Management of fluid overload in hemodialysis patients

Role of health literacy profiles in fluid management of individuals receiving haemodialysis: A cross-sectional study

AIMS

To identify health literacy profiles in individuals receiving haemodialysis and to explore how these profiles interact with individuals' self-efficacy, engagement with traditional dietary habits, self-reported fluid restriction and relative-interdialytic weight gain.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study engaging nephrology departments from four hospitals in Guangdong Province, China.

METHODS

A sample of 433 individuals receiving haemodialysis participated between December 2018 and July 2019. We assessed health literacy, self-efficacy and self-reported fluid restriction using the Health Literacy Questionnaire, the Fluid Self-efficacy Scale and the Fluid Adherence Subscale, respectively. Traditional dietary habits, including daily tea drinking, soup drinking and preserved food consumption, were measured using three yes/no questions. Relative-interdialytic weight gain was calculated by dividing the mean interdialytic weight gain (from three recent intervals) by dry weight. Latent profile analysis and structural equation modelling were performed.

RESULTS

Three health literacy profiles were identified: low, moderate and high. Compared to those in the low health literacy profile, individuals in high and moderate health literacy profiles demonstrated an indirect association with reduced relative-interdialytic weight gain. This reduction can be attributed to their higher self-efficacy levels, decreased reliance on dietary habits and higher self-reported fluid restrictions.

CONCLUSIONS

Most participants exhibited either low or moderate levels of health literacy. Improving health literacy has the potential to promote self-efficacy and foster effective fluid restriction, ultimately leading to a reduction in relative-interdialytic weight gain in individuals receiving haemodialysis.

IMPACT

This study reveals heterogeneity in health literacy levels among individuals receiving haemodialysis and illuminates the connections between an individual's entire spectrum of health literacy and fluid management. These findings provide valuable insights for developing person-centred fluid management interventions, especially for individuals with diverse cultural dietary backgrounds within the haemodialysis population.

REPORTING METHOD

We adhered to the STROBE guideline.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients were included only for collecting their data.

Etelcalcetide Inhibits the Progression of Left Atrial Volume Index Compared to Alfacalcidol in Hemodialysis Patients

INTRODUCTION

Increased left atrial (LA) size is a risk factor for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. It is closely related to left ventricular hypertrophy and chronic volume overload, both of which are common in hemodialysis. Calcimimetic treatment with etelcalcetide (ETL) previously showed an inhibitory effect on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) progression in this population.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of the EtECAR-HD trial, where 62 patients were randomized to ETL or alfacalcidol (ALFA) for 1 year. LA volume index (LAVI) was measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of the study was to investigate whether ETL was associated with a change of LAVI.

RESULTS

Median baseline levels of LAVI were 40 mL/m2 (31, 54 IQR) in the ETL group and 36 mL/m2 (26, 46 IQR) in the ALFA group. In the ITT population, the change of LAVI was 5.0 mL/m2 [95% CI: -0.04, 10] lower under ETL, compared to ALFA (p = 0.052, R2adj = 0.259). In the PP population, the difference in LAVI changes widened to 5.8 [95% CI: 0.36, 11], p = 0.037, R2adj = 0.302). Secondary analysis showed that the study delta of LVMI was correlated with the LAVI delta (r = 0.387) and that an inclusion of LVMI delta in the ANCOVA model mediated the effect on LAVI delta to β = 3.3 [95% CI: -0.04, 10] (p = 0.2, R2adj = 0.323). The same could not be observed for parameters assessing the volume status.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis indicates that ETL could inhibit LAVI progression compared with ALFA. This effect was mediated by the change of LVMI.

The Science of Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration: Introducing a Novel Miniaturized Device

INTRODUCTION

Fluid overload has been associated with untoward outcomes in a variety of clinical settings. Isolated extracorporeal ultrafiltration (UF) allows for mechanical extraction of excess fluid and optimization of volume status without the established risks associated with use of high-dose diuretics. Conventional machines for renal replacement therapy can be used to perform isolated UF. However, they typically need high blood flow rates with high circuit volumes and the therapy has to be performed by trained nurses. Herein, we describe a novel device, the Artificial Diuresis-1, or AD 1 (Medica S.p.A., Medolla, Italy), which is a portable technology designed to perform extracorporeal UF at bedside.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AD 1 uses a polysulfone mini-filter to generate ultrafiltrate with the help of two forces: blood flow (Qb) and gravity (based on the height at which the ultrafiltrate collection bag is placed). In vitro experiments were performed using human blood to evaluate vascular access pressures and ultrafiltrate volumes using various central venous catheters (CVCs; 12 Fr bilume, 10 Fr with 2 separate lumens, pediatric catheter 7 Fr). A variety of combinations were tested with Qb of 20, 35, 50 mL/min and collection bag height at 20, 40, 60 cm, measuring the UF rate per minute while monitoring the pressures in the venous and arterial lines and filtration fraction.

RESULTS

The device's performance was as expected. Regarding the pediatric CVC, it was possible to perform measurements only with a Qb of 20 mL/min due to increased venous pressure. UF rates when lines were directly connected to the blood container as well as for CVC Tesio ranged from 3.7 to 11 mL/min, for the CVC Niagara™ from 4.5 to 12.5 mL/min, and for the CVC 7 Fr from 8.5 to 10 mL/min. The pressures of the vascular accesses were kept within a range of -5/-40 mm Hg for the artery and +10/+70 mm Hg for the vein. The highest venous pressure values were found with the CVC 7 Fr (+80/+100 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel device allows to treat patients with fluid overload in a variety of settings, from low-intensity department such as long-term care facilities to the intensive care unit. The device is small and portable, has a simple design, and is user friendly. Future studies will be needed to evaluate whether gentle UF and treatment of volume overload will translate into improvement in clinical outcomes such as a reduction in congestion-related hospital admissions.