1
|
Liu Y, Ma J, Wang Q, Zeng W, He C. Successful retrieval of tip-embedded inferior vena cava filter using a modified forceps technique: case report. Thromb J 2024; 22:25. [PMID: 38475817 DOI: 10.1186/s12959-024-00595-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is essential for preventing complications associated with the device. Advanced techniques have been developed to improve the success rate of retrieving tip-embedded filters. The forceps technique is frequently used to address this issue. CASE PRESENTATION We present a case study of two patients who underwent a successful tip-embedded IVC filter retrieval using a modified forceps technique, which has not been previously reported. This technique involves using a wire loop under the filter tip and a forceps to grasp the filter shoulder. By pulling the wire loop and pushing the forceps in counterforce, the filter tip is straightened and aligned with the vascular sheath. The vascular sheath can then dissect the filter tip out from the caval wall and get inside the sheath to complete the retrieval. CONCLUSIONS The modified forceps technique we present here offers a new solution for the complex retrieval of IVC filters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 610072, Chengdu, Sichuan, CN, China
| | - Junlong Ma
- Department of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic and Vascular surgery, Meishan municipal people's hospital, Meishan, Sichuan, CN, China
| | - Qiqi Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 610072, Chengdu, Sichuan, CN, China
| | - Wei Zeng
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 610072, Chengdu, Sichuan, CN, China
| | - Chunshui He
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 610072, Chengdu, Sichuan, CN, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kang RD, Schuchardt P, Charles J, Kumar P, Drews E, Kazi S, DePalma A, Fang A, Raymond A, Davis C, Massis K, Hoots G, Mhaskar R, Nezami N, Shaikh J. Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails. CVIR Endovasc 2023; 6:55. [PMID: 37950835 PMCID: PMC10640549 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-023-00392-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endobronchial forceps are commonly used for complex IVC filter removal and after initial attempts at IVC filter retrieval with a snare have failed. Currently, there are no clear guidelines to help distinguish cases where primary removal should be attempted with standard snare technique or whether attempts at removal should directly be started with forceps. This study is aimed to identify clinical and imaging predictors of snare failure which necessitate conversion to endobronchial forceps. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 543 patients who underwent IVC filter retrievals were performed at three large quaternary care centers from Jan 2015 to Jan 2022. Patient demographics and IVC filter characteristics on cross-sectional images (degree of tilt, hook embedment, and strut penetration, etc.) were reviewed. Binary multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of IVC filter retrieval where snare retrieval would fail. RESULTS Thirty seven percent of the patients (n = 203) necessitated utilization of endobronchial forceps. IVC filter hook embedment (OR:4.55; 95%CI: 1.74-11.87; p = 0.002) and strut penetration (OR: 56.46; 95% CI 20.2-157.7; p = 0.001) were predictors of snare failure. In contrast, total dwell time, BMI, and degree of filter tilt were not associated with snare failure. Intraprocedural conversion from snare to endobronchial forceps was significantly associated with increased contrast volume, radiation dose, and total procedure times (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION IVC filter hook embedment and strut penetration were predictors of snare retrieval failure. Intraprocedural conversion from snare to endobronchial forceps increased contrast volume, radiation dose, and total procedure time. When either hook embedment or strut penetration is present on pre-procedural cross-sectional images, IVC filter retrieval should be initiated using endobronchial forceps. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3, large multicenter retrospective cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Kang
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Philip Schuchardt
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan Charles
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Premsai Kumar
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Elena Drews
- Department of Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephanie Kazi
- Department of Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Andres DePalma
- Department of Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adam Fang
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aislynn Raymond
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cliff Davis
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
- Radiology Associates of Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kamal Massis
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
- Radiology Associates of Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Glenn Hoots
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
- Radiology Associates of Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rahul Mhaskar
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Experimental Therapeutics Program, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jamil Shaikh
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Health, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
