Questionnaire Modifications and Alternative Scoring Methods of the Dermatology Life Quality Index: A Systematic Review

A Systematic Review of 207 Studies Describing Validation Aspects of the Dermatology Life Quality Index

This study systematically analysed peer-reviewed publications describing validation aspects of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and used Naicker's Critically Appraising for Antiracism Tool to assess risk of racial bias. Seven online databases were searched from 1994 until 2022 for articles containing DLQI validation data. Methodology followed PRISMA guidelines, the protocol was registered in PROSPERO, and articles reviewed independently by two assessors. Of 1,717 screened publications, 207 articles including 58,828 patients from >  49 different countries and 41 diseases met the inclusion criteria. The DLQI demonstrated strong test-retest reliability; 43 studies confirmed good internal consistency. Twelve studies were performed using anchors to assess change responsiveness with effect sizes from small to large, giving confidence that the DLQI responds appropriately to change. Forty-two studies tested known-groups validity, providing confidence in construct and use of the DLQI over many parameters, including disease severity, anxiety, depression, stigma, scarring, well-being, sexual function, disease location and duration. DLQI correlation was demonstrated with 119 Patient Reported Outcomes/Quality of Life measures in 207 studies. Only 15% of studies explicitly recruited minority ethnic participants; 3.9% stratified results by race/ethnicity. This review summarizes knowledge concerning DLQI validation, confirms many strengths of the DLQI and identifies areas for further validation.

Validation and application of the Dermatology Life Quality Index score, a modification of the DLQI score, in psoriasis patients

BACKGROUND

All the scoring methods for the DLQI miss the moderate impact of the disease on patients, which may underestimate the impact of psoriasis on patients' quality of life. To improve the accuracy of the assessment of the Dermatology Life Quality Index score (DLQI) for patients with psoriasis, this study proposed and validated a new scoring method, the DLQI-NS, which includes the moderate impact option in the self-assessment of each item in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in which patients with psoriasis were enrolled. A total of 425 participants completed the DLQI, DLQI-NS and Skindex-16 questionnaires. Reliability, validity, ceiling and floor effects were evaluated of both DLQI and DLQI-NS questionnaires.

RESULTS

About 14.4-32.5% of the patients reported a moderate impact on quality of life. The DLQI-NS allowed 17 more patients (4.0%) to achieve severe disease. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the DLQI-NS was 0.90, and that of the DLQI was 0.89. The KMO test results for the DLQI-NS and DLQI were 0.927 and 0.916, respectively. One factor was identified for each questionnaire. The items of the DLQI-NS showed an item-total correlation from 0.52 to 0.82, and the DLQI questionnaire's item-total correlation ranged from 0.47 to 0.83. The DLQI-NS, DLQI total score and Skindex-16 had Spearman's rank correlation coefficients of 0.89 and 0.84, respectively. Both the DLQI-NS and DLQI showed significant moderate correlations with the BSA (0.51 vs. 0.50) and PASI (0.47 vs. 0.46). No ceiling effects were observed for any of the items of both questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

The validity and reliability of the DLQI-NS and DLQI were good, but the DLQI-NS was superior to the DLQI. The DLQI-NS is an effective self-assessment tool for assessing quality of life in psoriasis patients.

A systematic review of 454 randomized controlled trials using the Dermatology Life Quality Index: experience in 69 diseases and 43 countries

BACKGROUND

Over 29 years of clinical application, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has remained the most used patient-reported outcome (PRO) in dermatology due to its robustness, simplicity and ease of use.

OBJECTIVES

To generate further evidence of the DLQI's utility in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to cover all diseases and interventions.

METHODS

The methodology followed PRISMA guidelines and included seven bibliographical databases, searching articles published from 1 January 1994 until 16 November 2021. Articles were reviewed independently by two assessors, and an adjudicator resolved any opinion differences.

