Transient bacteremia after a percutaneous liver biopsy

Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy: Recent evidence

Liver biopsy (LB) is an essential tool in diagnosing, evaluating and managing various diseases of the liver. As such, histopathological results are critical as they establish or aid in diagnosis, provide information on prognosis, and guide the appropriate selection of medical therapy for patients. Indications for LB include evaluation of persistent elevation of liver chemistries of unclear etiology, diagnosis of chronic liver diseases such as Wilson's disease, autoimmune hepatitis, small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis, work up of fever of unknown origin, amyloidosis and more. Traditionally, methods of acquiring liver tissue have included percutaneous LB (PCLB), transjugular LB (TJLB) or biopsy taken surgically via laparotomy or laparoscopy. However, traditional methods of LB may be inferior to newer methods. Additionally, PCLB and TJLB carry higher risks of adverse events and complications. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound guided LB (EUS-LB) has evolved as an alternative method of tissue sampling that has proven to be safe and effective, with limited adverse events. Compared to PC and TJ routes, EUS-LB may also have a greater diagnostic yield of tissue, be superior for a targeted approach of focal lesions, provide higher quality images and allow for greater patient comfort. These advantages have contributed to the increased use of EUS-LB as a technique for obtaining liver tissue. Herein, we provide a review of the recent evidence of EUS-LB for liver disease.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy

Liver biopsy remains the cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of liver disorders. Results of liver biopsy can often drive therapeutic decision-making. Unfortunately, studies have shown conventional biopsy techniques to carry significant sampling variability that can potentially impact patient care. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is gaining traction as an alternative method of biopsy. For parenchymal disease, it can decrease sampling variability. It offers a more targeted approach for focal lesions. Its diagnostic yield and limited adverse event profile make it a promising approach for liver biopsy.

Adenoma or atypical hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: role of preoperative imaging and laparoscopic treatment

Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and other hypervascular liver lesions, such as hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), is important because of the drastically different therapeutic approach. However, FNH can be well distinguished only if it shows a typical aspect; alternatively, in the case of atypical FNH, imaging findings are not specific enough to provide a secure diagnosis and histologic verification of the lesion is required. In addition, HCA cannot be identified conclusively by any current available imaging technique and it can be at best suspected strongly, and this suspicion may lead to liver resection. Herein we report a case of a patient with an unusual FNH nodule presenting at ultrasonographic scanning as an isoechoic mass arising from hepatic segment 4b; the diagnostic indecision between FNH and HCA was not definitively solved even after computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging and the patient was scheduled for a laparoscopic resection. The pathologic examination diagnosed an atypical FNH nodule. The clinical doubt between FNH and HCA remains a problem affecting the clinicians, and more effort should be made in the direction of a better preoperative differentiation of such different conditions. Surgical resection should not be considered as the failure of the preoperative diagnostic attempt, but as the mainstay for a definitive and sure diagnosis.