Unique hemoglobin A1c level distribution and its relationship with mortality in diabetic hemodialysis patients

Impact of HbA1c variability and time-in-range fluctuations on large and small nerve fiber dysfunction in well-controlled type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort observational study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Glycemic variability (GV) is a critical factor in the development of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN). This study aimed to evaluate the association of long-term GV, measured by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) average real variability (ARV), and short-term GV, assessed by time-in-range (TIR) ARV, with large and small nerve fiber dysfunction in individuals with well-controlled Type 2 Diabetes (T2D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study conducted at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan included 82 T2D participants. Long-term GV was assessed using HbA1c ARV from visit-to-visit measurements at three-month intervals over 1 year. Short-term GV was evaluated as TIR ARV from seven-day fingerstick data collected quarterly. Large and small nerve functions were assessed using the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS), nerve conduction studies, quantitative thermal testing, and Sudoscan.

RESULTS

Linear regression analysis adjusted for age, diabetes duration, and renal function revealed strong correlations between HbA1c ARV, TIR ARV, and diabetes duration. At baseline, high HbA1c ARV and TIR ARV groups exhibited higher TCNS and composite nerve conduction amplitude scores but lower cold detection thresholds compared to the low median groups. At one-year follow-up, TCNS significantly increased in the high HbA1c ARV (P = 0.001) and TIR ARV (P = 0.003) groups compared to the low median groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both long-term and short-term GV significantly contribute to small and large nerve fiber dysfunction in T2D, yielding similar neurological outcomes despite stable mean glucose levels. Combining GV minimization strategies with standard glycemic control may be essential in reducing DSPN risk.

Glycemic Management and Individualized Diabetes Care in Dialysis-Dependent Kidney Failure

Of the nearly 600,000 people in the U.S. who receive dialysis for chronic kidney failure, >60% have diabetes. People receiving dialysis who have diabetes have worse overall and cardiovascular survival rates than those without diabetes. Diabetes care in the dialysis setting is complicated by kidney failure-related factors that render extrapolation of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) targets to the dialysis population unreliable and may change the risk-benefit profiles of glucose-lowering and disease-modifying therapies. No prospective studies have established the optimal glycemic targets in the dialysis population, and few randomized clinical trials of glucose-lowering medications included individuals receiving dialysis. Observational data suggest that both lower and higher HbA1c are associated with mortality in the dialysis population. Existing data suggest the potential for safety and effectiveness of some glucose-lowering medications in the dialysis population, but firm conclusions are hindered by limitations in study design and sample size. While population-specific knowledge gaps about optimal glycemic targets and diabetes medication safety and effectiveness preclude the extension of all general population diabetes guidelines to the dialysis-dependent diabetes population, these uncertainties should not detract from the importance of providing person-centered diabetes care to people receiving dialysis. Diabetes care for individuals with and without dialysis-dependent kidney failure should be holistic, based on individual preferences and prognoses, and tailored to integrate established treatment approaches with proven benefits for glycemic control and cardiovascular risk reduction. Additional research is needed to inform how recent pharmacologic and technological advances can be applied to support such individualized care for people receiving maintenance dialysis.

Inferior Nutritional Status Significantly Differentiates Dialysis Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus is currently the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Assessing nutritional status is an important component of care in this group. This prospective observational study aimed to assess the nutritional status of type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and its relationship with hospitalizations and all-cause death. Adult patients with end-stage renal disease, treated with dialysis, and suffering from type 1 or type 2 diabetes, being treated with insulin, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria comprised other types of diabetes, the patient's refusal to participate in the study, and severe disorders impacting verbal-logical communication. The nutritional status based on the Nutritional Risk Index, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, fat distribution measures, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index was estimated for 95 Caucasian dialysis patients with type 1 (n = 25) or type 2 (n = 70) diabetes. Patients with type 1 diabetes exhibited significantly inferior nutritional status and increased nutritional risk than those with type 2 diabetes. Lower values of nutritional indices significantly differentiated patients with type 1 from those with type 2 diabetes, with ≥84% sensitivity and specificity. Inferior nutritional status was related to all-cause hospitalizations, whereas higher comorbidity was associated with a greater likelihood of cardiovascular hospitalizations and all-cause death. The significant difference between patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes being treated with dialysis indicates that these patients should not be considered as a homogeneous group, while also considering the greater age of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Narrative Review of glycaemic management in people with diabetes on peritoneal dialysis