RESULTS

Of 3220 screened publications, 454 articles meeting the eligibility criteria for inclusion, describing research on 198 190 patients, were analysed. DLQI scores were primary endpoints in 24 (5.3%) of studies. Most studies were of psoriasis (54.1%), although 69 different diseases were studied. Most study drugs were systemic (85.1%), with biologics comprising 55.9% of all pharmacological interventions. Topical treatments comprised 17.0% of total pharmacological interventions. Nonpharmacological interventions, mainly laser therapy and ultraviolet radiation treatment, comprised 12.2% of the total number of interventions. The majority of studies (63.7%) were multicentric, with trials conducted in at least 42 different countries; 40.2% were conducted in multiple countries. The minimal clinically importance difference (MCID) was reported in the analysis of 15.0% of studies, but only 1.3% considered full score meaning banding of the DLQI. Forty-seven (10.4%) of the studies investigated statistical correlation of the DLQI with clinical severity assessment or other PRO/quality of life tools; and 61-86% of studies had within-group scores differences greater than the MCID in 'active treatment arms'. The Jadad risk-of-bias scale showed that bias was generally low, as 91.8% of the studies had Jadad scores of ≥ 3; only 0.4% of studies showed a high risk of bias from randomization. Thirteen per cent had a high risk of bias from blinding and 10.1% had a high risk of bias from unknown outcomes of all participants in the studies. In 18.5% of the studies the authors declared that they followed an intention-to-treat protocol; imputation for missing DLQI data was used in 34.4% of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides a wealth of evidence of the use of the DLQI in clinical trials to inform researchers' and -clinicians' decisions for its further use. Recommendations are also made for improving the reporting of data from future RCTs using the DLQI.

Neck scar perception after neck dissection in HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

IMPORTANCE

While there has been an increased understanding of the impact of visible neck scars in some patients with certain diseases, this has not yet been explored in the HPV+ OPSCC population.

OBJECTIVE

To understand patients' perception of their scar and the impact on their quality of life (QOL) at least 6 months after neck dissection (ND) for HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this retrospective case-control study, patients who underwent primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and ND for HPV+ OPSCC between 2016 and 2021 at a single tertiary care center were identified. Data analysis was performed in January 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Dermatology Life Quality Index was modified (mDLQI) to assess patients' perceptions of their scars. The primary outcome was the mean mDLQI survey score with higher scores corresponding to worse perceptions. Three questions adapted from the Self-Consciousness Scale (SCS) were also included to assess awareness of appearance. All questions were scaled on a 0-3 Likert Scale. Tweedie generalized linear model was used to understand the relationship between mDLQI score and patient- and procedure-specific factors (including the three SCS survey questions). An additional exploratory logistic regression was performed to understand the risk factors for clinically significant mDLQI score change.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients (response rate 57 %) completed the survey with a mean mDLQI survey score of 0.84 (max 30). Although there was a statistically significant negative association between private insurance and mDLQI survey score (95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: -2.72 - -0.38), and a positive association between the SCS score and mDLQI survey score (95 % CI: 0.23-0.81) (p < 0.05), these variables were not found to be risk factors for a clinically significant difference in mDLQI on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients felt their neck scars did not interfere with their daily lives. Patient perceptions of neck scars were consistent despite differing patient characteristics and treatment regimens.

Dermatology Life Quality Index in Thai Patients with Facial Port-Wine Stains

INTRODUCTION

Port-wine stains (PWS) are congenital capillary abnormalities caused by immature, venule-like vasculature that progressively dilates due to poor endothelial cell differentiation. PWS affects between 0.3% and 0.9% of newborns, with 90% of cases occurring on the face. Individuals with facial PWS and their parents had a significant negative impairment on their quality of life (QoL) and also suffered from psychological disabilities.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey study in Thailand from July 2021 to April 2022. The questionnaires included demographic data, subjective evaluation (SE), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The questionnaire was performed with a full scale and adjusted scale of validity and reliability test of DLQI using factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. The study outcome was a subjective evaluation and DLQI in patients who received pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 54 patients, 35.2% (19) are male, and 64.8% (35) are female. Regarding age groups, 64.8% (35) are below 5 years old, and 35.2% (19) are older than 5 years. SE results showed that males evaluated an improvement of the facial PWS lesion significantly better than females (P < 0.05). The older age group graded the percentage of improvement better than the younger age group (P < 0.01). The result of the DLQI showed no difference in DLQI between gender. Older age result resulted in a significantly different DLQI compared with younger age (P < 0.01). Parent-reported DLQI improvement was less than self-reported DLQI improvement in patients with PWS treated with PDL (P < 0.05). Concerning the instrument of the study, the validity and reliability analysis of the DLQI questionnaire using factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha have been performed. The adjusted scale with the 5-item DLQI questionnaire is more appropriate in terms validity and reliability.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that facial PWS reduces the QoL as measured by DLQI. We discovered that the QoL of patients and parents with PWS was significantly impaired. The main influencing factors were older age, the improved perception between gender, and PDL treatments. In addition, we found only five questions that are reliable for PWS. The adjusted five-item DLQI questionnaires are more appropriate regarding validity and reliability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

