Comparison of 4.8 Fr and 6 Fr ureteral stents on stent related symptoms following ureterorenoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Outcomes following Exchange and Upsizing of Malfunctioning Small-Caliber Double-J Ureteral Stents

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of exchange and upsizing of malfunctioning small-caliber double-J (JJ) ureteral stents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with malfunctioning cystoscopically placed small-caliber (6 or 7 F) JJ stents underwent transurethral (n = 28) or transrenal (n = 3) exchange and upsizing to a large-caliber (10 F) JJ stent from 2013 to 2022. Ureteral obstruction was malignant in 20 patients (65%) and benign in 11 (35%). Fifteen patients (48%) presented with persistent hydroureteronephrosis and 16 patients (52%) with worsening hydronephrosis. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was present in 19 patients (61%) at the time of stent malfunction. Therapeutic success was defined as resolution of hydronephrosis and AKI, if present.

RESULTS

JJ stent exchange and upsizing was technically successful in 31 patients (100%) with no immediate adverse events. Therapeutic success was achieved in 27 patients (87%). During follow-up (median, 97 days; IQR, 32-205 days), 2 patients who initially achieved therapeutic success had stent malfunction, requiring conversion to percutaneous nephrostomy drainage (2/27, 7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Exchange and upsizing to large-caliber JJ stents can relieve urinary obstruction and resolve AKI in patients with malfunctioning small-caliber JJ stents. Large-caliber JJ stents should be considered as a salvage option for patients who wish to continue internal drainage and avoid percutaneous nephrostomy.

Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms and Pharmacotherapy: A Brief Narrative Review

The purpose of this article is to review the effects of different types of pharmacotherapy on symptoms that affect the quality of a patient's life after stent insertion. A thorough Medline/PubMed nonsystematic review was conducted from 1987 to January 2023, using the terms: "pigtail" OR "ureteral stents" AND "lower urinary tracts symptoms" OR "LUTS" AND "pharmacotherapy" OR "drugs". Relevant studies conducted in humans and reported in English language were included. The available reviews and articles associating the use of drugs with stent-related symptoms (SRS) provide conflicting results. Most of them show a clear benefit of alpha blockers, particularly alfuzosin, on treating urinary SRS, and hence there is a strong recommendation for the use of alpha blockers for the treatment of SRS in the guidelines of the European Association of Urology. Anticholinergics and mirabegron have shown a significant benefit in dealing with irritative bladder symptoms. In contrast, the findings for combination therapies are contradictory, with some studies showing that combination therapy is no superior to monotherapy with regards to most of the subsets of the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), whereas others present a clear benefit of combination therapies, specifically silodosin and solifenacin, in treating stent-associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), in comparison with any other type of monotherapy or combination therapy. Many studies suggest that some categories of pharmacotherapy, such as alpha blockers, can alleviate SRS. However, there is conflicting evidence concerning most other types of medical treatment. Randomized trials with the largest number of patients are needed to investigate the effectiveness of novel approaches on SRS.

Are All Stent Bearers Equal? Ureteral Stent Symptoms in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Case-Control Prospective Study

Purpose: The aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, controlled single-center study to determine the prevalence and types of ureteral stent symptoms in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and compare them with nontransplant subjects. Materials and Methods: From December 2012 to June 2019, a total of 102 patients having undergone a KTx and Double-J stent (DJS) placement and 88 patients having undergone endourological lithotripsy and DJS placement were enrolled. The Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) was administered to patients with a median of 25 (KTx) and 31 (urolithiasis) days after stent placement. USSQ scores were used to compare symptoms between the two groups. Results: Of the 190 patients enrolled, 88 belonged to the lithotripsy group (control group) and 102 to the KTx recipients' group. Mean score for urinary symptoms was 21.42 for KTx patients vs 27.53 for control patients with statistical significance (p < 0.001, CI -7.792 to -4.433). The visual analog scale, overall bother, pain at voiding, flank pain at voiding, and frequency of painkiller use scores were significantly higher for control patients than for KTx patients (p = 0.024, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.014, respectively). Frequency of rest, changes in work duration, work domain score, suspicion of urinary tract infection (UTI), and need for professional assistance scores were significantly lower for KTx patients than the control. There were no significant differences in general health and sexual domains between groups. Conclusions: KTx recipients have significantly fewer urinary symptoms, pain, work-related disturbances, suspected UTIs, and hospitalizations associated with stent placement than urolithiasis patients.

