1
|
Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF, Wasan SM, Meissner MH, Almeida J, Brown KR, Bush RL, Di Iorio M, Fish J, Fukaya E, Gloviczki ML, Hingorani A, Jayaraj A, Kolluri R, Murad MH, Obi AT, Ozsvath KJ, Singh MJ, Vayuvegula S, Welch HJ. The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II: Endorsed by the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2024; 12:101670. [PMID: 37652254 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
The Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society recently published Part I of the 2022 clinical practice guidelines on varicose veins. Recommendations were based on the latest scientific evidence researched following an independent systematic review and meta-analysis of five critical issues affecting the management of patients with lower extremity varicose veins, using the patients, interventions, comparators, and outcome system to answer critical questions. Part I discussed the role of duplex ultrasound scanning in the evaluation of varicose veins and treatment of superficial truncal reflux. Part II focuses on evidence supporting the prevention and management of varicose vein patients with compression, on treatment with drugs and nutritional supplements, on evaluation and treatment of varicose tributaries, on superficial venous aneurysms, and on the management of complications of varicose veins and their treatment. All guidelines were based on systematic reviews, and they were graded according to the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using the GRADE method. All ungraded Consensus Statements were supported by an extensive literature review and the unanimous agreement of an expert, multidisciplinary panel. Ungraded Good Practice Statements are recommendations that are supported only by indirect evidence. The topic, however, is usually noncontroversial and agreed upon by most stakeholders. The Implementation Remarks contain technical information that supports the implementation of specific recommendations. This comprehensive document includes a list of all recommendations (Parts I-II), ungraded consensus statements, implementation remarks, and best practice statements to aid practitioners with appropriate, up-to-date management of patients with lower extremity varicose veins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Gloviczki
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Peter F Lawrence
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Suman M Wasan
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Rex Vascular Specialists, UNC Health, Raleigh, NC
| | - Mark H Meissner
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jose Almeida
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | | | - Ruth L Bush
- John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | | | - John Fish
- Department of Medicine, Jobst Vascular Institute, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
| | - Eri Fukaya
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Monika L Gloviczki
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gonda Vascular Center, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Arjun Jayaraj
- RANE Center for Venous and Lymphatic Diseases, Jackson, MS
| | - Raghu Kolluri
- Heart and Vascular Service, OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Evidence Based Practice Center, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clark MR, Taylor AC. Pelvic Venous Disorders: An Update in Terminology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Semin Intervent Radiol 2023; 40:362-371. [PMID: 37575340 PMCID: PMC10415053 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Pelvic venous disorder (PeVD) is a term that encompasses all the interrelated causes of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and perineal/lower extremity varicose veins of pelvic venous origin historically known as nutcracker syndrome, pelvic congestion syndrome, and May-Thurner syndrome, resulting in a more precise diagnosis that accounts for the underlying pathophysiology and anatomy. PeVD manifests as CPP with associated vulvar and lower-extremity varicosities, left flank pain and hematuria, and lower extremity pain and swelling secondary to obstruction or reflux in the left renal, ovarian, or iliac veins. This article will focus specifically on the most current nomenclature, evaluation, and management of CPP of venous origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan R. Clark
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Amy C. Taylor
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ford RW, Winokur RS. Pelvic Venous Disorders (PeVD). Semin Intervent Radiol 2022; 39:483-489. [PMID: 36561941 PMCID: PMC9767768 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs) have replaced the concept of pelvic congestion syndrome encompassing venous origin chronic pelvic pain (VO-CPP) in women. The evaluation of women with VO-CPP includes the assessment for other causes of pelvic pain as well as imaging evaluation for pelvic varicosities measuring greater than 5 mm diameter, ovarian vein diameter, and flow direction, as well as iliac vein diameter and signs of compression. Proper identification of these patients can lead to high degrees of success eliminating chronic pelvic pain following ovarian vein embolization and/or iliac vein stenting. Strong encouragement is provided to use the symptoms, varices, pathophysiology classification for these patients and upcoming research studies on the specific symptoms of patients with VO-CPP will help elucidate patient selection for intervention. Additional future randomized controlled trials are also upcoming to evaluate for outcomes of ovarian vein embolization and iliac vein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W. Ford
