Delayed benign massive pneumoperitoneum associated with tunneled peritoneal drainage catheter placement

The characteristics of residual pneumoperitoneum after laparoscopic colorectal surgery

INTRODUCTION

Despite the popularity of laparoscopic surgery, it remains unclear whether residual pneumoperitoneum influences the patient's postoperative course. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of residual pneumoperitoneum.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 201 Japanese patients who had undergone elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The patients were divided into groups, with and without anastomotic failure; the non-anastomotic failure group was further divided into subgroups, with and without residual pneumoperitoneum. Patient characteristics were compared between the various groups.

RESULTS

The group with residual pneumoperitoneum included 57 patients (30.3%). Percutaneous drainage was required for one patient with residual pneumoperitoneum. Univariate analyses revealed that residual pneumoperitoneum was associated with low values for body mass index (BMI) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA). Furthermore, relative to the group with anastomotic failure, the group without anastomotic failure but with residual pneumoperitoneum had lower values for inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSION

Low BMI and SFA values were identified as risk factors for residual pneumoperitoneum. Inflammatory markers may be useful as indicators for avoiding emergent surgery when it is difficult to differentiate between asymptomatic residual pneumoperitoneum and free air related to anastomotic failure.

Perforation of the ascending colon during implantation of an indwelling peritoneal catheter: a case report

Background

Tunneled peritoneal drainage catheters are described as an effective and relatively safe method in the management of malignant and non-malignant refractory ascites. Therapeutic advantages, linked to their use, are self-management of ascites and palliative care at home. Complications occur rarely. We describe an ascending colon perforation after implantation of a peritoneal drainage in a patient with refractory ascites due to liver cirrhosis.

Case presentation

The 68-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit due to severe community acquired pneumonia. The ascites drainage was inserted in order to reduce the intra-abdominal pressure and enable appropriate ventilation. A few hours later, bowel content could be detected in the tube and an abdominal computed tomography confirmed the intestinal perforation. Notably, there was no pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis had not yet set in. The catheter was removed during an emergency laparotomy and sutured closure of both perforation sites was performed.

Conclusion

Patients with septated ascites and intraperitoneal adhesions are at potential higher risk of bowel perforation during implantation of an indwelling peritoneal catheter. A mini-laparotomy is, therefore, necessary in order to ensure safe implantation and positioning of the catheter in those cases.