Prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder in China

Efficacy and safety of bupropion hydrochloride extended-release versus escitalopram oxalate in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder: Results from a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the non-inferiority of bupropion extended-release (XL) compared to escitalopram for acute-phase treatment of Chinese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

This randomized (1:1), double-blind, active-control study conducted between February 2015 and October 2016 included patients with MDD (DSM-IV) (N = 538). The treatment phase had three dose levels (level 1 [Week 1], level 2 [Week 2-4], and level 3 [Week 5-8]), which included either bupropion XL 150 mg, 300 mg, 300 mg or escitalopram 10 mg, 10 mg, 10-20 mg (once-daily), respectively. Primary outcome was mean change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAMD-17) total score at Week 8.

RESULTS

Overall, 534 patients (bupropion XL, n = 266; escitalopram, n = 268) received at least one dose of study medication. The least square mean (standard error) change from baseline in HAMD-17 total score at Week 8 was -14.5 (0.41) in bupropion XL group and -15.4 (0.39) in escitalopram group (mean difference: 0.8 [-0.27, 1.94]). The response rate was 69.6% versus 72.9%, remission rate was 39.7% versus 47.2%, sustained response rate was 51.6% versus 56.3%, and sustained remission rate was 25.5% versus 28.6%, respectively, for bupropion XL versus escitalopram group. Adverse events were reported by 313 patients (bupropion XL, n = 157; escitalopram, n = 156); the most common on-treatment adverse event in both groups was nausea (10.5% versus 18.7%, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

A non-inferiority short-term (8 weeks) study without a placebo arm.

CONCLUSION

Results from this study demonstrated that the efficacy of bupropion XL was non-inferior to that of escitalopram in Chinese patients with MDD.

Prevalence of suicide attempt in individuals with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of observational surveys

BACKGROUND

Suicide attempt (SA), which is one of the strongest predictors of completed suicide, is common in major depressive disorder (MDD) but its prevalence across epidemiological studies has been mixed. The aim of this comprehensive meta-analysis was to examine the pooled prevalence of SA in individuals with MDD.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from their commencement date until 27 December 2017. Original studies containing data on prevalence of SA in individuals with MDD were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all, 65 studies with a total of 27 340 individuals with MDD were included. Using the random effects model, the pooled lifetime prevalence of SA was 31% [95% confidence interval (CI) 27-34%], 1-year prevalence was 8% (95% CI 3-14%) and 1-month prevalence was 24% (95% CI 15-34%). Subgroup analyses revealed that the lifetime prevalence of SA was significantly associated with the patient setting, study region and income level, while the 1-month prevalence of SA was associated with only the patient setting.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirmed that SA was common in individuals with MDD across the world. Careful screening and appropriate interventions should be implemented for SA in the MDD population.