Histological and cellular evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament

Acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: can repair become an alternative to reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair and ACL reconstruction for acute ACL rupture.

METHOD

We searched Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to seek relevant studies. Clinical outcomes included failure rate, hardware removal rate, anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity, and patient-reported outcomes. In addition, subgroup analysis was carried out according to repair techniques, rupture locations, and study designs. Funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA (version 14.2, StataCorp).

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles were included in this study, comprising 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 cohort studies, involving a total of 549 patients. We found no statistical differences between the ACL repair and ACL reconstruction in the following outcomes: failure rate, AP knee laxity, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Score, and Tegner score. However, the ACL repair group had a higher hardware removal rate. Except for AP knee laxity results on different repair techniques, there was no statistical difference in other subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Compared with ACL reconstruction, ACL repair shows similar results in clinical outcomes, and it is promising to be an effective alternative treatment for acute ACL rupture. Larger samples and higher-quality studies are needed to support our results and further explore the advantages of ACL repair in other aspects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Lower anatomical femoral ACL tunnel can be created in the large volume of femoral intercondylar notch

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between femoral intercondylar notch volume and the characteristics of femoral tunnels in anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Fifty-one subjects (24 male and 27 female: median age 27: range 15-49), were included in this study. Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction was performed in all subjects using a trans-portal technique. Femoral tunnel length was measured intra-operatively. Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) was taken at pre and post-surgery. The intercondylar notch volume was calculated with a truncated-pyramid shape simulation using the pre-operative 3D-CT image. In the post-operative 3D-CT, the modified quadrant method was used to measure femoral ACL tunnel placement.

RESULTS

Femoral tunnel placement was 47.6 ± 10.5% in the high-low (proximal-distal) direction, and 22.6 ± 5.4% in the shallow-deep (anterior-posterior) direction. Femoral tunnel length was 35.3 ± 4.4 cm. Femoral intercondylar notch volume was 8.6 ± 2.1cm³. A significant correlation was found between femoral intercondylar notch volume and high-low (proximal-distal) femoral tunnel placement (Pearson's coefficient correlation: 0.469, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Femoral ACL tunnel placement at a significantly lower level was found in knees with large femoral intercondylar notch volume in the trans-portal technique. For the clinical relevance, although the sample size of this study was limited, surgeons can create femoral ACL tunnel low (distal) in the notch where close to the anatomical ACL footprint in the knees with large femoral intercondylar notch volume.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effects of remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Compared with standard anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, it is controversial whether anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with remnant preservation can lead to better clinical outcomes. We conducted a systematic study and meta-analysis to assess the differences in clinical efficacy between the two.

Method

We searched for clinical randomized controlled studies and cohort studies included in the Cochrane library, PubMed, and Embase from March 2012 to March 2022 in English. The included studies were ACLR with or without remant preservation, and the data were extracted and the quality of the included studies was assessed by two authors, respectively. Revman 5.4 was used for statistical analysis and conclusions were presented.

Result

Ten articles containing a total of 777 patients were finally included. There was no significant difference in postoperative Lachman test [OR = 1.66, 95%CI (0.79, 3.49), P = 0.18 > 0.05], Tegner score [SMD = −0.13, 95%CI (−0.47, 0.22), P = 0.46 > 0.05], synovial coverage rate by second-look arthroscopy [OR = 1.55, 95%CI (0.66, 3.65), P = 0.32 > 0.05], the rate of cyclops lesion [OR = 3.92, 95%CI (0.53, 29.29), P = 0.18 > 0.05], joint range of motion [SMD = 0.27, 95%CI (−0.13, 0.68), P = 0.19 > 0.05] and re-injury rate [OR = 0.57, 95%CI (0.18, 1.74), P = 0.32 > 0.05] between the two groups. There were statistically significant differences in postoperative Lysholm score [SMD = 0.98, 95% CI (0.32, 1.64), P = 0.004 < 0.05], International Knee Documantation Committee grade (IKDC grade) [OR = 2.19, 95%CI (1.03, 4.65), P = 0.04 < 0.05], Pivot shift test [OR = 1.71, 95%CI (1.06, 2.77), P = 0.03 < 0.05], KT1000/2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference [SMD = −0.22, 95%CI (−0.42, −0.03), P = 0.02 < 0.05], operation time [SMD = 11.69, 95%CI (8.85, 14.54), P = 0.00001 < 0.05] and degree of tibial tunnel enlargement [SMD = −0.66, 95%CI (−1.08, −0.23), P = 0.002 < 0.05].

Conclusion

This meta-analysis concluded that remnant preservation significantly had better results in terms of patient functional score (Lysholm, IKDC), knee stability (Pivot shift test, postoperative side-to-side anterior laxity) and tibial tunnel enlargement. In terms of complications (incidence of Cyclops lesions, range of motion, re-injury rate), no significant differences were seen between the two groups. Although many studies concluded that remnant preservation could bring better synovial coverage, this meta-analysis indicated that there is insufficient evidence to support it, possibly due to different remnant preservation procedures.The potential risks associated with longer operation times are also worth considering.

Knees with straight Blumensaat's line have small volume of femoral intercondylar notch

PURPOSE

Smaller femoral intercondylar notch volume has been identified as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury. The present study aims to investigate differences in the intercondylar notch volume based on differences in the morphology of Blumensaat's line.

METHODS

Eighty-eight (88) subjects (42 male and 46 female: median age 27: range 15-49), were included in this study. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT), the volume of the intercondylar notch was calculated using a truncated-pyramid shape simulation with the formula: [Formula: see text]. Femoral condyle height (h) was measured in the sagittal plane of the knee in 3D-CT. The area of the intercondylar notch was measured in the axial slice containing the most proximal level (S1) and most distal level (S2) of Blumensaat's line. In the sagittal view of the knee, Blumensaat's line morphology was classified into either straight or hill type. Statistical analysis was performed to compare h, S1, S2, and notch volume between the straight and hill type groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects were classified as having straight type morphology and 52 subjects were classified as having hill type morphology. The measured h, S1, and S2, of the straight and hill types were 29 ± 4 and 31 ± 4 mm, 213 ± 72 and 205 ± 51 mm², 375 ± 114 and 430 ± 94 mm², respectively. The calculated femoral intercondylar notch volume of the straight and hill types was 8.1 ± 2 and 9.5 ± 2 cm³, respectively. Straight type knees showed significantly smaller S2 (p = 0.04), and notch volume (p = 0.01) when compared with hill type knees.

CONCLUSION

Intercondylar notch volume was significantly smaller in knees with straight type Blumensaat's line morphology. Considering that Blumensaat's line represents the roof of the femoral notch, morphological variations in Blumensaat's line are likely to reflect variation in notch volume. For clinical relevance, as a smaller notch volume is a risk factor for ACL injury, straight type Blumensaat's line may also be considered a potential risk factor for ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.