Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE): Outcomes at 12 months

Terapeutic challenge: vena cava filter retrieval four years after implantation

Vena cava filters are used to treat deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Despite the extensive literature on these filters, there is still no reliable evidence that they improve clinical results or mortality in patients with deep vein thrombosis. There are also increasing reports of complications from indiscriminate use, with a complication rate of approximately 19%. Complications include penetration into the vein wall, involvement of adjacent organs, fracture, embolization of filter fragments, and deep vein thrombosis. We describe the successful removal of a vena cava filter 4 years after implantation for inferior vena cava thrombosis. The procedure was performed using common endovascular surgery devices.

Postmarketing Surveillance of Inferior Vena Cava Filters Among US Medicare Beneficiaries: The SAFE-IVC Study

Importance

Inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are commonly used to prevent pulmonary embolism in selected clinical scenarios, despite limited evidence to support their use. Current recommendations from professional societies and the US Food and Drug Administration endorse timely IVCF retrieval when clinically feasible. Current IVCF treatment patterns and outcomes remain poorly described.

Objectives

To evaluate temporal trends and practice patterns in IVCF insertion and retrieval among older US patients and report the incidence of periprocedural and long-term safety events of indwelling and retrieved IVCFs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prespecified, retrospective, observational cohort of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries, leveraging 100% of samples of inpatient and outpatient claims data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2021.

Exposure

First-time IVCF insertion while insured by Medicare FFS.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary safety outcome was the composite of all-cause death, filter-related complications (eg, fracture, embolization), operating room visits following filter-related procedures, or new diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Events were considered periprocedural if they occurred within 30 days of IVCF insertion or retrieval and long-term if they occurred more than 30 days after.

Results

Among 270 866 patients with IVCFs placed during the study period (mean age, 75.1 years; 52.8% female), 64.9% were inserted for first-time venous thromboembolism (VTE), 26.3% for recurrent VTE, and 8.8% for VTE prophylaxis. Of these patients, 63.3% had major bleeds or trauma within 30 days of IVCF insertion. The volume of insertions decreased from 44 680 per year in 2013 to 19 501 per year in 2021. The cumulative incidence of retrieval was 15.3% at a median of 1.2 years and 16.8% at maximum follow-up of 9.0 years. Older age, more comorbidities, and Black race were associated with a decreased likelihood of retrieval, whereas placement at a large teaching hospital was associated with an increased likelihood of retrieval. The incidence of caval thrombosis and DVT among patients with nonretrieved IVCFs was 2.2% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.3%) and 9.2% (95% CI, 9.0%-9.3%), respectively. The majority (93.5%) of retrieval attempts were successful, with low incidence of 30-day complications (mortality, 0.7% [95% CI, 0.6%-0.8%]; filter-related complications, 1.4% [95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large, US real-world analysis, IVCF insertion declined, yet retrievals remained low. Strategies to increase timely retrieval are needed, as nonretrieved IVCFs may have long-term complications.

Early Thrombus Removal for Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Update on Inclusion, Technical Aspects, and Postprocedural Management

Acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common disorder with significant associated morbidity, including pain and swelling, as well as the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and chronic debilitating post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Anticoagulation is standard of care for DVT treatment. It assists in reducing thrombus progression and the occurrence of PE, but incomplete DVT resolution increases the risk of recurrent VTE, valvular insufficiency, and PTS. Endovascular DVT interventions, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and large-bore mechanical thrombectomy offer an alternative therapeutic strategy for DVT management. This paper will discuss technical factors and current issues when performing lower extremity DVT interventions including patient selection, anticoagulation, choice of device for endovascular thrombus removal, adjunctive techniques, and venous stent management.Level of Evidence: No level of evidence for: review articles, basic science, laboratory investigations, and experimental study articles.

Supply Costs in Complex and Routine Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: 10 Years' Data from a Single Center

PURPOSE

To characterize the medical supply costs associated with inferior vena cava filter retrieval (IVCFR) using endobronchial forceps (EFs), a snare, or Recovery Cone (RC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 594 of 845 IVCFRs attempted at a tertiary referral hospital between October 1, 2012, and June 20, 2022 were categorized by intended retrieval strategy informed by, rotational cavography as follows: (a) EF (n = 312) for tilted or tip-embedded/strut-embedded filters and for long-dwelling closed-cell filters and (b) a snare (n = 255) or (c) RC (n = 27) for other well-positioned filters with or mostly without hooks, respectively. List prices of relevant supplies at time of retrieval were obtained or, rarely, estimated using a standard procedure. Contrast use, fluoroscopic time, filter type, dwell time, and patient age and sex were recorded. Mean between-group cost differences were estimated by linear regression, adjusting for date. Additional models evaluated filter type, dwell time, and patient-level effects.

RESULTS

Of the 594 IVCFRs, 591 were successful, whereas 2 EF and 1 snare retrievals failed. Moreover, 4 EF retrievals were successful with a snare and 2 with smaller EF, 12 snare retrievals were successful with EF, 1 RC retrieval was successful with a snare and 2 with EF. Principal model indicated a significantly lower mean cost of EF ($564.70, SE ± 9.75) than that of snare ($811.29, SE ± 10.83; P < .0001) and RC ($1,465.48, SE ± 47.12; P < .0001) retrievals. Adjusted models yielded consistent results. Had all retrievals been attempted with EF, estimated undiscounted full-period supplies savings would be $87,201.51.

CONCLUSIONS

EFs are affordable for complex IVCFR, and extending their use to routine IVCFR could lead to considerable cost savings.