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronald S. Winokur
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
CARVALHO SFCD, METZGER. PB, FERNANDEZ MG, RIBEIRO WB, NOGUEIRA AKS, SOUZA JPRE. PELVIC VENOUS REFLUX EMBOLIZATION IN THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC PELVIC CONGESTIVE SYNDROME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
5
|
Marcelin C, Le Bras Y, Molina Andreo I, Jambon E, Grenier N. Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Venous Disorders in Females. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2337. [PMID: 36292025 PMCID: PMC9600975 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic venous pathologies in females are responsible for chronic symptoms grouped under the term pelvic congestion syndrome, which includes chronic pelvic pain, perineal heaviness, urgency, and postcoital pain, along with vulvar, perineal, and lower limb varicose veins. These conditions are also associated with ovarian and pelvic venous reflux and venous obstruction. This review aimed to explore the clinical and imaging modalities for diagnosing pelvic congestion syndrome, pelvic venous pathologies, their therapeutic management, and their outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Marcelin
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Pellegrin de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sheikh AB, Fudim M, Garg I, Minhas AMK, Sobotka AA, Patel MR, Eng MH, Sobotka PA. The Clinical Problem of Pelvic Venous Disorders. Interv Cardiol Clin 2022; 11:307-324. [PMID: 35710285 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Pelvic venous disorders are inter-related pathologic conditions caused by reflux and obstruction in the pelvic veins. It can present a spectrum of clinical features based on the route of transmission of venous hypertension to either distal or caudal venous reservoirs. Imaging can help to visualize pelvic vascular and visceral structures to rule out other gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and urologic diseases. Endovascular treatment, owing to its low invasive nature and high success rate, has become the mainstay in the management of pelvic venous disorders. This article reviews the pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to pelvic venous disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abu Baker Sheikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1021 Medical Arts Avenue NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA
| | - Marat Fudim
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, 300 West Morgan Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
| | - Ishan Garg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1021 Medical Arts Avenue NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA
| | - Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Forrest General Hospital, 6051 US 49, Hattiesburg, MS 39401, USA
| | | | - Manesh R Patel
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, 300 West Morgan Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Marvin H Eng
- Division of Cardiology, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, 1111 E McDowell Rd, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA
| | - Paul A Sobotka
- The Ohio State University, 281 West Lane Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Relationships of Pelvic Vein Diameter and Reflux with Clinical Manifestations of Pelvic Venous Disorder. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12010145. [PMID: 35054312 PMCID: PMC8774919 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The causes of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in patients with pelvic venous disorder (PeVD) are not completely understood. Various authors consider dilation of pelvic veins (PeVs) and pelvic venous reflux (PVR) as the main mechanisms underlying symptomatic forms of PeVD. The aim of this study was to assess relationships of pelvic vein dilation and PVR with clinical manifestations of PeVD. This non-randomized comparative cohort study included 80 female patients with PeVD who were allocated into two groups with symptomatic (n = 42) and asymptomatic (n = 38) forms of the disease. All patients underwent duplex scanning and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of PeVs with in vivo labeled red blood cells (RBCs). The PeV diameters, the presence, duration and pattern of PVR in the pelvic veins, as well as the coefficient of pelvic venous congestion (CPVC) were assessed. Two groups did not differ significantly in pelvic vein diameters (gonadal veins (GVs): 7.7 ± 1.3 vs. 8.5 ± 0.5 mm; parametrial veins (PVs): 9.8 ± 0.9 vs. 9.5 ± 0.9 mm; and uterine veins (UVs): 5.6 ± 0.2 vs. 5.5 ± 0.6 mm). Despite this, CPVC was significantly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients (1.9 ± 0.4 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively; p = 0.008). Symptomatic patients had type II or III PVR, while asymptomatic patients had type I PVR. The reflux duration was found to be significantly greater in symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients (median and interquartile range: 4.0 [3.0; 5.0] vs. 1.0 [0; 2.0] s for GVs, p = 0.008; 4.0 [3.0; 5.0] vs. 1.1 [1.0; 2.0] s for PVs, p = 0.007; and 2.0 [2.0; 3.0] vs. 1.0 [1.0; 2.0] s for UVs, p = 0.04). Linear correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship (Pearson's r = 0.78; p = 0.007) of CPP with the PVR duration but not with vein diameter. The grade of PeV dilation may not be a determining factor in CPP development in patients with PeVD. The presence and duration of reflux in the pelvic veins were found to be predictors of the development of symptomatic PeVD.
