Use of drug-eluting stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial disease: a real-world single-center experience

Outcomes following drug-coated balloons and drug-eluting stents in patients with peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND

Drug-coated balloons and drug-eluting stents (DCB/DES) have shown promise in improving outcomes for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD); however, more real-world analyses are needed to better understand the role of this technology within current practice. As such, we compared our institution's experience with DCB/DES vs percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting (PTA/S) for the treatment of PAD.

METHODS

All patients undergoing an infrainguinal endovascular intervention for PAD at our institution between 2016 and 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients undergoing isolated supra-inguinal or tibial interventions were excluded. Outcomes included primary patency, freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE), limb salvage, and amputation-free survival. To account for baseline differences, one-to-one propensity score matching was performed between DCB/DES and PTA/S groups. Outcomes were further evaluated using χ2, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2022, 800 patients underwent an endovascular infrainguinal intervention for PAD: 224 DCB/DES and 576 PTA/S. Before matching, DCB/DES patients were younger (69 vs 72 years), more often male (72% vs 65%), non-White (58%, vs 34%), had a history of smoking (77% vs 64%), were more likely to have had a prior ipsilateral intervention (45% vs 10%), and more often presented with claudication (44% vs 18%) (all P < .05). After matching, 211 patients were included in each group, where the only remaining difference between DCB/DES and PTA/S was prior ipsilateral intervention (40% vs 15%; P < .001). After DCB/DES, Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated higher rates of primary patency (65% vs 54%; P < .01) and higher freedom from MALE (3-year rates: 84% vs 75%; P = .04), correlating with a 38% lower event risk in both outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.89] and hazard ratio, 0.62 [0.39-0.99], respectively). No differences were noted in rates of limb salvage (3-year rates: 94% vs 90%; P = .63) or amputation-free survival (3-year rates: 78% vs 71%; P = .13). When stratifying by indication, DCB/DES demonstrated higher rates of freedom from MALE among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (3-year rates: 85% vs 66%; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Among a matched cohort of patients with PAD undergoing endovascular intervention, DCB/DES, as compared with PTA/S, demonstrated higher rates of primary patency and freedom from MALE, the former treatment effect remaining notable among patients with claudication and the latter among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. These data demonstrate the importance of further analyses on this evolving technology.

Drug Eluting Stents Below the Knee: Patency, Amputation-Rate, and Mortality-A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Numerous meta-analyses and multicenter randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that drug-eluting stents (DES) offer superior outcomes in terms of primary patency and limb salvage compared to other endovascular modalities such as balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents. This review aims to systematically analyze the literature on the clinical outcomes of DES for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusions.

METHODS

This study is a systematic review. Comprehensive searches were conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid, Cochrane, DAR, and BVS databases. Eligible studies were those that reported outcomes of DES in the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial disease, with no restrictions on time frame, publication status, or language. The primary outcome assessed was the primary patency of the stent, while secondary outcomes included the rates of re-occlusion and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies involving 2470 patients were included in the analysis, in which 1191 patients come from prospective multicenter studies. The mean age of the participants was 73.4 years. Approximately, 50% of the patients had diabetes mellitus and/or chronic renal failure, and 33.3% had heart disease. The fibular artery was the most frequently affected by stenosis, involved in 50.2% of cases, followed by the anterior tibial artery in 34.6% of cases and the posterior tibial artery in 15.2% of cases. The average patency rate following DES treatment was 72.2% at 12 months. The rate of re-occlusion was 21.6%, and the mortality rate was 16.6%. However, due to the heterogeneity of the sample and incomplete data, it was not possible to draw definitive correlations between patency, amputation rates, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and analysis revealed significant limitations due to the heterogeneity of the sample and incomplete data, preventing a comprehensive stratification of the findings. As a result, we are not yet able to fully address the research questions posed. Further studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to standardize the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusions and provide more definitive conclusions.Clinical ImpactThis review assessed the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents for below-the-knee lesions, showing promising patency and safety results. Their use in daily practice may aid in treating lesions prone to recoil and dissection after angioplasty. Despite some data inconsistencies, the findings remain encouraging. Drug-eluting stents demonstrated better outcomes than Bare-metal Stent, supporting their consideration in clinical practice for below-the-knee vascular treatment.

