The relation between physical fitness, frailty and all-cause mortality after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Impact of Frailty and Sarcopenia on Thirty-Day and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic role of frailty and sarcopenia on the survival of patients with AAA undergoing elective endovascular repair (EVAR). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE). The association of frailty or sarcopenia with 30-day mortality and late survival was expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis random effects models were applied. The five-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) was used as a frailty metric and sarcopenia was determined using computed tomography angiography (CTA) with measurements of the total psoas muscle area. Frailty was defined as patients with mFI-5 ≥ 0.6 and sarcopenia was defined as the total psoas muscle area (TPA) within the lowest tertile. Results: Thirteen observational cohorts reporting a total of 56,756 patient records were eligible for analysis. Patients with frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 0.6) had significantly increased 30-day mortality than those without frailty (random effects method: OR, 4.84, 95% CI 3.34-7.00, p < 0.001). Patients with sarcopenia (lowest TPA tertile) had significantly increased 30-day mortality according to the fixed effects method (OR, 3.30, 95% CI 2.17-5.02, p < 0.001), but not the random effects method (OR, 2.64, 95% CI 0.83-8.39, p = 0.098). Patients with sarcopenia or frailty had a significantly increased hazard ratio (HR) for late mortality than those without frailty or sarcopenia according to the random effects method (HR, 2.39, 95% CI 1.66-3.43, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity of the studies was low (I2: 0.00%, p = 0.86). The relation of frailty to age extracted from four studies demonstrates that the risk of frailty increases with age according to the random effects method (standard mean differences, SMD, 0.52, 95% CI 0.44-0.61, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity of the studies was low (I2: 0.00%, p = 0.64). Conclusions: Patients with sarcopenia or frailty have a significantly increased risk of mortality following elective EVAR. Prospective studies validating the use of frailty and sarcopenia for risk prediction after EVAR are needed before these tools can be used to support decision making.

[Inpatient rehabilitation for patients 65 years and older with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Indications and long-term outcome]

BACKGROUND

In Germany, there is no data available on the frequency of inpatient rehabilitation (IR) after elective endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

OBJECTIVE

To report for the first time on the outcome of patients 65 years and older and thus of retirement age with and without IR after AAA repair in a retrospective analysis of routine data from all eleven regional companies of the AOK health insurance fund (AOK-Gesundheit).

METHODS

Anonymized data of 16,358 patients 65 years and older with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with EVAR (n = 12,960) or OAR (n = 3,398) between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2016 were analyzed. Patients with postoperative IR (n = 1,531) were compared to those without postoperative IR (n = 14,827) with respect to general patient characteristics, comorbidities, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, and survival. The average follow-up of patients with postoperative and without postoperative IR was 49.9 months and 51.8 months, respectively.

RESULTS

5.4% of EVAR patients, but 24.6% of OAR patients were referred to IR (p < 0.001). Patients with IR were sicker than those without IR. Parameters significantly influencing the use of IR included OAR vs EVAR (Odds Ratio [OR] 6.03), condition after cerebral infarction (OR 1.53), and women vs men (OR 1.49). Perioperative influencing parameters were cerebral infarction (OR 2.40), blood transfusions (OR 2.21) and complex critical care (OR 2.15). After nine years, the Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 41.9% for patients with vs 43.4% for those without IR in the EVAR group (p = 0.178). For OAR, it was 50.2% for patients with IR vs 49.8% for patients without IR (p = 0.006). In multivariate regression analysis, postoperative IR had a significant effect on long-term survival in OAR but not in EVAR patients.

CONCLUSION

There are no generally binding guidelines for the indication of IR after AAA repair. It should therefore be a requirement for the future that the fitness of each patient with elective AAA repair be determined with a score before and after the procedure in order to make indications for AHB more comparable. The score should be documented in the hospital discharge letter.

Five-factors Modified Frailty Index role as predictors of outcomes after proximal abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between frailty, measured by the Five-Factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and mortality and all major adverse events (MAE) in patients who underwent proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm (p-AAA) open surgery (OS).

