Science Mandates Precision: A Plea for Accuracy in Reporting

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Initial North American Experience

Introduction and Objectives: The goal of this study is to evaluate the outcomes in a cohort of patients who underwent minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) at a single institution from 2017 to 2019. Methods: Sixty patients at a single institution with two different surgeons underwent MIP from 2017 to 2019. The MIP technique uses a proprietary nephroscope with a "vacuum" technique for stone evacuation. Patients were identified who had postoperative CT scan imaging available for direct review. A prospectively maintained database was queried along with retrospective chart review to evaluate the stone-free rate defined as no stones on CT imaging. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed including initial stone size, access type (fluoroscopic vs ultrasonic), access location, operative positioning (supine vs prone), operative time, and 60-day complications. Results: Forty-six of 60 patients had CT imaging postoperatively that were reviewable. Of these, 43% (n = 20) were stone free as defined by no identifiable fragments seen, 11% (n = 5) had residual fragments 0 to 2 mm, 7% (n = 3) had residual fragments 2 to 4 mm, and 39% (n = 18) had residual fragments >4 mm. Mean initial stone size was 21 mm (1.9-84 mm). Sixty percent (n = 28) of the patients were discharged the same day as surgery. Fifty-one percent (n = 24) of access was achieved through ultrasound alone. Seventeen percent of patients (n = 8) had a complication within 30 days of surgery. All complications were Clavien III or lower with unplanned return to operating room rate of 2% (n = 1). Conclusions: We present North America's first single institution analysis of MIP cases with acceptable outcomes comparable with both retrograde intrarenal surgery and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The exact role of MIP in renal stone disease needs to be determined by future studies that critically assess their outcomes.

In Vitro Evaluation of Stone Fragment Evacuation by Suction

Introduction: Contemporary, flexible stone baskets are unable to extract submillimeter stone fragments at the time of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. In this in vitro study, the feasibility of suctioning submillimeter fragments with a standard Luer Lock syringe through the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope was assessed. Materials and Methods: Phantom stones made from industrial plaster were mechanically fragmented into ≤1 and ≤0.5-mm groups. Both stone groups were divided into five preweighed trial samples. Each stone group was then mixed in a beaker filled with normal saline. A standard 10-mL Luer Lock syringe was connected to a fiber-optic ureteroscope with a 1.2-mm working channel. The syringe was then used to suction stone fragments from the beaker. The suctioned stone fragments and the stone fragments remaining in the beaker after removing the overlying solution were separated, centrifuged with supernatant removed, and dried in an incubator set at 33°C for 1 week. Dried weights were recorded. Results: Mean total weights for ≤0.5 and ≤1.0-mm stone groups at baseline were 0.807 and 0.806 g, respectively. The mean percentages of stone fragments suctioned through the ureteroscope for ≤0.5 and ≤1.0-mm groups were 86% and 86%, respectively (p = 0.973). During suctioning, 64% of stones in the ≤0.5-mm group were trapped in either the working channel of the ureteroscope or within the Luer Lock syringe compared with 78% of stones in the ≤1-mm group (p = 0.001) requiring cessation of the procedure to clear the channel. Conclusions: It is feasible to suction submillimeter stone fragments by connecting a Luer Lock syringe to the working channel of a flexible ureteroscope. The limiting factor for removing stone fragments appears to be the small working channel of flexible ureteroscopes as trapping of fragments during suctioning is common and requires time-consuming removal of the endoscope and clearing of the channel.