Balloon angioplasty for revision of failing lower extremity bypass grafts

Five-Year Experience of Interwoven Self-Expanding Stent Implantation in Stenotic Kinking of Below the Knee Prosthetic Bypasses

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year real-world results of Supera stent implantation in below the knee prosthetic bypasses (BKPBs). All the procedures were performed because of a history of recurrent thrombosis of the graft and significant stenotic kinking of the prosthesis during knee flexion. A Supera stent was implanted to prevent the next potential BKPB thrombosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients were included in this single-center, retrospective observational cohort study. All patients underwent Supera stent implantation in infrainguinal prosthetic bypass between 2012 and 2017, due to a history of recurrent thrombosis and kinking of the prosthetic bypass.

RESULTS

Prior to Supera stent implantation procedure, all the patients had more than one episode of acute limb ischemia caused by thrombosis of the BKPB. The median number of BKPB thromboses prior to Supera stent implantation was 3 and ranged from 2 to 6. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Primary patency rates at 12, 24, 36 and 60 months were 71.4%, 57.1%, 57.1% and 14.3%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 12, 24, 36 and 60 months were 78.6%, 64.3%, 64.3% and 35.7%, respectively. One stent fracture was reported during 60-month follow-up. Major amputation was performed in 6 patients in 5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Supera stent in treatment of recurrent thrombosis of BKBP is a safe procedure with acceptable mid-term results. However, larger and comparable prospective studies are needed for broader analysis of this procedure.

Reassuring Intraoperative Parameters Do Not Obviate the Need for Infrainguinal Bypass Completion Angiograms

OBJECTIVE

To determine if routine completion angiography for lower extremity bypasses using vein conduit results in lower rates of postoperative bypass occlusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

With the increasing availability of on-table angiography and significant advancements in endovascular techniques, some operators routinely perform completion angiograms. The effect of this surgical paradigm has yet to be rigorously compared to the more widespread selective use of completion imaging in the modern era.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included infrainguinal arterial bypass procedures utilizing vein conduit completed at a single hospital system from 2001 to 2018 and compared postoperative outcomes between bypasses that underwent routine completion angiography versus selective completion angiography. Notably, any bypasses that underwent completion angiography due to intraoperative concerns were excluded from this analysis.

RESULTS

666 bypasses that were performed in 589 patients met inclusion criteria. 126 (16.9%) bypasses were classified into the routine completion angiogram group compared to 540 (81.0%) into the selective completion angiogram group. Patients who underwent routine completion angiograms had a rate of intraoperative reintervention of 22.2%. The routine angiogram group had lower rates of reintervention (3.9% vs 10.0%, P = 0.03) and graft occlusion (2.3% vs 9.2%, P = 0.01) at 1-month postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Lower extremity bypasses using vein conduit that undergo routine completion angiography are associated with lower rates of graft occlusion at 30-days postoperatively. Completion angiography should thus be routinely performed in infrainguinal bypasses that utilize venous conduit.

Features of asymptomatic contralateral limb in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

BACKGROUND

The current study aimed to reveal clinical features and prognosis of asymptomatic contralateral limbs in patients undergoing revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

We analyzed a database of 520 CLTI patients registered in a prospective, multicenter registry in Japan. Severe ischemia in asymptomatic contralateral limbs was determined as the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system Ischemia (I) grade 2/3.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and dialysis-dependent renal failure was 74.2% and 53.5%, respectively. Asymptomatic limbs accounted for 65.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 60.9-69.1%] of the overall population, and 55.0% (95% CI, 49.6-60.4%) of the asymptomatic contralateral limbs had WIfI I-2/3. The multivariate analysis identified age ≥65 years, dialysis-dependent renal failure, WIfI I-3 in the index limb, and loss of pressure sensation in the contralateral limb as independent risk factors for WIfI I-2/3 in asymptomatic contralateral limbs (all p < 0.05). The 3-year cumulative incidence rate of major adverse limb events (MALE) in asymptomatic contralateral limbs was 19.3% (95% CI, 15.1-23.7%), whereas that of all-cause mortality was 46.9% (95% CI, 41.0-52.5%). The corresponding rate including a composite of mortality and MALE was 58.8% (95% CI, 52.9-64.6%). In asymptomatic contralateral limbs, the adjusted hazard ratio of WIfI I-2/3 versus I-0/1 was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.11-2.10) for a composite of mortality and MALE, 1.96 (95% CI, 1.14-3.36) for MALE, and 1.37 (95% CI, 0.95-1.96) for mortality (p = 0.009, 0.015, and 0.091, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-thirds of CLTI patients had an asymptomatic contralateral limb, and approximately half of the asymptomatic contralateral limbs were exposed to severe ischemia. Older age, dialysis-dependent renal failure, WIfI I-3 in the index limb, and loss of pressure sensation in the contralateral limb were independently associated with severe ischemia in asymptomatic contralateral limbs. In addition to mortality, MALE commonly occurred in asymptomatic contralateral limbs, especially with WIfI I-2/3.