METHODS

Data of all elective patients submitted to p-AAA OS from 2010 to 2021 were recorded. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and mid-term survival and secondary endpoints included postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), freedom from aortic reintervention and any MAE. The impact of frailty was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis; mid-term overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test).

RESULTS

Two-hundred twenty-one patients (197 male, 24 female; aged 72.2±7.4) were included. Thirty-seven (16.4%) were octogenarians (>80 years). The mFI-5 was assessed in the entire group: mean mFI-5 was 0.29±0.12. One-hundred patients (100/221, 45.25%, 91:9 male-to-female ratio) were defined "frail" considering the mFI-5 cut-off >0.25. At univariate analysis a correlation was found between mFI-5>0.25 and mid-term mortality (Pearson correlation [r] 0.280, P<0.001) and AKI (r=0.146, P=0.030). No correlation with 30-day mortality was found (P not significant). At multivariate analysis mFI-5>0.25 increased the risk for midterm mortality (odds ratio 3.32, P=0.021) and postoperative AKI (OR 2.09, P<0.001). The effect of mFI-5>0.25 on mid-term mortality persisted after adjustment for age (P<0.001). Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meyer method (mean follow-up of 52.7 months, 95% CI: 48.6-56.8); 68 (30.7%) deaths were recorded: 23 among non-frail patients (19.0%) and 45 among frail patients (45/100, 45%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that mFI-5 is a tool capable to identify "frail" patients, who appear to be at increased risk of postoperative AKI and mid-term mortality, but not 30-day mortality. Five-factor modified Frailty Index assessment is simple, fast and can be widely applied in surgical practice to perform appropriate risk stratifications.

A systematic review of frailty assessment tools used in vascular surgery research

OBJECTIVE

Frailty is common in vascular patients and is recognized for its prognostic value. In the absence of consensus, a multitude of frailty assessment tools exist. This systematic review aimed to quantify the variety in these tools and describe their content and application to inform future research and clinical practice.

METHODS

Multiple cross-disciplinary electronic literature databases were searched from inception to August 2022. Studies describing frailty assessment in a vascular surgical population were eligible. Data extraction to a validated template included patient demographics, tool content, and analysis methods. A secondary systematic search for papers describing the psychometric properties of commonly used frailty tools was then performed.

RESULTS

Screening 5358 records identified 111 eligible studies, with an aggregate population of 5,418,236 patients. Forty-three differing frailty assessment tools were identified. One-third of these failed to assess frailty as a multidomain deficit and there was a reliance on assessing function and presence of comorbidity. Substantial methodological variability in data analysis and lack of methodological description was also identified. Published psychometric assessment was available for only 4 of the 10 most commonly used frailty tools. The Clinical Frailty Scale was the most studied and demonstrates good psychometric properties within a surgical population.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial heterogeneity in frailty assessment is demonstrated, precluding meaningful comparisons of services and data pooling. A uniform approach to assessment is required to guide future frailty research. Based on the literature, we make the following recommendations: frailty should be considered a continuous construct and the reporting of frailty tools' application needs standardized. In the absence of consensus, the Clinical Frailty Scale is a validated tool with good psychometric properties that demonstrates usefulness in vascular surgery.

Preoperative Frailty Assessment Predicts Postoperative Mortality, Delirium and Pneumonia in Elderly Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) for postoperative mortality, delirium and pneumonia in patients over 65 years of age undergoing elective lung cancer surgery.

METHODS

Data were collected from a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted in a general tertiary hospital from January 2017 to August 2019. In total, the study included 1372 elderly patients aged over 65 who underwent elective lung cancer surgery. They were divided into frail group (mFI-5, 2-5), prefrail group (mFI-5, 1) and robust group (mFI-5, 0) on the basis of mFI-5 classification. The primary outcome was postoperative 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pneumonia and postoperative delirium.

