The Utility of a Benign Biliary Stricture Protocol in Preventing Symptomatic Recurrence and Surgical Revision

Comparing outcomes of right verse left hepatic approach percutaneous biliary drainage catheters

Purpose

Determine if there is a difference in adverse events (AE) between right or left hepatic percutaneous biliary drain placement (PTBD) in patients with biliary strictures.

Materials & methods

This retrospective study included patients with benign or malignant biliary stricture treated with PTBD at a single institution from 7/28/2004-3/30/2021. 357 patients met inclusion criteria, 77 (21.6 %) had PTBD on the left and 280 (78.4 %) on the right. AEs associated with the initial drain placement or during subsequent intervention were collected and categorized. AEs that were grouped as periprocedural included: surgery, infection, hemorrhage, and drain failure. AEs in the postprocedural group included: chills, catheter displacement, cholangitis, biliary stones, drain malfunction, fever resolving without treatment, and pericatheter leakage. Surgery was considered a major AE and the remaining AEs were categorized as minor. Statistical analyses were performed using Logistic Regression Analysis and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in AEs between right and left drains in the periprocedural and postprocedural period (p = 0.832, OR = 0.95 and p = 0.808, OR = 0.93 respectively). When analyzing minor AEs individually, only cholangitis occurred at a higher rate on the right side (p = 0.033, OR = 0.43). There was no statistical difference in the rate of major AEs in the periprocedural period between left and right drains (p = 0.311, OR = 1.37).

Conclusion

Current literature is equivocal when comparing right versus left percutaneous biliary drains. This analysis describes no statistically significant difference in AEs between right and left hepatobiliary drains aside from slightly higher incidence of cholangitis for right sided drains.

Evaluation and management of biliary complications after pediatric liver transplantation: pearls and pitfalls for percutaneous techniques

In pediatric liver transplantation, bile duct complications occur with a greater incidence than vascular anastomotic dysfunction and represent a major source of morbidity and mortality. While surgical re-anastomosis can reduce the need for retransplantation, interventional radiology offers minimally invasive and graft-saving therapies. The combination of small patient size and prevailing Roux-en-Y biliary enteric anastomotic techniques makes endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography difficult if not impossible. Expertise in percutaneous management is therefore imperative. This article describes post-surgical anatomy, pathophysiology and noninvasive imaging of biliary complications. We review percutaneous techniques, focusing heavily on biliary access and interventions for reduced liver grafts. Subsequently we review the results and adverse events of these procedures and describe conditions that masquerade as biliary obstruction.

Technical review of a single-center experience of biliary recanalization for liver transplantation-related benign biliary stricture

Purpose

To review a single-center experience of percutaneous biliary recanalization for liver transplantation-related benign biliary stricture, particularly focusing on the technical aspect

Method

Twenty-three recipients of liver transplantation (LT) with 27 benign biliary strictures underwent percutaneous recanalization using a step-by-step technique from June 2017 to March 2020. The step-by-step technique includes a hairy wire or an usual 0.035-inch wire passage, a coaxial system, supporting catheters of various shapes and wires, and an extraluminal passage. The success rate of percutaneous biliary recanalization, degree of stricture, interval between LT and biliary recanalization, procedure time, number of sessions, and recanalization techniques were analyzed.

Results

Among the 27 lesions, 26 (96 %) were successfully recanalized using a percutaneous approach without major complications. Of the 27 lesions, 8 were complete obstructions and 19 were partial obstructions. Consequently, the average interval between LT and biliary recanalization was 28.8 ± 42.7 months (range, 2–192 months). The average procedure time was 50 ± 65 min (range, 8–345 min). The average number of sessions was 1.4 ± 1 (range, 1–6). The case distribution for the used recanalization techniques was as follows: twelve cases utilized step 1, 10 utilized step 2, 4 utilized step 3, and only 1 case utilized step 4. The complete obstruction group required a more advanced technique and spent more recanalization time than the partial obstruction group.

Conclusions

The step-by-step percutaneous biliary recanalization technique had a high success rate without major complications. According to the patient’s biliary anatomy appropriate selection of an angled 5-Fr support catheter and wire is essential in increasing the recanalization success rate.

Evaluation of a three-session biliary dilation protocol following transplant-related biliary stricture in pediatric patients

To evaluate whether a serial biliary dilation protocol improves outcomes and decreases total biliary drainage time for biliary strictures following pediatric liver transplantation. From 2006 to 2016, 213 orthotopic deceased and living related liver transplants were performed in 199 patients with a median patient age of 3.1 years at a single pediatric hospital. Patients with biliary strictures were managed by IR or surgically by the transplant team. Patients managed by IR were divided into two groups. The first group was managed with a standardized three-session protocol consisting of dilation every two weeks for three dilations. The second group was managed clinically with varying number and interval of dilations as determined by a multidisciplinary team. The location of biliary stricture, duration of drainage, number of balloon dilations, balloon diameter, time interval between dilations, and success of percutaneous treatment were recorded. Thirty-four patients developed biliary strictures. Thirty-one patients were managed with percutaneous intervention. Three strictures could not be crossed and were converted to operative management. Ten patients were managed in the three-session protocol, and 18 patients were managed in the clinically treated group. There was no significant difference in clinical success rates between groups, 80% and 61%, respectively. The three-session protocol group trended toward a lower total biliary drain indwell time (median 49 days) compared with the clinically treated group (median 89 days), P = .089. Our study suggests that a three-session dilation protocol following transplant-related biliary stricture may decrease total biliary drainage time for some patients.