Outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization for acute hemorrhage originating from gastric adenocarcinoma

Transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) to treat acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) secondary to gastric cancer presents a significant clinical challenge due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. Transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for managing this condition, especially in the context of failed endoscopic management. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAE in treating acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding caused by gastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of medical databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, was conducted for studies published between 2000 and 2023. Included studies reported on the use of TAE for acute upper GI bleeding specifically due to gastric cancer, including retrospective analyses, case reports, and cohort studies. Demographics and clinical outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria, all being retrospective in nature. The overall technical success rate of TAE was 94.9 %. Overall clinical success rates were 72 % with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of 66-79 %. Overall rebleeding rates were 11 % with a 95 % CI of 3-18 %. Major complications were reported in 2.4 % of patients, including ischemic complications and organ perforation. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 26.4 %, primarily due to underlying disease progression rather than procedural complications.

CONCLUSION

TAE is an effective and safe intervention for managing acute upper GI bleeding secondary to gastric cancer, with high success rates. TAE should be considered a viable treatment modality for this challenging condition, particularly for patients who are being considered for neoadjuvant therapy or indeed those not suitable candidates for curative surgical intervention.

Systematic treatment in gastric cancer patients with overt bleeding: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage, which is not a rare complication in patients with gastric cancer (GC)/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC), can lead to a poor prognosis. However, no study has examined the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy as an initial therapy for GC/GEJC patients with overt bleeding (OB).

AIM

To investigate the impact of OB on the survival and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of GC/GEJC patients.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC who received systematic treatment at Peking University Third Hospital were enrolled in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.

RESULTS

After 1:2 PSM analysis, 93 patients were assessed, including 32 patients with OB before treatment (OBBT) and 61 patients without OBBT. The disease control rate was 90.6% in the group with OBBT and 88.5% in the group without OBBT, and this difference was not statistically significant. There was no difference in the incidence of TRAEs between the group with OBBT and the group without OBBT. The median overall survival (mOS) was 15.2 months for patients with OBBT and 23.7 months for those without OBBT [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.101, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.672-1.804, log rank P = 0.701]. The mOS was worse for patients with OB after treatment (OBAT) than for those without OBAT (11.4 months vs 23.7 months, HR = 1.787, 95%CI: 1.006-3.175, log rank P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

The mOS for GC/GEJC patients with OBBT was similar to that for those without OBBT, but the mOS for patients with OBAT was worse than that for those without OBAT.

[Complicated gastric cancer and modern treatment approaches]

Among all patients with gastric cancer, 40% admit to the hospitals due to cancer-related complications. The most common complications of gastric cancer are bleeding (22-80%), malignant gastric outlet obstruction (26-60%), and perforation (less than 5%). The main treatment methods for gastric cancer complicated by bleeding are various forms of endoscopic hemostasis, transarterial embolization and external beam radiotherapy. Surgical treatment is possible in case of ineffective management. However, surgical algorithm is not standardized. Malignant gastric outlet stenosis requires decompression: endoscopic stenting, palliative gastroenterostomy. Surgical treatment is also possible (gastrectomy, proximal or distal resection of the stomach). The main problem for patients with complicated gastric cancer is the lack of standardized algorithms and abundance of potential surgical techniques. The aim of our review is to systematize available data on the treatment of complicated gastric cancer and to standardize existing methods.

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization (TAE) of Cancer-Related Bleeding

Background and Objectives: Roughly 10% of cancer patients experience an episode of bleeding. The bleeding severity can range from occasional trivial bleeds to major bleeding. The treatment for the bleeding may vary, depending on the clinical condition and anatomical site, and may include various strategies, among which TAE is a cornerstone of major bleeding management. However, the existing literature on tumor hemorrhages is inconsistent. The objective of this multicenter retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of arterial embolization in the treatment of tumor hemorrhages in patients with solid cancers. Materials and Methods: The data for patients with solid cancers undergoing TAE for the management of tumor hemorrhages from January 2020 to May 2023 were gathered. Results: A total of 92 patients with cancer-related bleeding were treated between January 2020 and May 2023. No bleeding was detected by X-ray angiography (XA) in 12 (13%) cases; therefore, a blind embolization was performed. The most common bleeding site was the liver (21.7%). A total of 66 tumor hemorrhages were spontaneous. The most commonly used embolic agent was polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles (30.4%). Technical success was achieved in 82 (89.1%) cases, with an 84.8% clinical success rate related to 14 cases of rebleeding. Proximal embolization was performed for 19 (20.7%) patients. Complications were recorded for 10 (10.9%) patients. The 30-day bleeding-related mortality was 15.2%. The technical success, clinical success, proximal embolization rate, and 30-day rebleeding were worse in the subset of patients undergoing TAE with coils. Conclusions: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) represents a viable and potentially life-saving therapeutic approach in the management of tumor hemorrhages, demonstrating a notable effectiveness and safety. The TAE of bleeding tumors using coils resulted in a higher rate of non-superselective proximal embolization, with a trend toward lower clinical success rates and higher rebleeding episodes.