RESULTS

Frailty group had the highest incidence of postoperative delirium (frailty 31.2% versus prefrailty 1.6% versus robust 1.5%, p < 0.001), postoperative pneumonia (frailty 23.5% versus prefrailty 7.2% versus robust 7.7%, p < 0.001), and postoperative 1-year mortality (frailty 7.0% versus prefrailty 2.2% versus robust 1.9%. p < 0.001). Frail patients have significantly longer length of hospitalization than those in the robust group and prefrail patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a clear link between frailty and increased risk of postoperative delirium (aOR 2.775, 95% CI 1.776-5.417, p < 0.001), postoperative pneumonia (aOR 3.291, 95% CI 2.169-4.993, p < 0.001) and postoperative 1-year mortality (aOR 3.364, 95% CI, 1.516-7.464, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

mFI-5 has potential clinical utility in predicting postoperative death, delirium and pneumonia incidence in elderly patients undergoing radical lung cancer surgery. Frailty screening of patients (mFI-5) may provide benefits in risk stratification, targeted intervention efforts, and assist physicians in clinical decision-making.

Effect of Sarcopenia on Mortality and Spinal Cord Ischaemia After Complex Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Sarcopenia has been related to higher mortality rates after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. This analysis aimed to assess sarcopenia related mortality and spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) at 30 days, and mortality during the available follow up, in patients with complex aortic aneurysms, managed with open or endovascular interventions.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the English literature, via Ovid, using Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to 15 June 2022 was done.

REVIEW METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42022338079). Observational studies (2000 - 2022), with five or more patients, reporting on sarcopenia related mortality and SCI at 30 days, and midterm mortality after thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair (open or endovascular), were eligible. The ROBINS-I tool (Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions) was used for risk of bias, and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) for the assessment of evidence quality. The primary outcome was 30 day and midterm mortality, and the secondary outcome was SCI at 30 days, in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. The outcomes were summarised as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Four retrospective studies (1 092 patients; 40.0% sarcopenic) were included. Thirty day mortality was similar, with low certainty between groups (6% [95% CI 1 - 11] in sarcopenic vs. 5% [95% CI 1 - 9] non-sarcopenic patients [OR 0.30, 95% CI -0.21 - 0.81; p = .94, Ι2 = 0%). The estimated midterm mortality was statistically significantly higher (very low certainty) in sarcopenic patients (25% [95% CI 0.19 - 0.31] vs. 13% [95% CI -0.03 - 0.29] in non-sarcopenic patients (1.11 OR 0.95, 95% CI -0.21 - 2.44; p < .001, Ι2 = 88.32%). SCI was significantly higher (very low certainty) in sarcopenic patients (19%, 95% CI 4 - 34) vs. 7% (95% CI 5 - 20) in non-sarcopenic patients (OR 1.80, 95% CI -0.17 - 3.78; Ι2 = 82.4%), despite an equal distribution of aneurysm type between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Early mortality does not appear to be affected by sarcopenia in patients treated for thoraco-abdominal aneurysms. However, sarcopenia may be associated with higher peri-operative SCI and midterm mortality rates.

Modified frailty index as an indicator for outcomes after lower extremity endovascular revascularization

BACKGROUND

The 5-factor frailty index is associated with adverse outcomes after various procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the 5-factor frailty index after lower extremity endovascular revascularization.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database as retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular revascularization between 2015 and 2019. Outcomes were assessed using bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

In the study, 11,947 lower extremity endovascular revascularization performed between 2015 and 2019 were identified from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Median age was 69 (standard deviation 11.44) years, 4,727 (39.6%) were female, and 7,570 (63.4%) were White. In addition, 7,541 (62.9%) were performed for chronic limb threatening ischemia. Thirty-day mortality was 1.7%. Bivariate analysis demonstrated that a 5-factor frailty index score greater than 0.6 was associated with higher rates of discharge to SNF (28.6% vs 8.2%, P < .001, reference 5-factor frailty index = 0), cardiopulmonary arrest (2.0% vs 0.1%, P < .001), readmission (21.1% vs 10.8%, P < .001), reintubation (2.8% vs 0.3%, P < .001), and 30-day mortality (5.1% vs 0.7%, P < .001). Beta blocker use, higher age, chronic limb threatening ischemia indication, and 5-factor frailty index were all associated with increased 30-day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression showed that 5-factor frailty index >0.6 predicted 3 times higher odds for 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 2.988; P = .013), with physiologic high risk (odds ratio, 2.118; P < .001), chronic limb threatening ischemia indication (odds ratio, 2.157; P < .001), and inpatient procedures (odds ratio, 3.409; P < .001) also showing increased risk for mortality.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular revascularization, higher 5-factor frailty index was associated with increased hospital resource utilization and 30-day mortality. The 5-factor frailty index may be useful for preoperative risk stratification and predicting adverse outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular revascularization.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Early Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