Mid-Term Results of Popliteal-Pedal Inframalleolar Vein Bypasses in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients After Previous Failed Tibial Endovascular Recanalization

BACKGROUND

Inframalleolar bypass still preserves its role in the modern endovascular era. Aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of "short" inframalleolar vein bypasses in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) after the previously failed tibial endovascular recanalization.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2021,107 CLTI patients in 3 Italian Departments of Vascular Surgery underwent "short" inframalleolar vein bypass after failed tibial endovascular recanalization. Early (30-day) and 3-year outcomes were evaluated in terms of survival, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and amputation-free survival. Univariate analysis of the perioperative factors affecting outcomes were performed by the means of log-rank test. The associations of procedure variables were sought based on a multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Distal anastomosis (inframalleolar) was mostly performed on dorsal pedis (64, 59.8%). At 30 days, bypass occlusion was recorded in 5 cases (4.6%). The mean follow-up period was 20.5 ± 17.9 months. The estimated 3-year overall survival was 66.7%. Three-year estimates of primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and amputation-free survival were 68.5%, 70.1%, 70.2%, and 76.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a negative association of insulin treatment with primary patency (HR 4.3, P = 0.04), primary assisted patency (HR 5.1, P = 0.02), and secondary patency (HR 5.1, P = 0.02). The negative association of long-term corticosteroid use was also found with primary patency (HR 7.8, P = 0.005), primary assisted patency (HR 8.7, P = 0.003), secondary patency (HR 8.7, P = 0.003), and amputation-free survival (HR 3.9, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Short" vein bypasses to the foot arteries in CLTI patients yielded good mid-term overall patency and limb salvage rates after a failed tibial endovascular recanalization. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and long-term corticosteroid use seemed to affect the outcomes.

In-stent restenosis

Endovascular arterial recanalization has become the mainstay therapy for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Although immediate technical success is achieved in greater than 90% of cases, longer-term results continue to vary based on the clinical presentation, and the treated target lesion. In the current era, sustained patency can be expected following intervention in the carotid, coronary, renal, and iliac arteries. However, maintaining patency in the femoropopliteal and tibial arteries continues to be present a significant challenge. Endovascular intervention in the peripheral arteries is met with heavy complex plaque burdens, multiple serial stenoses and occlusions, sluggish blood flow, low mean and oscillatory shear stress, and repetitive axial, radial and torsional deformation that hinder its outcomes. In order to maximize the longevity of endovascular intervention, its therapeutic armamentarium has developed to include vessel preparation, drug delivery, and arterial scaffolding. Nevertheless, in the aggregate of real-world clinical practice, recurrence of stenosis still complicates up to 50% of all infrainguinal endovascular procedures after only one year. Unfortunately, this timeline is often insufficient to reliably address lifestyle limiting symptoms, heal a wound, or save a threatened extremity. The purpose of this review is to discuss the pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, morphology and treatment of restenosis following peripheral endovascular intervention.

The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Infrapopliteal Revascularization: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) to standard endovascular techniques like percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bare metal stent (BMS) for treating infrapopliteal artery disease.

METHODS

Including 8 DCB trials and 4 DES trials, this meta-analysis of 12 recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is comprehensive. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science of Web, Cochrane, and PubMed for this meta-analysis. We searched these databases for papers from their inception to February 2023. We also analyzed the references given in the listed studies and any future study that cited them. No language or publication date restrictions were applied to the 12 RCTs. The experimental group includes 8 DCB studies and 4 DES investigations, the DCB group is primarily concerned with the paclitaxel devices, whereas the DES group is preoccupied with the "-limus" devices. Key clinical outcomes in this study were primary patency and binary restenosis rates. This study's secondary outcomes are late lumen loss (LLL), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. The evidence quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias. The PROSPERO registration number for this study is CRD42023462038.

