Pain is Independent of Stone Burden and Predicts Surgical Intervention in Patients with Ureteral Stones

Daily Ecological Momentary Assessments of Pain and Ability to Work After Ureteroscopy and Stenting

Introduction: Ureteral stents can cause significant patient discomfort, yet the temporal dynamics and impact on activities remain poorly characterized. We employed an automated tool to collect daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) regarding pain and the ability to work following ureteroscopy with stenting. Our aims were to assess feasibility and better characterize the postoperative patient experience. Materials and Methods: As an exploratory endpoint within an ongoing clinical trial, patients undergoing ureteroscopy with stenting were asked to complete daily EMAs for 10 days postoperatively or until the stent was removed. Questionnaires were distributed through text messages and included a pain scale (0-10) and a single item from the validated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities instrument, as well as days missed from work or school. Results: Among the first 65 trial participants, 59 completed at least 1 EMA (overall response rate 91%). Response rates were >85% for each time point through postoperative day (POD)10. Median respondent age was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR] 50-67), and 56% were female. Stones were 54% renal and 46% ureteral, with a median diameter of 9 mm (IQR 7-10). Median stent dwell time was 7 days (IQR 6-8). Pain scores were highest on POD1 (median score 4) and declined on each subsequent day, reaching a median score of 2 on POD5. Sixty-three percent of patients on POD1 reported that they had trouble performing their usual work at least sometimes, but by POD5, this was <50% of patients. Patients who work or attend school reported a median of 1 day missed (IQR 0-2). Conclusions: An automated daily EMA system for capturing patient-reported outcomes was demonstrated to be feasible with sustained excellent engagement. Patients with stents reported the worst pain and interference with work on POD1, with steady improvements thereafter, and by POD5, the majority of patients had minimal pain or trouble performing their usual work. This work is associated with a registered clinical trial [NCT05026710].

A prospective evaluation of patient-reported outcomes during follow-up of ureteral stones managed with medical expulsive treatment (MET)

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for ureteral stones predominantly assess the pain. Despite the lack of evidence, multiple trials studying the efficacy of medical expulsive therapy (MET) have used PROs to define spontaneous stone passage (SSP). We aim to objectively evaluate the accuracy of PROs to predict successful SSP and the probability of patient's symptom resolution after stone passage. A single-center, prospective observational study recruiting adults with isolated, uncomplicated, ≤ 10 mm ureteral calculus was conducted. All patients received 4 weeks of MET, and SSP was confirmed by low-dose non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT). The accuracy of PROs: "pain cessation," "decreased pain," "stone seen," and "stone capture" to predict successful SSP were evaluated in 1 month. The patient's symptom resolution rate was assessed at 1 and 4-month follow-ups. A total of 171 patients were included, and the overall SSP rate was 66.4% (n = 99). Patient-reported pain cessation, stone visualization, and stone capture were associated with successful SSP, but their accuracy was 59, 53, and 43%, respectively. Moreover, 25% of patients reporting complete pain cessation still harbored ureteral calculus. Pain resolved in 91% of patients after SSP at a 4-month follow-up. While hematuria and nausea resolved in all patients, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were not resolved in 17% of patients. We concluded that patient-reported pain cessation, stone visualization, and stone capture predict successful SSP, but confirmatory imaging is required due to the poor accuracy of these measures. The significant rates of non-pain-related symptoms indicate their significant contribution to patient morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered in Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI), Registration number: CTRI/2020/10/028777 (29th October 2020).

Correlation of Severity of Renal Colic With Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiological Parameters: An Emergency Department-Based Prospective Observational Study

Introduction In this study, we investigated the correlation of severity of renal colic with clinical parameters like pain characteristics, haematuria and pyuria, laboratory parameters such as inflammatory markers, and radiological parameters including site and size of stone and hydronephrosis. Methods The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) determined the pain severity. Detailed history and clinicodemographic profiling of the patient was done, laboratory investigations were done, ultrasound and non-contrast computed tomography of kidney-ureter-bladder were done and all the parameters were duly noted and correlated with the pain severity. Result The mean age of the 183 patients was 43.96 ± 15.16 years, and 62.8% were male. The patients' mean VAS score at presentation was 8.57 ± 1.08. The mean VAS score was found to be statistically higher in patients having a first episode of renal colic, solitary kidney, pyuria, raised creatinine, severe hydronephrosis, and stones located at the renal pelvis. In addition, higher VAS scores led to more surgical interventions. Conclusion The correlation of pain severity of renal colic with various parameters can aid in the development of quick diagnostic and therapeutic protocols for patients presenting to the emergency department with renal stone disease. This study shows that pain scores can correlate with various parameters and predict the outcome and complications in these patients.