- Radiology Associates of Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Osztrogonacz PJ, Munawar L, Auyang P, Chinnadurai P, Lumsden AB. Endovascular retrieval of a fractured Optease inferior vena cava filter using endobronchial forceps and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography guidance. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2023; 9:101187. [PMID: 37799830 PMCID: PMC10547734 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Endovascular retrieval of fractured inferior vena cava (IVC) filters after the manufacturer recommended indwelling time can be challenging and require advanced retrieval techniques. We describe an endovascular retrieval technique of a fractured Optease IVC filter in a 57-year-old woman using endobronchial forceps and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography guidance. Following incomplete filter retrieval, the location and orientation of fractured strut was confirmed by cone-beam computed tomography venography. The embedded filter fragment was then successfully removed using endobronchial forceps via a transjugular venous approach. In the present report, we highlight the additional value of intraoperative cross-sectional imaging, in conjunction with advanced endovascular techniques, for retrieval of challenging IVC filters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J. Osztrogonacz
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Leena Munawar
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Philip Auyang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Ponraj Chinnadurai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Malvern, PA
| | - Alan B. Lumsden
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kethidi N, Barsoum K, Shukla PA, Kumar A. Inferior vena cava filter retrievals using advanced techniques: a systematic review. Diagn Interv Radiol 2023; 29:500-508. [PMID: 36960630 PMCID: PMC10679615 DOI: 10.4274/dir.2022.22908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the safety of complex inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval techniques through a systematic review of published literature. Using PubMed, a systematic review was conducted in line with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify articles published through April 2020 that reported on complex IVC filter retrieval techniques in >5 patients. Case reports, review papers, and studies that did not report on primary outcomes or variables of interest were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale. Pooled success and complication rates were calculated for the overall number of complex retrieval attempts as well as for each filter type and each complex retrieval method. Sixteen fair-quality and three good-quality studies met the inclusion criteria, with 758 patients (428 female) who had undergone 770 advanced retrieval attempts. The mean age of the patients was 46.5 ± 7.1 years (range: 14.1-90), and the mean dwell time was 602.5 ± 388.6 days (range: 5-7336). Regarding filters, 92.6% (702/758) were retrievable and 7.4% (56/758) were permanent. Indications for complex retrieval included the failure of standard retrieval (89.2%; 676/758) and tilting or embedding in the caval wall (53.8%; 408/758); 92.6% (713/770) of the advanced retrieval attempts were successful. The pooled success rate was 92.0% (602/654) for retrievable filters and 96.4% (53/55) for permanent filters (P = 0.422). Only 2.8% (21/758) of patients experienced major complications, and the major complication rate was not significantly associated with filter type (P = 0.183). Advanced techniques for IVC filter retrieval appear safe for the retrieval of retrievable filters and certain permanent filters, with a low short-term major complication rate. Further studies on complex retrieval techniques used to remove permanent filters should be conducted to clarify their safety with respect to filter type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhit Kethidi
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Kyrollos Barsoum
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Pratik A. Shukla
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Complex Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrievals: Success Rate and Predictors of Adverse Events at a Large Specialized Referral Center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:389-397. [PMID: 36169541 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Specialized inferior vena cava (IVC) filter referral centers can achieve improved retrieval outcomes, potentially facilitating complex retrievals after long filter dwell times. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the success rate of complex IVC filter retrievals at a large specialized IVC filter referral center and to identify predictors of adverse events during complex retrievals. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent complex IVC filter retrieval from March 2014 to June 2018 at a large regional health system with specialized complex retrieval referral centers and interventional radiologists with expertise in such procedures. Complex retrievals methods included a range of loop snare, coaxial sheath, forceps, and snare techniques. Data were collected from the electronic medical record. The success rate of complex retrieval was determined. Factors associated with adverse events during retrieval procedures were explored. RESULTS. The study included 125 patients (51 women, 74 men; mean age, 60 years). The mean filter dwell time at retrieval was 47.5 months (median, 21.8 months). The complex retrieval success rate was 99.2% on the first attempt and 100.0% overall. A total of 11.2% (14/125) of patients experienced an adverse event during retrieval, including 10.4% (13/125) with minor and 0.8% (1/125) with major events. Prolonged dwell time was the only indication for complex retrieval that was significantly associated with adverse events (adverse event rate, 16.7% for patients with this indication vs 5.1% for patients without this indication; p = .04). In multiple regression analysis, the only significant independent predictor of adverse events was a filter dwell time of 5 years or longer (odds ratio, 6.98 [95% CI, 1.64-29.81]; p = .009). CONCLUSION. In a specialized referral system with expertise in complex retrieval methods, high retrieval success rates can be achieved in patients who have filters with long dwell times. Nonetheless, longer dwell times are associated with adverse events during retrieval procedures. CLINICAL IMPACT. The observations support performing early filter retrieval and referring patients who have filters with prolonged dwell times to specialized centers.
