The snuffbox fistula should be preferred over the wrist arteriovenous fistula

Arteriovenous fistula patency and self-care behaviors in hemodialysis patients

This study aimed to determine the factors affecting arteriovenous fistula (AVF) patency and the relationship between AVF self-care behaviors in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This was a descriptive and correlational study. The data were collected from 195 HD patients between August and December 2023. The mean score of the AVF Assessment Scale (AVF-AS) was significantly higher in diabetic patients and patients with the elbow AVF site. A significant positive correlation was found between the AVF-AS and the total number of AVF operations. AVF-AS was found to be lower in patients with very high levels of AVF self-care behaviors compared to high-level and moderate levels. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between the AVF-AS and the pump speed, Kt/V, URR, and AVF self-care behaviors. This study found that patient-related factors and self-care behaviors effectively maintain AVF patency.

Snuffbox Versus Wrist Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas: 10 Years Experience

Background The wrist radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) is the initial suggested procedure for establishing hemodialysis vascular access (HVA) in the most distal site of the upper limb. The anatomical snuffbox arteriovenous fistula (SBAVF) is barely utilised, despite its remote location. In this study, we aimed to analyse and compare the results of SBAVF and RCAVF in terms of their maturity, patency, and failure rates. Methodology This descriptive, retrospective study compared outcomes between SBAVF and RCAVF in terms of maturation, patency, and failure. All patients with chronic kidney disease who attended and underwent either procedure at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board between 2013 and 2023 were studied. Results In a period of 10 years, 179 patients were included. Overall, 102 (57%) were male and 77 (43%) were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. Wrist radiocephalic fistula was the dominant type of surgery done in 76% (n = 136), while the snuffbox radiocephalic fistula was done in fewer than 24% (n = 43) of patients. Most patients underwent a successful arteriovenous (AV) fistula (n = 105, 58.7%), in contrast to 67 patients whose fistulas failed. There was a significant relationship between fistula failure and complications (p = 0.000). There was no significant effect of the fistula site, hypertension, diabetes, cardiac diseases, smoking, peripheral vascular disease, or central vein stenosis on the failure of the AV fistula (p = 0.127, 0.534, 0.510, 0.397, 0.017, 0.68, and 0.371, respectively). Conclusions The snuffbox AV fistula is a suitable and feasible first choice for patients on hemodynamic therapy.

Snuff-Box Versus Wrist Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis: Maturation Tend and its Affecting Factors

BACKGROUND

Thanks to its well proved long-term patency rates, native radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula remains the most commonly used vascular access type. Many articles had approached the criteria leading to a mature fistula. The aims of this work are to evaluate variables that may affect the maturation of distal fistulas and to determine if wrist fistulas have less risk of maturation failure than the snuff-box fistulas.

METHODS

We recorded all distal radiocephalic fistulas that had been created from January 2018 to February 2021. Epidemiological and clinical profile of patients, characteristics of performed fistulas and per and post-operative data were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

From January 2018 to February 2021, 165 upper limb vascular accesses for hemodialysis had been created including 47 (28.5%) distal radiocephalic fistulas. Among the latter, 39 (83%) fistulas were performed at the wrist and 8 (17%) at snuff-box area. There were 34 men (72.3%). Mean age was 67 years (37-87). Both types of fistulas had approximately an identic frequency of primary maturation failure (50% for radiocephalic versus 47.2% for snuff-box fistulas). Secondary maturation had been achieved in 9 fistulas. Patients with medical history of dyslipidemia, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), central catheter placement, and bad quality of vessels tend to develop an immature fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in maturation tend between snuff-box and wrist fistulas had been demonstrated. Thus, it seems reasonable to privilege the creation of the most distal fistulas allowing preservation of wrist fistulas as a second option in case of snuff-box fistulas maturation failure. However, selection of the most suitable cases for snuff-box fistulas creation, based on clinical and duplex ultrasound data, remains primordial.

Distal radial artery access in noncoronary procedures

Since the beginning of interventional cardiology and for decades, the femoral artery has been the access of choice for both diagnostic and interventional endovascular procedures. Due to an extensive evidence base accumulated over the last 20 years, the majority of interventional cardiologists around the world prefer classical radial artery access for both elective and emergency procedures. A similar trend has been observed for distal radial artery access over the last five years. Noncoronary endovascular surgery undergoes the same stages of improvement and optimization of access, but in a more accelerated way. The goal of this review is to analyze the literature on distal radial artery access in noncoronary procedures.

Long-term outcomes of arteriovenous snuffbox fistulas for hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

Autologous arteriovenous fistulas in the arm have been shown to be superior to all other types of arteriovenous access and should be placed as far distally as possible. The aim of the present study was to delineate the advantages of snuffbox fistulas (SBFs).

METHODS

From January 2007 through April 2017, first time or new arteriovenous fistula surgery was performed in 375 patients. If feasible, an SBF was chosen. The observation period ended in December 2019. The focus of the present study was on the patency rates, redo surgery, complications, and mortality rates.