TCTR20230210001, COA no. si 1059/2020.

The application of traditional Chinese medicine nursing combined with the health education standard path in acute myeloid leukaemia

Objective

The standard path of health education is a standardised health education method formulated according to the characteristics of the disease in question. This study aimed to explore the effect of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) nursing combined with the health education standard path in terms of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML).

Methods

Sixty patients with AML at Shijiazhuang Ping'an Hospital were recruited and divided into the control group (n = 30) and the intervention group (n = 30). Both groups received the same chemotherapy treatment, while the control group received routine nursing and the intervention group received a combined TCM-health education standard path intervention. The scores for the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), Spitzer quality of life index (QLI), self-rating depression scale (SDS), awareness of TCM health education standard path content and nursing satisfaction were then compared.

Results

The SAS and SDS scores of the patients decreased following the intervention, while the QLI score increased, with the intervention group significantly improved compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The awareness of TCM health education standard path content was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05), and the nursing satisfaction was also higher in the former than in the latter (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the hospitalisation cost and length of stay were lower in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in the median survival time between the intervention group and the control group (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The application of TCM combined with the health education standard path has an effect in terms of reducing patients' anxiety and depression, improving their awareness of health education content and enhancing their nursing satisfaction.

Investigation of the Relationship between the Disease Severity and Quality of Life of Psoriasis Patients and Their Anthropometric Measurements and Diets

Psoriasis is a multifaceted, chronic, inflammatory skin disease that impacts patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the disease severity and quality of life of psoriasis patients and their nutritional status. The study included 40 patients in the psoriasis group, compared with 40 healthy individuals in the control group. A questionnaire for determination of socio-demographic characteristics and nutritional intake, anthropometric measurements, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) were used for the assessments. Daily food consumption details were recorded for three consecutive days to determine daily energy and nutrient intakes. Compared to the control group, the frequencies of single participants, primary school graduates, and housewives were higher in the psoriasis group (p < 0.05). The psoriasis patients weighed more and had an increased waist/hip ratio in comparison with the healthy individuals. The energy intake was lower in the psoriasis group (p < 0.01). There was not a significant statistical difference in the intake of proteins, fiber, vitamin A, vitamin E, vitamin C, Zn, Fe, and Mg supplements between the groups. However, there was an inverse correlation between the daily vitamin E intake and PASI scores (p < 0.05). There was a positive moderate correlation between the DLQI and PASI scores (p < 0.01). Our study indicated that lower daily vitamin E intake levels were associated with the severity of psoriasis. In addition to this, abdominal obesity seems to be another risk factor in psoriasis patients, even if they have a normal body mass index (BMI). An integrated healthcare approach with dermatologists, family physicians, and dietitians is essential to the management of psoriasis.

Where do measures of health, social care and wellbeing fit within a wider measurement framework? Implications for the measurement of quality of life and the identification of bolt-ons

BACKGROUND

There is variability across studies in the dimensionality i.e., set of latent variables to which health, social care and wellbeing measures relate. This variability may impact the development of new measures and the identification of bolt-on dimensions. We examine the dimensionality of commonly used measures and identify a set of potential bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L.

METHODS

We used the OMS dataset, an online survey of health, social care and wellbeing measures in patients and members of the general public. A content analysis provided a theoretical framework for results interpretation. Quantitative analyses were based on a pool of 79 items from 7 measures. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess health, social care and wellbeing measures dimensionality and their contribution to quality of life. The relationship between EQ-5D-5L items and the identified factors was used for bolt-ons identification.