Collapse
|
8
|
Stratification of pelvic venous reflux in patients with pelvic varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021; 9:1417-1424. [PMID: 34023538 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated the association between the pattern and duration of pelvic venous reflux (PVR) and pelvic pain severity in patients with pelvic varicose veins (PVVs). METHODS The present retrospective study included 600 female patients with PVVs. Of the 600 patients, 453 had had PVVs and pelvic congestion syndrome (group 1) and 147 had had an asymptomatic disease course (group 2). Pelvic venous pain (PVP) was assessed using a visual analog scale. All the patients had undergone duplex ultrasound of the left and right renal veins, external, internal, and common iliac veins, and parametrial, uterine, gonadal, and vulvar veins (PV, UV, GV, and VV, respectively), with an assessment of their patency and diameter and the presence and duration of reflux. Reflux in the pelvic veins was considered pathologic if it lasted for >1 second. RESULTS In group 1, PVR type I (1-2 seconds), II (3-5 seconds), and III (>5 seconds or spontaneous reflux in the absence of a loading test) was found in 31%, 58%, and 11% of the patients, respectively. Moderate and severe reflux (types II and III) was associated with severe PVP (mean score, 8.3 ± 0.5) in 69% of the group 1 patients. A combination of reflux in the GV, PV, UV, and internal iliac vein was associated with severe PVP (mean score, 8.1 ± 0.3) in 51% of these patients. A combination of reflux in the PVs, UVs, and VVs was associated with moderate pain (mean score, 5.3 ± 0.2) in 49.2% of group 1. In group 2, PVR type I, II, and III was present in 95%, 4%, and 1% of the patients, respectively, and was observed in the PV only in patients with type I; in the GVs, PVs, UVs, and internal iliac veins in those with type II; and in the PVs and GVs in the patients with type III reflux. Reflux in the GVs and UVs was significantly more prevalent in group 1 than in group 2 (GVs, 51% vs 6%; P = .0001; UVs, 57% vs 7%; P = .0001). A combination of reflux in the GVs and UVs was a predictor of severe PVVs (odds ratio, 19.7; 95% confidence interval, 11.3-34.6). CONCLUSIONS In patients with PVVs, the presence and severity of pelvic pain will be determined by the type of PVR and its distribution in the pelvic veins. The combination of moderate to severe reflux (types II and III) in the PVs, UVs, and GVs was a predictor of severe PVP. Patients with asymptomatic PVVs were characterized by mild reflux (type I) in the PVs, with rare involvement of the GVs and UVs.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The term pelvic venous disorders (PeVD) describes a group of related clinical entities with overlapping clinical presentations that were previously characterized by separate imprecise syndromic terminology. The clinical manifestations of PeVD may variously include chronic pelvic pain; pelvic origin extrapelvic lower extremity and genital varices; lower extremity pain and swelling; and left flank pain and hematuria. This manuscript focuses on the primary manifestations of PeVD in women - chronic pelvic pain and pelvic origin lower extremity and vulvar varices - and will review the underlying pathophysiology and related complicating factors (such as maladaptive pain responses) to explain the variety of clinical presentations.
Collapse
|
10
|
French S, Daugherty S, Thul S. Pelvic Venous Disease: Identifying This Commonly Overlooked Cause of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women. J Nurse Pract 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Gibson K, Minjarez R. Vascular Disease Patient Information Page: Pelvic venous reflux (pelvic congestion syndrome). Vasc Med 2019; 24:467-471. [PMID: 31441390 DOI: 10.1177/1358863x19868282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
12
|
Khilnani NM, Meissner MH, Learman LA, Gibson KD, Daniels JP, Winokur RS, Marvel RP, Machan L, Venbrux AC, Tu FF, Pabon-Ramos WM, Nedza SM, White SB, Rosenblatt M. Research Priorities in Pelvic Venous Disorders in Women: Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Research Consensus Panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30:781-789. [PMID: 30857986 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs) in women can present with chronic pelvic pain, lower-extremity and vulvar varicosities, lower-extremity swelling and pain, and left-flank pain and hematuria. Multiple evidence gaps exist related to PeVDs with the consequence that nonvascular specialists rarely consider the diagnosis. Recognizing this, the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation funded a Research Consensus Panel to prioritize a research agenda to address these gaps. This paper presents the proceedings and recommendations from that Panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil M Khilnani
- Division of Interventional Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, 2315 Broadway, Fourth Floor, New York, New York 10128.
| | - Mark H Meissner
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lee A Learman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles A. Schmidt School of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida
| | | | - Jane P Daniels
- Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ronald S Winokur
- Division of Interventional Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, 2315 Broadway, Fourth Floor, New York, New York 10128
| | | | - Lindsay Machan
- Departments of Radiology and Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anthony C Venbrux
- Division of Interventional Radiology, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Frank F Tu
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Medical Group, Skokie, Illinois
| | - Waly M Pabon-Ramos
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Susan M Nedza
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sarah B White
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Froedtert Hopsital, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Mel Rosenblatt
- Connecticut Image-Guided Surgery, Fairfield, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|