Collapse
|
6
|
Goh GS, Ng N, Fitzgerald M, Mathew J. Retrieval of a Cook Celect inferior vena cava (IVC) filter after prolonged dwell time of 5,117 days: Factors to consider for retrieval of long-dwell IVC filters. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:283-287. [PMID: 36692006 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used in certain patients to help prevent the occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE). IVC filters are generally recommended to be removed once PE prophylaxis is no longer required. Long-dwelling IVC filters are associated with higher complication rates (Vasa 2020; 49: 449), being more difficult to retrieve and associated with higher retrieval complications (Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2016; 6: 632). This report describes the pre-procedural work-up and removal of an IVC filter with a prolonged dwell time of 5,117 days (14 years, 3 days) using the loop snare advanced retrieval technique. As far as the authors are aware this case is the longest-described successful retrieval of a Cook Celect IVC filter at 5,117 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerard S Goh
- Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,National Trauma Research Institute, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nico Ng
- Department of Radiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Fitzgerald
- National Trauma Research Institute, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Trauma Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joseph Mathew
- National Trauma Research Institute, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Trauma Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu Q, Tran P, Iyer D, Gutti S, Li D, Li X, Navuluri R, Van Ha T, Ahmed O. Rigid forceps and excimer laser use for complex inferior cava filter retrieval: a preliminary quantitative analysis of available evidence. CVIR Endovasc 2022; 5:33. [PMID: 35802261 PMCID: PMC9270549 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-022-00311-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The present study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of advanced inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) retrieval using laser assistance compared with forceps via systematic review and quantitative aggregation of available data. Methods Pubmed and Embase were queried from establishment to September 2021. Original studies with a sample size ≥ 5 that reported at least one primary outcome of patients who underwent laser- or forceps-assisted IVCF retrieval were included. Primary outcomes included technical success and complication rates. Baseline characteristics were extracted: age, sex, presence of filter thrombus, strut penetration, previous retrieval attempt, filter dwell time, fluoroscopy time, and filter type. Complications were categorized by type and severity. Categorical data was pooled and evaluated with chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Results From the 16 included studies, a total of 673 and 368 patients underwent laser- and forceps-assisted IVCF retrieval, respectively. Successful retrieval was achieved in 98.1 and 93.7% patients from the laser and forceps groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Major complication rates (1.6 vs 2.1%, p = 0.629) and risk of injury to cava or adjacent organs (1.0 vs 1.4%, p = 0.534) were similar between the two groups. A higher proportion of filters from the laser arm were closed-cell design (75.4 vs 68.1%, p = 0.020). Conclusion Based on limited available evidence, forceps- and laser-assisted complex IVCF retrievals were equally safe. The use of laser sheath is associated with a higher retrieval rate than forceps alone, though the baseline characteristics of two cohorts were not controlled. Future large-scale case-controlled comparative studies with longer clinical follow-up are warranted. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42155-022-00311-4.
Collapse
|
8
|
Safety and efficacy of inferior vena cava filter retrieval: a 5-year single center retrospective review from a tertiary care center. CVIR Endovasc 2022; 5:39. [PMID: 35932376 PMCID: PMC9357242 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-022-00316-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval is typically accomplished with standard snare technique. When this fails, more advanced techniques are necessary, especially when removal falls outside a 12-month window. Complications during filter retrieval depend heavily on technique, type of filter, and filter position. In this study we examined safety and efficacy of 536 filter retrievals at a tertiary care center and compared complication rates between standard snare and endobronchial forcep retrieval. Method We reviewed 536 cases between August 2015 and August 2020, recording retrieval success rates, patient comorbidities, and complication rates at the time of removal. Results Total overall retrieval success was 97.9% (525/536), and complications occurred in approximately 6.0% (32/536) of all cases. Success and complications with standard snare technique alone were 99.4% (345/347) and 1.7% (5 Grade I/II, 1 Grade III) and advanced forcep technique 98.8% (171/173) and 14.5% (22 Grade I/II, 2 Grade III, and 1 Grade IV), respectively. There was no significant difference between the technical success rates of the standard snare technique and forceps techniques (p = 0.60) despite a significantly longer dwell time in patients undergoing forceps retrieval (p < 0.001). Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of forceps directed IVC filter retrieval present in the literature. Rates of successful endobronchial forceps and standard snare retrievals in this study are similar to previous reports. Although use of endobronchial forceps may be associated with higher complication rates, this is likely due to prolonged dwell times, filter tilt, and attempted removal of non retrievable filters. Overall, forceps-directed retrieval offers a safe, effective means of removal in difficult cases. Level of evidence Level 3, Large Retrospective Study.