Clinical Score Application for Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Used in the Diagnosis of Renal Colic Patients

Background To develop risk scoring for the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging using the visual analog scale (VAS), physical examination, and laboratory findings of renal colic patients admitted to the emergency department (ED).

Materials and Methods This is prospective observational study. Among the patients who presented to the ED with abdominal or flank pain, patients who were scheduled for CT imaging for urolithiasis were included in the study. The mean VAS pain scores, physical examination findings, laboratory parameters, and macroscopic and microscopic values in urinalysis were compared between the two groups with and without stones on CT.

Results Of the 196 urolithiasis patients included in the study, 165 had ureteral stones, 76 had renal stones, and 45 had renal and ureteral stones. While the difference between the urine erythrocyte averages of the two groups was borderline significant (p = 0.04), there was a high difference between the urinary hemoglobin amounts (p < 0.001). In patients with urinary system stone disease, hydronephrosis, and ureteral dilatation, hemoglobin ++ and above were more significant (p < 0.001). For ureteral stones, pain intensity increased as the size increased (r = 0.34 p < 0.001). White blood cells > 10,000 103/mL, and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤ 5 mg/L were more significant in patients with acute renal colic.

Conclusions Although we cannot develop a clinical scoring system for renal colic patients, the meaningful results we found for urinary stone disease can be used in a newly developed scoring system. It can be used in new scoring systems in the ED using a high VAS score, presence and amount of urine hemoglobin, CRP) ≤ 5 mg/L, and creatinine value.

Standardizing perioperative medications to be used in an enhanced recovered after surgery (ERAS) program is feasible in percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this process improvement project was to determine the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) patients with respect to quality of life and pain management in the post-operative recovery period.

METHODS

An electronic-based medical record ERAS orders protocol for PCNL was instituted at an academic medical center in July of 2020. The protocol utilized a pain control regimen designed to minimize opioid medication use post-operatively. We prospectively evaluated PCNL patients' quality of life via the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life survey (WISQOL) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) at routine perioperative visits. To assess any opioid reduction benefit of the ERAS protocol, we reviewed an age-matched historical cohort n = 66 (prior to ERAS implementation) to serve as a comparison cohort with respect to opioid usage.

RESULTS

After an inception cohort of 95 patients, 55 ERAS patients remained available for assessment with the WISQOL and PROMIS surveys. In comparison to the non-ERAS cohort, the ERAS cohort represented larger stones, more supine positioning, higher blood loss, shorter hospital stay and more use of access sheath. ERAS patients received a significantly lower amount of opioids compared to non-ERAS patients upon discharge narcotic usage (116.13 morphine milliequivalent (MME) vs. 39.57 MME, p=0.0001). Compared to their pre-operative evaluation, the ERAS cohort had significantly improved quality of life scores at 1 week which sustained through 8 weeks post-operatively. Moreover, pain intensity and pain interference scores were improved at 8 weeks post-operatively for ERAS patients compared to their pre-operative time point.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that standardizing medications in early efforts towards a PCNL ERAS protocol is feasible and allows for reduced opioid use by patients while achieving early and sustained post-procedure quality of life.

Quality of life impact and recovery after ureteroscopy and stent insertion: insights from daily surveys in STENTS

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to describe day-to-day evolution and variations in patient-reported stent-associated symptoms (SAS) in the STudy to Enhance uNderstanding of sTent-associated Symptoms (STENTS), a prospective multicenter observational cohort study, using multiple instruments with conceptual overlap in various domains.

METHODS

In a nested cohort of the STENTS study, the initial 40 participants having unilateral ureteroscopy (URS) and stent placement underwent daily assessment of self-reported measures using the Brief Pain Inventory short form, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System measures for pain severity and pain interference, the Urinary Score of the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire, and Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index. Pain intensity, pain interference, urinary symptoms, and bother were obtained preoperatively, daily until stent removal, and at postoperative day (POD) 30.

