TT-TG vs. modified lateral patellar edge for determination of tibial tubercle transfer distance in Fulkerson osteotomy procedures

Reliability of Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance for Assessing Tibial Tubercle Lateralization: A Study Comparing Different Anatomic References

Background

The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a measurement used to quantitatively assess tibial tubercle lateralization (TTL), and it has important reference value for the treatment of patellar dislocation (PD). However, TT-TG distance accuracy has been questioned, so many new parameters have been proposed.

Purpose

To compare which of the TT-TG, tibial tubercle-midepicondyle (TT-ME), tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA), tibial tubercle-tibial intercondylar midpoint (TT-TIM), and tibial tubercle-mid inter-epicondyle trochlea intersection (TT-MIELTI) distances better reflect TTL in patients with PD.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 96 patients who had undergone surgery for PD and 96 patients without PD (controls) were included in the study. The patients had all undergone computed tomography examination. The TT-TG, TT-ME, TT-RA, TT-TIM, TT-MIELTI distances and the TTL distance were measured independently by 2 surgeons in a blinded and randomized fashion. The t test was used to detect whether the parameters were significantly different between the 2 groups. The TTL distance was used as a reference value for lateralization of tibial tubercle. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine correlations between the defined measurements.

Results

The intra- and interobserver reliability of the defined measurements was excellent. All parameters except for TT-TIM distance were significantly larger in the PD group than the control group (P < .01 for all). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.601) between the TT-TG distance and TTL, and other parameters were less correlated with TTL.

Conclusion

Among 5 the parameters tested, the TT-TG distance still had the highest correlation with TTL and was able to reflect TTL better in patients with PD. The role of TT-TIM distance in the assessment of PD needs further study.

Radiologic Measurements in the Assessment of Patellar Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

Numerous diagnostic imaging measurements related to patellar instability have been evaluated in the literature; however, little has been done to compare these findings across multiple studies.

Purpose:

To review the different imaging measurements used to evaluate patellar instability and to assess the prevalence of each measure and its utility in predicting instability. We focused on reliability across imaging modalities and between patients with and without patellar instability.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We performed a systematic review of the literature using the PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases. Each database was searched for variations of the terms “patellar instability,” “patellar dislocation,” “trochlear dysplasia,” “radiographic measures,” “computed tomography,” and “magnetic resonance imaging.” Studies were included if they were published after May 1, 2009, and before May 1, 2019. A meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed on several measurements, comparing instability and control groups to generate pooled values.

Results:

A total of 813 articles were identified, and 96 articles comprising 7912 patients and 106 unique metrics were included in the analysis. The mean patient age was 23.1 years (95% CI, 21.1-24.5), and 41% were male. The tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance was the most frequently included metric (59 studies), followed by the Insall-Salvati ratio and Caton-Deschamps index (both 26 studies). The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent or good for the TT-TG distance and Insall-Salvati ratio in 100% of studies reporting them; however, for the Caton-Deschamps index and Blackburne-Peel ratio, they were excellent or good in only 43% and 40% of studies. Pooled magnetic resonance imaging values for TT-TG distance (P < .01), Insall-Salvati ratio (P = .01), and femoral sulcus angle (P = .02) were significantly different between the instability and control groups. Values for tibial tubercle–posterior cruciate ligament distance (P = .36) and Caton-Deschamps index (P = .09) were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion:

The most commonly reported measurements for evaluating patellar instability assessed patellar tracking and trochlear morphology. The TT-TG distance was the most common measurement and was greater in the patellar instability group as compared with the control group. In addition, the TT-TG, tibial tubercle–posterior cruciate ligament, and patellar tendon–trochlear groove distances were highly reproducible measurements for patellar tracking, and the Insall-Salvati ratio had superior reproducibility for assessing patellar height.

Distal alignment procedures for patellofemoral instability: comprehensive review of the literature

Patellofemoral disorders are a common cause of complaint in adolescent patients. Several distal realignment procedures performed in isolation or combination with proximal alignment have been described. To clarify the role of distal alignment for patellofemoral instability, a systematic review of the literature was conducted. Two independent reviewers accessed the following databases: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar. A total of 1478 patients with a mean age of 22.78 years were included. The mean follow-up was 86.53 months. The average Kujala score improved from 57.66 to 82.73. The average Lysholm score improved from 63.25 to 87.87, and the average Tegner score from 3 to 4.16. VAS score improved from an average 8 to 2.56. We account a total of 46 major complications, 45 minor complications and 95 recurrences. The risk of a recurrence is 6.42%. A total of 122 additional surgeries were performed during the follow-up. This systematic review of literature suggests the importance to identify the pathological background that predisposes patients for developing patellofemoral instability and its implications for the decision-making process. The optimal treatment for patellofemoral instability should be individualized to address the specific anatomical abnormalities that contribute to patellofemoral dislocations. Distal alignments are a feasible solution to restore correct patellar biomechanics and tracking, leading to an improvement of patients' quality of life.

Clinical Accuracy of J-Sign Measurement Compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

The J-sign is defined as lateral patellar translation over the anterolateral femur proximal to the trochlear groove during active leg extension. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques allow for quantification of the J-sign using a variety of published indices. However, to date, clinical quantification of the J-sign has not been reliably described. The purpose of the present study is to assess the accuracy of clinically quantifying the J-sign compared with objective MRI data.

METHODS

All patients in this case series were indicated for Fulkerson osteotomy due to recurrent lateral patellar instability and examined preoperatively for the presence of J-sign. The J-sign was estimated by placing a finger on the lateral edge of the trochlea and estimating the lateral translation of the patella while the patient actively extended the knee from 30 degrees of flexion to maximum extension. Independent preoperative measurements were obtained by both the senior author and a resident and compared to dynamic MRI measurements read by independent investigators.

RESULTS

Preoperative physical examination for the presence of the J-sign was conducted on 10 patients (10 knees). The average difference between clinical and MRI J-sign measurement was 4.32 mm (range 0.2 - 10.4 mm). There was no significant difference between the clinical and MRI J-sign measurements (p = 0.2579). Clinical measurements of the J-sign differed by an average of 2.2 mm between the two examiners (range 0 - 5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical quantification of the Jsign showed relative imprecision when compared with MRI measurements of the modified lateral patellar edge (LPE), though in several patients we did achieve accurate J-sign assessment. If further research can validate this technique as accurate and consistent using larger patient populations, it could aid in the development of surgical treatment plans for patients presenting with patellar instability, and serve as an objective assessment of alignment in the postoperative period.