Impact of Glp-1RA on Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Hypertension Among Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists modestly reduced blood pressure among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

AIM

The cardiovascular benefits provided by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) extend beyond weight reduction and glycaemic control. One possible mechanism may relate to blood pressure (BP) reduction. We aim to quantify the BP-lowering effects of GLP1-RAs.

METHODS

A comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until December 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, employing a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to determine outcomes with a mean difference (MD) in mmHg and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was the mean difference in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were done to account for covariates.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, GLP-1RAs modestly reduced SBP [semaglutide: MD -3.40 (95% CI -4.22 to -2.59, p < .001); liraglutide: MD -2.61 (95% CI -3.48 to -1.74, p < .001); dulaglutide: MD -1.46 (95% CI -2.20 to -0.72, p < .001); and exenatide: MD -3.36 (95% CI -3.63 to -3.10, p < .001)]. This benefit consistently increased with longer treatment durations. Diastolic BP reduction was only significant in the exenatide group [MD -0.94 (95% CI -1.78 to -0.1), p = .03]. Among semaglutide cohorts, mean changes in glycated haemoglobin and mean changes in body mass index were directly associated with SBP reduction.

CONCLUSION

Patients on GLP-1RA experienced modest SBP lowering compared with placebo. This observed effect was associated with weight/body mass index reduction and better glycaemic control, which suggests that BP-lowering is an indirect effect of GLP-1RA and unlikely to be responsible for the benefits.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of HRS-7535, a novel oral small molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in healthy participants: A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending dose, and food effect trial

AIM

To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics of HRS-7535, a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), in healthy participants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This phase 1 trial consisted of single-ascending dose (SAD), food effect (FE) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) parts. In the SAD part, participants were randomized (6:2) to receive HRS-7535 (at doses of 15, 60 and 120 mg; administered orally once daily) or placebo. In the FE part, participants were randomized (8:2) to receive a single dose of 90-mg HRS-7535 or placebo, in both fed and fasted states. In the MAD part, participants were randomized (18:6) to receive daily HRS-7535 (120 mg [30/60/90/120-mg titration scheme]) or placebo for 28 days. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently reported AEs across all three parts. In the SAD part, the median Tmax was 5.98-5.99 hours and the geometric mean t1/2 was 5.28-9.08 hours across the HRS-7535 dosing range. In the MAD part, the median Tmax was 5.98-10.98 hours and the geometric mean t1/2 was 6.48-8.42 hours on day 28 in participants on HRS-7535. PKs were approximately dose-proportional. On day 29 in the MAD part, the mean (percentage) reduction in body weight from baseline was 4.38 kg (6.63%) for participants who received HRS-7535, compared with 0.8 kg (1.18%) for those participants who received a placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

HRS-7535 exhibited a safety and tolerability profile consistent with other GLP-1RAs and showed PKs suitable for once-daily dosing. These findings support further clinical development of HRS-7535 for type 2 diabetes.

Elevated circulating GPHB5 levels in women with insulin resistance and polycystic ovary syndrome: A cross-sectional study and multiple intervention studies

OBJECTIVE

GPHB5 has been found to be associated with glucose and lipid metabolism in animal studies. However, the association of GPHB5 with IR and metabolic disorders remains unknown, and there is a lack of research in humans. Our aim in this study was to investigate the relationship between circulating GPHB5 and metabolic disorders in humans.

METHODS

Bioinformatics analysis was performed to understand the relationship between GPHB5 and metabolic disorders. GPHB5 mRNA expression in mice and rats was determined using RT-qPCR. Circulating GPHB5 concentrations were measured with an ELISA kit. EHC and OGTT were performed in humans.

RESULTS

Bioinformatics analysis shows that GPHB5 is associated with metabolic disorders and PCOS. GPHB5 mRNA expression levels in the metabolic-related tissues of HFD-fed mice, db/db and ob/ob mice, and PCOS rats were significantly higher than those of WT mice or rats. In human studies, we find that circulating GPHB5 levels were significantly higher in women with IR and PCOS. GPHB5 levels were positively correlated with age, BMI, WHR, BP, FBG, 2 h-BG, FIns, 2 h-Ins, TC, LDL-C, HbA1c, and FFA, but negatively correlated with adiponectin. Furthermore, GPHB5 was positively correlated with DHEAS and FAI, while negatively correlated with SHBG, FSH, SHBG and FSH. The increased GPHB5 concentration was related to IR and PCOS. After the treatment of metformin, GLP-1RA (Lira), and TZDs, circulating GPHB5 levels were decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal that circulating GPHB5 could be a biomarker and potential therapeutic target for IR and PCOS in women.

The effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure: a confirmatory meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Hypertension augments overall cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, control rates remain suboptimal. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have revolutionized the field of T2DM therapeutic management due to their multiple pleiotropic effects. Therefore, we sought to determine the effect of this class on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), pooling data from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We searched major electronic databases, namely PubMed and Cochrane Library, along with gray literature sources, for RCTs assessing the effect of various GLP-1RAs on ambulatory BP in patients with T2DM.

RESULTS

We pooled data from seven RCTs in total. GLP-1RA treatment compared to placebo or active control resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in 24-h SBP (mean difference = -1.57 mm Hg; 95% CI,-4.12 to 0.98; I2 = 63%) and in 24-h DBP (mean difference = 1.28 mmHg; 95% CI,-0.31 to 2.87; I2 = 49%). No subgroup differences between the various GLP-1RAs were detected.

CONCLUSION

GLP-1RAs treatment does not influence either systolic or diastolic ambulatory BP in patients with T2DM.