Transcatheter arterial embolization for cancer-related non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter retrospective study of 107 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcome of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in the treatment of cancer-related non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred and seven patients who underwent TAE for the treatment of cancer-related non-variceal UGIB at five institutions between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively included. There were 78 men and 29 women, with a mean age of 60.6 ± 13.2 (SD) (age range: 31-87 years). Clinical success was defined as no rebleeding within 30 days after TAE. Rebleeding was defined as non-variceal UGIB resulting in a decrease in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL within 24 h. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate actuarial probabilities of rebleeding and survival within 30 days after TAE. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify variables associated with clinical success and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 106 out of 107 patients (99.1%). Positive angiographic findings (contrast extravasation and pseudoaneurysm) were observed in 30/107 patients (28.0%). Empiric embolization was performed in 77/107 patients (72.0%). Clinical success was achieved in 60/107 patients (56.1%). The 3-day, 7-day, and 30-day actuarial probabilities of rebleeding were 21.5%, 31.0%, and 44.6%, respectively. No variables were identified as predictors of clinical success. Nineteen patients (19/107; 17.8%) died within 30 days after TAE; of them, 14 (14/107; 13.1%) died due to bleeding-related causes. The 3-day, 7-day, and 30-day actuarial probabilities of survival were 91.6%, 88.8%, and 77.4%, respectively. A baseline hemoglobin level of ≤ 60 g/L (Odds ratio [OR]: 3.376; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.223-9.318; P = 0.019) and clinical failure (OR: 6.149; 95% CI: 2.113-17.893; P = 0.001) were identified as predictors of 30-day mortality. Major complications (gastrointestinal perforation) occurred in one patient (1/107; 0.9%). Minor complications (abdominal pain, fever, and vomiting) occurred in 19 patients (19/107; 17.8%).

CONCLUSION

TAE is a safe treatment option for patients with cancer-related non-variceal UGIB, and seems to be effective in more than half of these patients.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer complicated with bleeding and/or stenosis: short- and long-term outcomes

Background

Laparoscopic surgery has justified its efficacy in the treatment of early gastric cancer. There are limited data indicating the eligibility of laparoscopic interventions in locally advanced gastric cancer. Publications describing the safety of laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of local and metastatic gastric cancer complicated by bleeding and stenosis are scarce.

Methods

The study included patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced and disseminated gastric cancer and complicated with bleeding and/or stenosis who underwent gastrectomy with vital indications between February 2012 and August 2018. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic surgery (laparoscopic surgery) and open surgery (OS) were compared.

Results

In total, 127 patients (LS, n = 52; OS, n = 75) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Forty-four total gastrectomies with resection of the abdominal part of the esophagus, 63 distal subtotal (43 Billroth-I and 20 Billroth-II), and 19 proximal gastrectomies were performed. The median duration of surgery was significantly longer in the LS group, 253 min (interquartile range [IQR], 200–295) versus 210 min (IQR, 165–220) (p < 0.001), while median intraoperative blood loss in the LS group was significantly less, 180 ml (IQR, 146—214) versus 320 ml (IQR, 290–350), (p < 0.001). Early postoperative complications occurred in 35% in the LS group and in 45 % of patients in the OS group (p = 0.227). There was no difference in postoperative mortality rates between the groups (3 [6 %] versus 5 (7 %), p = 1.00). Median intensive care unit stay and median postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter after laparoscopy, 2 (IQR, 1–2) versus 4 (IQR, 3–4) days, and 8 (IQR, 7–9) versus 10 (IQR, 8–12) days, both p < 0.001. After laparoscopy, patients started adjuvant chemotherapy significantly earlier than those after open surgery, 20 vs. 28 days (p < 0.001). However, overall survival rates were similar between the group. Three-year overall survival was 24% in the LS group and 27% in the OS groups.