Collapse
|
9
|
Classification System for Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Appearance Following Percutaneous IVC Filter Retrieval. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1064-1073. [PMID: 35737099 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03189-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is no classification system for describing inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries. The objective of this study was to develop a standardized grading system for venographic appearance of the IVC following percutaneous IVC filter retrieval. METHODS A classification system for the appearance of the IVC on cavograms following percutaneous IVC filter removal was developed consisting of two grading elements; luminal characteristics and extravasation. Luminal narrowing from 0% up to 50% from any cause is grade 1; narrowing between 50 and 99% is grade 2; occlusion is grade 3; and avulsion is grade 4. Absence of extravasation is grade A, contained extravasation is grade B, and free extravasation is grade C. This system was then applied retrospectively to pre- and post-IVC filter retrieval cavograms performed at a single institution from October 2004 through February 2019. RESULTS 546 retrieval attempts were identified with 509 (93.2%) filters successfully retrieved. 449 cases (88.2%) had both pre-retrieval and post-retrieval imaging appropriate for application of the proposed classification system. Inter-rater reliability was 0.972 for luminal characteristics, 0.967 for extravasation, and 0.969 overall. Consensus grading demonstrated a distribution of 97.3% grade 1, 1.3% grade 2, 1.3% grade 3, and 0.0% grade 4 for post-retrieval luminal characteristics. For extravasation classification, 96.4% of the cases were classified as grade A, 2.7% grade B, and 0.9% grade C. CONCLUSION A classification system was developed for describing IVC appearance after IVC filter retrieval, and retrospectively validated using a single center dataset.
Collapse
|
10
|
Rezaei-Kalantari K, Rotzinger DC, Qanadli SD. Vena Cava Filters: Toward Optimal Strategies for Filter Retrieval and Patients' Follow-Up. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:746748. [PMID: 35310979 PMCID: PMC8927289 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.746748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Mortality rates associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are high. Inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) have been frequently placed for these patients as part of their treatment, albeit the paucity of data showing their ultimate efficacy and potential risk of complications. Issues regarding long-term filter dwell time are accounted for in society guidelines. This topic has led to an FDA mandate for filter retrieved as soon as protection from pulmonary embolism is no longer needed. However, even though most are retrievable, some were inadvertently left as permanent, which carries an incremental lifetime risk to the patient. In the past decade, attempts have aimed to determine the optimal time interval during which filter needs to be removed. In addition, distinct strategies have been implemented to boost retrieval rates. This review discusses current conflicts in indications, the not uncommon complications, the rationale and need for timely retrieval, and different quality improvement strategies to fulfill this aim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - David C. Rotzinger
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Division, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Salah D. Qanadli
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Division, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yao S, Li Y, Zhu F, Guan S, Ge X, Ci H. Biopsy Forceps-Assisted Loop Snare Technique for Complex Retrieval of Inferior Vena Cava Filter. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2022; 56:424-427. [PMID: 35171744 DOI: 10.1177/15385744211069052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Severe tilt with embedded hooks is a common obstacle to successful inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval. We present a case for which the biopsy forceps-assisted loop snare technique was successfully used to retrieve filters with hooks embedded in the IVC wall for which conventional retrieval failed. The technique is effective and provides a less-invasive, low-cost method for the complex retrieval of IVC filters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Yao
- Division of Vascular Surgery, 159426People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People's Republic of China
| | - Yangyang Li
- Division of Vascular Surgery, 159426People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng Zhu
- Division of Vascular Surgery, 159426People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People's Republic of China
| | - Sheng Guan
- Division of Vascular Surgery, 159426People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaohu Ge
- Division of Vascular Surgery, 159426People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongbo Ci
- Division of Vascular Surgery, 159426People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pillai A, Kathuria M, Bayona Molano MDP, Sutphin P, Kalva SP. An expert spotlight on inferior vena cava filters. Expert Rev Hematol 2021; 14:593-605. [PMID: 34139952 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2021.1943350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are mechanical filtration devices designed as an alternative to surgical ligation/plication of the IVC. Their use has been controversial, especially with the introduction of retrievable filters and expanded/prophylactic indications.Areas covered: Authors discuss the types of available IVC filters, indications for placement, evidence on their effectiveness in general and specific patient populations, procedural considerations, off-label use, complications, and filter retrieval. This review is based on manuscripts/abstracts published from 1960 to 2021 on venous thromboembolism and IVC filters.Expert opinion: Despite the limited data on their effectiveness and survival benefit, IVC filters continue to play an important role in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who cannot receive standard anticoagulation. There is no role of IVC filters in patients without VTE. While retrievable filters are desirable for short-term use, a dedicated team-based approach, and advanced training are required for their successful removal. Newer devices are promising in improving patient safety . The device manufacturers and regulatory agencies should consider specific approaches to track device-related adverse events. Population-based studies are required to establish optimal patient population who would benefit from these devices. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Pillai
