Impact of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage following endovascular repair on long-term outcomes between favorable and hostile neck anatomy

Single Centre Evaluation of the Proposal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Guidelines to Stratify Surveillance after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare methods that identify patients at low risk of developing complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and who would thus not require surveillance in the first post-operative years.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single centre, cohort study including all patients after elective infrarenal EVAR with both immediate post-operative and one year computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging. Patients were categorised by adherence to instructions for use (IFU), adequate seal, and absence of endoleak (method A1), and without high risk features (method A2) on the first post-operative CTA. Additionally, these patients were dichotomised based on aneurysm sac shrinkage at one year (> 5 mm maximum diameter reduction, method B). Outcomes were graft related adverse events and all cause death. Negative predictive value (NPV) was used to compare risk classifications.

RESULTS

Of 422 eligible patients, 297 underwent the required imaging for classification: 140 (47.1%) and 109 (36.7%) patients were classified as low risk based on methods A1 and A2, respectively, while 147 (49.5%) were assumed low risk based on method B. The five year cumulative incidence of adverse events in low risk patients according to method A1 was 14.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5 - 20.9%), similar to method A2 (16.1%, 95% CI 8.8 - 23.4%) and method B (15.4%, 95% CI 9.3 - 21.5%). The five year median NPV for adverse events for method A1 was 85.2% (95% CI 79.7 - 90.8%), comparable with method A2 (83.8%, 95% CI 76.9 - 90.3%; p = .37) and method B (84.7%, 95% CI 79.4 - 89.5%; p = .87). Significantly higher NPVs were found by combining method A1 or A2 with method B, with median values ≥ 95% up to four years after EVAR. The five year NPV for death did not differ between methods (five year NPVmethod A1, 81.7%, 95% CI 76.6 - 86.5%).

CONCLUSION

Refraining from imaging in the first five years after EVAR in patients treated within IFU and with a favourable post-operative CTA would have failed to detect important complications at an early stage. It is proposed to combine the post-operative CTA with sac shrinkage at one year in order to stratify post-EVAR surveillance. No benefit was found in considering the high risk features suggested in the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Graft Replacement and Aneurysmorrhaphy with Graft Preservation for Type 2 Endoleaks after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes between graft replacement and aneurysmorrhaphy with ligation of the aortic side branches for type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed multicenter data of patients who underwent open surgical conversion, including graft replacement or aneurysmorrhaphy with ligation of the aortic side branches (graft preservation) for the treatment of type 2 endoleaks between 2007 and 2022. The endpoints were postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, overall survival, and reintervention or sac expansion after open surgical conversion.

RESULTS

Forty patients underwent open surgical conversion (graft replacement, n = 9; graft preservation, n = 31). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics at open surgical conversion or anatomical data of the initial EVAR between the groups. The median operative time and amount of blood loss were significantly lesser in the graft preservation group than in the replacement group (179 vs. 318 min, P < 0.001, and 710 vs. 2,567 mL, P = 0.030, respectively). There was no difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P = 0.645). No 30-day mortality was observed in any of the groups. Overall survival rate at 5 years after open surgical conversion was 85.7% in the graft replacement group and 77.8% in the graft preservation group (P = 0.789). Freedom from sac expansion or reintervention rate at 5 years after open surgical conversion was 100% in the graft replacement group and 76.0% in the graft preservation group (P = 0.239).

CONCLUSION

Aneurysmorrhaphy with ligation of the aortic side branches was less invasive treatment compared with graft replacement, although there were no differences in postoperative complications. No reintervention was needed after graft replacement; however, some patients required reintervention after graft preservation. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of type 2 endoleak.

Endovascular Aneurysmal Repair With the INCRAFT Stent Graft System for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Combined Korean Multi-Center and Single-Center Registry Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The INCRAFT™ Stent Graft System is a trimodular, bifurcated, ultra-low-profile endovascular device designed for endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population comprised a prospective multi-center cohort (n = 85) and a single-center retrospective cohort (n = 61) of Korean AAA patients treated with INCRAFT. Postprocedural follow-up involved computed tomography (CT) imaging at 1 and 12 months post-procedure to monitor aneurysm dimensions and detect any endoleak.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 72.0 ± 7.1 years, with the majority being male (91.8%). The average maximal aortic sac diameter was 54.7 ± 8.6 mm. Technical success was achieved in 82.9%, primarily due to the relatively high incidence of type I endoleak (17.1%) observed on immediate angiographical assessment. The rate of 30-day major vascular complication was 0.7%. For the hemostasis of bilateral femoral access arteries, 57.5% required only 2 ProGlides. At the 30-day follow-up CT, the prevalence of endoleaks was 30.4% including type I (1.4%), type II (26.1%), and undermined type (2.8%). At the 12-month follow-up, the major adverse event rate was 6.2% attributed to noncardiovascular mortality. Aneurysm-related events included 3 cases (2.1%) of re-interventions due to graft occlusion (n = 2) and type II endoleak with sac expansion (n = 1). Aneurysm shrinkage and enlargement occurred in 37.8% and 3.4% of patients, respectively. At the 12-month follow-up, type II endoleak was the most frequent type, with a prevalence of 22.7%. Type I endoleak and undetermined type were found in 0.8% and 17.8% of cases, respectively, with no instances of type III endoleak.