Conclusions

Despite the technical complexity, in patients with complicated locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer, laparoscopic gastrectomies were associated with longer operation time, reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter reconvalescence, and similar morbidity, mortality rates and long-term oncologic outcomes compared to conventional open surgery.

[Gastric cancer complicated by bleeding. (A systematic review)]

Bleeding as the most common complication of gastric cancer is a significant problem of modern surgery. Both oncologists and surgeons in ordinary hospitals deal with this adverse event. In addition to the well-known drugs for hemostasis, there are also generally recognized traditional methods of endoscopic hemostasis and transcatheter angiographic embolization. Surgical interventions do not lose their role too if previous hemostatic methods turned out to be ineffective. The reports devoted to radiotherapy for treatment and prevention of gastric bleeding following malignant process have been recently published. Such a wide choice of hemostatic methods prompted us to analyze the most significant recent studies regarding effectiveness of various methods and choice of the most optimal one.

[Gastric cancer complicated by bleeding: a systematic review]

Bleeding as the most common complication of gastric cancer is a significant problem of modern surgery. Both oncologists and surgeons in ordinary hospitals deal with this adverse event. In addition to the well-known drugs for hemostasis, there are also generally recognized traditional methods of endoscopic hemostasis and transcatheter angiographic embolization. Surgical interventions do not lose their role too if previous hemostatic methods turned out to be ineffective. The reports devoted to radiotherapy for treatment and prevention of gastric bleeding following malignant process have been recently published. Such a wide choice of hemostatic methods prompted us to analyze the most significant recent studies regarding effectiveness of various methods and choice of the most optimal one.

Efficacy of radiotherapy for gastric bleeding associated with advanced gastric cancer

Background

Gastric bleeding negatively impacts the quality of life of patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer and is frequently lethal. We investigated the efficacy of RT for palliation of gastric bleeding from gastric cancer and identified an optimal radiotherapy (RT) strategy.

Methods

The study analyzed 57 patients submitted to palliative RT for gastric bleeding associated with gastric cancer between January 2009 and February 2019. Changes in hemoglobin (Hb) levels were analyzed based on measurements taken before and immediately, 1 month, and 2 months after RT. Re-bleeding after RT was identified as either Hb level dropping to < 7.0 g/dL or the administration of a blood transfusion after RT.

Results

The median biologically effective dose (α/β = 10) was 37.5 Gy (range 23.6–58.5). The most common regimen was 25 Gy in five fractions. The mean Hb levels before, immediately after, 1 month, and 2 months after RT (6.6, 9.7, 10.3, and 9.7 g/dL, respectively) were significantly higher than that before RT (all p < 0.001). No significant differences in re-bleeding rates were observed according to total dose, fractional dose, and fraction number. Gastric tumor response evaluated by computed tomography within 2 months after RT showed partial responses were more frequent in patients achieving bleeding control (25.0% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.023) and overall survival was significantly improved for bleeding control within 3 months after RT (median, 15.4 vs. 10.0 weeks, p = 0.048).

Conclusions

RT was an effective modality for gastric bleeding control in gastric cancer, which can be achieved with a short course scheme with five fractions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01884-5.

Clinical outcomes of doxorubicin-eluting CalliSpheres® beads-transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with doxorubicin-loaded CalliSpheres® beads for patients with unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma have not been reported. The aim of this study is to study the clinical outcomes of DEB-TACE for patients with unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 21 patients (15 men; mean age 68.7 ± 9.7; range 46-86 years) with unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma received DEB-TACE between July 2017 and September 2020. Patient characteristic data, imaging findings, complications and DEB-TACE procedure were reviewed. The primary endpoints, disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR), were calculated. The secondary endpoints were overall survival rate and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Twenty-two sessions of DEB-TACE were performed in 21 patients. The technical success rate was 100%; without sever adverse events or procedure-related deaths. All patients received transarterial chemotherapy infusion with raltitrexed or oxaliplatin. The median follow-up period was 3.6 months (interquartile range, IQR 1.5-9.4 months). ORR and DCR were 42.9 and 85.7%, 28.6 and 71.4%, 20.0 and 40.0% respectively at 1-, 3-, and 6-months after DEB-TACE. The median PFS was 6.0 months, and the 3-, 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 68.2%, 45.5 and 0.0%, respectively. The median overall survival was 9.4 months, and the 3-, 6- and 12-month overall survival rates were 75.5%, 55.0 and 13.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study reports outcomes of DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded CallSpheres bead treatment in the management of patients with unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma. According to our results, this is a safe and feasible treatment modality that may be considered among the options for the treatment of these patients.

