Efficacy of axillary-to-femoral vein bypass in relieving venous hypertension in dialysis patients with symptomatic central vein occlusion

Utility of covered stents as a bypass for the treatment of central venous occlusion: a case report

BACKGROUND

Central venous occlusion (CVO) is difficult to treat with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty because the guidewire cannot pass through the occluded segments. In this study, we devised a new method for establishing an extra-anatomic bypass between the right subclavian vein and the superior vena cava via a covered stent to treat whole-segment occlusion of the right brachiocephalic vein (BCV) with calcification.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 58-year-old female patient who complained of right arm swelling present for 1.5 years. Twelve years prior, the patient began hemodialysis because chronic glomerulonephritis had progressed to end-stage renal disease. During the first 3 years, a right internal jugular vein (IJV)-tunneled cuffed catheter was used as the dialysis access, and the catheter was replaced once. A left arteriovenous fistula (AVF) was subsequently established. Owing to occlusion of the left AVF, a new fistula was established on the right upper extremity 1.5 years prior to this visit. Angiography of the right upper extremity revealed complete occlusion of the right BCV and IJV with calcification. Because of the failure to pass the guidewire across the lesion, we established an extra-anatomic bypass between the right subclavian vein and the superior vena cava with a covered stent. Angiography confirmed the patency of whole vascular access system. After 3 months of follow-up, the patient's AVF function and the bypass patency were satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

As a new alternative for the treatment of long, angled CVO with or without calcification, a covered stent can be used to establish an extravascular bypass between central veins.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dialysis Fistula Malfunction

The creation and maintenance of a dialysis access is vital for the reduction of morbidity, mortality, and cost of treatment for end stage renal disease patients. One's longevity on dialysis is directly dependent upon the quality of dialysis. This quality hinges on the integrity and reliability of the access to the patient's vascular system. All methods of dialysis access will eventually result in dialysis dysfunction and failure. Arteriovenous access dysfunction includes 3 distinct classes of events, namely thrombotic flow-related complications or dysfunction, nonthrombotic flow-related complications or dysfunction, and infectious complications. The restoration of any form of arteriovenous access dysfunction may be supported by diagnostic imaging, clinical consultation, percutaneous interventional procedures, surgical management, or a combination of these methods. This document provides a rigorous evaluation of how variants of each form of dysfunction may be appraised and approached systematically. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Long-term outcomes of transposed femoral vein arteriovenous fistula for abandoned upper extremity dialysis access

BACKGROUND

The number and longevity of patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis access have continued to increase, leading to challenging situations, including exhausted upper extremity access and severe central venous stenosis. This has led to an increase in the use of alternative access sites, including the lower extremities. The transposed femoral vein arteriovenous fistula for dialysis access is a previously described alternative, although limited data are available on its long-term patency.

METHODS

Patients treated with a transposed femoral vein fistula were retrospectively reviewed. A transposed femoral vein fistula was created by harvesting the femoral vein and transposing it to the distal superficial femoral artery at the level of the adductor canal. The demographic information, perioperative characteristics, complications, and long-term outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients had undergone transposed femoral vein fistula for dialysis access after an average of 5.3 ± 2.8 failed dialysis access procedures and a duration of 6.1 ± 4.9 years from the initiation of dialysis. The average age at the procedure was 53.5 ± 12.8 years. Ten patients (47.6%) had a history of diabetes mellitus and nine (42.9%) had a history of coronary artery disease. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases, and 16 patients (76.2%) were discharged with anticoagulation therapy. The primary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years was 93%, 74%, and 74%, respectively. The secondary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years was 100%, 89%, and 89%, respectively. Two patients had compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy, and six patients experienced wound complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Transposed femoral vein fistula for dialysis access is a viable alternative for patients with an exhausted upper extremity access, with good long-term patency.

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update

The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access since 1996. Since the last update in 2006, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2019 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access is a comprehensive document intended to assist multidisciplinary practitioners care for chronic kidney disease patients and their vascular access. New topics include the end-stage kidney disease "Life-Plan" and related concepts, guidance on vascular access choice, new targets for arteriovenous access (fistulas and grafts) and central venous catheters, management of specific complications, and renewed approaches to some older topics. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence was independently conducted by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and interpretation and application followed the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.

An unusual cause of subacute airway obstruction in a hemodialysis patient with brachio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula: A rare presentation of central venous occlusion

A young lady with an arteriovenous (AV) fistula on hemodialysis was referred for surgical management following a failed endovascular approach to relieve central venous occlusion. She had an obstructed left brachiocephalic vein with a history of numerous central vein catheter placements. Alternative routes for new arteriovenous fistula creation had been exhausted due to previous contralateral upper limb fistula rupture and ligation. To the best of our knowledge, no similar cases of airway obstruction in central venous occlusion occurring in hemodialysis patients with AV fistula have been reported. The importance of identifying the possible emergency red flags in hemodialysis patients with central venous occlusion is important to prevent unwanted consequences.

Outcomes in patients with solid organ transplants undergoing cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Long-term outcomes after cardiac surgery in solid organ transplant recipients are limited in the contemporary literature. The objective of this study is to evaluate postoperative outcomes in these patients, including variables associated with mortality and readmissions.