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Manoj Kathuria
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Patrick Sutphin
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sanjeeva P Kalva
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang H, Liu Z, Zhu X, Liu J, Man L. Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic-Assisted Retrieval of Wall-Penetrating Inferior Vena Cava Filter After Endovascular Techniques Failed: An Initial Clinical Outcome. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2021; 55:706-711. [PMID: 34080447 DOI: 10.1177/15385744211022517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are commonly used in China to prevent pulmonary embolisms in patients with deep vein thrombosis. However, IVC filter removal is complicated when the filter has penetrated the IVC wall and endovascular techniques usually fail. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic-assisted retrieval of wall-penetrating IVC filters after endovascular techniques have failed. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated a series of 8 patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic-assisted retrieval of a wall-penetrating IVC filter between December 2017 and November 2019. All patients had experienced at least 1 failure with endovascular retrieval before the study. The filters were slanted and the proximal retrieval hooks penetrated the posterior lateral IVC wall in all patients on computed tomography. Demographic information, operation parameters, and complications were recorded and analyzed. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. RESULTS The procedure was successful in all patients. The median surgery time was 53.6 ± 12.7 min and the average blood loss was 45.0 ± 13.5 ml. No serious complication occurred during the patients' hospitalization, which was an average of 6.4 days. The median follow-up time was 15.1 months, and no patient had deep vein thrombosis recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Retroperitoneal laparoscopic-assisted retrieval is a feasible and effective technique, particularly when proximal retrieval hooks penetrate the posterior lateral wall of the IVC after endovascular techniques have failed. To some extent, the development of this technique at our institution has increased the success rate of filter removal and improved patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haidong Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the 4th Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenhua Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the 4th Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaofei Zhu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the 4th Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianlong Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the 4th Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Libo Man
- Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the 4th Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kuo WT, Doshi AA, Ponting JM, Rosenberg JK, Liang T, Hofmann LV. Laser-Assisted Removal of Embedded Vena Cava Filters: A First-In-Human Escalation Trial in 500 Patients Refractory to High-Force Retrieval. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9:e017916. [PMID: 33252283 PMCID: PMC7955387 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.017916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Background Many patients are subject to potential risks and filter‐related morbidity when standard retrieval methods fail. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the laser sheath technique for removing embedded inferior vena cava filters. Methods and Results Over an 8.5‐year period, 500 patients were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board–approved study. There were 225 men and 275 women (mean age, 49 years; range, 15–90 years). Indications for retrieval included symptomatic acute inferior vena cava thrombosis, chronic inferior vena cava occlusion, and/or pain from filter penetration. Retrieval was also offered to prevent risks from prolonged implantation and potentially to eliminate need for lifelong anticoagulation. After retrieval failed using 3X standard retrieval force (6–7 lb via digital gauge), treatment escalation was attempted using laser sheath powered by 308‐nm XeCl excimer laser system (CVX‐300; Spectranetics). We hypothesized that the laser‐assisted technique would allow retrieval of >95% of embedded filters with <5% risk of major complications and with lower force. Primary outcome was successful retrieval. Primary safety outcome was any major procedure‐related complication. Laser‐assisted retrieval was successful in 99.4% of cases (497/500) (95% CI, 98.3%–99.9%) and significantly >95% (P<0.0001). The mean filter dwell time was 1528 days (range, 37–10 047; >27.5 years]), among retrievable‐type (n=414) and permanent‐type (n=86) filters. The average force during failed attempts without laser was 6.4 versus 3.6 lb during laser‐assisted retrievals (P<0.0001). The major complication rate was 2.0% (10/500) (95% CI, 1.0%–3.6%), significantly <5% (P<0.0005), 0.6% (3/500) (95% CI, 0%–1.3%) from laser, and all were successfully treated. Successful retrieval allowed cessation of anticoagulation in 98.7% (77/78) (95% CI, 93.1%–100.0%) and alleviated filter‐related morbidity in 98.5% (138/140) (95% CI, 96.5%–100.0%). Conclusions The excimer laser sheath technique is safe and effective for removing embedded inferior vena cava filters refractory to high‐force retrieval. This technique may allow cessation of filter‐related anticoagulation and can be used to prevent and alleviate filter‐related morbidity. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01158482.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William T Kuo