Role of palliative radiotherapy in bleeding control in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer

Background

This study analyzed the clinical results of palliative radiotherapy for bleeding control in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who met the following inclusion criteria between January 2002 and June 2018: histologically proven gastric cancer, gastric tumor bleeding confirmed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and palliative radiotherapy performed for hemostasis. The median radiotherapy dose was 30 Gy, with a daily dose ranging from 1.8 to 3 Gy.

Results

Sixty-one patients were included in this analysis. The study population was predominantly male (72.1%), with a median age of 62 years (range: 32–92). The median baseline hemoglobin level was 7.1 g/dL, and the most common presenting symptom of gastric tumor bleeding was melena (85.2%). Bleeding control was achieved in 54 (88.5%) patients. The median levels of hemoglobin at 1, 2, and 3 months after completion of radiotherapy were 10.1 g/dL, 10.2 g/dL, and 10.4 g/dL, respectively; these values were significantly different from that before radiotherapy (7.1 g/dL; p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 4.8 months. Among the 54 patients who achieved bleeding control after radiotherapy, 19 (35.2%) experienced re-bleeding during the follow-up period. The median time to re-bleeding was 6.0 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a higher radiation dose (p = 0.007) and additional chemotherapy after radiotherapy (p = 0.004) were significant factors for prolonging the time to re-bleeding.

Conclusions

Tumor bleeding was adequately controlled by radiotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

Verification of the Utility of Palliative Radiotherapy for Hemostasis of Gastric Cancer Bleeding: a Case Control Study

PURPOSE

Bleeding from unresectable gastric cancer is a localized condition that adversely affects quality of life. Radiotherapy can be used to treat gastric cancer bleeding when surgery, endoscopic treatment, and intravascular embolization are ineffective. This study evaluated the utility of radiotherapy for unresectable hemorrhagic gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 33 patients with gastric cancer bleeding who underwent palliative radiotherapy in our hospital between April 2013 and May 2020. In this study, successful hemostasis was defined as > 1 month after starting radiotherapy with the patient alive and showing no need for blood transfusion, no drop in hemoglobin, and no evidence of melena or hematemesis.

RESULTS

Patients comprised 26 men (79%) and 7 women (21%), with a median age of 71 years (range, 41-78 years). Hemostasis was achieved in 24 patients (73%). Thirty-two patients (94%) have been discharged home or transferred to the hospice. Patients with successful hemostasis from radiotherapy showed significantly longer overall survival than patients with unsuccessful hemostasis (p = 0.0026). No toxicities of grade 2 or more were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study found that palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer bleeding was useful and safe and can improve remaining quality of life in patients with poor prognosis.

Angiography and transcatheter arterial embolization for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

Acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (NVGIB) is one of the most common medical emergencies, leading to significant morbidity and mortality without proper management. This study was to analyze the causes of NVGIB and to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the treatment of NVGIB.

STUDY

From November 2012 to October 2018, 158 patients with NVGIB underwent digital subtraction angiography, and TAE was performed for confirmed gastrointestinal bleeding. Patient characteristics, cause of bleeding, angiographic findings, technical and clinical success rates, complication rates, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Bleeding was confirmed in 71.5% (113/158) of performed angiographies, and 68 patients had visible contrast extravasation on angiography, with the other 45 patients having indirect signs of bleeding. Among the 113 patients with confirmed gastrointestinal bleeding, TAE was technically successful in 111 patients (98.2%). The mean procedure time required for TAE was 116 ± 44 min (ranging from 50 to 225 min). The primary total clinical success rate of TAE was 84.7% (94/111). The primary clinical success rates of TAE for vascular abnormality, neoplastic disease, and iatrogenic condition were 84.5% (49/58), 84.1% (37/44), and 88.9% (8/9), respectively. Intestinal necrosis and perforation were found in two patients after TAE.