Open Surgical Secondary Interventions are More Durable than Endovascular Interventions for Lower Extremity Bypass Stenosis or Occlusion

Objectives: Lower extremity bypasses often require secondary interventions to maintain patency. Our objectives were to characterize effectiveness of secondary interventions to maintain or restore bypass graft patency, and to compare outcomes of open and endovascular interventions. Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent lower extremity bypass at our institution from 2007 to 2010. We recorded the index bypass and subsequent ipsilateral interventions performed through 2018 or until loss of secondary patency. Patient, procedure, and anatomic data were collected. Endovascular intervention was compared with open/hybrid intervention. For outcome analysis, patency measures were defined relative to the time of the secondary intervention rather than the time of the index bypass. Results: 174 secondary interventions (56 open/hybrid, 118 endovascular; 42 for graft occlusion, and 132 for stenosis) treating 228 lesions in 97 bypasses were available for study. The index bypass was most commonly performed for tissue loss (71.1%), utilized a tibial artery target (57.7%), and used single-segment great saphenous vein (59.8%) rather than alternative vein (32.0%) or prosthetic (8.2%). A higher portion of open/hybrid interventions (51.8%) were done for graft occlusion than endovascular interventions (11.0%, P < .001). Mean follow-up for secondary interventions was 3.5 years. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model identified female gender, prior MI, anticoagulation, occlusion, and endovascular intervention as predictors of loss of primary patency. Intervention for occlusion predicted poorer primary and secondary patency. Endovascular intervention was associated with poorer primary patency as compared to open intervention and a trend toward poorer secondary patency. Conclusions: Both open and endovascular secondary interventions on lower extremity bypasses are low-risk procedures that offer acceptable patency. Although more commonly performed in the setting of graft occlusion, open surgical interventions show improved durability compared to endovascular interventions. Some patients, including those with occluded grafts, may benefit from more liberal use of open surgical intervention to restore bypass patency.

Long Term Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for Failing Distal Bypass Vein Grafts

OBJECTIVE

Although distal bypass using vein has been established with acceptable outcomes for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI), the major issue affecting long term outcomes is vein graft disease. This study aimed to analyse the peri-procedural results and long term outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for failing vein grafts after distal bypass.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 113 failing vein grafts (94 patients, 113 limbs) after distal bypass between 2009 and 2019 at the study hospital.

RESULTS

The mean age was 74 ± 9 years and 72% of the patients were men. Of the 113 grafts, 54 grafts (48%) were detected in asymptomatic patients, 41 grafts (36%) in patients with recurrent ulcer or gangrene, and 18 grafts (16%) in patients with rest pain. The failing grafts were treated by low pressure long inflation balloon angioplasty with a mean balloon size of 3.0 ± 0.8 mm. The mean procedural time was 60 ± 29 min and procedural success was 98% (111 grafts). During the mean follow up period of 34 months, EVT was performed a median frequency of two times (range 1-11 times). The primary and assisted primary patency of the EVT revised grafts were 41% and 80% at one year, 34% and 68% at three years, 31% and 58% at five years, respectively. Of 41 limbs with recurrent ulcer or gangrene, the wound healed in 34 limbs (85%). The complete healing rate was 71% at three months and 84% at 12 months. Eight patients required major amputation, and the freedom from major amputation rate was 96% at one year and 80% at five years.

CONCLUSION

Long term outcomes including patency, wound healing rate, and amputation free survival after EVT for failing vein grafts were acceptable. EVT could be a viable alternative to surgical revascularisation in patients with a failing distal bypass graft for CLTI.

Contemporary Outcomes following Redo Autogenous Infrainguinal Bypass

BACKGROUND

Revascularization after lower extremity bypass failure poses many challenges. Despite nearly 7 decades of experience with lower extremity revascularization, there is little data on the success of redo bypass particularly when autogenous conduit is utilized. The purpose of this study is to review outcomes of redo infrainguinal bypass constructed solely of autogenous vein.