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA
| | - Ankur A Doshi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA
| | - John M Ponting
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA
| | - Jarrett K Rosenberg
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA
| | - Tie Liang
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA
| | - Lawrence V Hofmann
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Current Controversies in Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 216:563-569. [PMID: 33206563 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.24817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Despite inferior vena cava (IVC) filter practice spanning over 50 years, interventionalists face many controversies in proper utilization and management. This article reviews recent literature and offers opinions on filter practices. IVC filtration is most likely to benefit patients at high risk of iatrogenic pulmonary embolus during endovenous intervention. Filters should be used selectively in patients with acute trauma or who are undergoing bariatric surgery. Retrieval should be attempted for perforating filter and fractured filter fragments when imaging suggests feasibility and favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered when removing filters with confirmed gastrointestinal penetration. Anticoagulation solely because of filter presence is not recommended except in patients with active malignancy. Anticoagulation while filters remain in place may decrease long-term filter complications in these patients. Patients with a filter and symptomatic IVC occlusion should be offered filter removal and IVC reconstruction. Physicians implanting filters may maximize retrieval by maintaining physician-patient relationships and scheduling follow-up at time of placement. Annual follow-up allows continued evaluation for removal or replacement as appropriate. Advanced retrieval techniques increase retrieval rates but require caution. Certain cases may require referral to experienced centers with additional retrieval resources. The views expressed should help guide clinical practice, future innovation, and research.
Collapse
|
16
|
Beer D, Harjai K, Bauch TD, Vijayaraman P. Percutaneous Extraction of an Embolized IVC Filter Strut Embedded in the Right Ventricle. JACC Case Rep 2020; 2:2318-2322. [PMID: 34317163 PMCID: PMC8304553 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.07.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of IVC filter fracture is high with risk for embolization and may require open surgery. We present a minimally invasive approach of complex transcatheter extraction of an embolized and embedded IVC filter strut from the right ventricle. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
- Address for correspondence: Dr. Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, Cardiac Electrophysiology, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Heart Institute, MC 36-10, 1000 East Mountain Boulevard, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18711, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jaberi A, Tao MJ, Eisenberg N, Tan K, Roche-Nagle G. IVC filter removal after extended implantation periods. Surgeon 2020; 18:265-268. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2019.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
18
|
Ivanics T, Williams P, Nasser H, Leonard-Murali S, Schwartz S, Lin JC. Contemporary management of chronic indwelling inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 9:163-169. [PMID: 32721588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite increasing retrieval rates of the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, less than one-third are removed within the recommended timeline. Prolonged filter dwell times may increase the technical difficulty of retrieval and filter-related complications. We sought to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of patients with chronic indwelling IVC filters at a tertiary care center. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed from August 2015 through August 2019 of all patients who were referred for removal of a prolonged IVC filter with a dwell time >1 year. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate patients' characteristics and procedural outcomes, which were reviewed through electronic medical records. Data were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) or number and percentage, as appropriate. RESULTS A total of 47 patients were identified with a median filter dwell time of 10.0 years (IQR, 6-13 years); 34 patients underwent IVC filter removal, and 13 patients refused retrieval. The median age of patients was 54.9 years (IQR, 42.5-64.0 years); the majority were female (57%) and white (53%). The most common indication for filter placement was high risk despite anticoagulation (49%), followed by venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (21%). The majority of patients were symptomatic (72%). If symptomatic, the most common reason for retrieval was IVC penetration (94%), and the chief complaint was pain (56%). Retrieval success was 97%, with a median length of stay of 0 days. The majority of retrievals were performed through an endovascular approach (97%). There was one postprocedural complication (3%). CONCLUSIONS Despite prolonged dwell times, IVC filter retrieval can be performed safely and effectively in carefully selected patients at a tertiary referral center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich.