RESULTS

The dimensionality comprised of seven factors, namely physical functioning, psychological symptoms, energy/sleep, physical pain, social functioning, needs and satisfaction. Health measures covered five of the seven factors identified, wellbeing measures three and the social care measure one. A list of candidate bolt-on items for the EQ-5D-5L was presented e.g., cognition, energy, dignity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence on the dimensionality of health, social care and wellbeing measures and presents a list of candidate bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L.

Comparative Analysis of Quality of Life of Patients with Dermatological Problems: Teledermatology Versus Face-to-Face Dermatology

The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the patients cared for with teledermatology (TD) services was analyzed as compared with face-to-face dermatology (F-F/D) at the hospital. This study was a controlled, non-blinded, intra-level, and multicenter randomized clinical trial, with a 6-month follow-up. A total of 450 patients were randomly assigned to two different groups. The Spanish version of the generic EuroQol-5-dimensions-5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and the specific Skindex-29 questionnaire were used at 0 and 6 months. The number of primary care visits (2.24 TD; 1.68 F-F/D) and number of hospital visits (0.01 TD; 1.48 F-F/D) were statistically significant. It was observed that from month 0 onwards, the users included in the F-F/D group self-perceived a lower HRQoL than the users included in the TD group (Skindex-29 total: p ≤ 0.00; EQ-5D-5L VAS = p ≤ 0.00; EQ-5D-5L utilities = p ≤ 0.00). At the end of the study, the patients included in the F-F/D group still obtained lower scores in their perception of HRQoL, as compared to those included in the other type of follow-up (Skindex-29 total: p ≤ 0.00; EQ-5D-5L VAS = p ≤ 0.00; EQ-5D-5L utilities = p ≤ 0.00). TD was an effective diagnosis and follow-up tool. At the end of the study period, the HRQoL of the patients in both groups was significantly higher as compared to their baseline levels. Additionally, both the general and specific HRQoL perceived by the TD patients was higher than the F-F/D group from the start of the study.

Normative data and socio-demographic determinants of the Dermatology Life Quality Index in a large online sample of the Hungarian population

BACKGROUND

Population norms are available for several generic health-related quality of life questionnaires, but rarely for disease- or specialty-specific questionnaires.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to calculate population norms for the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score.

METHODS

We conducted an online self-completed questionnaire survey on a large sample of the general Hungarian adult population. Respondents' socio-demographic characteristics and dermatology-related quality of life aspects were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 2,001 participants completed the questionnaire, with the average age of 48.2 (SD = 16.6) years, half of the respondents in our sample (n = 981) reported long-standing health problems. The average DLQI score was 1.9 (SD = 4.0) with women having a higher average (2.0, SD = 3.9) than men (1.8, SD = 4.0; p=<0.001). The DLQI score differed among age-groups with younger people having relatively higher DLQI averages. When the multivariate linear regression model was applied, it showed that young age, lower income and unemployment status were associated with higher DLQI scores, while controlling for the existence of skin disease (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study esthablished DLQI population norms among the general population, which may provide a reference point in health-policy and financing decision-making.

General and Skin-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to compare HRQoL in adult AD patients before and during the pandemic and to assess measurement performance of 4 HRQoL measures.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2021, a multicenter, cross-sectional survey was conducted, involving 218 adult AD patients. Health-related quality of life outcomes included the EQ-5D-5L, Skindex-16, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DLQI-Relevant (DLQI-R). Severity was measured using objective SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema Area and Severity Index, and Investigator Global Assessment.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD EQ-5D-5L utility, Skindex-16, DLQI, and DLQI-R scores were 0.82 ± 0.22, 56.84 ± 27.46, 13.44 ± 8.46, and 13.76 ± 8.60, respectively. The patients reported more problems during the pandemic (P < 0.05) regarding pain/discomfort (odds ratio [OR], 1.78), worrying (OR, 1.89), concerns about persistence/reoccurrence of disease (OR, 1.88), and social relationships (OR, 1.69). The HRQoL outcomes showed strong correlations with each other (range of rs, |0.69| to |0.99|). The Skindex-16, DLQI, and DLQI-R were able to discriminate between severity groups with large (η2 = 0.20-0.23), whereas the EQ-5D-5L with moderate effect sizes (η2 = 0.08-0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Atopic dermatitis patients experienced significantly more problems in some areas of HRQoL during the pandemic. The EQ-5D-5L, Skindex-16, DLQI, and DLQI-R demonstrated good convergent and known-group validity and can be suitable instruments for HRQoL assessment in clinical and research settings.