RESULTS

The median age was 44 years (IQR 29,58), and 53% were female. The size of the dominant stone was 7.5 mm (IQR 5,11), and 50% were located in the kidney. There was consistency among instruments assessing similar concepts. Pain intensity and urinary symptoms increased from baseline to POD 1 with apparent peaks in the first 2 days, remained elevated with stent in situ, and varied widely among individuals. Interference due to pain, and bother due to urinary symptoms, likewise demonstrated high individual variability.

CONCLUSIONS

This first study investigating daily SAS allows for a more in-depth look at the lived experience after URS and the impact on quality of life. Different instruments measuring pain intensity, pain interference, and urinary symptoms produced consistent assessments of patients' experiences. The overall daily stability of pain and urinary symptoms after URS was also marked by high patient-level variation, suggesting an opportunity to identify characteristics associated with severe SAS after URS.

The identification of pregnant women with renal colic who may need surgical intervention

Background

Renal colic is a surgical emergency in pregnancy that is caused by a range of non-obstetric factors and known to occur more frequently during the second and third trimesters. Several studies have reported that up to 70–80% of stones pass spontaneously during pregnancy. There are some patients will not pass their stones and will ultimately require surgical intervention. Through retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 212 pregnant women with renal colic, the predictive factors of pregnant women with renal colic in need of surgical intervention were determined.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 212 pregnant women presenting with renal colic between 1st January 2009 and 31st December 2020. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified a range of predictive variables for surgical intervention. In addition, we used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to evaluate the predictive power of our model and created a nomogram for clinical application.

Results

Of the 212 patients presenting with acute renal colic in pregnancy, 100 patients (47.2%) underwent surgical intervention and 112 patients (52.8%) were treated conservatively. Univariate analysis identified significant differences between the two groups with regards to fever, the duration of pain, white blood cells, C-reactive protein, ureteral stone size, hydronephrosis, and stone location. Multivariate analysis further identified a number of independent predictors for surgical intervention, including fever, a duration of pain ≥ 4 days, a ureteral stone size ≥ 8 mm, and moderate or severe hydronephrosis.

Conclusions

We identified several independent predictors for surgical intervention for renal colic in pregnancy. Fever, a duration of pain ≥ 4 days, a ureteral stone size ≥ 8 mm, and moderate/severe hydronephrosis, play significant roles in predicting surgical intervention. Our nomogram can help to calculate the probability of surgical intervention in a simple and efficient manner. Prospective studies are now required to validate our model.

Does pain severity predict stone characteristics or outcomes in emergency department patients with acute renal colic?

OBJECTIVES

After initial emergency department (ED) management of acute renal colic, recurrent or ongoing severe pain is the usual pathway to ED revisits, hospitalizations and rescue interventions. If index visit pain severity is associated with stone size or with subsequent failure of conservative management, then it might be useful in identifying patients who would benefit from early definitive imaging or intervention. Our objectives were to determine whether pain severity correlates with stone size, and to evaluate its utility in predicting important outcomes.

METHODS

We used administrative data and structured chart review to study all ED patients with CT proven renal colic at six hospitals in two cities over one-year. Triage nurses recorded arrival numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores. We excluded patients with missing pain assessments and stratified eligible patients into severe (NRS 8-10) and less-severe pain groups. Stone parameters were abstracted from imaging reports, while hospitalizations and interventions were identified in hospital databases. We determined the classification accuracy of pain severity for stones >5mm and used multivariable regression to determine the association of pain severity with 60-day treatment failure, defined by hospitalization or rescue intervention.

RESULTS

We studied 2206 patients, 68% male, with a mean age of 49 years. Severe pain was 52.0% sensitive and 45.3% specific for larger stones >5mm. After multivariable adjustment, we found a weak negative association (adjusted OR =0.96) between pain severity and stone width. For each unit of increasing pain, the odds of a larger stone fell by 4%. Index visit pain severity was not associated with the need for hospitalization or rescue intervention within 60-days.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain severity is not helpful in predicting stone size or renal colic outcomes. More severe pain does not indicate a larger stone or a worse prognosis.