Impact of differential ureteral stent diameters on clinical outcomes after ureteroscopy intracorporeal lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In this meta-analysis we assessed whether the diameter of ureteral stents (4.7-5-Fr, 6-Fr) has an impact on the rate of occurrence of urinary tract symptoms and complications after successful URS and intracorporeal lithotripsy. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A rigorous search for relevant studies published in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was conducted to find informative randomized controlled trials. The reference lists of relevant articles were also manually searched and reviewed. The protocol was prospectively registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020202164). All statistical evaluations were performed using RevMan software version 5.3.0. Seven articles comprising 547 patients were included in the meta-analysis. After placement of ureteral stents with different diameters for approximately 1 week, we found that ureteral stents with smaller diameters (4.7-5-Fr) were associated with significant improvements in the main domain scores on the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire, such as urinary symptoms (mean difference -4.47, 95% confidence interval -5.87 to -3.08; P < 0.00001) and body pain (mean difference -2.48, 95% confidence interval -4.37 to -0.59; P = 0.01), but poor outcomes in stent migration compared to ureteral stents with a 6-Fr diameter (odds ratio 3.00, 95% confidence interval 1.06-8.51; P = 0.04). However, there were no significant differences in Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire scores with regard to work performance (mean difference -0.56, 95% confidence interval -2.52 to 1.40; P = 0.58), general health (mean difference -2.29, 95% confidence interval -4.95 to 0.37; P = 0.09), additional problems (mean difference -0.43, 95% confidence interval -1.02 to 0.15; P = 0.15), and complications such as fever (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.24-2.39; P = 0.63). Ureteral stents with a diameter of 4.7-5-Fr have better outcomes than those with a diameter of 6-Fr, based on the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire pain and urinary tract symptoms scores. However, they are more prone to migration compared to those with a larger diameter.

Non-invasive evaluation of obstruction after ureteroscopic stone removal: Role of renal resistive index assessment

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate prediction of postoperative ureteral obstruction needing ureteral stent insertion by evaluating the resistive index (RI) values and the grade of hydronephrosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 66 adult patients undergoing stentless endoscopic ureteral stone treatment (URS) between January 2018 and January 2019 were included in this prospective study. Preoperative patient and stone characteristics were noted. All patients were evaluated with renal Doppler ultrasonography study to assess degree of hydronephrosis and RI values. A renal Doppler ultrasonography was repeated at postoperative 1st, 3rd and 7th days. Changes in both RI and hydronephrosis levels before and after the procedures were noted. On the postoperative 7th day, patients were divided into two groups including obstructive and non-obstructive cases according to RI values assessed where a RI value of 0.7 was accepted as the cut-off for obstruction. The preoperative and perioperative characteristics of both groups were evaluated in a comparative manner.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 43.6 ± 1.72 years. Significant improvements were noted in RI and grade of hydronephrosis after the operation. The grade of hydronephrosis and RI values were found to improve more significantly on postoperative 3rd day when compared to the postoperative 7th day (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01). A significant correlation was detected between the grade of hydronephrosis (>grade 2) and obstructive RI values (> 0.7) in each postoperative visits (p: 0.001). RI values (> 0.7) at postoperative seventh days were correlated with larger mean stone size, increased ureteral wall thickness, increased diameter of the ureter proximal to the stone, and longer duration of the operation. Preoperative high-grade hydronephrosis indicated obstructive RI values at postoperative seventh day (p = 0.001) Conclusion: Changes in RI values on Doppler sonography and the grade of hydronephrosis may be a guiding parameter in assessing postoperative ureteral obstruction.

Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes and QOL: Current Complications of the Design and Placements of Ureteric Stents

Ureteric stents have played a vital role in relieving urinary obstruction in many urological conditions. Although they are extremely successful, stents have been associated with complications and reduced patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There are many factors that may affect the quality and longevity of stents. In this review, we have highlighted the journey and innovation of ureteric stents through the modern day. A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles over the last 20 years. There is a plethora of evidence with various indications for the use of ureteral stents and how they affect QoL. There is still ongoing research to develop the ideal stent with reduced encrustation, one that resists infection and is also comfortable for the patients. Stents made from metal alloys, polymers and biodegradable materials have unique properties in their own right but also have certain deficiencies. These have been discussed along with an overview of newly developed stents. Certain pharmacological adjuncts have also been highlighted that may be useful to improve patient's tolerance to stents. In summary, this paper describes the features of the different types of stents and the problems that are frequently encountered, including effect on patients' HRQoL and financial burden to healthcare providers.