1
|
Matsukawa A, Yanagisawa T, Bekku K, Parizi MK, Laukhtina E, Klemm J, Chiujdea S, Mori K, Kimura S, Miki J, Pradere B, Rivas JG, Gandaglia G, Kimura T, Kasivisvanathan V, Ploussard G, Cornford P, Shariat SF, Rajwa P. Nonsurgical Interventions to Prevent Disease Progression in Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:376-400. [PMID: 38277189 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Active surveillance (AS) is a standard of care for patients with low-risk and selected intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Nevertheless, there is a lack of summary evidence on how to impact disease trajectory during AS. OBJECTIVE To assess which interventions prevent PCa progression effectively during AS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We queried PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies examining the impact of interventions aimed at slowing disease progression during AS. The primary endpoint was PCa progression, the definition of which must have included pathological upgrading. The secondary endpoint included treatment toxicities. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 22 studies, six randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies, which analyzed the association between different interventions and PCa progression during AS. The interventions considered in the studies included 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), statins, diet, exercise, chlormadinone, fexapotide triflutate (FT), enzalutamide, coffee, vitamin D3, and PROSTVAC. We found that administration of 5-ARIs was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio: 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.72), with no increased toxicity signals. Therapies such as vitamin D3, chlormadinone, FT, and enzalutamide have shown some efficacy. However, these anticancer drugs have been associated with treatment-related adverse events in up to 88% of patients. CONCLUSIONS The use of 5-ARIs in PCa patients on AS is associated with longer PFS. However, for the other interventions, it is difficult to draw clear conclusions based on the weak available evidence. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance (AS) who are treated with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors have a lower risk of disease progression, with minimal adverse events. Other interventions require more studies to determine their efficacy and safety profile in men on AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Murures, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Mures, Romania
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu Y, Wang Y, Gu Y, Xia J, Qian Q, Hong Y. Prostate Cancer Risk and Prognostic Influence Among Users of 5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors and Alpha-Blockers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urology 2020; 145:216-223. [PMID: 32745485 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
We systematically assessed the effect of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) and/or alpha-blockers use on prostate cancer (CaP) incidence and outcomes, including CaP pathologic progression, CaP-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality. 5-ARIs but not alpha-blockers decreased risk of overall CaP, low grade CaP (Gleason < 7), and delayed CaP pathologic progression. Both 5-ARIs and alpha-blockers had no significant impact on risk of high grade CaP (Gleason ≥ 7), CaP-specific mortality, or all-cause mortality. Our result suggested that finasteride should be given for at least 4 years if used for preventing CaP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yougen Wu
- National Institute of Clinical Research, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Urology, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuting Gu
- National Institute of Clinical Research, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ju Xia
- National Institute of Clinical Research, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingqing Qian
- National Institute of Clinical Research, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Pharmacy, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Hong
- National Institute of Clinical Research, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Osteology, The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deng T, Lin X, Duan X, He Z, Zhao Z, Zeng G. Prostate cancer patients can benefit from 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor treatment: a meta-analysis. PeerJ 2020; 8:e9282. [PMID: 32547884 PMCID: PMC7271889 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The efficacy and safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) in treating prostate cancer (PCa) have not been fully determined. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 5ARIs for PCa patients. Methods A comprehensive literature search of online databases was conducted to obtain comparative studies exploring the effectiveness and safety of 5ARIs in treating PCa up to October 2019. Summarized odds ratio s (OR s) or hazard ratio s (HR s) were calculated to compare the outcomes between 5ARI and control groups. Our meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018109809. Results A total of 2,277 patients from 10 studies were included. No significant difference was found in prostate-specific antigen progression between two groups (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.52–1.29], P = 0.40). However, 5ARI treatment significantly reduced the total progression of PCa (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.48–0.77], P < 0.0001), especially for patients with local (OR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.44–0.73], P < 0.00001) and low-Gleason score (≤7) PCa (OR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.48–0.84], P = 0.002). Additionally, 5ARIs also significantly prolonged the progression-free survival time (HR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.34–0.96], P = 0.04) for PCa patients. No significant difference was found in the occurrence of PCa recurrence, metastasis, biopsy reclassification, and side-effects between two groups. Conclusions Our study suggests that 5ARI treatment can benefit patients with local and low Gleason score (≤7) PCa, especially in delaying the disease progression. More studies with larger sample size and comprehensive study design are still needed to verify our outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuo Deng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xueming Lin
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiaolu Duan
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zihao He
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijian Zhao
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|