CONCLUSIONS

The causes of NVGIB are complex and the onset, location, risk, and clinical presentations are variable. NVGIB can be generally divided into three types: vascular abnormality, neoplastic disease, and iatrogenic condition. TAE is a safe, effective, and fast procedure in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Palliative care for advanced gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Proactive palliative care can effectively relieve symptoms early and effectively as well as improve the quality of life of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC).

AREAS COVERED

The review summarizes palliative care for GAC. GAC caused specific symptoms, such as malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), bleeding, weight loss, and/or ascites, therefore, these symptoms must be addressed specifically.

EXPERT OPINION

Palliative care should start early to control general symptoms, thus may improve the patient's condition to make the patient eligible for anti-cancer treatment. As some stage IV GAC patients can now live longer, palliative interventions become more important. A multimodality interdisciplinary approach is strongly encouraged.

Transcatheter arterial embolization for gastrointestinal bleeding related to pancreatic adenocarcinoma: clinical efficacy and predictors of clinical outcome

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for managing pancreatic adenocarcinoma-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and to determine the factors associated with clinical outcomes.

METHOD

From 2001-2017, this retrospective study included 58 patients who underwent TAE for pancreatic adenocarcinoma-related GI bleeding. The technical and clinical success of TAE, clinical factors including patient characteristics and embolization details, complications, and the 30-day mortality were evaluated. Univariate analyses were performed to determine the factors related to the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

On angiography, bleeding foci were detected in 47 patients (81%), while the other 11 patients showed tumor staining. Technical success rate was 98%, and first session and overall clinical success rates were 79% and 88%, respectively. N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) was the most commonly used embolic agent (53%). Stent-related bleeding was shown in 22 patients with characteristic angiogram such as arterial cut-off (13/22) and arteriobiliary fistula (5/22), with comparable clinical success rate (82%). Bleeding from the superior mesenteric artery (n = 3) at the first session of angiography and complications (n = 2), such as ischemic hepatitis and small bowel infarction, were all associated with a 30-day mortality. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 22%. Univariate analysis showed that massive transfusion and TNM stage 4 were related to clinical failure (P = 0.035 and 0.038, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TAE was effective and safe for pancreatic adenocarcinoma-related GI bleeding. Stent-related bleeding was not uncommon, and associated with vascular abnormality amenable to TAE. Massive transfusion and TNM stage 4 were related to clinical failure.

Management of Bleeding from Unresectable Gastric Cancer

Bleeding from unresectable gastric cancer (URGC) is not a rare complication. Two major ways in which the management of this issue differs from the management of benign lesions are the high rate of rebleeding after successful hemostasis and that not only endoscopic therapy (ET) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) but palliative radiotherapy (PRT) can be applied in the clinical setting. However, there are no specific guidelines concerning the management of URGC with bleeding. We herein discuss strategies for managing bleeding from URGC. A high rate of initial hemostasis for active bleeding is expected when using various ET modalities properly. If ET fails in patients with hemostatic instability, emergent TAE is considered in order to avoid a life-threating condition due to massive bleeding. Early PRT, especially, regimens with a high biologically effective dose (BED) of ≥39 Gy should be considered not only for patients with hemostatic failure but also for those with successful hemostasis and inactive hemorrhage, as longer duration of response with few complications can be expected. Further prospective, comparative studies considering not only the hemostatic efficacy of these modalities but the patients' quality of life are needed in order to establish treatment strategies for bleeding from URGC.

Embolization of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Complicated by Bowel Ischemia

Over the past three decades, transcatheter arterial embolization has become the first-line therapy for the management of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding refractory to endoscopic hemostasis. Overall, transcatheter arterial interventions have high technical and clinical success rates. This review will focus on patient presentation and technical considerations as predictors of complications from transcatheter arterial embolization in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Palliative Embolization for Refractory Bleeding

Bleeding is a common and often challenging complication of malignancy. Etiologies of hemorrhage in this patient population vary, and bleeding may present as an acute, life-threatening emergency or a chronic, low-volume blood loss. For patients with advanced malignancies, interventions to manage bleeding must be balanced by the patient's life expectancy and quality of life. As such, minimally invasive procedures such as transarterial embolization are useful therapeutic options in appropriately selected patients. There is a rich history of palliative transarterial embolization for refractory bleeding in cancer patients. This technique was first applied in the 1970s and has since become an established treatment tool for malignancy-related bleeding throughout the body. While the preponderance of published data comprised case reports and small retrospective studies, the use of embolization continues to expand as experience grows and techniques are refined. In this review, we summarize the literature and provide our perspective on embolization for refractory bleeding in cancer patients.

