Cement debonding behaviors of the various tibial components of the ATTUNE knee system and its predecessors: Is a cement-in-cement revision an alternative?

Medial proximal tibial resorption after total knee arthroplasty according to the design of the cobalt chrome tibial baseplate

PURPOSE

A new tibial baseplate of the cobalt-chrome (CoCr) prosthesis has an enhanced design with additional cement pockets and undersurface with increased roughness compared with the original baseplate. This study aimed to compare the incidence of medial proximal tibial resorption (MPTR) in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with the original and new CoCr tibial baseplates.

METHODS

Each of 200 posterior stabilized TKAs with the original (Group O) and new (Group N) CoCr tibial baseplates with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. The matches were made according to age, sex, body mass index, and severity of varus deformity. The occurrence of MPTR was investigated with a radiograph at 2 years postoperatively. MPTR was categorized as type U (resorption under the tibial baseplate; associated with stress shielding), C (resorption around the penetrated cement under the baseplate; associated with thermal necrosis), and M (resorption on the medial tibial cortex without extension to the baseplate; associated with bony devascularization).

RESULTS

The incidence of MPTR was 35% in group O and 24% in group N (p = 0.021) at postoperative 2 years. The U type of MPTR occurred more frequently in group O (26 vs. 15%, p = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the incidence of types C and M MPTR.

CONCLUSION

The modified design of the CoCr tibial baseplate affected the incidence of MTPR. The new tibial baseplate was more advantageous in preventing MPTR than the original baseplate in TKAs using the CoCr prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.