Prospective sequential comparison of femoral roll-back between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using an intra-operative sensor

Robotic-assisted differential total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific implants: surgical techniques and preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), achieving soft-tissue balance while retaining acceptable lower limb alignment is sometimes difficult and may lead to patient dissatisfaction. Theoretically, patient-specific implants can bring great benefits, while the lack of precise surgical tools may hinder the improvement of outcomes. The objective of this study was to illustrate surgical techniques and evaluate kinematics and early clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA using patient-specific implants.

METHODS

Based on preoperative CT scan, femoral and tibial components were 3D printed. Medial and lateral tibial liners were separate with different thicknesses, posterior slopes and conformity. TiRobot Recon Robot was used for surgery, and was armed with smart tools that quantify gap, force and femoral-tibial track. We collected data on demographics, intraoperative gap balance and femoral-tibial motion. In the follow-up, we evaluated the range of motion, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), forgotten joint score (FJS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) score. Radiological data were also harvested.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (17 knees) were enrolled with a mean age of 64.6 ± 6.4 (53-76) years. In 5 knees, we used symmetric tibial liners, the rest were asymmetric. After surgery, the average alignment was 1.6 ± 2.0 (-3-5) degrees varus. The average follow-up lasted 6.7 ± 4.2 (1-14) months. The mean visual analogue scale was 0.8 ± 0.7 (0-2), FJS was 62.4 ± 25.3 (0-87), KOOS was 86.5 ± 9.4 (57-97). 11 patients were "very satisfied", 3 were "satisfied" with the result, and one patient was neutral due to restricted extension and unsatisfactory rehabilitation at five months' follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With patient-specific implants and robotics, TKA could be performed by a mathematical way, which was dubbed a "differential" TKA. Intraoperative kinematics was excellent in terms of gap-force balancing and femoral-tibial relative motion. Preliminary clinical outcomes were overall satisfactory.

Higher rates of fully preserved posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty using a double tibial cut: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

In cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, posterior cruciate ligament damage may occur during tibial cutting. A prospective randomized study was conducted to investigate whether a novel tibial cutting technique was more effective than the currently used techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty were recruited in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. In 25 patients (group 1) the tibial cut was performed using a double tibial cut technique; in 25 (group 2) and 25 (group 3) patients, the bone island and en bloc resection techniques were performed, respectively. Posterior cruciate ligament integrity and femoral rollback were assessed at the end of surgery. The Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC score and range of motion were assessed postoperatively.

RESULTS

Posterior cruciate ligament was completely preserved in 92% of patients in group 1 and in 64% in group 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.03). The Oxford Knee Score and WOMAC scores did not differ between groups (p = 0.4). The mean knee flexion was 126.4°, 121.5° and 123.9° in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.04). The femoral rollback at 120° flexion was 80.7%, 72.2% and 75.4% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The double cut technique preserves the posterior cruciate ligament at significantly higher rates than the bone island or en bloc resection techniques. Better posterior cruciate ligament preservation may improve the femoral rollback and knee flexion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review

Posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee is a popular implant choice. At present, there is no consensus on whether sacrifice or retention of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) offers superior outcomes. This review explores the current literature available on CR total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PubMed was searched by keyword to find relevant articles for inclusion. Additional sources came from article references and joint registry reports. CR design knees have distinct kinematic gait patterns from posterior-stabilizing (PS) knees and exhibit paradoxical anterior femoral movement with less femoral rollback. While CR implants offer less flexion than PS designs, the difference is not clinically detectable as clinical scores are similar in the short and long term. CR implants have better long-term survival compared to PS knees, likely due to lower risk of aseptic loosening. CR total knee arthroplasties also have shorter operating times and lower risk of peri-prosthetic fractures. Because the CR implant is unconstrained, there may be an increased risk of instability compared to PS designs, but the literature is mixed. Overall, the current literature supports the continued use of CR TKAs due to their lower risk of complications, durability, and demonstrated equivalence in function to posterior-substituting models.

What is the Optimal Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tension to Achieve Patient Satisfaction in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Achieving adequate posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tension is important during PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA), but the effect of PCL release on this tension is unpredictable. This study assessed the relationship between postoperative PCL laxity and patient satisfaction at a 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

There were 44 varus osteoarthritis knees undergoing CR-TKA included. The PCL tension was adjusted by resizing the femoral component and modifying the posterior tibial slope, without PCL release. Postoperative PCL laxity at 90° of knee flexion was defined as the difference in radiographic anterior-posterior tibial translation with or without an 80-Newton posterior load at the tibial tubercle measured using a load device. Four subgroups were defined according to the PCL laxity: laxity ≤0 mm (n = 5); 0 mm < laxity ≤2 mm (n = 19); 2 mm < laxity ≤4 mm (n = 10); and laxity >4 mm (n = 10). The effect of PCL laxity on the 2-year postoperative 2011 Knee Society Score was determined.

RESULTS

The femoral component was downsized in 27 of 44 knees, while the posterior tibia slope was increased in 6 of 44 knees, but no PCL was released intraoperatively. The 2011 Knee Society Score subscores improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively, and patients reported "neutral satisfaction" or better after 96% of operations. The mean PCL laxity was 2.3 mm on postoperative stress radiographs, and postoperative satisfaction scores were significantly highest in the subgroup with 2-4 mm laxity.

CONCLUSION

CR-TKA was successfully performed without PCL release. Moderate PCL laxity (2-4 mm) achieved excellent postoperative satisfaction.