Development And Content Validity Testing Of A Treatment Acceptance Measure For Use In Hypercholesterolemia Patients Receiving Treatment Via Subcutaneous Injection

Treatment Preferences in Germany Differ Among Apheresis Patients with Severe Hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Severe hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor of death in patients with coronary heart disease. New adjunctive drug therapies (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 [PCSK9] inhibitors) have gained approval in Europe and the USA.

OBJECTIVE

In this empirical study, we documented preferences regarding adjuvant drug therapy in apheresis-treated patients with severe familial hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify patient-relevant outcomes in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia currently undergoing apheresis. Data were used to generate a semi-structured qualitative interview that enabled seven patient-relevant characteristics with three levels each to be identified. For the discrete choice experiment, an experimental design (7 × 3) was generated using NGene Software that consisted of 96 choices divided into eight blocks. The survey was conducted between November 2015 and April 2016 using computer-assisted personal interviews.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 348 patients (64.9% male). The random parameter logit estimation showed predominance for the attribute 'reduction of LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) level'. 'Risk of myopathy' and 'frequency of apheresis' dominated next. Within the random parameter logit estimation, all coefficients were significant (P ≤ 0.01). The latent class analysis identified three patient groups. The first group (126 patients) found 'reduction of LDL-C level in blood' to be most important. This group focused solely on this treatment outcome independently of apheresis frequency or additional injections. The second group (106 patients) focused on three attributes: 'frequency of apheresis', 'risk of myopathy', and 'reduction of LDL-C level in blood'. Respondents clearly considered a high frequency of apheresis to have a negative impact. The third group (116 patients) demonstrated the highest preference for apheresis. These patients have adjusted to apheresis for > 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Regarding patient preference, clinical efficacy seems to dominate. Hence, 'reduction of LDC-C in blood' was ranked highest above patient-relevant modes of administration and adverse effects. In the patient groups identified, reduction of apheresis was important for only a subsegment (30%) of patients. Another 30% wanted effective LDL-C reduction by whatever means necessary. Most strikingly, another 30% preferred higher frequencies of apheresis.

Patient and Physician Perspectives on Mode of Administration of the PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibody Alirocumab, an Injectable Medication to Lower LDL-C Levels

PURPOSE

Clinical trials of the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab, an every 2 week injectable monoclonal antibody, have shown significant reductions in LDL-cholesterol. However, many patients requiring lipid-lowering therapy are not experienced with self-injected medication. This study assessed patient and physician perceptions of 2 alirocumab delivery devices.

METHODS

400 participants (200 physicians, 200 patients) were included from 6 countries. Physicians (99 primary care physicians [PCPs]; 101 specialists) had mean practice experience of 17.8 years and an average of 797 hypercholesterolemic patients. Participating patients had LDL-C levels above their goal and at least one of the following: familial hypercholesterolemia, statin intolerance, high cardiovascular risk, and/or diabetes. Mean patient age was 58.5 years, 51% were female, and 25.5% had injectable medication experience. Following device instruction and demonstration, participants tested either a pre-filled pen or pre-filled syringe, using both 75 and 150 mg doses of single-blinded placebo into a prosthetic pad. Data were collected by self-administered questionnaire.

FINDINGS

Participant acceptance of both devices was positive, with 83-100% agreeing with ease-of-use statements. After testing, physicians estimated that 66% (pen) and 58% (syringe) of their patients would be willing to self-inject using the device (relative increases from pre-testing of 22% and 16%, respectively; both P<0.05). Specialist estimates were higher than PCP estimates: for the pen, 60% versus 47% (pre-testing), respectively, and 72% versus 61% (post-testing); for the syringe, 57% versus 43% (pre-testing), 63% versus 54% (post-testing; all P<0.05, specialist vs PCP). After testing, 72% (pen) and 63% (syringe) of patient-participants were very willing to self-inject (relative increases from pre-testing of 26% [P<0.05] and 11%, respectively); 96% (pen) and 93% (syringe) were either very willing or somewhat willing to self-inject. The proportion of patients aged <60 years who were very willing to self-inject with either device was numerically (but not statistically) higher compared with those ≥60 years. Initially, patients with injectable medication experience were generally more willing to use the pen than injection-naive patients; after testing there was no difference between groups. No significant differences were observed in responses to the 2 different doses.

IMPLICATIONS

Responses from physicians and patients to pre-filled pen and syringe devices were positive. Devices were considered easy to operate, with most patients willing to use and accept self-injection. Patient willingness to self-inject increased after demonstration and testing. Results suggest that, in clinical practice, alirocumab administration by either pre-filled pen or syringe would not deter most physicians from prescribing or most patients from self-administering.