There is an increasing number of people with diabetes on peritoneal dialysis (PD) worldwide. However, there is a lack of guidelines and clinical recommendations for managing glucose control in people with diabetes on PD. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the relevant literature and highlight key clinical considerations with practical aspects in the management of diabetes in people undergoing PD. A formal systematic review was not conducted because of the lack of sufficient and suitable clinical studies. A literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Central, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov., from 1980 through February 2022. The search was limited to publications in English. This narrative review and related guidance have been developed jointly by diabetologists and nephrologists, who reviewed all available current global evidence regarding the management of diabetes in people on PD.We focus on the importance of individualized care for people with diabetes on PD, the burden of hypoglycemia, glycemic variability in the context of PD and treatment choices for optimizing glucose control. In this review, we have summarized the clinical considerations to guide and inform clinicians providing care for people with diabetes on PD.

The association between long-term glycemic control and all-cause mortality is different among older versus younger patients with diabetes mellitus and maintenance hemodialysis treatment

AIMS

Knowledge about association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and risk of all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus on maintenance hemodialysis (HD)-treatment is sparse. The study aims to investigate association between HbA1c and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes and maintenance HD-treatment, separately for two age groups- above and below 75 years.

METHODS

2487 patients (mean age 66 years, 66 % men) were separated in two age groups: ≤75 years (n = 1810) and > 75 years (n = 677) and followed up between 2008 and 2018. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for associations between HbA1c and all-cause mortality were calculated using Cox-regression-models.

RESULTS

1295 (52 %) patients died and 473 (70 %) among the patients above 75 years old. In the multivariate analysis, HbA1c5-6 % was used as reference. In patients ≤ 75 years old, only increased HbA1c > 9.7 %, HR2.03(CI1.43-2.89) was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. In patients > 75 years, HbA1c ≤ 5 %, HR1.67(CI1.16-2.40); HbA1c6.9-7.8 %, HR1.41(CI1.03-1.93) and HbA1c8.7-9.7 %, HR1.79 (CI1.08-2.96) were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a J-shaped association between HbA1c and mortality only in diabetic HD-patients > 75 years. This probably indicates that in an old population of diabetic HD-patients, both intensive glucose control and hyperglycemia could be harmful and associated with higher risk of death.

Glycated hemoglobin levels and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in hemodialysis patients with diabetes

AIM

Adequate glycemic control is fundamental for improving clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients with diabetes. However, the target for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and whether cause-specific mortality differs based on HbA1c levels remain unclear.

METHODS

A total of 24,243 HD patients with diabetes were enrolled from a multicenter, nationwide registry. We examined the association between HbA1c levels and the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to patients with HbA1c 6.5%-7.5%, patients with HbA_1c 8.5-9.5% and ≥9.5% were associated with a 1.26-fold (95% CI, 1.12-1.42) and 1.56-fold (95% CI, 1.37-1.77) risk for all-cause mortality. The risk of all-cause mortality did not increase in patients with HbA1c < 5.5%. In cause-specific mortality, the risk of cardiovascular deaths significantly increased from small increase of HbA1c levels. However, the risk of other causes of death increased only in patients with HbA1c > 9.5%. The slope of HR increase with increasing HbA1c levels was significantly faster for cardiovascular causes than for other causes.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a linear relationship between HbA1c levels and risk of all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients, and the risk of cardiovascular death increased earlier and more rapidly, with increasing HbA1c levels, compared with other causes of death.

Diabetes Prevalence, Treatment, Control, and Outcomes Among Hemodialysis Patients in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We provide the first description of DM prevalence, related outcomes, and the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)/mortality relationship in national hemodialysis (HD) patient samples across the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the prospective Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) in the GCC (2012-2018, N = 2274 HD patients ≥18 years old). Descriptive statistics were calculated, and all-cause mortality was analyzed for patients with DM versus without DM and by HbA1c levels in patients with DM by Cox regression with progressive confounder adjustments.

RESULTS

DM in the GCC ranged from 45% to 74% in patients with HD by country. Patients with DM were 13 years older (59.9 vs. 46.7 years) and had greater body mass index (BMI), shorter median years on dialysis (1.5 vs. 3.0 years), and higher comorbidity burden. In patients with DM, insulin use was 26% to 50% across countries, with variable oral antidiabetic drug use (2%-32%); median HbA1c levels were 6.1% to 7.5% across countries. Patients with DM (vs. without DM) had higher crude death rates (15.6 vs. 6.2 deaths per 100 patient-years, mean follow-up 1.3 years) and adjusted mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.72 [95% CI 1.23-2.39]). In patients with DM, mortality was lowest at HbA1c 6.5% to 7.5%, with mortality particularly elevated at high HbA1c >9% (HR = 2.13 [95% CI 1.10-4.10]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with DM in the GCC have high comorbidity burden and mortality rates despite a relatively young mean age. In GCC countries, a holistic strategy for improving diabetes care and outcomes for HD patients is needed at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels.