| | - Paul Williams
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich
| | - Hassan Nasser
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich
| | | | - Scott Schwartz
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich
| | - Judith C Lin
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Quencer KB, Smith TA, Deipolyi A, Mojibian H, Ayyagari R, Latich I, Ali R. Procedural complications of inferior vena cava filter retrieval, an illustrated review. CVIR Endovasc 2020; 3:23. [PMID: 32337618 PMCID: PMC7184068 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-020-00113-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Annually, approximately 65,000 inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are placed in the United States (Ahmed et al., J Am Coll Radiol 15:1553-1557, 2018). Approximately 35% of filters are eventually retrieved (Angel et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol 22: 1522-1530 e1523, 2011). Complications during filter retrieval depend heavily on technique and filter position. In this paper, we review risk factors and incidence of complications during IVC filter removal. We also discuss ways these complications could be avoided and the appropriate management if they occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith B Quencer
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, 50 N Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| | - Tyler A Smith
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, 50 N Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Amy Deipolyi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, USA
| | - Hamid Mojibian
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Raj Ayyagari
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Igor Latich
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Rahmat Ali
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Capasso K, Awad NA, Alvarez N, Deutsch ER, Zaki R, Choudry RG. Urinary excretion after transcaval renal penetration of a fragmented Bird's Nest filter. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 9:254-257. [PMID: 32305584 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Permanent inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used to prevent venous thromboembolic events in select populations of patients. The Bird's Nest filter (BNF; Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) is an IVC filter that has been associated with various complications including filter strut fractures, migration, caval wall perforation, visceral perforation, and vascular injury. We report a case of a BNF that eroded transmurally through the IVC into the right kidney parenchyma. The patient underwent operative intervention with removal of the BNF with an uncomplicated postoperative course. In patients with symptoms and local filter perforations, we advocate for safe filter removal when possible to avoid long-term damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Capasso
- Department of Surgery, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa.
| | - Nadia A Awad
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Nkosi Alvarez
- Department of Surgery, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Evan R Deutsch
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Radi Zaki
- Department of Transplantation, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Rashad G Choudry
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Park BG, Seo A, Lee SY, Cha JG, Hong J, Lee H, Heo J, Do YW. Over-the-wire deployment techniques of option elite inferior vena cava filter: 3D printing vena cava phantom study. Eur J Radiol Open 2020; 7:100227. [PMID: 32258247 PMCID: PMC7096752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Bent stiff-wire technique with transfemoral access had lower filter tilt ratio at Option IVC filter deployment. Original push wire with transjugular access had lower filter tilt ratio at Option IVC filter deployment. Filter jumping was common using the original push wire with transjugular access.
