Outcomes of patients with aortic vascular graft and endograft infections initially contra-indicated for complete graft explantation

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Aortic Vascular Graft and Endograft Infection-Patient Outcome Cannot Be Determined Based on Pre-Operative Characteristics

Vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) is a serious complication after aortic surgery. This study investigates VGEI and patient characteristics, PET/CT quantification before surgical or conservative management of VGEI and post-intervention outcomes in order to identify patients who might benefit from such a procedure. PET standard uptake values (SUV) were quantitatively assessed and compared to a non-VGEI cohort. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and aortic reintervention-free survival at six months. Ninety-three patients (75% male, 65 ± 10 years, 82% operated) were included. The initial operation was mainly for aneurysm (67.7%: 31% EVAR, 12% TEVAR, 57% open aortic repair). Thirty-two patients presented with fistulae. PET SUVTLR (target-to-liver ratio) showed 94% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Replacement included silver-coated Dacron (21.3%), pericardium (61.3%) and femoral vein (17.3%), yet the material did not influence the overall survival (p = 0.745). In-hospital mortality did not differ between operative and conservative treatment (19.7% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.84). At six months, 50% of the operated cohort survived without aortic reintervention. Short- and midterm morbidity and mortality remained high after aortic graft removal. Neither preoperative characteristics nor the material used for reconstruction influenced the overall survival, and, with limitations, both the in-hospital and midterm survival were similar between the surgically and conservatively managed patients.

Management of secondary aorto-enteric fistulae: a multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF) are a rare, complex and life-threatening complication following aortic repair. Traditional treatment strategy has been with open aortic repair (OAR), with emergence of endovascular repair (EVAR) as a potentially viable initial treatment option. Controversy exists over optimal immediate and long-term management.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, multi-institutional cohort study. Patients who had been treated for SAEF between 2003 and 2020 were identified using a standardized database. Baseline characteristics, presenting features, microbiological, operative, and post-operative variables were recorded. The primary outcomes were short and mid-term mortality. Descriptive statistics, binomial regression, Kaplan-Meier and Cox age-adjusted survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Across 5 tertiary centres, a total of 47 patients treated for SAEF were included, 7 were female and the median (range) age at presentation was 74 years (48-93). In this cohort, 24 (51%) patients were treated with initially with OAR, 15 (32%) with EVAR-first and 8 (17%) non-operatively. The 30-day and 1-year mortality for all cases that underwent intervention was 21% and 46% respectively. Age-adjusted survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in mortality in the EVAR-first group compared to the OAR-first group, HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.03, P = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

In this study there was no difference in all-cause mortality in patients who had OAR or EVAR as first line treatment for SAEF. In the acute setting, alongside broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, EVAR can be considered as an initial treatment for patients with SAEF, as a primary treatment or a bridge to definitive OAR.

Aortic Endograft Infection: Diagnosis and Management

Aortic endograft infection (AEI) is a rare but life-threatening complication of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The clinical features of AEI range from generalized weakness and mild fever to fatal aortic rupture or sepsis. The diagnosis of AEI usually depends on clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria are often used to diagnose AEI. Surgical removal of the infected endograft, restoration of aortic blood flow, and antimicrobial therapy are the main components of AEI treatment. After removing an infected endograft, in situ aortic reconstruction is often performed instead of an extra-anatomic bypass. Various biological and prosthetic aortic grafts have been used in aortic reconstruction to avoid reinfection, rupture, or occlusion. Each type of graft has its own merits and disadvantages. In patients with an unacceptably high surgical risk and no evidence of an aortic fistula, conservative treatment can be an alternative. Treatment results are determined by bacterial virulence, patient status, including the presence of an aortic fistula, and hospital factors. Considering the severity of this condition, the best strategy is prevention. When encountering a patient with AEI, current practice emphasizes a multidisciplinary team approach to achieve an optimal outcome.

Infection of Vascular Prostheses: A Comprehensive Review

Vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI) is a complex disease that complicates vascular-surgery and endovascular-surgery procedures and determines high morbidity and mortality. This review article provides the most updated general evidence on the pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VGEI. Several microorganisms are involved in VGEI development, but the most frequent one, responsible for over 75% of infections, is Staphylococcus aureus. Specific clinical, surgical, radiologic, and laboratory criteria are pivotal for the diagnosis of VGEI. Surgery and antimicrobial therapy are cornerstones in treatment for most patients with VGEI. For patients unfit for surgery, alternative treatment is available to improve the clinical course of VGEI.

Referral Centre Experience with Infected Abdominal Aortic Endograft Explantation

OBJECTIVE

The increasing use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) appears to be associated with the burden of vascular endograft infections. Complete stent graft explantation is recommended but leads to significant mortality. This study aimed to assess the technical challenges, complications, and mortality rate following infected endograft explantation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent abdominal aortic endograft explantation for infection at the Bordeaux University Hospital from July 2008 to December 2020 were included retrospectively in this single centre observational study. The diagnosis was established based on the MAGIC criteria. The primary endpoint was 30 day mortality. Secondary endpoints were 90 day and in hospital mortality, survival, and re-infection.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included, median age 69 years (interquartile range [IQR] 65, 76), with four (12%) treated as an emergency. The median time from EVAR to explantation was 17.5 months (4.5 - 36.3). In situ reconstruction was carried out with prosthetic grafts in 24 patients (71%, including 23 antimicrobial grafts combining silver and triclosan), and biological grafts in 10 (five femoral veins, four arterial allografts, three bovine patches, one biosynthetic graft). Seventeen aorto-enteric fistulae (AEnF) were addressed with direct repair of the intestinal tract (n = 10/17; 59%) or resection and anastomosis (n = 7/17; 41%). The culture was polymicrobial in 12 patients (35%) and remained sterile in four (12%). The 30 day and in hospital mortality rates were 21% (n = 7) and 27% (n = 9). Twenty-five patients (73%) presented with early post-operative complications, requiring 16 revision procedures (47%). Over a median follow up of 16.2 months (IQR 8.3, 33.6), the mortality rate was 35% (n = 12; 11 aortic related; 32%), with two re-infections (6%), both after biological reconstruction (one for an AEnF).

CONCLUSION

Early morbidity and mortality remain high after complete infected endograft explantation, even in a high volume centre. Comparison with other treatment modalities in large multicentre cohorts might be of interest.