intracorporeal locations in a minimally invasive manner. Recent adjunctive technological developments offer the robotic platform enhanced optical magnification, improved intraoperative imaging, and more precise ablation techniques for microsurgical procedures. The authors present the current state-of-the art tools available in the robotic-assisted microsurgical platform.