RESULTS

SBFs were created in 236 patients (92 women and 144 men; mean age, 67 years; 46% with diabetes). Within the first 6 weeks, 11% of the fistulas had failed. The primary patency rates were 75%, 69%, 64%, 61%, 60%, and 58% after 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years, respectively. The secondary patency rates were 86%, 83%, 80%, and 77% after 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Age, sex, and the presence of diabetes mellitus had no effect on the primary patency rates. Patients with a right-sided SBF had significantly worse primary patency. Of the 236 patients, 154 (65%) had died during the observation period. The incidence of surgical site infection within the first 30 days and access-related ischemia during the observation period was <1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present study have shown that with suitable anatomic conditions, a SBF is a good choice for the creation of dialysis access. The patency rates were encouraging, and it offers the longest puncturable segment of the cephalic vein. Also, the rate of perioperative complications was low.

The impact of location and patency of the arteriovenous fistula on quality of life of kidney transplant recipients

Background

Arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) may remain patent after kidney transplantation (KTx), contributing to maladaptive cardiac remodeling. The flow in AVFs is associated with the diameter of its vessels and thus with the AVF location. The main objective of this study is to assess the influence of AVF location and its patency on the self-reported quality of life (QOL) of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with past history of hemodialysis.

Methods

To gain clinical data, during a scheduled visit, 353 KTRs were asked to fill out an anonymous questionnaire. From this group, 284 respondents were found eligible for analysis. The outcome was defined as prevalence of symptoms and health status, measured with the Left Ventricular Dysfunction-36 (LVD-36) Questionnaire in symptomatic patients.

Results

The hemodialysis patients (n = 243) were divided into two groups according to AVF location, i.e., DAVF – distally located AVF – (n = 174) and PAVF – proximally located AVF – (n = 69). The proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) was higher in PAVF group (24% vs. 12%, p = 0.0482). In the multivariable regression, PAVF, serum creatinine levels, and the presence of HF or coronary artery disease (CAD) remained independent predictors of lower functional capacity. Among patients with heart disease, the presence of active AVF was independently associated with worse functional outcome (higher LVD-36 scores).

Conclusions

The influence of persistent PAVF in KTRs seems to be unfavorable, especially when coexisting with CAD or HF. Abbreviations: AVF arteriovenous fistula; BMI body mass index; CAD coronary artery disease; D-AVF distally-located arteriovenous fistula; EC exercise capacity; HD hemodialysis; HF heart failure; KTx kidney transplantation; KTR kidney transplant recipient; LVD-36 Left Ventricle Disfunction – 36; LVEF left ventricle ejection fraction; LVH left ventricle hypertrophy; NYHA New York Heart Association; P-AVF proximally located arteriovenous fistula; PD peritoneal dialysis; PRO patient-reported outcomes; QOL quality of life.

Vascular Access Perspectives in Patients After Kidney Transplantation

Introduction: More attention has been paid to the influence of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) on the cardiovascular system. In renal transplant recipients, some beneficial effect of an elective vascular access (VA) ligation was observed in patients with a high AVF flow. However, this strategy is not widely accepted and is in contradiction to the rule of vasculature preservation for possible future access. The aim of our study is to elucidate the vascular access function and VA perspective in the kidney transplantation (KTx) population.

Materials and Methods: KTx patients with a stable graft function were recruited to participate in this single center observational study (NCT04478968). The measurement of VA flow and vessel mapping for future vascular access was performed by a color Doppler ultrasound. The study group included 99 (63%) males and 58 (37%) females; the median age was 57 (IQR 48–64) years. The median time from the transplantation to the baseline visit was 94 (IQR 61–149) months. Median serum creatinine concentration was 1.36 (IQR 1.13–1.67) mg/dl.

Results: Functioning VA was found in 83 out of 157 (52.9%) patients. The sites were as follows: snuffbox in six (7.2%), wrist in 41 (49.4%), distal forearm in 18 (21.7%), middle or proximal forearm in eight (9.6%), upper-arm AV graft in one (1.2%), and upper-arm AVFs in nine (10.8%) patients, respectively. Blood flow ranged from 248 to 7,830 ml/min; the median was 1,134 ml/min. From the transplantation to the study visit, 66 (44.6%) patients experienced access loss. Spontaneous thrombosis was the most common, and it occurred in 60 (90.9%) patients. The surgical closure of VA was performed only in six (4%) patients of the study group with a functioning VA at the time of transplantation. Access loss occurred within the 1st year after KTx in 33 (50%) patients. Majority (50 out of 83, 60.2%) of the patients with an active VA had options to create a snuffbox or wrist AVF on the contralateral extremity. In a group of 74 patients without a functioning VA, the creation of a snuffbox or wrist AVF on the non-dominant and dominant extremity was possible in seven (9.2%) and 40 (52.6%) patients, respectively. In 10 (13.1%) patients, the possibilities were limited only to the upper-arm or proximal forearm VA on both sides. Access ligation was considered by 15 out of 83 (18.1%) patients with a patent VA.

Conclusions: In the majority of the patients, vascular access blood flow was below the threshold of the negative cardiovascular effect of vascular access. Creation of a distal AVF is a protective measure to avoid a high flow and preserve the vessels for future access. The approach to VA should be individualized and adjusted to the patient's profile.