Purpose To compare filter tilt and filter jumping during Option inferior vena cava (IVC) filter deployment with 3 different wires techniques using a 3-dimensional (3D) printing vena cava phantom. Materials and methods An IVC 3D printed vena cava phantom was made from a healthy young male’s computed tomographic data. Option IVC filters were deployed with 3 different wires: i) original push wire, ii) hydrophilic stiff wire, and iii) bent stiff wire. Right internal jugular and right femoral access were used 5 times with each wire. Filter tilt angle, tilt ratio, jumping, and tip abutment to the IVC wall were analyzed. Results The transfemoral approach with original push wire had significantly higher tilt angle than did the transjugular approach (6.1˚ ± 1.9 vs. 3.5˚ ± 1.3, p = 0.04). Mean tilt ratio was significantly lower with the bent wire with transfemoral access (0.49 ± 0.13 vs. 0.78 ± 0.18 [original push-wire] and 0.67 ± 0.08 [stiff wire], p = 0.019). The ratio was lower also with original push wire with transjugular access (0.34 ± 0.19 vs. 0.57 ±0.11 [stiff wire] and 0.58 ±0.17 [bent wire], p = 0.045). Filter jumping occurred more often with the transjugular approach with original push wire than with stiff or bent-wire delivery. Filter tip abutment to the IVC wall occurred only with the transfemoral approach. Conclusions Bent wire with transfemoral access and original push wire with transjugular access had lower filter tilt ratio at Option IVC filter deployment. However, filter jumping was common using the original push wire with transjugular access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Geon Park
- Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Anna Seo
- Lee Gil Ya Cancer and Diabetes Institute, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Yub Lee
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Guen Cha
- Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihoon Hong
- Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hoseok Lee
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Heo
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Woo Do
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ahmed O, Kim YJ, Patel MV, Tullius TG, Navuluri R, Funaki B, Van Ha T. A Single-Institutional Comparative Analysis of Advanced Versus Standard Snare Removal of Inferior Vena Cava Filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 31:53-60.e1. [PMID: 31734075 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate differences in procedure time, radiation exposure, and periprocedural complications associated with advanced inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval compared with standard snare retrieval. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 378 patients underwent standard or advanced IVC filter retrieval over a 5-year period. Technical success, retrieval techniques, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and complications were analyzed. All retrieval procedures with techniques other than a "snare-and-sheath" method were categorized as advanced, including failed standard attempts requiring intraprocedural conversion to advanced techniques. RESULTS A total of 462 filter retrieval attempts were made in 378 patients (57% female). Success rates for standard and advanced retrieval attempts were 86.8% (317 of 365) and 91.8% (89 of 97), respectively. The rate of periprocedural complications was significantly higher in the advanced retrieval group (P = .006). Complication rates for standard and advanced retrievals were 0.6% (2 of 318; all minor) and 5.2% (5 of 97; 3 minor [3.1%] and 2 major [2.1%]), respectively. The 2 major complications during advanced retrievals included filter fracture and embolization. Average fluoroscopy time for advanced retrievals was significantly higher than for standard retrievals (23.1 min vs 4.3 min; P < .001). Average radiation dose for advanced retrievals was also significantly higher than for standard retrievals (557.2 mGy vs 156.9 mGy; P < .001). Use of general anesthesia was also significantly more common in advanced retrievals compared with standard retrievals (6.2% vs 0.9%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Advanced filter retrieval results in a similarly high rate of technical success compared with standard snare retrieval but is associated with greater fluoroscopy time, anesthesia requirements, and radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ye Joon Kim
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL 60064.
| | - Mikin V Patel
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Thomas G Tullius
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rakesh Navuluri
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brian Funaki
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Thuong Van Ha
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Forceps-assisted Removal of Difficult-to-Retrieve Filters: Preliminary Results. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 61:371-376. [PMID: 31394218 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of forceps-assisted removal of difficult-to-retrieve filters. METHODS Patients who underwent forceps-assisted removal of difficult-to-retrieve filters (filters that could not be successfully removed with the standard loop-snare technique) between February 2008 and February 2019 were included in this study. Patients underwent forceps-assisted filter removal either immediately after failed loop-snare removal (same procedure) or at a later time (separate procedure). Data regarding success rate, X-ray exposure time, and complications were recorded. RESULTS A total of 27 patients (14 men, 13 women; mean age 57.9 ± 12.6 years) were included in this study. The mean indwelling time of the filters was 10.9 ± 10.7 months. All filters were successfully removed. The mean X-ray exposure time was 25.9 ± 12.7 min (range 8-55) for all patients; the mean X-ray exposure times were 10.2 ± 2.3 min (range 8-14) for the 5 patients who underwent forceps-assisted filter removal in a separate procedure and 29.5 ± 11.2 min (range 15-55) for the 22 patients who underwent forceps-assisted filter removal immediately after failure of the loop-snare technique (P < 0.001). Two patients (8.3%) experienced extravasation of contrast material and needed no additional treatment. No major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS Forceps-assisted filter retrieval can be used to safely and effectively remove difficult-to-retrieve filters.
Collapse
|