This study compares the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), based on their weight status as defined by their body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

Patients with primary EVAR for ruptured and intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2016-2019). Patients were categorized by weight status (underweight: BMI < 18.5 kg/m², normal weight: 18.5-24.9 kg/m², overweight: 25-29.9 kg/m², Obese I: 30-34.9 kg/m², Obese II: 35-39.9 kg/m², Obese III: > 40 kg/m²). Preoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of 3,941 patients, 4.8% were underweight, 24.1% normal weight, 37.6% overweight, and 22.5% with Obese I, 7.8% Obese II, and 3.3% Obese III status. Underweight patients presented with larger (6.0 [5.4-7.2] cm) and more frequently ruptured (25.0%) aneurysms than normal weight patients (5.5 [5.1-6.2] cm and 4.3%, P < 0.001 for both). Pooled 30-day mortality was worse for underweight (8.5%) compared to all other weight status (1.1-3.0%, P < 0.001), but risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated that aneurysm rupture (odds ratio [OR] 15.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.98-28.0) and not underweight status (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.73-4.18) accounted for increased mortality in this population. Obese III status was associated with prolonged operative time and respiratory complications after ruptured AAA, but not 30-day mortality (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.25-2.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at either extreme of the BMI range had the worst outcomes after EVAR. Underweight patients represented only 4.8% of all EVARs, but 21% of mortalities, largely attributed to higher incidence of ruptured AAA at presentation. Severe obesity, on the other hand, was associated with prolonged operative time and respiratory complications after EVAR for ruptured AAA. BMI, as an independent factor, was however not predictive of mortality for EVAR.

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of obesity on outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the impact of obesity on perioperative mortality and complication rates in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

A systematic review of all studies reporting AAA treatment perioperative (30 day) outcomes in obese patients (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²). The primary outcome was 30 day mortality. Secondary outcomes included: cardiac complications, respiratory complications, wound complication, renal complications, and neurological complications at 30 days. These outcomes were pooled for meta-analysis. Analysis first compared obese versus nonobese patients undergoing EVAR and OSR then compared EVAR to OSR in obese patients.

RESULTS

We identified 7 observational studies with 14,971 patients (11,743 EVAR, 3228 OSR). Obese patients undergoing EVAR had lower 30 day mortality (1.5%) compared to nonobese patients (2.2%) (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.96; p=0.03; I²= 0%; Grade of evidence: low). In OSR, obese patients (5.0%) had similar 30 day mortality to nonobese patients (5.7%) (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.70-1.20; p=0.54; I²=0%; Grade of evidence: low). Wound complications were higher in obese patients undergoing OSR (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.74-3.06; p<0.001; I²=0%; Grade of evidence: low). EVAR was associated with a lower 30 day mortality (1.5%) compared to OSR (5.0%) in obese patients (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.12-0.46; p<0.001; I²= 38%; Grade of evidence: low). Cardiac, respiratory, wound, renal and neurological complications were also reduced in EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients have lower 30 day mortality in EVAR compared to nonobese patients. In OSR, obese patients had similar 30 day mortality but higher wound complications compared to nonobese patients. Obese patients otherwise have similar cardiopulmonary complication rates compared to nonobese patients in both EVAR and OSR. EVAR offers lower 30 day mortality and morbidity compared to OSR in obese patients. This study suggests that EVAR is superior to OSR in obese patients.