Deep-learning enabled ultrasound based detection of gallbladder cancer in northern India: a prospective diagnostic study

Contrast Enhanced CT Versus MRI for Accurate Diagnosis of Wall-thickening Type Gallbladder Cancer

Introduction

Diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) is challenging. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly utilized to evaluate gallbladder wall thickening. However, there is a lack of data comparing the performance of CT and MRI for the detection of wall-thickening type GBC.

Aim

We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in diagnosis of wall-thickening type GBC.

Materials and methods

This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected of wall-thickening type GBC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathology of the resected gallbladder lesion. Two radiologists independently reviewed the characteristics of gallbladder wall thickening at CT and MRI. The association of CT and MRI findings with histological diagnosis and the interobserver agreement of CT and MRI findings were assessed.

Results

Thirty-three patients (malignancy, 13 and benign, 20) were included. None of the CT findings were significantly associated with GBC. However, at MRI, heterogeneous enhancement, indistinct interface with the liver, and diffusion restriction were significantly associated with malignancy (P = 0.006, <0.001, and 0.005, respectively), and intramural cysts were significantly associated with benign lesions (P = 0.012). For all MRI findings, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.697-1.000). At CT, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (k = 0.631-1.000).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that MRI may be preferred over CT in patients with suspected wall thickening type GBC. However, larger multicenter studies must confirm our findings.

Preliminary study on diagnosis of gallbladder neoplastic polyps based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and grey scale ultrasound radiomics

Objective

Neoplastic gallbladder polyps (GPs), including adenomas and adenocarcinomas, are considered absolute indications for surgery; however, the distinction of neoplastic from non-neoplastic GPs on imaging is often challenging. This study thereby aimed to develop a CEUS radiomics nomogram, and evaluate the role of a combined grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS model for the prediction and diagnosis of neoplastic GPs.

Methods

Patients with GPs of ≥ 1 cm who underwent CEUS between January 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Grey-scale ultrasound and arterial phase CEUS images of the largest section of the GPs were used for radiomics feature extraction. Features with good reproducibility in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient were selected. Grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS Rad-score models were first constructed using the Mann-Whitney U and LASSO regression test, and were subsequently included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis as independent factors for construction of the combined model.

Results

A total of 229 patients were included in our study. Among them, 118 cholesterol polyps, 68 adenomas, 33 adenocarcinomas, 6 adenomyomatoses, and 4 inflammatory polyps were recorded. A total of 851 features were extracted from each patient. Following screening, 21 and 15 features were retained in the grey-scale and CEUS models, respectively. The combined model demonstrated AUCs of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83 - 0.93) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.93) in the training and testing set, respectively. When applied to the whole dataset, the combined model detected 111 of the 128 non-neoplastic GPs, decreasing the resection rate of non-neoplastic GPs to 13.3%.

Conclusion

Our proposed combined model based on grey-scale ultrasound and CEUS radiomics features carries the potential as a non-invasive, radiation-free, and reproducible tool for the prediction and identification of neoplastic GPs. Our model may not only guide the treatment selection for GPs, but may also reduce the surgical burden of such patients.

Diagnostic performance of the gallbladder reporting and data system combined with color doppler flow imaging for gallbladder cancer in the Asian population

Purpose

Evaluating the performance of the Gallbladder Reporting and Data System (GB-RADS) combined with Color Doppler Flow Imaging (CDFI) for the diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening disease in an Asian population.

Methods

In this study, the lesions were classified and the actual incidence rate of malignant tumors was calculated for each GB-RADS category, following the guidelines provided by GB-RADS. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of GB-RADS and GB-RADS combined with CDFI, we plotted Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy (AC) were also calculated. Inter-observer agreement (IRA) between the two observers was assessed using Kappa values.

Results

The incidence of malignancy risk for GB-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 was 9%, 12.5%, 72.2%, and 100%. The AUC for GB-RADS was 0.855 (95% CI: 0.800-0.900), with a sensitivity of 82.5%, a specificity of 84.6%, and an accuracy of 83.8%. The AUC of GB-RADS combined with CDFI was 0.965 (95% CI: 0.930-0.985), with a sensitivity of 96.2%, a specificity of 94.6%, and an accuracy of 95.2%. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of GB-RADS combined with CDFI for diagnosing gallbladder malignancy were higher than those of GB-RADS alone, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The IRA was excellent between the two observers (Kappa = 0.870).

