Radiographic analysis using the hip-to-calcaneus line and its association with lower limb joint kinetics in varus knee osteoarthritis

Comparison of Outcomes Between Functionally and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of Parallelism to the Ground and Weight-Bearing Position of the Knee Using Hip-to-Calcaneus Radiographs

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes between patients undergoing mechanically aligned conventional total knee arthroplasty (MA-CTKA) and functionally aligned robotic-arm-assisted TKA (FA-RTKA). Methods: We reviewed a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis between June 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into two groups-MA-CTKA (n = 50) and FA-RTKA (n = 50)-based on the introduction of a robotic-arm-assisted system during the study period. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, joint line orientation angle (JLOA) relative to the floor, and weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio were evaluated using full-length standing hip-to-calcaneus radiographs to compare the conventional mechanical axis (MA) and the ground mechanical axis (GA) passing through the knee joint between the groups. Clinical outcomes were also compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the postoperative HKA angle between the groups, due to discrepancies in the targeted alignment strategies (FA-RTKA: 2.0° vs. MA-CTKA: 0.5°; p = 0.001). The postoperative JLOA in the FA-RTKA group was more parallel to the floor, whereas the MA-CTKA group showed a downward angulation toward the lateral side (0.6° vs. -2.7°; p < 0.001). In the FA-RTKA group, the GA passed through a neutral position when accounting for the calcaneus, while the MA-CTKA group showed a more lateral GA position (48.8% vs. 53.8%; p = 0.001). No significant differences in clinical outcomes were shown between the FA-RTKA and MA-CTKA groups, with the FA-RTKA group demonstrating higher Forgotten Joint Scores and a greater range of motion (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Functionally aligned TKA demonstrated improved joint line parallelism to the floor and more neutral weight-bearing alignment in the GA compared to mechanically aligned TKA. These findings indicate a more balanced load distribution across the knee, which may contribute to the superior clinical outcomes observed in the functionally aligned group.

Medial opening low tibial osteotomy shifts the load laterally not only at the ankle joint but also at the knee joint

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of medial opening low tibial osteotomy (LTO) on lower limb alignment, including the knee joint, 1 year after low tibial osteotomy.

Methods

This study included 20 legs of 20 patients (mean age, 66.8 ± 5.4 years) who underwent LTO for medial ankle osteoarthritis and evaluated the changes in the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), percentage hip-to-ankle line (%HA), percentage hip-to-calcaneal line (%HC), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), knee joint line convergence angle (K-JLCA), tibio-calcaneal angle (TCA), tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), tibio-plafond inclination (TPI), talar inclination (TI), ankle joint line convergence angle (A-JLCA), mechanical ankle joint axis point (MAJAP) on radiographs and the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle/hindfoot scale before and 1 year after low tibial osteotomy.

Results

The mean preoperative/postoperative measured values showed the following: HKA (degrees) of 1.0 ± 3.7/-0.8 ± 3.7; %HC of 38.8 ± 10.0/53.8 ± 16.1; MPTA (degrees) of 85.6 ± 2.4/87.6 ± 2.1; and A-JLCA (degrees) of 4.2 ± 2.9/1.1 ± 2.3 respectively. Including other measurements, a significant increase in the %HA, %HC, MPTA, TCA, TAS, MAJAP and JSSF ankle/hindfoot scale was observed postoperatively, whereas a significant decrease in the HKA, TPA, TI and A-JLCA was observed postoperatively (p < 0.05). With the numbers available, no significant differences were observed between the preoperative and postoperative values of K-JLCA (n.s.).

Conclusion

After LTO, the entire lower limb alignment became valgus, and the loading points of the knee and ankle joints shifted laterally. These changes must be considered when performing LTO, especially in patients with lateral knee OA.

Level of Evidence

Ⅳ.

Varus knee osteoarthritis with ankle osteoarthritis demonstrates greater hindfoot inversion and larger ankle inversion loading during gait following total knee arthroplasty compared to varus knee osteoarthritis alone

PURPOSE

Although patients with varus knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and concurrent ankle osteoarthritis (AOA) may experience increased ankle joint pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the underlying mechanism remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of concurrent AOA on ankle and hindfoot alignment, frontal plane ankle and hindfoot biomechanics during gait following TKA and the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with varus KOA who underwent TKA were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were categorized into two groups: with and without AOA. Radiographic evaluations of lower-limb, ankle and hindfoot alignment, and knee and ankle clinical outcomes were conducted preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. In addition, gait analyses were performed to investigate knee, ankle and hindfoot kinematics and kinetics. Each data was compared between patients with and without AOA.