A Pilot Study of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Across a Broad Sample of Surgical Patients

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have the potential to aid in surgical decision-making, predict surgical outcomes, assess recovery, and evaluate long-term success. We performed a pilot study testing the ability to use PROs in a broad surgical population in preparation for wide spread use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Surgical patients completed five Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures during their preoperative encounter in the preanesthesia clinic and again postoperatively via emailed link. Preoperative to postoperative changes in PROMIS scores, factors related to completion of postoperative measures, intercorrelations between PROMIS measures, and numbers of patients with normal function, and mild, moderate, and severe deficits in PROMIS scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 393 patients undergoing surgery in 8 specialties completed preoperative PROMIS measures; 239 (60.8%) completed them postoperatively. Physical function (P < 0.0001), pain (P < 0.0001), and cognitive function (P = 0.03) PROMIS scores significantly worsened after surgery but not mental PROMIS scores (P = 0.48). Hispanic and sicker patients had lower completion rates of postoperative measures. Intercorrelations were very high (>0.80) among the physical function and self-efficacy for activities of daily living PROMIS measures. Physical function and pain PROMIS measures had the largest number of patients in the "severe" range after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients across a broad surgical population completed PROMIS measures successfully, both preoperatively and postoperatively, although the postoperative completion rate was lower than other studies reported in the literature. PROMIS scores were reflective of the effects of surgery. Some of the PROMIS measures were highly correlated suggesting that some measures could be eliminated or replaced with measures assessing other important effects of surgery. Consideration could be made to alert health care providers about patients having PROs in the "severe" range for potential intervention.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy: Prospective Evaluation of an Opioid-Free Protocol

Purpose: A large part of the national opioid epidemic has been tied to prescription opioids, leading to a push to reduce or eliminate their use when feasible. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone treatment with stent placement geared toward minimizing opioid use. Materials and Methods: We performed a pre-post study concerning a process improvement project of consecutive patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone treatment with stent placement utilizing a novel ERAS protocol. A lead-in period with patients managed conventionally with opioids was performed before implementation of the ERAS protocol. Data regarding opioid utilization, postoperative outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes, including Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), were compared between groups. Results: There were 28 pre-ERAS patients and 52 ERAS-managed patients. Patients discharged with an opioid prescription decreased from 93% to 0% (p < 0.05). Mean total morphine milligram equivalent decreased from 60.1 ± 41 to 7.7 ± 26 (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference noted for postoperative calls for pain in the pre-ERAS vs ERAS groups (25% vs 19%, p = 0.9) or in unscheduled provider encounters (0% vs 4%, p = 0.46). There were no clinically significant differences between groups on patient-reported measures. Conclusions: Implementation of an ERAS protocol for ureteroscopic stone treatment resulted in a significant reduction in perioperative opioids, a total reduction in discharge opioid prescriptions, and ∼90% reduction in total 30-day postoperative opioid prescribing with no adverse effects on recovery or increase in postoperative clinical encounters.

The effect of travel distance on health-related quality of life for patients with nephrolithiasis

INTRODUCTION

Urolithiasis causes a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Patients with kidney stones have high levels of stress and anxiety. Symptom resolution often requires treatment. Travel distance is a barrier to care but little is known about its effects on HRQOL. We hypothesize that increased distance to treatment site is associated with decreased HRQOL.

METHODS

Patients with a history of stones were enrolled at 11 tertiary centers as part of the QOL Stone Consortium of North America. HRQOL data were obtained using the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire (WISQOL). We calculated distance between patient and treatment site using national ZIP codes. We used linear models to evaluate the effect of distance on HRQOL, while also considering demographics data, stones/symptom status, and distance.

RESULTS

Of the 1676 enrolled patients, 52% were male, 86% non-Latino White, and the mean age was 53 years. Mean distance to treatment site was 63.3 km (range 0-3774), with 74% reporting current stones and 45% current symptoms. WISQOL score and distance were negatively correlated for patients reporting current stones and symptoms (p=0.0010). Linear modelling revealed decreased WISQOL scores for patients with symptoms as distance increased from treatment site (p=0.0001), with a 4.7-point decrease for every 100 km traveled.

CONCLUSIONS

Stone disease imposes significant burden on patients' HRQOL due to a variety of factors. Patients with active stone symptoms report worse HRQOL with increased distance to their treatment site. Possible etiologies include travel burden, increased disease burden, decreased healthcare use, and delays in care.