[Preparation of the dialysis patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus for kidney transplantation]

Kidney transplantation is unique method of renal replacement therapy, allowing to improve quality and duration of life for patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis therapy. Recently using of innovation technologies for diabetes management and modern immunosuppression enable achieving better results of posttransplant rehabilitation for patients with DM1, especially if kidney transplantation is performed early after initiation of dialysis. Detailed examination of patient with DM1 before potential kidney transplantation is very important to reduce of early and late postoperative complications. Kidney transplantation preparation includes effective glycemic control, adequate dialysis therapy, treatment of diabetes and ESRD complications and concomitant conditions, especially cardiovascular diseases, accounting for kidney transplantation perspective. Furthermore, diagnostics and treatment of any infectious process, timely vaccination, cancer screening are basic approaches of kidney transplantation preparation program, providing the best survival rate of kidney graft and patient.

Glycated albumin and hemoglobin A1c levels and cause-specific mortality by patients' conditions among hemodialysis patients with diabetes: a 3-year nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Differences in mortality and cause-specific mortality rates according to glycated albumin (GA) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels among dialysis patients with diabetes based on hypoglycemic agent use and malnutrition status remain unclear. Here, we examine these associations using a nationwide cohort.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We examined 40 417 dialysis patients with diabetes who met our inclusion criteria (female, 30.8%; mean age, 67.3±11.2 years; mean dialysis duration, 5.4±4.6 years). The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria were used to assess malnutrition. Adjusted HRs and 95% confidence limits were calculated for 3-year mortality after adjustment for 18 potential confounders. HRs and subdistribution HRs were used to explore cause-specific mortality.

RESULTS

We found a linear association between 3-year mortality and GA levels only in patients with GA ≥18% and not in patients with low GA levels, with a U-shaped association between HbA1c levels and the lowest morality at an HbA1c 6.0%-6.3%. This association differed based on patient conditions and hypoglycemic agent use. If patients using hypoglycemic agents were malnourished, mortality was increased with GA ≥24% and HbA1c ≥8%. In addition, patients with GA ≥22% and HbA1c ≥7.6% had significantly higher infectious or cardiovascular mortality rates. On the other hand, an inverse association was found between GA or HbA1c levels and cancer mortality. Patients with GA ≤15.8% had a higher risk of cancer mortality, especially those not using hypoglycemic agents (HR 1.63 (1.00-2.66)).

CONCLUSIONS

Target GA and HbA1c levels in dialysis patients may differ according to hypoglycemic agent use, nutritional status, and the presence of cancer. The levels may be higher in malnourished patients than in other patients, and a very low GA level in dialysis patients not taking hypoglycemic agents may be associated with a risk of cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000018641.

Glucose time in range and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease

​OBJECTIVE: Compared with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may better capture risk of diabetes complications in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). We hypothesized that glucose time in range (TIR), measured by CGM, is associated with DPN symptoms among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM) and moderate-to-severe CKD. ​RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We enrolled 105 people with type 2 DM treated with insulin or sulfonylurea, 81 participants with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) and 24 matched control participants with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m². Each participant wore a CGM for two 6-day periods. Calculated glycemic measures included TIR (glucose 70-180 mg/dL) and glucose management indicator (GMI). DPN symptoms were assessed using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) questionnaire, with a positive MNSI score defined as ≥2 symptoms. ​RESULTS: Participants with CKD had a mean age of 68 years, diabetes duration 20 years, eGFR 38 mL/min/1.73 m² and HbA1c 7.8%, 61 mmol/mol. Sixty-two participants reported ≥2 DPN symptoms, 51 (63%) with CKD and 11 (46%) controls. Less TIR and higher GMI were associated with higher risk of MNSI questionnaire score ≥2 (OR 1.25 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.52) per 10% lower TIR, and OR 1.79 (95% CI 1.05 to 3.04) per 1% higher GMI, adjusting for age, gender and race). Similar results were observed when analyses were restricted to participants with CKD. In contrast, there was no significant association of HbA1c with DPN symptoms. ​CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of DPN were common among participants with long-standing type 2 DM and CKD. Lower TIR and higher GMI were associated with DPN symptoms.

