Resolution of Acute Pulmonary Embolism using anticoagulation therapy alone in Coronavirus Disease 2019

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension after Pulmonary Embolism in SARS-CoV-2

INTRODUCTION

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) consists of persistent pulmonary vascular obstruction on imaging and involves long-term functional limitations, with or without chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of both persistent pulmonary vascular defects and CTEPH after hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 and PE during a 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary hospital center. Patients were hospitalized between March 2020 and December 2021 with a diagnosis of PE during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients received anticoagulant treatment for at least 3 months and were followed up for 2 years. Between the third and fourth months after discharge, all patients were evaluated for the presence of residual thrombotic defects by CTPA and/or perfusion pulmonary scintigraphy. Clinical findings, lung function tests with DLCO, exercise capacity, and echocardiograms were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 133 patients included, 18% had persistent thrombotic defects on lung imaging at follow-up. The incidence of CTEPD was 0.75% at 2 years of follow-up. Patients with persistent defects were significantly older, had a higher prevalence of systemic arterial hypertension, higher D-dimer and NT-proBNP levels, and more severe PE at diagnosis. Furthermore, there was a higher prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiogram at diagnosis of PE (25.0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.006). This was the only variable independently related to persistent defects in multivariate analyses (OR: 8.13 [95% CI: 1.82-36.32], p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The persistence of thrombotic defects after PE is a common finding after SARS-CoV-2 infection, affecting 18% of the population. However, the incidence of CTEPH appears to be lower (0.75%) in COVID-19-related PE compared to that previously observed in PE unrelated to COVID-19.

Long term follow-up of a multicentre cohort of COVID-19 patients with pulmonary embolism: Anticoagulation management and outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent complication in COVID19 hospitalized patients. Inflammatory storm and endothelial dysfunction due to the virus seem to be the two major risk factors for PE. Consequently, PE related to COVID19 could be consider as triggered by a transient inflammatory acute phase and treated for no longer than 3 months. However, few data are available on management of anticoagulation and risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) recurrences in these patients and guidelines are still undefined. Aim of the present study is to evaluate the long-term follow-up of a cohort of covid-19 patients with PE.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in four Italian hospitals between March 1st, 2020, and May 31st, 2021 in patients who experienced a PE during hospitalization for a COVID-19 pneumonia, excluding patients who died during hospitalization. Baseline characteristics were collected and patients were grouped according to duration of anticoagulant treatment (< 3 months or > 3 months). The primary outcome was incidence of VTE recurrence while secondary outcome was the composite of deaths, major hemorrhages and VTE recurrence during follow-up.

RESULTS

106 patients with PE were discharged, of these 95 (89.6 %) had follow up longer than 3 months (seven patients were lost to follow up and four died within three months). The median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 1-19). Overall, 23 % of subjects (22/95) were treated for 3 months or less and 76.8 % (73/95) received anticoagulation for >3 months. Of patients in the short treatment group, 4.5 % died, compared with 5.5 % of those in the longer treatment group (p = NS); no difference was shown in risk of VTE recurrence (0 % vs 4.1 %, p = NS), major bleeding (4.5 % vs 4.1 %, p = NS) or in composite outcome (9.1 % vs 11 %, p = NS). No difference was found between the two treatment groups for composite outcome using the Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log Rank Test p = 0.387).

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective multi-center cohort, prolongation of duration of anticoagulation seems not to affect risk of VTE recurrences, deaths and bleeding after a PE related to COVID-19.

The Role of Multidisciplinary Approaches in the Treatment of Patients with Heart Failure and Coagulopathy of COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a severe respiratory syndrome caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Heart failure (HF) is associated with a worse prognosis for patients with this viral infection, highlighting the importance of early detection and effective treatment strategies. HF can also be a consequence of COVID-19-related myocardial damage. To optimise the treatment of these patients, one needs to understand the interactions between this disease and viruses. Until now, the validity of the screening for cardiovascular complications after COVID-19 has not been confirmed. There were also no patients in whom such diagnostics seemed appropriate. Until appropriate recommendations are made, diagnosis procedures must be individualised based on the course of the acute phase and clinical symptoms reported or submitted after COVID-19. Clinical phenomena are the criteria for determining the recommended test panel. We present a structured approach to COVID-19 patients with heart involvement.

Pulmonary thromboembolic events in COVID-19-A systematic literature review

Pulmonary thromboembolic events have been linked to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but their incidence and long-term sequelae remain unclear. We performed a systematic literature review to investigate the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), microthrombi, thrombosis in situ (thromboinflammatory disease), and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) during and after COVID-19. PubMed and the World Health Organization Global Research Database were searched on May 7, 2021. Hospital cohort and database studies reporting data for ≥1000 patients and autopsy studies reporting data for ≥20 patients were included. Results were summarized descriptively. We screened 1438 records and included 41 references (32 hospital/database studies and 9 autopsy studies). The hospital/database studies reported the incidence of PE but not CTEPH, microthrombi, or thromboinflammatory disease. PE incidence varied widely (0%-1.1% of outpatients, 0.9%-8.2% of hospitalized patients, and 1.8%-18.9% of patients in intensive care). One study reported PE events occurring within 45 days after hospital discharge (incidence in discharged patients: 0.2%). Segmental arteries were generally the most common location for PE. In autopsy studies, PE, thromboinflammatory disease, and microthrombi were reported in 6%-23%, 43%-100%, and 45%-84% of deceased patients, respectively. Overall, the included studies mostly focused on PE during the acute phase of COVID-19. The results demonstrate the challenges of identifying and characterizing vascular abnormalities using current protocols (e.g., visual computed tomography reads). Further research is needed to detect subtle pulmonary vascular abnormalities, distinguish thromboinflammatory disease from PE, optimize treatment, and assess the incidence of long-term sequelae after COVID-19.

Diagnostic Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 and Other Special Patient Populations

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), in particular acute pulmonary embolism (PE), has been shown to be a frequent and potentially fatal complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response to the observed thrombotic complications, a large number of studies has been devoted to the understanding and management of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. Notably, only a limited number of mostly retrospective studies has focused on the optimal diagnostic strategy for suspected PE in COVID-19 patients. As in other special populations, the accuracy of diagnostic algorithms for PE-exclusion has been debated in this specific patient subgroup as the specificity of D-dimer assays and clinical decision rules (CDRs) may be lower than normal. From this viewpoint, we discuss the current state-of-the-art diagnostic algorithms for acute PE with a focus on patients with COVID-19 in the perspective of other special patient populations. Furthermore, we summarize current knowledge regarding the natural history of PE resolution with anticoagulant treatment in patients with COVID-19.