Conclusions

GB-RADS combined with CDFI demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy when it comes to distinguishing various diseases that caused gallbladder wall thickening in the Asian population, which has good clinical value and can improve the detection rate of malignant tumors in patients with gallbladder wall thickening.

Applications of artificial intelligence in biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancers are malignant neoplasms arising from bile duct epithelial cells. They include cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder cancer. Gallbladder cancer has a marked geographical preference and is one of the most common cancers in women in northern India. Biliary tract cancers are usually diagnosed at an advanced, unresectable stage. Hence, the prognosis is extremely dismal. The five-year survival rate in advanced gallbladder cancer is < 5%. Hence, early detection and radical surgery are critical to improving biliary tract cancer prognoses. Radiological imaging plays an essential role in diagnosing and managing biliary tract cancers. However, the diagnosis is challenging because the biliary tract is affected by many diseases that may have radiological appearances similar to cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) can improve radiologists' performance in various tasks. Deep learning (DL)-based approaches are increasingly incorporated into medical imaging to improve diagnostic performance. This paper reviews the AI-based strategies in biliary tract cancers to improve the diagnosis and prognosis.

Value of high frame rate contrast enhanced ultrasound in gallbladder wall thickening in non-acute setting

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US) has been widely used in screening and differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening (GWT). However, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer are limited, leading to delayed treatment or overtreatment. We aim to explore the value of high frame rate contrast enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) in distinguishing wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (malignant) from GWT mimicking malignancy (benign).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with non-acute GWT who underwent US and H-CEUS examination before cholecystectomy. Clinical information, US image and H-CEUS image characteristics between malignant and benign GWT were compared. The independent risk factors for malignant GWT on H-CEUS images were selected by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of H-CEUS in determining malignant GWT was compared with that of the gallbladder reporting and data system (GB-RADS) score.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients included 30 benign GWTs and 16 malignant GWTs. Only mural layering and interface with liver on US images were significantly different between malignant and benign GWT (P < 0.05). Differences in enhancement direction, vascular morphology, serous layer continuity, wash-out time and mural layering in the venous phase of GWT on H-CEUS images were significant between malignant and benign GWT (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of H-CEUS based on enhancement direction, vascular morphology and wash-out time in the diagnosis of malignant GWT were 93.75%, 90.00%, and 91.30%, respectively. However, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the GB-RADS score were only 68.75%, 73.33% and 71.74%, respectively. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of H-CEUS was significantly higher than that of the GB-RADS score (AUC = 0.965 vs. 0.756).

CONCLUSIONS

H-CEUS can accurately detect enhancement direction, vascular morphology and wash-out time of GWT, with a higher diagnostic performance than the GB-RADS score in determining wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer. This study provides a novel imaging means with high accuracy for the diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer, thus may be better avoiding delayed treatment or overtreatment.

Deep-learning models for differentiation of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and gallbladder cancer on ultrasound

BACKGROUND

The radiological differentiation of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) is challenging yet critical. We aimed at utilizing the deep learning (DL)-based approach for differentiating XGC and GBC on ultrasound (US).

METHODS

This single-center study comprised consecutive patients with XGC and GBC from a prospectively acquired database who underwent pre-operative US evaluation of the gallbladder lesions. The performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) DL models (GBCNet-convolutional neural network [CNN] and RadFormer, transformer) for XGC vs. GBC classification in US images was tested and compared with popular DL models and a radiologist.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with XGC (mean age, 57 ± 12.3, 17 females) and 55 patients with GBC (mean age, 54.6 ± 11.9, 38 females) were included. The performance of GBCNet and RadFormer was comparable (sensitivity 89.1% vs. 87.3%, p = 0.738; specificity 72% vs. 84%, p = 0.563; and AUC 0.744 vs. 0.751, p = 0.514). The AUCs of DenseNet-121, vision transformer (ViT) and data-efficient image transformer (DeiT) were significantly smaller than of GBCNet (p = 0.015, 0.046, 0.013, respectively) and RadFormer (p = 0.012, 0.027, 0.007, respectively). The radiologist labeled US images of 24 (30%) patients non-diagnostic. In the remaining patients, the sensitivity, specificity and AUC for GBC detection were 92.7%, 35.7% and 0.642, respectively. The specificity of the radiologist was significantly lower than of GBCNet and RadFormer (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SOTA DL models have a better performance than radiologists in differentiating XGC and GBC on the US.