Contemporary outcomes of a "snuffbox first" hemodialysis access approach in the United States

OBJECTIVE

The Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for permanent hemodialysis (HD) access creation recommend prioritizing the most distal possible autogenous access to minimize complications and preserve more proximal options. The "snuffbox" arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the most distal radial artery-cephalic vein AVF. Despite the theoretical benefits of the snuffbox approach, recent trends have been toward upper arm access. Our study sought to investigate the feasibility of a snuffbox-first strategy for HD access in all anatomically appropriate candidates.

METHODS

From January 2016 to August 2019, all patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or pre-ESRD under consideration for HD access were evaluated for a snuffbox-first approach by a team of vascular surgeons and nephrologists at a single, urban academic medical center in the United States. Data were collected prospectively and supplemented by medical record review. A survival analysis was performed to evaluate primary unassisted and secondary patency and clinical and functional maturation. Patients were censored if they had received a kidney transplant or had died. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the risk factors for prolonged clinical maturation and functional maturation.

RESULTS

A total of 55 snuffbox AVFs were created. The median patient age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 52-70 years), and 52.7% of the patients were men. The median follow-up was 369 days (IQR, 166-509 days). The median survival for primary unassisted patency was 90 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-111). Secondary patency at 1 year was 92.3% (95% CI, 85.3%-99.9%). The clinical maturation rate at 1 year was 83.7% (n = 55; 95% CI, 66.8%-91.9%), and the functional maturation rate at 1 year was 85.6% (n = 40; 95% CI, 63.3%-94.4%). Of the patients who were pre-ESRD at AVF creation and had initiated HD during the study period, 87.5% had successfully received incident HD with their snuffbox AVF. Twenty-four patients were receiving HD via a catheter at snuffbox creation. Of those patients, the functional maturation rate at 1 year was 82.5% (95% CI, 44.8%-94.4%). The patients had undergone a median of two interventions (IQR, zero to seven interventions) in the first year. Of these, 46.9% were percutaneous angioplasty and 31.2% were side-branch ligation. Diabetes was associated with slower AVF clinical maturation (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.82; P = .016). A larger artery diameter was associated with earlier AVF clinical maturation (multivariate hazard ratio, 6.64; 95% CI, 2.11-20.9).

CONCLUSIONS

A snuffbox-first approach to HD access is a viable option for distal access creation in a cohort of patients requiring HD in the United States. Subsequent ancillary interventions to facilitate access maturation were required for most patients.

Distal Radial Artery Access: The Future of Cardiovascular Intervention

Access sites for coronary intervention have been changing over the last several decades, from the femoral artery to the radial artery and then to the distal radial artery. Distal radial access, which was first used in 2017 and is still not recommended by the guidelines, shows a higher success rate and less complications than other sites; therefore, it might be the future for cardiovascular intervention. In this study, we reviewed almost all of the articles that are related to the distal radial access, from 2017 to present, and summarized the technique, success rate, advantages, disadvantages, and noncardiac use of this access site.

The sleeve method for creation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas in patients with calcified vessels

INTRODUCTION

Creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in patients with advanced atherosclerotic changes of the artery is often a challenge for the physician due to difficulties in suturing the vein to the side of the frangible artery. The sleeve technique relies on advancing the end of the artery into the lumen of the vein and protecting the anastomosis by adventitial sutures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The sleeve technique was performed in 23 patients with chronic kidney disease stage IV and V and included hemodialysis patients. Their mean age was 60.8 ± 14.8 years and hemodialysis treatment time 49.8 ± 40.2 months. The most frequent causes of chronic kidney disease are ischemic nephropathy (43%, n = 10) and type l diabetes (21%, n = 5). Only patients with extremely advanced atherosclerotic were recruited and analyzed.

RESULTS

The primary patency rate was 67%, 59%, 44% and 28% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. The secondary patency rate was 67%, 61%, 50% and 37% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. In three patients the AVF failed directly after the operation. Delayed fistula failure occurred in seven patients. The overall success in the creation of a functioning fistula was achieved in 15 of the 23 patients (65%). No serious complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with calcified atherosclerotic plaques, which constitute a barrier or make it difficult to suture the vein to the side of the artery, the sleeve method may be considered as an alternative before abandoning the creation of a fistula on the forearm. The technique is much simpler than the standard end-to-side or side-to-side anastomosis.

Vascular access should be tailored to the patient

A cornerstone of hemodialysis treatment is the creation of a functional and durable dialysis vascular access. Every patient with chronic kidney disease should have a plan of renal replacement therapy and access site protection. Factors having a crucial impact on vascular access selection include age, comorbidity, vessel quality, prognosis, dialysis urgency, and surgeon's preferences. Our medical group have reviewed these factors in our patients and, based on recently published data, developed a clinical decision tree for dialysis access in the chronic kidney disease patient. Vascular access care should be patient-centered with the aim to maximize patient survival without loss of vascular access options; and not focused only the primary patency rates of dialysis access procedures.