RESULTS

Concomitant AOA was found in eight ankles. The AOA group exhibited greater postoperative hindfoot varus and increased postoperative ankle pain than the non-AOA group. Gait analysis showed no significant differences in knee varus alignment or tibial tilt after TKA between the groups. However, the AOA group demonstrated significantly greater hindfoot inversion and larger ankle inversion loading.

CONCLUSION

One third of patients who underwent TKA had concurrent AOA associated with hindfoot varus. Despite achieving proper coronal knee alignment postoperatively, these patients experienced greater hindfoot and ankle joint inversion load during gait. Surgeons should consider the inability to evert the hindfoot and the possibility of increased ankle joint pain when planning and performing TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Preoperative Hindfoot Alignment and Outcomes After High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis: We Walk on Our Heel, Not Our Ankle

UPDATE

This article was updated on May 15, 2024 because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 898, in the section entitled "Materials and Methods," the sentence that had read "The WBL ratio of the knee joint was defined as the point where the GA or MA passed through the width of the tibia and intersected a line from the center of the femoral head to the center of the calcaneus (for the GA) or talus (for the MA), with the medial edge defined as 0% and the lateral edge as 100%." now reads "The WBL ratio of the knee joint was defined as the point where the GA or MA passed through the width of the tibia and intersected a line from the center of the femoral head to the lowest point of the calcaneus (for the GA) or the center of the talus (for the MA), with the medial edge defined as 0% and the lateral edge as 100%." Likewise, in the legend for Figure 3 on page 899, the sentence that had read "Depiction of the ground mechanical axis (GA), defined as the line (represented by the solid red line) from the center of the femoral head to the ground reaction point at the center of the calcaneus, passing lateral to the traditional mechanical axis (MA; represented by the dashed red line)." now reads "Depiction of the ground mechanical axis (GA), defined as the line (represented by the solid red line) from the center of the femoral head to the ground reaction point at the lowest point of the calcaneus, passing lateral to the traditional mechanical axis (MA; represented by the dashed red line)." Finally, on page 903, "HKA" was changed to "HKA angle" in Table III.

BACKGROUND

The hip-to-calcaneus axis, previously known as the ground mechanical axis (GA), ideally passes through the center of the knee joint in the native knee. The aim of this study was to elucidate, with use of hip-to-calcaneus radiographs, changes in knee and hindfoot alignment and changes in outcomes following high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

METHODS

We reviewed the records for 128 patients who underwent HTO between 2018 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 2 groups, a hindfoot valgus group (n = 94) and a hindfoot varus group (n = 34), on the basis of their preoperative hindfoot alignment. The hindfoot alignment was evaluated with use of the hindfoot alignment angle (HAA). To evaluate lower-limb alignment, full-length standing posteroanterior hip-to-calcaneus radiographs were utilized to measure 4 radiographic parameters preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively: the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, hip-knee-calcaneus (HKC) angle, and the weight-bearing line (WBL) ratios of the mechanical axis (MA) and GA.

RESULTS

The mean HAA improved significantly from 5.1° valgus preoperatively to 1.9° valgus postoperatively in the hindfoot valgus group (p < 0.001). In contrast, in the hindfoot varus group, the HAA showed no meaningful improvement in the coronal alignment of the hindfoot following HTO (p = 0.236). The postoperative mean HKC angle in the hindfoot varus group was 2° more varus than that in the hindfoot valgus group (1.0° versus 3.0°; p = 0.001), and the GA in the hindfoot varus group passed across the knee 8.0% more medially than that in the hindfoot valgus group (55% versus 63% from the most medial to the most lateral part of the tibial plateau). The hindfoot varus group had worse postoperative clinical outcomes than the hindfoot valgus group in terms of the mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our findings did not provide sufficient evidence to establish clinically relevant differences between the groups, they indicated that the group with a preoperative fixed hindfoot varus deformity had a higher rate of undercorrection and worse clinical outcomes, especially pain, following HTO. Therefore, modification of the procedure to shift the GA more laterally may be required for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Influence of Distal Reference Point of the Tibial Mechanical Axis on the Ankle and Hindlimb Alignment Change after Total Knee Arthroplasty