METHODS

All patients who underwent redo infrainguinal bypass at a single institution by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Bypasses were categorized into 3 groups: femoral-popliteal, femoral-distal, and popliteal-distal bypasses. Since the repeat bypasses were all done for limb salvage, freedom from above or below knee amputation (FFA) was primary outcome, which was defined as the number of days from redo bypass to subsequent amputation or the most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2016, 100 limbs underwent redo bypass. Fifty-nine (59.0%) limbs had undergone one previous bypass while 41 (41.0%) had undergone 2 or more. The redo configurations consisted of 23 (23.0%) femoral-popliteal, 70 (70.0%) femoral-distal, and 7 (7.0%) popliteal-distal bypasses. Ninety-seven (97.0%) underwent redo using autologous vein grafts including 41 (95.5%) of those who had 2 or more previous bypasses. The 3 patients who ultimately underwent prosthetic bypass had bilateral great and small saphenous veins and bilateral basilic and cephalic veins previously harvested. Nine (9.0%) limbs were subsequently amputated: 2 (2.0%) above knee and 7 (7.0%) below knee amputations. Of these, all had had 2 or more previous bypasses and 2 of the 3 patients who ultimately received prosthetic bypasses were in this group. In patients with one previous bypass, FFA was 775 days (IQR: 213-1,626 days). In patients with 2 or more previous bypasses, FFA was 263 days (IQR: 106-1,148 days). No patients with femoral-popliteal bypasses suffered amputation while 7 (10.0%) of the femoral-distal and 2 (28.6%) of the popliteal-distal bypasses suffered subsequent amputations (P = 0.067).

CONCLUSIONS

Redo infrainguinal bypass is effective in salvaging threatened lower extremities. Furthermore, once a patient is deemed a bypass candidate, revascularization with autologous vein can be achieved. A significant FFA rate is achieved with redo bypass, although patients with more distal disease are harder to salvage.

Efficacy of Balloon Angioplasty for Infrainguinal Vein Graft Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Vein graft stenosis is a critical complication of lower-limb bypass surgery. For vein graft stenosis, balloon angioplasty has been performed instead of surgical revision in recent years. We therefore investigated the effectiveness of the balloon angioplasty for vein graft stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULT

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 115 vein graft stenoses performed via balloon angioplasty from August 2011 to January 2018. The rate of freedom from reintervention after balloon angioplasty was 54.3%, 44.4%, and 38.0% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The rate of freedom from graft occlusion after balloon angioplasty was 79.9%, 71.9%, and 61.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Predictors of freedom from graft occlusion after balloon angioplasty by a multivariate analysis were a single treated lesion (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.85; P = 0.0189), balloon angioplasty within 90 days after bypass surgery (HR: 3.59; 95% CI: 1.56-8.07; P = 0.0033), and using a cutting balloon (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.17-0.97; P = 0.0426).

CONCLUSIONS

The freedom from graft occlusion rate after balloon angioplasty remained relatively high. Furthermore, better results can be expected in single treated lesions and cases of balloon angioplasty occurring 90 days after bypass surgery or in which a cutting balloon was used. Balloon angioplasty for lower-limb bypass graft stenosis was shown to be a useful treatment.

Endovascular Reintervention for Failing Infrainguinal Bypass Grafts

OBJECTIVE

Patients with lower extremity bypass grafts that develop stenosis commonly undergo endovascular treatment (EVT) procedures. This study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of EVT procedures for infrainguinal grafts with bypass at risk (BAR).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 24 grafts in 22 patients from July 2010 to June 2016. The demographic information of the patients and the characteristics of lesions were examined, and the outcomes with regard to the patency and survival rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four grafts were evaluated; the initial technical success rate of EVT procedure was 91.7%. Sixteen of 24 bypass grafts (66.7%) required multiple EVT procedures due to graft restenosis. Inflow vessels from the superficial femoral artery were associated with significantly higher rates of single EVT procedures (P = 0.0206). At 2 years, the primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 30.3%, 69.5%, and 78.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The EVT procedure is one of the treatment options for the treatment of grafts with BAR and might be associated with an acceptable medium-term patency rate.

