Under-correction of preoperative varus alignment does not lead to a difference in in-vivo bone loading in 3D-SPECT/CT compared to neutral alignment

Tibia-first, gap-balanced patient-specific alignment technique achieves well-balanced gaps in 90% of cases by rebuilding bony anatomy within boundaries

PURPOSE

Patient-specific alignment (PSA) technique tries to achieve balanced gaps and simultaneously rebuild the individual bony phenotype. The hypothesis was: PSA technique achieves balanced knees in a high percentage with more anatomical resections than adjusted mechanical alignment (AMA).

METHODS

Three hundred sixty-seven patients underwent navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a tibia-first gap-balanced PSA technique. Resection boundaries for medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) of 86-92°, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) of 86-92°, and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) of 175-185° were defined. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters of HKA, MPTA, mLDFA, and gap widths were recorded. Depending on the coronal deformity, the patients were divided into three groups: varus HKA < 178°; straight 178-182° and valgus HKA > 182°. The stability was analysed by assessing the difference between medial and lateral extension and flexion gaps as well as between flexion and extension gaps. All PSA measurements were compared with data from a previously published AMA series.

RESULTS

PSA achieved balanced gaps in extension, flexion and between flexion/extension in over 90% of cases, being similar to AMA. In PSA, MPTA and mLDFA were restored within 1°, except in extreme varus (MPTA difference 2°) and valgus knees (mLDFA difference 3°). This was caused by the defined boundaries of the alignment technique. This individualised reconstruction led to significantly more anatomical resections of all tibia and femur resections.

CONCLUSION

A tibia-first, gap-balanced PSA technique achieves balanced joints in more than 90% of cases. By maintaining preoperative MPTA and mLDFA to a high extent, far more anatomical resections, compared to AMA were performed. Future studies need to be conducted to investigate whether those promising intraoperative results correlate with postoperative patient outcomes and whether patients outside the 5° corridor have higher failure rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Navigated, gap-balanced, adjusted mechanical alignment achieves alignment and balancing goals in a very high percentage but with partially non-anatomical resections

PURPOSE

Navigated, gap-balanced adjusted mechanical alignment (AMA) including a 0° varus tibial cut and modification of angles and resections of the femoral cuts to obtain optimal balance accepting minor axis deviations. Objectives of this study were (1) to analyse to what extent AMA achieves the goals for leg alignment and gap balance, and (2) in what percentage non-anatomical cuts are needed to achieve these goals.

METHODS

Out of 1000 total knee arthroplasties (TKA) all varus knees (hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle < 178°; n = 680) were included. All surgeries were performed as computer assisted surgery (CAS) in AMA technique. CAS data at the end of surgery were analysed with respect to HKA and gap-sizes. All bone cuts were quantified. Depending on the amount of deformity, a subgroup analysis was performed. It was analysed whether the amount of deformity influences the non-anatomical cuts by correlation analysis.

RESULTS

AMA reached the goals for postoperative HKA (3° corridor) in 636 cases (93.5%). While extension and flexion gap balance were achieved in more than 653 cases (96%), flexion and extension gap size were equalled in 615 knees (90.4%). The resections of the lateral tibia plateau and distal and posterior medial femoral condyle were anatomical (Tibia: 7.0 ± 1.7 mm; medial condyle distal: 7.8 ± 1.4 mm; medial posterior: 8.2 ± 1.8 mm). The number of non-anatomical resections for those cuts were low; 67 (9.9%); 24 (3.5%); 32 (4.7%). For the medial tibia plateau and the lateral posterior condyle, the cuts were non-anatomical in a high percentage of cases; Tibia: 606 (89.1%), lateral posterior condyle: 398 (58.5%). Moderate but significant correlations were found between resection differences and amount of deformity (medio-lateral: tibia: 0.399; distal femur: 0.310; posterior femur: 0.167). No correlations were found between resection differences and gap values.

CONCLUSION

AMA reaches the intended target for HKA and gap balance in over 612 (90%) of cases and maintains the medial femoral condyle anatomically. Non-anatomical tibial resection causes increased external rotation of the femoral component and by that non-anatomical cut of the posterior lateral condyle. Nonanatomical resections of AMA might be one reason for the persisting high rate of unsatisfied patients after TKA. Anatomical and individual alignment philosophies might help to reduce this rate of dissatisfaction.