Retrieval characteristics of the Bard Denali and Argon Option inferior vena cava filters

Comparison of success and cost after retrieval of two inferior vena cava filters

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to help guide inferior vena cava (IVC) filter choices by better understanding the retrieval characteristics, complications, and total costs between two commonly used IVC filters.

METHODS

All patients who underwent retrieval or attempted retrieval of Denali (Bard Peripheral Vascular) or Option (Argon Medical Devices) IVC filters were identified between March 2016 and October 2021 at a single tertiary care center. Those with imaging studies that permitted evaluation of filter placement, presence or degree of tilt, and/or hooking of the filter into the IVC wall were included in the present study. Filter retrieval success, number of attempts, use of advanced techniques, and fluoroscopy and procedural times were recorded and compared between the two filters.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients presented for retrieval of 52 Denali and 35 Option Elite filters during the study period. Denali filters were more likely to be successfully retrieved at the first attempt (94% vs 77%; P = .019). The procedural and fluoroscopy times were shorter for Denali filters (29 minutes vs 63 minutes [P < .001] and 7 minutes vs 25 minutes [P < .001], respectively). Denali filters were less likely to be significantly tilted (≥15○) at retrieval (12% vs 29%; P < .001) or to have the filter hook embedded in the IVC wall (6% vs 40%; P < .001). Tilting of the filter of ≥15○ had no significant effects on the retrieval success rate (no tilt or tilt <15○ vs tilt of ≥15○: 98% vs 100%; P = .58). In contrast, filter hook penetration into the IVC wall significantly reduced successful recovery (41% vs 99%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study suggest that although the filter designs are similar, a benefit exists in the ease of retrievability of the Denali over the Option filter. We found that tilting and hooking of the filter in the IVC wall occurred significantly more with the Option filter. These factors likely made retrieval more difficult and contributed to the longer procedure and fluoroscopy times.

Characteristics of Option and Denali Inferior Vena Cava Filters

BACKGROUND

To assess the characteristics of Option and Denali filters and to identify associations between these characteristics in each filter type.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent Option or Denali filter placement between August 2019 and August 2022 were included in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients (Option, n = 60; Denali, n = 59) were included. The retrieval rates were 45.0% for Option filters and 40.7% for Denali filters. The incidence of tilt at placement was higher for Option filters (76.7%) than for Denali filters (11.9%; P < 0.001). The tilt angle of Option filters at placement was correlated with the common iliac vein-inferior vena cava (CIV-IVC) angle. The incidence of tilt angle change after placement was higher for Option filters (74.1%) than for Denali filters (8.3%; P = 0.001). The IVC contraction rate after retrieval of Option is less than Denali (22.2% vs. 87.5%, P < 0.001). The median fluoroscopy time during Option filter retrieval was longer than during Denali filter retrieval. The fluoroscopic time was related to tilt angle during retrieval of Option filters.

CONCLUSIONS

Option filters are more likely than Denali filters to tilt at placement, and the tilt angle of Option filters is more prone to change after placement. The tilt angle at placement in Option filters is related to the CIV-IVC angle. Option filters require a longer fluoroscopic time during retrieval than Denali filters, and this increased fluoroscopic time is related to the tilt angle. Denali is more likely to cause IVC constriction after placement.

Denali Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: Complications and Success Rates

PURPOSE

The present study was to evaluate the outcomes of Denali filter retrieval.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 143 patients who received Denali filter insertion from September 2015 to April 2020. Ninety-seven patients who required removal of the filters were include in this study. Filters were retrieved with either standard or advanced techniques. Venography before and after retrieval was obtained to evaluate technical success, complications and duration of filter insertion.

RESULTS

All 97 filters were retrieved successfully without complications. Ninety-two (94.8%) were retrieved with standard technique and 5 filters (5.2%) required the advanced technique. There were two cases with a filter angle greater than 15 degrees. Inferior vena cava penetration was shown in 17 patients (17.5%) on venography but was not associated with contrast media extravasation after filter removal.

CONCLUSION

The Denali filter showed a high rate of successful retrieval without complications. This study adds value to previous studies and trials showing that the Denali filter is a reliable and safe filter that can potentially improve retrieval rates, with increasing use of this device.

Clinical outcomes of retrievable inferior vena cava filters for venous thromboembolic diseases

Aim: To identify literature evidence assessing retrievable inferior vena cava filter (rIVCF) for venous thromboembolic diseases. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant references from the mainstay English and Chinese bibliographic databases (search period: January 2003 to October 2019). Results: 80 original studies with 11,413 patients were included in this review. The success rates of deploying the six types of rIVCFs ranged from 98.4 to 100.0%. Denali had the highest retrieval success rate (95.4-97.6%). The incidence rates of fracture and perforation associated with retrieving the six rIVCFs were less than 2%. Conclusion: The approved rIVCF had comparable clinical profiles, except that Denali was easier to be retrieved than other rIVCF.

Computational evaluation of inferior vena cava filters through computational fluid dynamics methods

Numerical simulation is growing in its importance toward the design, testing and evaluation of medical devices. Computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis allow improved calculation of stress, heat transfer, and flow to better understand the medical device environment. Current research focuses not only on improving medical devices, but also on improving the computational tools themselves. As methods and computer technology allow for faster simulation times, iterations and trials can be performed faster to collect more data. Given the adverse events associated with long-term inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement, IVC filter design and device evaluation are of paramount importance. This work reviews computational methods used to develop, test, and improve IVC filters to ultimately serve the needs of the patient.

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Evaluation and Management for the Diagnostic Radiologist: A Comprehensive Review Including Inferior Vena Cava Filter-Related Complications and PRESERVE Trial Filters

Inferior vena cava filters are commonly encountered devices on diagnostic imaging that were highlighted in a 2010 Food and Drug Administration safety advisory regarding their complications from long-term implantation. The Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE) trial is an ongoing after-market study investigating the safety and utility of commonly utilized filters in practice today. While most of these filters are safe, prompt recognition and management of any filter-associated complication is imperative to prevent or reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with them. This review is aimed at discussing the appropriate utilization and placement of inferior vena cava filters in addition to the recognition of filter-associated complications on cross-sectional imaging. An overview of the PRESRVE trial filters is also provided to understand each filter's propensity for specific complications.