The alignment philosophy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has tended to shift from the gold standard of mechanically aligned technique to personalized alignment, such as the kinematically aligned (KA) technique. However, the influences of different surgical techniques on lower limb alignment relative to the ground are not fully investigated. This study investigated the influence of the ankle and hindlimb alignment change after mechanically aligned TKA and KA-TKA. The varus osteoarthritic patients who underwent TKAs were divided into a mechanically aligned TKA group (group M, n = 50) and a KA-TKA group (group K, n = 50). Radiographic parameters (hip-knee-calcaneus [HKC] angle, hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle, talar tilt angle [TTA], and tibiocalcaneal angle [TCA]) were investigated using full-length standing radiographs. The deviation angle (ΔTA; angle between the tibial mechanical axis [TMA] and the ground tibial mechanical axis [gTMA]) and the change of ΔTA (cΔTA) were also assessed. These parameters were compared between the two groups, along with the correlation between the preoperative HKA angle and other parameters. ΔTA, TTA, and TCA showed no differences between the groups pre- and postoperatively, and no significant changes were observed postoperatively. The preoperative HKA angle showed a significant negative correlation with cΔTA in both groups (group M: r = -0.33, p = 0.02; group K: r = -0.29, p = 0.04) although no correlation was observed the with preoperative TTA and TCA. Despite no change in ΔTA after surgery, the preoperative varus deformity was associated with a change in the deviation between gTMA and TMA after surgery. A severely varus knee may be inappropriate for ground KA-TKA.

Weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level shifted laterally after total knee arthroplasty for varus knee osteoarthritis: Evaluation of the hip-to-calcaneus line

BACKGROUND

Few studies have comprehensively examined how alignment beyond the ankle joint changes after Total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This retrospective study aimed to answer the questions: (1) do the radiological parameters beyond the ankle joint, including the weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level, change after TKA in varus knee osteoarthritis? (2) Does the lower extremity alignment correlate with alignment beyond the ankle joint?

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that TKA altered the radiological parameters beyond the ankle, which correlated with the lower extremity alignment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 67 patients who underwent mechanically aligned TKA for varus knee osteoarthritis. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), tibial plafond inclination angle (TPIA), hindfoot alignment angle (HA), talar tilt (TT), and weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level (mechanical ankle joint axis point [MAJAP]) were measured using radiographs taken before and 6 months after TKA; each parameter was compared between the two time points. The correlations between HKA and other parameters were examined preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean HKA, TPIA, HA, TT, and MAJAP changed significantly after TKA from 15.0±6.1̊ to 2.6̊±3.5̊, from 10.8̊±5.7̊ to 4.7̊±3.9̊, from 2.3̊±5.5̊ to -2.5̊±4.5̊, from 0.2̊±1.3̊ to -0.5̊±1.4̊, and from 29.3±23.3 to 54.3±20.6, respectively. Correlations were noted between the preoperative HKA and the preoperative TPIA (r=0.58), HA (r=0.36), and MAJAP (r=-0.59), and between the postoperative HKA and the postoperative TPIA (r=0.54) and MAJAP (r=-0.38).

DISCUSSION

TKA for varus knee osteoarthritis altered radiological parameters beyond the ankle, with the weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level passing more laterally. The weight-bearing line at the ankle joint level was correlated with lower extremity alignment both preoperatively and postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; single-centre retrospective observational study.

Targeting the neutral hip-to-calcaneus axis in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty is feasible with fewer alignment outliers for varus osteoarthritic patients

PURPOSE

Assessment of the conventional mechanical axis (MA) (hip-to-talus axis) is reported to result in constitutional varus in the native knee. However, the ground MA (hip-to-calcaneus axis), which is the line from the hip center to the bottom of the calcaneus, passes through the center of the knee joint in the native knee and is a possible alternative target for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) assessments. Therefore, this study aimed to present a "ground kinematically aligned (KA)-TKA." In this technique, the femoral component is placed on the cylindrical axis using the calipered technique and the tibial component is placed to give a neutral ground MA. Radiographical investigation was used to determine whether physiological alignment can be individually achieved with ground KA-TKA; this was compared with that of a tibia-restricted modified KA-TKA, referring to conventional MA (hip-to-talus axis) results.