Comparison of outcomes between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic incident hemodialysis patients with functioning arteriovenous fistulas

This study compared clinical outcomes of patient survival and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) patency between incident hemodialysis patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Between January 2011 and December 2013, 384 consecutive incident hemodialysis patients with confirmed first upper-extremity AVF placement were divided into a T2DM group (n = 180, 46.9%) and a non-DM group (n = 204, 53.1%) and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome was AVF patency.Patients in the T2DM group had a higher prevalence of hypertension (P = .02), smoking (P < .01), cardiovascular disease (P < .01), history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (P < .01), and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (P < .01) than those in the non-DM group. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the overall survival and AVF patency rates were significantly higher in the non-DM group relative to the T2DM group (both P < .01). In the adjusted model, older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.06; P < .01), T2DM (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.12-2.77; P = .014), and history of CVA (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.98; P = .04) were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. Older age and T2DM were independently associated with decreased primary (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; P < .01, HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.22-2.33; P < .01, respectively) and secondary (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .01, HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.42-3.00; P < .01, respectively) AVF patency during follow-up.Compared with patients in the non-DM group, patients in the T2DM group had a higher mortality rate and worse AVF patency rates.

[Glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus on hemodialysis]

Achievement of stabilization of carbohydrate metabolism in patients with diabetes mellitus, receiving renal replacement therapy with hemodialysis, is a significant problem in endocrinology. It has to do with multiple factors of this cohort of patients, which affect the level of glycemia, pharmacokinetic of drugs, the efficiency of glycemic control. At the moment, the most efficiency method of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on hemodialysis is insulin therapy in the basis - bolus regime by analogues of human insulin. The use of oral hypoglycemic agents is significantly limited. The hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) remains the main parameter of glycemic control. The simultaneous use of continuous glucose monitoring allows to reveal the true level of glucose of the blood and to carry out the timely correction of therapy in order to achieve targets for glycemic control and to decrease the risk of hypoglycemic episodes. At the moment other glycemic control markers such as glycated albumin and fructosamine are described. However, in routine practice at the moment these indicators are not used due to the lack of sufficient evidentiary base of their use in this cohort of patients.

Glycated albumin versus hemoglobin A1c and mortality in diabetic hemodialysis patients: a cohort study

Background

For glycemic control in diabetic patients on dialysis it was unclear what level of glycated albumin (GA) was associated with the lowest mortality and GA's utility. Accordingly, we examined the difference in association between GA and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with 1-year mortality in a cohort of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.

Methods

We examined 84 282 patients with prevalent diabetes who were on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) (female 30.3%; mean age 67.3 ± 11.2 years; mean dialysis vintage 6.4 ± 4.5 years). Of them, 22 441 had both GA and HbA1c. We followed these for a year, 2013-14, using Cox regression to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence limits for 1-year mortality after adjusting for potential confounders such as baseline age, sex, smoking and diabetes type.

Results

One-year mortality was lowest in diabetic HD patients who had GA levels of 15.6-18.2% and HbA1c levels of 5.8-6.3%. The associations were linear or J-shaped for GA and U-shaped for HbA1c. Adjusted HRs were significantly higher in patients with GA <12.5% and GA ≥22.9%. This trend flattened in elderly patients, those with higher hemoglobin or those with prior cardiovascular disease. In addition, the C-statistics, Harrell's C and category-free net reclassification improvement to predict 1-year mortality were better when GA was added to the model than when HbA1c was added.

Conclusions

There was a linear or J-shaped association between GA and 1-year mortality, with the lowest mortality at GA 15.6-18.2%. Furthermore, our analyses suggest the potential superiority of GA over HbA1c in predicting mortality.

Safety and efficacy of antihyperglycaemic agents in diabetic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the major contributor to the mortality and the financial burden of diabetes, accounting for approximately 50% of the cases of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the developed world. Several studies have already demonstrated that achieving blood pressure targets in DKD with agents blocking the renin-angiotensin system confer superior renoprotection when compared to other agents. However, the effects on renal outcomes of antihyperglycaemic agents in these patients have not been reported or studied broadly until recent years. The intent of this article is to review the available data on safety, efficacy, impact on renal outcomes and pathophysiology implications of the most utilized antihyperglycaemic agents in DKD/ESRD.