Infrainguinal Vein Graft Stenoses: Long-Term Outcomes of Graft Angioplasty

OBJECTIVE

Graft angioplasty combines the durability and ability of surgical bypasses to treat long arterial occlusions with the minimally invasive nature of endovascular procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of single and repeated graft angioplasty in revising failing infrainguinal vein bypass grafts and to determine predictors of medium- and long-term freedom from revision after graft angioplasty.

METHOD

This was a retrospective analysis from a prospectively maintained database. Consecutive endovascular revisions of graft-threatening lesions identified by duplex ultrasound surveillance were reviewed from 2003 to 2010. Patients were followed up until death, major amputation, or the end of follow-up, with the data last updated on January 1, 2013.

RESULTS

178 graft angioplasty procedures performed in 114 bypass grafts in 103 limbs from 98 patients were studied. At 5 years, freedom from revision was 22.6%, graft survival was 45.8%, amputation-free survival was 57.9%, and patient survival was 64.9%. Analysis of repeated angioplasties found no evidence that effectiveness diminishes significantly with the number of previous angioplasties performed (p=.892). Higher Rutherford Grade of ischemia and longer time interval from index surgery to first angioplasty were significant positive predictors of medium- and long-term patency.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of infrainguinal vein grafts is safe and effective in the treatment of failing grafts identified by duplex surveillance. Graft angioplasties do not lose effectiveness when repeated and have shown cumulative benefit in prolonging graft survival. Treatment of claudicants and time interval from graft implantation of more than 6 months at the time of first angioplasty are positive predictors of at least medium-term patency after graft angioplasty.

Vein graft failure: from pathophysiology to clinical outcomes

Occlusive arterial disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Aside from balloon angioplasty, bypass graft surgery is the most commonly performed revascularization technique for occlusive arterial disease. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery is performed in patients with left main coronary artery disease and three-vessel coronary disease, whereas peripheral artery bypass graft surgery is used to treat patients with late-stage peripheral artery occlusive disease. The great saphenous veins are commonly used conduits for surgical revascularization; however, they are associated with a high failure rate. Therefore, preservation of vein graft patency is essential for long-term surgical success. With the exception of 'no-touch' techniques and lipid-lowering and antiplatelet (aspirin) therapy, no intervention has hitherto unequivocally proven to be clinically effective in preventing vein graft failure. In this Review, we describe both preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the pathophysiology underlying vein graft failure, and the latest therapeutic options to improve patency for both coronary and peripheral grafts.

Paclitaxel-coated versus plain balloon angioplasty in the treatment of infrainguinal vein bypass stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of plain vs paclitaxel-coated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with infrainguinal vein bypass stenosis.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive patients treated by infrainguinal bypass PTA. Primary study end points were primary and assisted primary patency. Secondary end points were clinical and hemodynamic improvement, limb salvage, and survival. Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards were applied.

RESULTS

From April 2008 to November 2014, 83 infrainguinal vein bypasses were treated for graft stenosis by plain (group A, n = 41) or by paclitaxel-coated PTA (group B, n = 42). The groups did not differ significantly in mean age (71.9 years for both groups; P = .99), hypertension (P = 1.0), hyperlipidemia (P = .5), diabetes (P = .6), coronary artery disease (P = 1.0), smoking (P = 1.0), preoperative ankle-brachial index (P = .08), or bypass characteristics (below-knee, P = .82). Technical success rate was 100% for both groups. Mean follow-up was 2.9 years for group A patients and 2.2 years for group B patients (P = .08). No patient was lost to follow-up. Primary patency rates were 88% vs 87% and 73% vs 75% (P = .19) and assisted primary patency rates were 88% vs 90% and 77% vs 84% (P = .76) for group A and B patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Repeat target lesion revascularization rates were 22% vs 14% (P = .17). At the last follow-up, there were eight vs seven bypass occlusions (P = .74) for group A and B patients, respectively. In univariate analysis, proximal in-graft stenosis (Cox F, P = .041), bypass failure <6 months after bypass surgery (Cox F, P = .013), more than one bypass stenosis per graft (Cox F, P = .047), and redo bypass procedure (Cox F, P = .0001) were significantly related to assisted primary bypass patency. Immediate hemodynamic and sustained clinical improvement rates were 88% vs 86% and 70% vs 73% for group A and B patients, respectively. There were three vs one major amputations (P = .36) and eight vs seven deaths (P = .78) in group A and B patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel-coated and plain angioplasty of significant infrainguinal vein bypass stenoses performed equally well in clinical and hemodynamic improvement and in primary and assisted primary bypass patency rates.