METHODS

As the primary endpoint, this prospective cohort study compared the ground MA ratios of the knee joints in 40 ground KA-TKAs (G group: Coronal Plain Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) 28 type I, 7 II, 1 IV, and 4 V) with those of the preceding 60 modified KA-TKAs (M group: CPAK 46 type I, 12 II, and 2 V) performed for patients with varus osteoarthritis (OA). The number of outliers differing over ± 5% from the neutral were compared between groups using the χ2-test. The Hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, coronal femoral/tibial component alignment (FCA/TCA), and joint line orientation angle (JLOA) were compared between the groups using non-paired t-tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The G group had a higher ratio of the ground MA passing through the knee center than the M group did; outliers differing over ± 5% from the neutral of the ground MA were 2/40 cases in the G group and 20/60 cases in the M group, which was a significant difference (p = 0.001). The HKA angle, FCA/TCA, and JLOA were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting the ground MA in KA-TKA for patients with varus OA was feasible and has the potential to provide a physiological alignment more similar to the native knee in TKA than other kinematic alignment techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Ground kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: new personalized technique which enables a stable knee with deep flexion

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) targeting the neutral ground mechanical axis (MA) (hip-to-calcaneus axis), the line from the hip centre to the bottom of the calcaneus, (ground KA-TKA) in terms of its comparison with tibia-restricted modified KA-TKA (modified KA-TKA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 106 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral KA-TKA for varus osteoarthritis (OA) (60 modified KA-TKAs and 46 ground KA-TKAs). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 60 patients (30 pairs) were matched between the groups with comparable demographic data. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, coronal femoral component alignment (FCA), and coronal tibial component alignment (TCA) were compared between groups. Intraoperative soft tissue balance, including the joint component gap and varus/valgus balance, was also compared between the groups. One year postoperatively, the clinical outcomes, including the range of motion and 2011 Knee Society Score, were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The HKA angle and FCA/TCA were not significantly different between groups. Whereas the varus/valgus balance showed no significant differences between groups, smaller joint component gaps were found throughout the range of motion in the ground KA-TKA group than in the modified KA-TKA group. Despite no difference in clinical scores between groups, a significantly deeper postoperative flexion angle was achieved in the ground KA-TKA group than in the modified KA-TKA group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Targeting neutral ground MA in KA-TKA for patients with varus OA has the potential to provide a better flexion angle with stable intraoperative soft tissue balance.

Evaluation of hindfoot and knee alignment by the hip-to-calcaneus view in patients with knee osteoarthritis and healthy individuals

BACKGROUND

Hip-to-calcaneus (HC) view is a whole-leg standing view that can visualize the hindfoot in detail. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of tibiocalcaneal angle in HC view (H-TCA) by comparing it with that in long axial view (L-TCA). We also verified whether periarticular knee alignment parameters, measured conventionally in whole-leg standing radiography, could be measured in HC view.

METHOD

Sixty healthy volunteers and 61 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were included. H-TCA was measured by two examiners in the healthy group, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were evaluated. H-TCA and L-TCA were then measured in the healthy and osteoarthritis groups and correlated. Finally, we measured hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical axis deviation ratio, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, and joint-line convergence angle in HC view and conventional whole-leg standing radiography to evaluate statistical differences and correlations.

RESULTS

The intra-observer and inter-observer ICCs were 0.86 and 0.76, respectively. Correlation coefficients (r) between H-TCA and L-TCA were r = 0.87 in healthy group and r = 0.81 in osteoarthritis group, indicating a strong positive correlation in both groups. There was no significant difference in periarticular knee alignment parameters between HC view and conventional whole-leg radiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Hindfoot evaluation in HC view showed high intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities and strong positive correlation with TCA in long axial view. By using HC view before knee surgery, such as total knee arthroplasty, other necessary alignments can be evaluated simultaneously.