Salvage Embolization and Histologic Analysis of Gastric Cancer with Hemorrhagic Shock Using Spherical Embolic Material

Background

In a recent study, it was reported that transcatheter arterial embolization with spherical embolic material for life-threatening hemorrhages in various cancer patients was safe and effective. Calibrated microspheres are able to access distal regions of the target arteries, which results in the disappearance of tumor staining. However, there are few reports on the pathological behavior of EmboSpheres in gastric cancer specimens. In this case, we succeeded in salvage embolization for advanced gastric cancer with hemorrhagic shock using spherical embolic material. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a pathological evaluation of spherical embolic microspheres in a gastric cancer specimen.

Case Report

A 70-year-old man with scirrhous gastric cancer was admitted to our hospital for staging laparoscopy. Unfortunately, he had a sudden onset of hematemesis and melena leading to hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding from the gastric cancer. While undergoing a rapid blood transfusion, he underwent emergent embolization to achieve hemostasis. The left gastric and right gastroepiploic arteries were embolized with spherical embolic material, and the patient survived. Two days later, the patient was able to undergo gastrectomy. A large number of microspheres were observed in areas of hemorrhage. The range and median diameter of the minor axis were 177–1048 μm and 281 μm, respectively.

Conclusions

Transcatheter arterial embolization using spherical embolic material could become one of safe and effective options, especially when there is no extravasation or pseudoaneurysm but only tumor staining from the clinical and pathological point of view.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality with mortality rates as high as 14%. This document addresses the indications for imaging UGIB that is nonvariceal and unrelated to portal hypertension. The four variants are derived with respect to upper endoscopy. For the first three, it is presumed that upper endoscopy has been performed, with three potential initial outcomes: endoscopy reveals arterial bleeding source, endoscopy confirms UGIB without a clear source, and negative endoscopy. The fourth variant, "postsurgical and traumatic causes of UGIB; endoscopy contraindicated" is considered separately because upper endoscopy is not performed. When endoscopy identifies the presence and location of bleeding but bleeding cannot be controlled endoscopically, catheter-based arteriography with treatment is an appropriate next study. CT angiography (CTA) is comparable with angiography as a diagnostic next step. If endoscopy demonstrates a bleed but the endoscopist cannot identify the bleeding source, angiography or CTA can be typically performed and both are considered appropriate. In the event of an obscure UGIB, angiography and CTA have been shown to be equivalent in identifying the bleeding source; CT enterography may be an alternative to CTA to find an intermittent bleeding source. In the postoperative or traumatic setting when endoscopy is contraindicated, primary angiography, CTA, and CT with intravenous contrast are considered appropriate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Gastrointestinal Bleeding Associated with Gastric Carcinoma: Prognostic Factors Predicting Successful Hemostasis and Survival

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for gastric cancer-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and factors associated with successful TAE and improved survival after TAE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 43 patients (34 men; age 60.6 y ± 13.6) with gastric cancer-related GI bleeding undergoing angiography between January 2000 and December 2015. Clinical course, laboratory findings, and TAE characteristics were reviewed. Technical success of TAE was defined as target area devascularization, and clinical success was defined as bleeding cessation with hemodynamic stability during 72 hours after TAE. Student t test was used for comparison of continuous variables, and Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictors of successful TAE and 30-day survival after TAE.

RESULTS

TAE was performed in 40 patients. Technical and clinical success rates of TAE were 85.0% and 65.0%, respectively. Splenic infarction occurred in 2 patients as a minor complication. Rebleeding after TAE occurred in 7 patients. Death related to bleeding occurred in 5 patients. Active bleeding (P = .044) and higher transfusion requirement (3.3 U ± 2.6 vs 1.8 U ± 1.7; P = .039) were associated with TAE failure. Successful TAE predicted improved 30-day survival after TAE on univariate and multivariate analysis (P = .018 and P = .022; odds ratio, 0.132).

CONCLUSION

TAE for gastric cancer-associated GI bleeding may be a lifesaving procedure. Severe bleeding with a higher transfusion requirement and active bleeding on angiography predicted TAE failure.