The Utility of Pulmonary Function Testing in Patients Presenting With Dysphonia

Effect of Pompage on Vocal and Respiratory Measurements from Female Teachers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Teachers stand out among occupational groups due to their contribution to modern societies, and their voice is the main form of interaction.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to verify the changes in vocal and respiratory measurements from teachers with vocal and musculoskeletal complaints and with normal larynx after applying a musculoskeletal manipulation protocol of myofascial release using pompage.

METHODS

Controlled and randomized clinical trial with 56 participants: 28 teachers in the study group and 28 teachers in the control group. Anamnesis, videolaryngoscopy, hearing screening, sound pressure and maximum phonation time measurements, and manovacuometry were performed. The musculoskeletal manipulation protocol of myofascial release using pompage consisted of a total of 24 sessions, 40 min for each session, three times a week, for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in the maximum respiratory pressure in the study group after the intervention. The sound pressure level and the maximum phonation time did not change significantly.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Musculoskeletal manipulation protocol of myofascial release using pompage had a direct effect on the respiratory measurements from female teachers, significantly increasing the maximum respiratory pressure but without affecting sound pressure level and the /a/ maximum phonation time.

Respiratory Function and Voice: The Role for Airflow Measures

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the relationship between voice and respiratory function, and to understand the role for airflow measures in the evaluation of voice patients.

METHODS

Literature searches of MEDLINE (Ovid) and Web of Science were performed on April 6, 2020, to include articles written in English that both discussed voice in relation to lower respiratory function and reported evaluation of airflow. Search strategies included the keywords voice, respiratory, airflow, and aerodynamic measures. Data were extracted from articles that met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included for review. Fourteen (70%) studies evaluated at least 1 spirometric respiratory measure, including Forced Vital Capacity, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second, and Forced Expiratory Flow. Other measures assessed included mean flow rate, mean peak airflow, phonatory airflow, inspiratory airflow, expiratory airflow, and phonation quotient. Notably, four studies which included pulmonary function tests (PFTs) as part of voice evaluation discovered previously undiagnosed respiratory disease in their study populations.

CONCLUSION

This review confirms that respiratory function contributes significantly to voice and reveals that few studies have explored the role for airflow measures in clarifying this relationship. Including airflow measures such as PFTs in standard voice evaluation may allow recognition of underlying respiratory disease contributing to voice dysfunction. Further research is recommended to establish indications and diagnostic criteria for the use of PFTs in voice patients.

Immediate effects of cervical stimulation and diaphragmatic release on vocal production

Abstract Introduction: The voice is heavily influenced by breathing and abdominal muscles. Objective: To verify the immediate effects of cervical stimulation and diaphragmatic release on the respiratory and phonatory function of adult women with no vocal complaints. Method: Relaxation maneuvers and eccentric work of the diaphragm were performed together with articulatory maneuver of the third cervical vertebra. Twenty-four women without vocal complaints, aged between 18 and 35 years were part of the intervention. All volunteers were submitted to an evaluation of respiratory muscle strength, maximum phonation time of the vowel /a/, sound pressure level and acoustic vocal analysis, before and after physiotherapeutic intervention. Statistical analysis consisted of the Student's t-test for independent samples and Spearman's correlation. Significance level was set at 5%. Results: There was a significant increase in the maximum phonation time of the vowel /a/ and in the modal sound pressure level. Regarding the acoustic analysis, there was a reduction in the standard deviation values of the fundamental frequency; in the smoothed pitch disturbance quotient; and in the fundamental frequency and amplitude variations. Conclusion: Cervical stimulation and diaphragmatic release improved vocal quality regarding duration of emission, sound pressure, and stability and noise of the glottic signal.