Outcomes of an Algorithmic Approach to Management of Pneumothorax Complicating Thermal Ablation of Pulmonary Neoplasms

CT-Guided Transthoracic Core-Needle Biopsy of Pulmonary Nodules: Current Practices, Efficacy, and Safety Considerations

CT-guided transthoracic core-needle biopsy (CT-TTNB) is a minimally invasive procedure that plays a crucial role in diagnosing pulmonary nodules. With high diagnostic yield and low complication rates, CT-TTNB is favored over traditional surgical biopsies, providing accuracy in detecting both malignant and benign conditions. This literature review aims to present a comprehensive overview of CT-TTNB, focusing on its indications, procedural techniques, diagnostic yield, and safety considerations. Studies published between 2013 and 2024 were systematically reviewed from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library using the SANRA methodology. The results highlight that CT-TTNB has a diagnostic yield of 85-95% and sensitivity rates for detecting malignancies between 92 and 97%. Several factors, including nodule size, lesion depth, needle passes, and imaging techniques, influence diagnostic success. Complications such as pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage were noted, with incidence rates varying from 12 to 45% for pneumothorax and 4 to 27% for hemorrhage. Preventative strategies and management algorithms are essential for minimizing and addressing these risks. In conclusion, CT-TTNB remains a reliable and effective method for diagnosing pulmonary nodules, particularly in peripheral lung lesions. Advancements such as PET/CT fusion imaging, AI-assisted biopsy planning, and robotic systems further enhance precision and safety. This review emphasizes the importance of careful patient selection and procedural planning to maximize outcomes while minimizing risks, ensuring that CT-TTNB continues to be an indispensable tool in pulmonary diagnostics.

Risk assessment of pneumothorax in colorectal lung metastases treated by percutaneous thermal ablation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of pneumothorax in the percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) treatment of colorectal lung metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

Data regarding patients with CRLM treated with IGTA from five medical institutions in China from 2016 to 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. Pneumothorax and non-pneumothorax were compared using the Student's t -test, χ 2 test and Fisher's exact test. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the predictors of pneumothorax. Interactions between variables were examined and used for model construction. Receiver operating characteristic curves and nomograms were generated to assess the performance of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 254 patients with 376 CRLM underwent 299 ablation sessions. The incidence of pneumothorax was 45.5%. The adjusted multivariate logistic regression model, incorporating interaction terms, revealed that tumour number [odds ratio (OR)=8.34 (95% CI: 1.37-50.64)], puncture depth [OR=0.53 (95% CI: 0.31-0.91)], pre-procedure radiotherapy [OR=3.66 (95% CI: 1.17-11.40)], peribronchial tumour [OR=2.32 (95% CI: 1.04-5.15)], and emphysema [OR=56.83 (95% CI: 8.42-383.57)] were significant predictive factors of pneumothorax (all P <0.05). The generated nomogram model demonstrated a significant prediction performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.800 (95% CI: 0.751-0.850).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-procedure radiotherapy, tumour number, peribronchial tumour, and emphysema were identified as risk factors for pneumothorax in the treatment of CRLM using percutaneous IGTA. Puncture depth was found to be a protective factor against pneumothorax.

Risk prediction of pneumothorax in lung malignancy patients treated with percutaneous microwave ablation: development of nomogram model

OBJECTIVES

To develop effective nomograms for predicting pneumothorax and delayed pneumothorax after microwave ablation (MWA) in lung malignancy (LM) patients.

METHODS

LM patients treated with MWA were randomly allocated to a training or validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. The predictors of pneumothorax identified by univariate and multivariate analyses in the training cohort were used to develop a predictive nomogram. The C-statistic was used to evaluate predictive accuracy in both cohorts. A second nomogram for predicting delayed pneumothorax was developed and validated using identical methods.

RESULTS

A total of 552 patients (training cohort: n = 402; validation cohort: n = 150) were included; of these patients, 27.9% (154/552) developed pneumothorax, with immediate and delayed pneumothorax occurring in 18.8% (104/552) and 9.1% (50/552), respectively. The predictors selected for the nomogram of pneumothorax were emphysema (hazard ratio [HR], 6.543; p < .001), history of lung ablation (HR, 7.841; p= .025), number of pleural punctures (HR, 1.416; p < .050), ablation zone encompassing pleura (HR, 10.225; p < .001) and pulmonary fissure traversed by needle (HR, 10.776; p < .001). The C-statistics showed good predictive performance in the training and validation cohorts (0.792 and 0.832, respectively). Another nomogram for delayed pneumothorax was developed based on emphysema (HR, 2.952; p= .005), ablation zone encompassing pleura (HR, 4.915; p < .001) and pulmonary fissure traversed by needle (HR, 4.348; p = .015). The C-statistics showed good predictive performance in the training cohort, and it had efficacy for prediction in the validation cohort (0.719 and 0.689, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The nomograms could effectively predict the risk of pneumothorax and delayed pneumothorax after MWA.

Expert consensus on image-guided radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary tumors: 2018 edition

Lung cancer ranks first in incidence and mortality in China. Surgery is the primary method to cure cancer, but only 20-30% of patients are eligible for curative resection. In recent years, in addition to surgery, other local therapies have been developed for patients with numerous localized primary and metastatic pulmonary tumors, including stereotactic body radiation therapy and thermal ablative therapies through percutaneously inserted applicators. Percutaneous thermal ablation of pulmonary tumors is minimally invasive, conformal, repeatable, feasible, cheap, has a shorter recovery time, and offers reduced morbidity and mortality. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), the most commonly used thermal ablation technique, has a reported 80-90% rate of complete ablation, with the best results obtained in tumors < 3 cm in diameter. Because the clinical efficacy of RFA of pulmonary tumors has not yet been determined, this clinical guideline describes the techniques used in the treatment of localized primary and metastatic pulmonary tumors in nonsurgical candidates, including mechanism of action, devices, indications, techniques, potential complications, clinical outcomes, post-ablation surveillance, and use in combination with other therapies. In the future, the role of RFA in the treatment of localized pulmonary tumors should ultimately be determined by evidence from prospective randomized controlled trials comparing sublobar resection or stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Persistent pathways after lung radiofrequency ablation as a risk factor of drain placement

PURPOSE

The risk factors of pneumothorax after lung radiofrequency (RF) ablation are long known. The objective was to demonstrate that the visualisation of an aeric RF path after the needle withdrawal was predictive of pneumothorax occurrence and chest tube placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 70 patients were retrospectively included in this study. For each patient, we determined the pneumothorax risk factors (age, gender, previous surgery, emphysema, lesion size, distance between pleura and lesion), visualisation of a RF track, length and thickness, presence of pneumothorax, volume, chest tube placement, duration of drainage and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Among 70 patients included retrospectively, 26 needed a chest tube placement (37%). Considering the group with path visualisation (37 patients, group A) and the patients without path visualisation (group B), the 2 groups were comparable for pneumothorax risk factors. Considering the patients who needed a chest drain, the visualisation of the path was significatively more important (23 cases, 88.4%) (p< 10^-3) than in the group without (8 patients, 31.8%). Multivariate analyses were significant in the three analyses after adjustments on the risk factors for the occurrence of pneumothorax. Incidence of drains was significantly more (p < 10^-3) important in group A (23 drainages 62%) than in group B (4 drainages or 12%). The length and thickness of the tracks were not predictable of drain placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides the well-known risk factors of severe pneumothorax after lung RFA, the simple visualisation of an aeric path just after the RF needle withdrawal is significantly associated with chest tube placement and can be considered as a risk factor as itself.