1
|
Jia S, Yin Z, Pan H, Wang F, Liu X, Wang Q, Zhang L, Tang J, Yang H, Du J, Wang Z, Jin P, Peng Z, Tang R, Kang G, Wang X, Li S, Wang W, Li J, Shen H, Zhu F. Relative effectiveness of a heterologous booster dose with adenovirus type 5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine versus three doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in adults during a nationwide outbreak of omicron predominance, in China: a retrospective, individually matched cohort-control study. Emerg Microbes Infect 2024; 13:2332660. [PMID: 38678636 PMCID: PMC11057405 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2332660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Effectiveness of heterologous booster regimes with ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine in a large, diverse population during the national-scale outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 omicron predominance in China has not been reported, yet. We conducted a large-scale cohort-control study in six provinces in China, and did a retrospective survey on the COVID-19 attack risk during this outbreak. Participant aged ≥18 years in five previous trials who were primed with 1 to 3 doses of ICV received heterologous booster with either intramuscular or orally inhaled ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine were included in the heterologous-trial cohort. We performed propensity score-matching at a ratio of 1:4 to match participants in the heterologous-trial cohort individually with the community individuals who received three-dose of ICV as a control (ICV-community cohort). From February 4 to April 10, 2023, 41504 (74.5%) of 55710 individuals completed the survey. The median time since the most recent vaccination to the onset of the symptoms of COVID-19 was 303.0 days (IQR 293.0-322.0). The attack rate of COVID-19 in the heterologous-trial cohort was 55.8%, while that in the ICV-community cohort was 64.6%, resulting in a relative effectiveness of 13.7% (95% CI 11.9 to 15.3). In addition, a higher relative effectiveness against COVID-19 associated outpatient visits, and admission to hospital was demonstrated, which was 25.1% (95% CI 18.9 to 30.9), and 48.9% (95% CI 27.0 to 64.2), respectively. The heterologous booster with ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine still offered some additional protection in preventing COVID-19 breakthrough infection versus homologous three-dose regimen with ICV, 10 months after vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyue Jia
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zundong Yin
- China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongxing Pan
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Fuzhen Wang
- China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqiang Liu
- Yunnan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kunming, People's Republic of China
| | - Qing Wang
- Chongqing Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Zhang
- Shandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jihai Tang
- Anhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Yang
- Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiangbo Du
- National Vaccine Innovation Platform and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiguo Wang
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Pengfei Jin
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhihang Peng
- National Vaccine Innovation Platform and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Rong Tang
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Guodong Kang
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuewen Wang
- Canming Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Simin Li
- School of Public Health, Southeast University; Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Weixiao Wang
- National Vaccine Innovation Platform and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingxin Li
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
- National Vaccine Innovation Platform and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
- School of Public Health, Southeast University; Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongbing Shen
- National Vaccine Innovation Platform and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
- China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengcai Zhu
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
- National Vaccine Innovation Platform and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
- School of Public Health, Southeast University; Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang H, Jin P, Guo X, Zhu J, Wang X, Wan P, Wan J, Liu J, Li J, Zhu F. The 6-Month Antibody Durability of Heterologous Convidecia Plus CoronaVac and Homologous CoronaVac Immunizations in People Aged 18-59 Years and over 60 Years Based on Two Randomized Controlled Trials in China. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1815. [PMID: 38140219 PMCID: PMC10747853 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous reports have shown that heterologous boosting with the AD5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine Convidecia based on a primary series of two doses of inactivated vaccine induces increasing immune responses. However, the immune persistence until 6 months after the heterologous prime-boost immunization was limited. Participants were from two single-center, randomized, controlled, observer-blinded trials, which involved individuals of 18-59 years of age and over 60 years of age. Eligible participants who previously primed with one dose or two doses of CoronaVac were stratified and randomly assigned to inoculate a booster dose of Convidecia or CoronaVac. Neutralizing antibodies against a live SARS-CoV-2 prototype virus and Delta and Omicron (B.1.1.529) variants, pseudovirus neutralizing antibodies against Omicron BA.4/5 variants, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies at month 6 were detected, and the fold decreases and rate difference were calculated by comparing the levels of antibodies at month 6 with the peak levels at month 1. The neutralizing antibody titers against prototype SARS-CoV-2, RBD-specific IgG antibodies, and the Delta variant in the heterologous regimen of the CoronaVac plus Convidecia groups were significantly higher than those of the homologous prime-boost groups. In three-dose regimen groups, the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies against prototype SARS-CoV-2 were 30.6 (95% CI: 25.1; 37.2) in the heterologous boosting group versus 6.9 (95% CI: 5.6; 8.6) in the homologous boosting group (p < 0.001) at month 6 in participants aged 18-59 years, and in the two-dose regimen, the neutralizing antibody GMTs were 8.5 (95% CI: 6.2; 11.7) and 2.7 (2.3 to 3.1) (heterologous regimen group versus CoronaVac regimen group, p < 0.001). Participants aged over 60 years had similar levels of neutralizing antibodies against the prototype, with GMTs of 49.1 (38.0 to 63.6) in the group receiving two doses of CoronaVac plus one dose of Convidecia versus 9.4 (7.7 to 11.4) in the group receiving three doses of CoronaVac (p < 0.001) and 11.6 (8.4 to 16.0) in the group receiving one dose of CoronaVac and one dose of Convidecia versus 3.3 (2.7 to 4.0) in the group receiving two doses of CoronaVac (p < 0.001). Compared with day 14, over sixfold decreases in neutralizing antibody GMTs were observed in the heterologous groups of the three- or two-dose regimen groups of younger and elderly participants, while in the homologous regimen groups, the GMTs of neutralizing antibodies decreased about fivefold in the two age groups. The heterologous prime-boost regimen with two doses of CoronaVac and one dose of Convidecia was persistently more immunogenic than the regimen of the homologous prime-boost with three doses of CoronaVac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hudachuan Jiang
- School of Public Health, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Avenue, Nanjing 210009, China;
| | - Pengfei Jin
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 172 Jiangsu Avenue, Nanjing 210009, China; (P.J.); (X.G.); (J.L.)
- School of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Xiling Guo
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 172 Jiangsu Avenue, Nanjing 210009, China; (P.J.); (X.G.); (J.L.)
| | - Jiahong Zhu
- Lianshui County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huaian 223400, China;
| | - Xue Wang
- CanSino Biologics Inc., Tianjin 300450, China; (X.W.); (P.W.); (J.W.)
| | - Peng Wan
- CanSino Biologics Inc., Tianjin 300450, China; (X.W.); (P.W.); (J.W.)
| | - Jingxuan Wan
- CanSino Biologics Inc., Tianjin 300450, China; (X.W.); (P.W.); (J.W.)
| | - Jingxian Liu
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 172 Jiangsu Avenue, Nanjing 210009, China; (P.J.); (X.G.); (J.L.)
| | - Jingxin Li
- School of Public Health, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Avenue, Nanjing 210009, China;
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 172 Jiangsu Avenue, Nanjing 210009, China; (P.J.); (X.G.); (J.L.)
- School of Public Health, National Vaccine Innovation Platform, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Fengcai Zhu
- School of Public Health, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Avenue, Nanjing 210009, China;
- NHC Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 172 Jiangsu Avenue, Nanjing 210009, China; (P.J.); (X.G.); (J.L.)
- School of Public Health, National Vaccine Innovation Platform, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210009, China
| |
Collapse
|