FINDINGS

Only 108 of 1152 publications found satisfied qualifying criteria and contained data. All 13 RCTs have low to moderate bias. Drug-coated balloons and DESs were compared in the excluded study. The analysis comprised 2055 participants from 12 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, including 1417 DCB patients and 638 DES patients. Drug-coated balloons outperform traditional methods in short-term monitoring of primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR. The benefits fade over time, and the 2 techniques had similar major amputation rates, mortality rates, and LLL. Drug-eluting stents outperform conventional procedures in primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR during medium-term to short-term follow-up. Comparing the 2 methods, major and minor amputations, death rate, and LLL were similar.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of DES and DCB with PTA or BMS shows that DES had better follow-up results. DCB has positive short-term results, but long-term effects differ, however, more research is needed to determine when DES and DCB should be used in medical procedures.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The provision of additional evidence to substantiate the advancement of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy in the treatment of lower limb arteriosclerosis obliterans, particularly in the below-the-knee area characterized by high calcium load and significant occlusion, is comparable in efficacy to conventional procedures. This finding is advantageous for the progress of interventional revascularization. The advancement and efficacy of DCB have resulted in improved treatment outcomes for medical practitioners in clinical settings. Our research incorporates the most recent randomized experiments.

Polymer Free Amphilimus Drug Eluting Stent for Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: A New Device in the Armamentarium

Background and Objectives: Endovascular technologies have significantly improved the outcome of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Drug eluting stents (DES) have documented their efficacy against percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bare metal stents (BMS) in infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. However, late in-stent neoatherosclerosis may lead to vascular lumen loss and eventually thrombosis. Polymer free DES constitute a new technology aiming to improve long term patency which their action is still under investigation. The purpose of this study is to report the mechanism of action and to provide a literature review of a novel polymer free amphilimus eluting stent (Cre8, Alvimedica, Instabul, Turkey) in infrapopliteal arterial disease. Methods: Publications listed in electronic databases, European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database, as well as scientific programmes of recent interventional vascular conferences were searched. Three studies were included. We analyzed primary and secondary patency, major amputation rate, freedom from CD-TLR, and mortality. Results: Cre8 was implanted in 79 patients with CLI. Most of the patients (n = 65) were Rutherford class 5-6 (82.3%), and diabetes mellitus (DM) was present in 66 patients (83.5%). Mean primary patency was 82.5% at 12 months. Mean lesion stented length was 20 mm and 35 mm in two studies. Mean limb salvage was 91.3% at 12 months. Freedom from CD-TLR was reported in two out of the three studies and was 96% and 83.8%. Mortality was 15% and 23.8% in the same studies, whilst it was not reported in one study. Conclusion: Stenting of infrapopliteal arteries with Cre8 is safe and feasible in patients with CLI and diabetes. All studies have shown very good primary patency and freedom from CD-TLR at 12 and 24 months. Larger observational prospective studies and randomized trials are necessary to establish long term effectiveness and clinical outcomes using the non-polymer Cre8 DES.

The application of tissue-engineered fish swim bladder vascular graft

Small diameter (< 6 mm) prosthetic vascular grafts continue to show very low long-term patency, but bioengineered vascular grafts show promising results in preclinical experiments. To assess a new scaffold source, we tested the use of decellularized fish swim bladder as a vascular patch and tube in rats. Fresh goldfish (Carassius auratus) swim bladder was decellularized, coated with rapamycin and then formed into patches or tubes for implantation in vivo. The rapamycin-coated patches showed decreased neointimal thickness in both the aorta and inferior vena cava patch angioplasty models. Rapamycin-coated decellularized swim bladder tubes implanted into the aorta showed decreased neointimal thickness compared to uncoated tubes, as well as fewer macrophages. These data show that the fish swim bladder can be used as a scaffold source for tissue-engineering vascular patches or vessels.

Bai et al. employ a fish bladder-derived decellularized matrix for the engineering of vascular grafts. The authors show that rapamycin-coated bladder-derived vascular grafts can be implanted as an interposition graft in rats, and that these vascular grafts showed decreased neointimal thickness both in artery and veins.