A Comparative Study of Cavitary and Noncavitary Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with CT-Guided Microwave Ablation

CT-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Combined with Local Radiotherapy or Chemotherapy of Malignant Pulmonary Tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of CT-guided microwave ablation (MWA) combined with 125I seed implantation or bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant pulmonary tumors.

METHODS

A total of 56 patients who underwent MWA, MWA combined with 125I particle implantation, or MWA combined with BAI chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer or metastatic lung cancer from January 2015 to June 2021 in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled. Among them, 21 patients were treated with MWA (MWA), 18 with MWA combined with 125I seed implantation (MWA+125I), and 17 with MWA combined with BAI chemotherapy (MWA+BAI). The short-term outcomes, complications, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (Zubrod-ECOG-WHO, ZPS), survival, and factors related to survival were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

The response rate of the MWA group (9.52%) was significantly lower than that of the MWA+125I group (50.00%) and MWA+BAI chemotherapy group (47.06%), and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the MWA, MWA+125I, and MWA+BAI chemotherapy groups was 47.62%, 55.56%, and 52.94%, respectively, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Three months after the treatment, the ZPS of the MWA+125I and MWA+BAI chemotherapy groups was significantly lower than before treatment and significantly lower than that of the MWA group in the same period; the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The median survival time of the MWA+125I group was 18 (9.983, 26.017) months and that of the MWA+BAI chemotherapy group was 21 (0.465, 41.535) months, both of which were higher than that of the MWA group [11 (6.686, 15.314) months]; the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis was performed on the factors related to survival and revealed treatment mode as a protective factor [HR = 0.433, 95% CI = (0.191, 0.984), p = 0.046]. Other factors, such as gender, age, and tumor size, did not independently affect survival.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided MWA combined with 125I seed implantation and MWA combined with BAI chemotherapy are safe and effective for the treatment of advanced lung cancer and metastatic lung cancer, and can control tumor progression and prolong survival time.

Computed tomography-guided microwave ablation for non-small cell lung cancer patients on antithrombotic therapy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients on antithrombotic therapy who are treated with microwave ablation (MWA), the transient interruption of antithrombotic agents may increase the risk of thromboembolism, and continuation of antithrombotic agents may increase the risk of intraprocedural hemorrhage. This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the safety of MWA in patients with NSCLC on antithrombotic therapy.

METHODS

A total of 572 patients with NSCLC (antithrombotic therapy group: n=84, Group A; control group: n=488, Group B) who received MWA were included. Antithrombotic agent use was suspended before MWA and resumed as soon as possible after MWA. Hemorrhagic (hemothorax and hemoptysis) and thromboembolic complications (pulmonary embolism, cerebral infarction, and angina) were compared. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the predictors of hemorrhagic complications after MWA.

RESULTS

Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 8 participants (9.5%) from Group A and 33 participants (6.8%) from Group B, and no statistically significant difference was found (P=0.365). There were 3 participants (0.5%) who developed thromboembolic complications, including 1 case (1.2%, 1/84) of pulmonary embolism in Group A, and 2 cases (0.4%, 2/488) of cerebral infarction or angina in Group B; no significant difference was found (P=0.923). In the subgroup analyses of Group A, no statistically significant difference of hemorrhagic (P>0.999) or thromboembolic complications (P>0.999) was found between patients who received and did not receive bridging anticoagulation with heparin. Logistic regression analyses revealed that direct contact of a tumor with vessels ≥2 mm was a predictor of hemorrhagic complications [hazard ratio (HR) =2.318; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.215-4.420; P=0.011], while antithrombotic therapy was irrelevant.

CONCLUSIONS

With the appropriate cessation and resumption of antithrombotic agents, patients with NSCLC on antithrombotic therapy have comparable incidence rates of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications after MWA to those of patients who are not on antithrombotic therapy. Therefore, with appropriate cessation, MWA appears to generally be safe for NSCLC patients on antithrombotic therapy.

Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization With and Without Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Advanced and Standard Treatment-Refractory/Ineligible Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with and without microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of advanced and standard treatment-refractory/ineligible non-small cell lung cancer (ASTRI-NSCLC).

Materials and Methods

A total of 77 ASTRI-NSCLC patients who received DEB-BACE combined with MWA (group A; n = 28) or DEB-BACE alone (group B; n = 49) were included. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups A and B. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to compare the median progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to investigate the predictors of OS for ASTRI-NSCLC treated with DEB-BACE.

Results

No severe adverse event was found in both groups. Pneumothorax was the predominant MWA-related complication in group A, with an incidence rate of 32.1% (9/28). Meanwhile, no significant difference was found in DEB-BACE-related complications between groups A and B. The overall disease control rate (DCR) was 61.0% (47/77), with a significantly higher DCR in group A (85.7% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.002). The median PFS in groups A and B was 7.0 and 4.0 months, respectively, with a significant difference (P = 0.037). The median OS in groups A and B was both 8.0 months, with no significant difference (P = 0.318). The 6-month PFS and OS rates in groups A and B were 75.0% and 78.6%, 22.4% and 59.2%, respectively, while the 12-month PFS and OS rates in groups A and B were 17.9% and 28.6%, 14.3% and 22.4%, respectively. Of these, a significantly higher 6-month PFS rate was found in group A (75.0% vs. 22.4%; P < 0.001). The cycles of DEB-BACE/bronchial artery infusion chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR): 0.363; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.202–0.655; P = 0.001] and postoperative immunotherapy (HR: 0.219; 95% CI: 0.085–0.561; P = 0.002) were identified as the predictors of OS in ASTRI-NSCLC treated with DEB-BACE.

Conclusion

MWA sequentially combined with DEB-BACE was superior to DEB-BACE alone in the local control of ASTRI-NSCLC. Although the combination therapy reveals a trend of prolonging the OS, long-term prognosis warrants an investigation with a longer follow-up.

Local progression after computed tomography-guided microwave ablation in non-small cell lung cancer patients: prediction using a nomogram model

OBJECTIVES

To develop an effective nomogram model for predicting the local progression after computed tomography-guided microwave ablation (MWA) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

NSCLC patients treated with MWA were randomly allocated to either the training cohort or the validation cohort (4:1). The predictors of local progression identified by univariable and multivariable analyses in the training cohort were used to develop a nomogram model. The C-statistic was used to evaluate the predictive accuracy in both the training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 304 patients (training cohort: n = 250; validation cohort: n = 54) were included in this study. The predictors selected into the nomogram for local progression included the tumor subtypes (odds ratio [OR], 2.494; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.415-4.396, p = 0.002), vessels ≥3 mm in direct contact with tumor (OR, 2.750; 95% CI, 1.263-5.988; p = 0.011), tumor diameter (OR, 2.252; 95% CI, 1.034-4.903; p = 0.041) and location (OR, 2.442; 95% CI, 1.201-4.965; p = 0.014). The C-statistic showed good predictive performance in both cohorts, with a C-statistic of 0.777 (95% CI, 0.707-0.848) internally and 0.712 (95% CI, 0.570-0.855) externally (training cohort and validation cohort, respectively). The optimal cutoff value for the risk of local progression was 0.39.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor subtypes, vessels ≥3 mm in direct contact with the tumor, tumor diameter and location were predictors of local progression after MWA in NSCLC patients. The nomogram model could effectively predict the risk of local progression after MWA. Patients showing a high risk (>0.39) on the nomogram should be monitored for local progression.