CONCLUSION

INCRAFT demonstrated favorable early and 12-month clinical efficacy and safety profiles for treating Korean patients with AAA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

K-INCRAFT; www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT03952780Clinical ImpactEndovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR) is effective treatment option for unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients with high perioperative risk and suitable anatomy. The INCRAFT stent graft system is an ultra-low-profile endovascular graft designed for EVAR, and its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in multi-center European and U.S.

TRIALS

Our study found that the INCRAFT stent graft system has favorable early and 12-month clinical efficacy and safety profiles in treating AAAs within Korean population, with a 30-day major vascular complications rate of 0.7% and no cases of aneurysmal-related mortality or rupture.

Long-Term Outcomes of Simple Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Based on the Initial Aortic Diameter

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the effects of initial abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter on aneurysmal sac expansion/shrinkage, endoleaks, and reintervention postelective simple endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Overall, 228 patients monitored for >1 year after EVAR were analyzed. Male and female participants with initial AAA diameters <55 mm and <50 mm, respectively, composed the small group (group S), while those with initial AAA diameters ≥55 mm (men) and ≥50 mm (women) composed the large group (group L). Aneurysmal sac expansion of 10 mm and/or reintervention during follow-up (composite event) and its related factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 5-year freedom from composite event rate was significantly higher in group S (92.4 ± 2.8%) than that in group L (79.1 ± 4.9%; P <0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed AAA diameters before EVAR in group S (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.81; P = 0.01) and type II endoleak (T2EL) at discharge (hazard ratio, 2.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-6.20; P <0.01) as factors associated with the composite event. The freedom from composite event rate decreased to 51 ± 13% at 5 years in group L with T2EL.

CONCLUSIONS

Group S had high freedom from composite event rate; in group L, the rate decreased to 51% at 5 years with T2EL at discharge.

Five-year outcomes of endosuture aneurysm repair in patients with short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm from the ANCHOR registry

OBJECTIVE

Hostile aortic neck anatomies such as proximal short necks are known to put patients at an increased risk for type IA endoleaks, migration, and need for reinterventions. The Heli-FX EndoAnchor System was designed to improve seal of aortic stent grafts. Endosuture aneurysm repair (ESAR) using EndoAnchors with the Endurant stent graft has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of patients with short necks through one year. This study reports the 5-year patient outcomes of the Aneurysm Treatment using the Heli-FX EndoAnchor System Global Registry (ANCHOR) short neck regulatory cohort.

METHODS

The 70 patients from the ANCHOR Registry were cohort submitted to regulators for approval of the Endurant short neck indication. Patients had an infrarenal neck length of ≥ 4 mm and <10 mm. At 5 years, this short neck cohort had clinical and imaging follow-up compliance rates of 85% (28/33) and 70% (23/33), respectively.

RESULTS

The short neck cohort had a mean age of 71.3±8.1 years and was 27.1% (19/70) female. Kaplan Meier freedom from all-cause mortality was 68.5 ± 6.2%, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 90.1 ± 4.5%, freedom from any endovascular or surgical secondary procedure was 76.9 ± 7.2%, and freedom from rupture was 95.6 ± 3.2%. Eight patients had a total of nine type IA endoleaks detected through 5 years, of which three resolved spontaneously by the next follow-up visit. There were two patients with renal complications who did not undergo reintervention and there were no device migrations reported through 5 years. After 5 years, 68.2% of patients (15/22) had sac regression, 13.6% (3/22) had stable sacs, and 18.2% (4/22) had increased sac diameter as compared with their 1-month measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

After ESAR treatment using Heli-FX EndoAnchors with Endurant, the 5-year outcomes of the short neck cohort from the ANCHOR registry had encouraging results with regards to proximal neck-related complications, secondary procedures, and sac regression. This review of ESAR in patients with short proximal necks showed positive outcomes through 5 years although follow-up of a larger cohort is necessary.