Real-World Safety Analysis of Paclitaxel Devices Used for the Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease

Compensating for Angiographic Underestimation With Oversized Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Occluded Below-the-Knee Vessels

PURPOSE

Our study aims to determine optimal sizing of below-the-knee (BTK) artery angioplasty without intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), compensating for conventional angiography underestimation by selecting a balloon size one size larger than the 1-to-1 angiographic sizing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study is a retrospective, single-center study. Patients were separated into 2 groups as over and angiographic reference group which the over group is larger balloon diameter selection (0.5-mm larger balloon diameter selection), and angiographic reference group is 1-to-1 balloon diameter selection by angiographic images. Primary end point was the target vessel reocclusion, whereas major and minor amputation was the secondary end point.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients with occluded BTK lesions treated with balloon angioplasty (Opt=43, Over=41). Primary patency was 62.8% at 12 months in angiographic reference group and 82.9% in over group (p=0.039). Amputation rate at 1-year follow-up was 9.8% in angiographic reference group and 16.3% in over group (p=0.382). TLR rate is 4.9% in over group versus 20.9% in angiographic reference group (20.9%) at 1-year follow-up (p=0.029).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that oversizing the balloon diameter by one size larger in BTK artery angioplasty, guided by conventional angiography, results in a higher patency rate and a lower target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, while amputation rate remains statistically similar between the 2 groups.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Our study highlights the importance of compensating for conventional angiography's underestimation in BTK artery angioplasty by using a balloon size one size larger than the 1-to-1 angiographic sizing. Our findings demonstrate that oversizing the balloon leads to significantly higher patency rates and lower TLR rates, with no increase in amputation risk. This approach provides a practical, cost-effective solution for clinicians performing angioplasty without IVUS, allowing for better vessel treatment and outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Clinicians can implement this strategy to optimize long-term results in BTK interventions.

Device regulation and surveillance in vascular care: Challenges and opportunities

Cardiovascular devices are essential for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including cerebrovascular, coronary, valvular, congenital, peripheral vascular and arrhythmic diseases. The regulation and surveillance of vascular devices in real-world practice, however, presents challenges during each individual product's life cycle. Four examples illustrate recent challenges and questions regarding safety, appropriate use and efficacy arising from FDA approved devices used in real-world practice. We outline potential pathways wherein providers, regulators and payors could potentially provide high-quality cardiovascular care, identify safety signals, ensure equitable device access, and study potential issues with devices in real-world practice.

Mortality in randomised controlled trials using paclitaxel-coated devices for femoropopliteal interventional procedures: an updated patient-level meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous randomised clinical trials and real-world studies have supported the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. However, a 2018 summary-level meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for paclitaxel-coated devices compared with uncoated control devices. This study presents an updated analysis of deaths using the most complete and current data available from pivotal trials of paclitaxel-coated versus control devices.

METHODS

Ten trials comparing paclitaxel-coated versus control devices were included in a patient-level pooled analysis. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on risk of death in both intention-to-treat (ITT; primary analysis) and three as-treated analysis sets accounting for treatment group crossover at the index procedure and over time. The effect of paclitaxel dose and baseline covariates were also evaluated.

FINDINGS

A total of 2666 participants were included with a median follow-up of 4·9 years. No significant increase in deaths was observed for patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices. This was true in the ITT analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1·14, 95% CI 0·93-1·40), the as-treated analysis (HR 1·13, 95% CI 0·92-1·39), and in two crossover analyses: 1·07 (0·87-1·31) when late crossovers were censored and 1·04 (0·84-1·28) when crossovers were analysed from the date of paclitaxel exposure. There was no significant effect of paclitaxel dose on mortality risk.

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis found no association between paclitaxel-coated device exposure and risk of death, providing reassurance to patients, physicians, and regulators on the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices.

FUNDING

Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Cook, Medtronic, Philips, Surmodics, and TriReme Medical.

Endovascular Therapy with Interwoven Nitinol Stent Placement after Predilation for Heavily Calcified Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Results of the BURDOCK Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the 1-year and 2-year clinical outcomes of interwoven stent (IWS) implantation for symptomatic femoropopliteal arterial disease with calcification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective multicenter study evaluated 308 limbs (63% with the peripheral arterial calcium scoring system 3 and 4 severe calcification and 87% with ≥180° calcification on intravascular ultrasound) of 299 patients (diabetes in 66.9%, chronic renal failure in 52.8%, and dialysis in 49.2%) who underwent IWS (Supera; Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) implantation after sufficient predilation (residual stenosis < 30%) for calcified femoropopliteal lesions. The primary outcome measure was primary patency (freedom from restenosis) at 1 and 2 years, whereas the secondary outcome measure included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). Clinical parameters associated with loss of patency were explored.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that primary patency was 88.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.5%-92.1%) at 1 year and 80.8% (95% CI, 76.1%-85.8%) at 2 years. The CD-TLR-free rate was 96.5% and 94.8% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The characteristics associated with loss of patency were restenotic lesion with and without stent implantation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.96 and 2.40; P = .047 and .041, respectively), chronic total occlusion (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88; P = .022), and popliteal involvement (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.60; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of IWS after sufficient predilation for calcified femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease demonstrated clinically acceptable primary patency.