METHODS

All adults undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, isolated valve, or coronary artery bypass grafting + valve cardiac surgical procedures from 2011 to 2018 were included in this study. Patients with solid organ transplants undergoing cardiac surgery were studied. Primary outcomes included operative (30-day) and 5-year mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 11,190 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, isolated valve, or coronary artery bypass grafting + valve operations at our institution from 2011 to 2018. Of these, 129 patients (1%) had solid organ transplants and underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 84), isolated valve (n = 30), or coronary artery bypass grafting + valve (n = 15). Type of organ transplant included 84 patients (65%) with kidney, 27 patients (21%) with liver, 9 patients (7%) with heart, and 9 patients (7%) with lung transplants. The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk Of Mortality for the cohort was 2.73 (Q1-Q3: 1.67-6.33). Three patients (2%) had an operative (30-day) mortality. Significant variables associated with 5-year mortality on multivariable Cox regression analysis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 2.44; 1.01-5.90; P = .048) and congestive heart failure (hazard ratio, 4.45; 1.81-10.9; P = .001). Significant variables associated with 5-year readmissions included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dialysis dependence, and concomittant valve surgery with coronary artery bypass grafting. Five-year readmission rate was 88%, and patients with valve operations (± coronary artery bypass grafting) had significantly lower (P = .009) freedom from readmission (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac surgery can be performed with low operative mortality and good long-term survival in patients with solid organ transplants. Five-year hospital readmissions are common, with significantly more readmissions in patients who had valve procedures.

The axillary vein and its tributaries are not in the mirror image of the axillary artery and its branches

INTRODUCTION

The axillary and cephalic veins are used for various clinical purposes but their anatomy is not fully understood. Increased knowledge and information about them as well as superficial veins in the upper arm would be useful.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to contribute to the literature regarding the anatomy of the venous drainage of the upper extremity.

METHODS

The veins of forty upper extremities from twenty one adult cadavers were injected and their axillary regions dissected. The course and pattern of drainage of the venous tributaries in the axillary region were identified and recorded.

RESULTS

The basilic, brachial, subscapular, lateral thoracic and superior thoracic veins drained mainly into the axillary vein, in common with most textbook descriptions. However, the thoracoacromial veins were observed to drain into the cephalic vein in 70.0% of upper limbs. In addition, a venous channel connecting the distal part and proximal part of the axilla was found along the posterolateral wall of the axilla in 77.5% of the upper limbs. In 95.0% of upper limbs, we discovered a superficial vein which ran from the axillary base and drained directly into the axillary vein.

CONCLUSION

The veins from the inferomedial part of the axilla drain into the axillary vein, whereas the veins from the superolateral part of the axilla drain into the cephalic vein. The venous drainage of the axilla is variable and in common with venous drainage elsewhere, does not necessarily follow the pattern of the arterial supply.

Alternative surgical procedure for treating superior vena cava syndrome in a hemodialysis patient

BACKGROUND

The incidence of superior vena cava syndrome has been increasing in hemodialysis patients with the widespread use of dialysis catheters. Although endovascular intervention remains the primary choice for treatment, the long-term patency rate is not optimistic. Occlusive lesions are often encountered that cannot be opened using this intervention. Therefore, we chose to present this case involving a pericardial patch used to reconstruct the superior vena cava in the treatment of catheter-associated chronic superior vena cava occlusion.

METHODS

Here, we report a case of facial swelling and severe bilateral pleural effusion secondary to superior vena cava occlusion in a 41-year-old woman. An endovascular venous intervention was attempted initially but failed. Finally, we adopted a procedure using the pericardium as a patch to reconstruct the superior vena cava, maintaining most of the original anatomical structure.

RESULTS

This patient's facial swelling and bilateral pleural effusion disappeared after the operation. In addition, her symptoms of coughing and dyspnea were relieved. The Brescia-Cimino fistula in her left forearm functioned well.

CONCLUSION

The use of a pericardial patch to reconstruct the superior vena cava is a reliable approach in patients who are not candidates for endovascular treatment.

Stent Grafts Provided Superior Primary Patency for Central Venous Stenosis Treatment in Comparison with Angioplasty and Bare Metal Stent: A Retrospective Single Center Study on 70 Hemodialysis Patients

PURPOSE

To compare patency in dialysis patients following different endovascular treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 10-year retrospective evaluation in 70 patients (32 men) dialyzing through vascular access (33, 47%) and tunneled catheters (37, 53%) was made. Three cohorts were compared: angioplasty alone (22), bare metal stent (28), and stent graft (20). Patencies were described with Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox uni- and multivariate models were analyzed to find factors associated.

RESULTS

All patients had a favorable anatomical and clinical outcome. Restenosis occurred in 22 (31%) of 70 patients requiring 41 additional interventions; 34 of 70 patients died (median follow-up 19.4 months). Primary patency at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 100%, 100%, 100%, and 84% for stent graft versus 90%, 79%, 58%, and 43% for angioplasty (P = .014) versus 84%, 80%, 75%, and 46% for bare-metal stent (P = .062). The overall comparison was more favorable for stent graft (P = .020) when the sites of lesions were matched. Patencies for angioplasty and bare-metal stents were equivalent (P = .141). A lower risk of restenosis (hazard rate [HR] 0.20, confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.7) and fewer reinterventions (P < .01) were associated with stent graft, whereas age (HR 1.04, CI 1.001-1.08) and cardiovascular disease (HR 2.26, CI 1.06-4.84) influenced the overall survival. No difference in assisted primary patency was found.

CONCLUSION

Stent graft seems to improve primary patency for central venous stenosis and requires fewer reinterventions in a dialysis population with a high prevalence of long-term catheters.

Palliative iliac vein-to-right atrium bypass in a patient with a prior vena cava ligation for invasive renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma can involve the inferior vena cava and extend into the right atrium. Cure is rarely achieved in patients with concomitant metastases, but cytoreductive nephrectomy and eradication of the entire tumor thrombus can extend survival and prevent symptoms of venous congestion; however, the invasive nature of the tumor thrombus can make resection with negative margins difficult. We present a patient with aggressive renal cell carcinoma that demanded an iliac vein-to-right atrium bypass after inferior vena cava ligation during a previous attempt at curative resection with nephrectomy and caval thrombectomy.