Assessment of health state utilities in dermatology: an experimental time trade-off value set for the dermatology life quality index

Background

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores are used in many countries as access and reimbursement criteria for costly dermatological treatments. In this study we examined how time trade-off (TTO) utility valuations made by individuals from the general population are related to combinations of DLQI severity levels characterizing dermatologically relevant health states, with the ultimate purpose of developing a value set for the DLQI.

Methods

We used data from an online cross-sectional survey conducted in Hungary in 2020 (n = 842 after sample exclusions). Respondents were assigned to one of 18 random blocks and were asked to provide 10-year TTO valuations for the corresponding five hypothetical health states. To analyze the relationship between DLQI severity levels and utility valuations, we estimated linear, censored, ordinal, and beta regression models, complemented by two-part scalable models accommodating heterogeneity effects in respondents’ valuation scale usage. Successive severity levels (0–3) of each DLQI item were represented by dummy variables. We used cross-validation methods to reduce the initial set of 30 dummy variables and improve model robustness.

Results

Our final, censored linear regression model with 13 dummy variables had R² = 0.136, thus accounting for 36.9% of the incremental explanatory power of a maximal (full-information) benchmark model (R² = 0.148) over the uni-dimensional model (R² = 0.129). Each DLQI item was found to have a negative effect on the valuation of health states, yet this effect was largely heterogeneous across DLQI items, and the relative contribution of distinctive severity levels also varied substantially. Overall, we found that the social/interpersonal consequences of skin conditions (in the areas of social and leisure activities, work and school, close personal relationships, and sexuality) had roughly twice as large disutility impact as the physical/practical aspects.

Conclusions

We have developed an experimental value set for the DLQI, which could prospectively be used for quantifying the quality-adjusted life years impact of dermatological treatments and serve as a basis for cost-effectiveness analyses. We suggest that, after validation of our main results through confirmatory studies, population-specific DLQI value sets could be developed and used for conducting cost-effectiveness analyses and developing financing guidelines in dermatological care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-022-01995-x.

A comparative study on the measurement properties of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), DLQI-Relevant and Skindex-16

BACKGROUND

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Skindex-16 are among the most commonly used dermatology-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) instruments. DLQI has two common scoring methods, the original and the DLQI-Relevant (DLQI-R) modification. Head-to-head comparisons of the measurement properties of the DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 are currently lacking.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to compare the measurement properties of the DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16.

METHODS

We analysed data from 618 patients with self-reported physician-diagnosed dermatological conditions from a cross-sectional survey carried out in Hungary in early 2020. DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 were compared in terms of ceiling and floor effects, informativity, convergent validity and known-group validity.

RESULTS

Mean DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 total scores were 3·76 ± 5·03, 4·11 ± 5·34 and 29·36 ± 26·62, respectively. Among patients with a DLQI/DLQI-R total score of zero, 64% reported problems on Skindex-16. Overall, 23-38% of patients with 'not relevant' responses on DLQI items 3 (shopping/home/gardening), 7 (working/studying), 8 (interpersonal problems) and 9 (sexual difficulties) reported problems on their corresponding Skindex-16 items. Average relative informativity (Shannon's evenness index) was the highest for Skindex-16 (0·85), followed by DLQI-R (0·66) and DLQI (0·54). DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 demonstrated similar convergent validity. DLQI was able to better discriminate between known groups of patients based on overall skin-related HRQoL impairment, whereas DLQI-R and Skindex-16 performed better with respect to self-perceived health status.

CONCLUSIONS

Skindex-16 seems to be more sensitive than DLQI/DLQI-R in capturing mild impairment in HRQoL. Our findings help to provide a fuller understanding of the difference between DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 and support the informed choice of instrument for clinical and research purposes.