High-dose melphalan versus busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide as preparative regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide Compared with Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Transplantation of Multiple Myeloma: A Long-Term Assessment

BACKGROUND

Melphalan was poorly available in mainland China. The aim of this study is to explore the dose-adjusted busulfan/cyclophosphamide (BU/CY) as an alternative regimen in auto stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

A total of 105 newly diagnosed MM patients undergoing ASCT during May 2012 and August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The BU/CY regimen was applied to 64 patients. Busulfan (9.6 mg/kg or 8.0 mg/kg in total) and cyclophosphamide (3.6 g/m2 or 3.0 g/m2 in total) were administered according to the creatinine clearance rate (CCR). A high-dose melphalan (HDMEL) regimen (200 mg/m2) was given to the other 41 patients.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 65 (1~119) months, estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 104 months in the BU/CY and HDMEL groups were 35.6% vs. 20.5% (p = 0.263) and 20.2% vs. 2.4% (p = 0.035), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and PFS of the HDMEL and BU/CY groups were 55 vs. 70.5 months and 26 vs. 46.5 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the BU/CY regimen was found to be the only protective factor for PFS. No lethal toxicity was found in the BU/CY group, and treatment-related mortality (TRM) in 100 days was similar to the HDMEL group.

CONCLUSIONS

MM patients may also benefit from the dose-adjusted BU/CY regimen.

Cyclophosphamide etoposide dexamethasone as salvage and bridging therapy in relapsed refractory and extramedullary multiple myeloma

Patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) that are triple-exposed to immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies have a poor prognosis. Standard treatment for these patients has not been established. Patients with extramedullary disease or secondary plasma cell leukemia often display high tumor cell proliferation and might therefore be susceptible to chemotherapy. While current regimens are often platinum-based, we present single-center data on 70 patients with RRMM who were treated with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and dexamethasone (CED) after a median of four lines of therapy. An overall response rate of 52% was achieved after 1-6 cycles, with 23% of patients having a very good partial response. Comparable response rates and survival were observed in patients with extramedullary disease and high-risk cytogenetics. Treatment resulted in non-hematological °III-IV adverse events in 31% of patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. The median progression-free and overall survival were 6.2 and 10.9 months, respectively. 23% of patients were bridged to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. In summary, CED is an effective treatment regimen for RRMM cases with a tolerable safety profile and suitable as bridging therapy to CAR T cell treatment and ASCT.

Survival outcomes following autologous stem cell transplant with melphalan 140mg/m2 versus 200mg/m2 preparative regimens in patients with multiple myeloma

The standard preparative regimen for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) is 200 mg/m2 of intravenous melphalan; however, a dose of 140 mg/m2 is often used when concerns exist related to patient age, performance status, organ function, and other factors. It is unclear whether a lower dose of melphalan impacts post-transplant survival outcomes. We performed a retrospective review of 930 patients with MM who underwent ASCT with 200 mg/m2 versus 140 mg/m2 melphalan. On univariable analysis, no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed, however, an overall survival (OS) benefit was observed in patients receiving 200 mg/m2 melphalan (p = 0.04). Multivariable analyses showed patients receiving 140 mg/m2 faired no worse than those receiving 200 mg/m2. While a subset of younger patients with normal renal function may achieve superior OS with a standard dose of 200 mg/m2 melphalan, these findings suggest an opportunity to individualize the ASCT preparative regimen to optimize outcomes.

Recombinant human thrombopoietin improved platelet engraftment after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Background

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) for hematopoietic reconstitution after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

Method

Thirty‐five cases with NDMM had been enrolled into a prospective clinical trial from March 2014. The hematopoietic reconstitution was compared between these 35 cases (rhTPO group) and 98 historic cases not receiving rhTPO (control group) after stem cell reinfusion.

Results

Thirty‐five (100%) cases receiving rhTPO achieved both neutrophil and platelet engraftment within 30 days post‐transplant. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was the 10^th day and 11^th day after stem cell reinfusion, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that rhTPO administration was an independent factor for accelerating platelet engraftment (HR 2.013, 95% CI 1.336–3.034, p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that rhTPO improved platelet engraftment and alleviated platelet transfusion needs in patients with inadequate re‐infused CD34⁺ cell counts of <2 × 10⁹/L. All the 35 patients tolerated rhTPO well. Survival analysis showed no decrease in time to progression (TTP) or overall survival (OS) by rhTPO administration.

Conclusion

rhTPO accelerated the platelet engraftment after ASCT in patients with NDMM with good tolerability and long‐term safety, especially for those patients with poor CD34⁺ cell reinfusion. rhTPO might be recommended to be used early after ASCT for patients with NDMM.

Evaluating the incidence of engraftment syndrome with different melphalan formulations in adult multiple myeloma and immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Engraftment syndrome (ES) is a common complication of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The difference in incidence of ES between melphalan formulations has not been widely reported throughout the literature and would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of both melphalan formulations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, observational study evaluated 83 adult multiple myeloma and immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis patients who received either propylene glycol-containing (PG) or propylene glycol-free (PG-free) melphalan 140 mg/m² as single-agent conditioning chemotherapy for autologous HCT from May 31, 2015 to May 31, 2019. The primary outcome was to assess the incidence of ES, as defined using the Maiolino criteria, with both melphalan formulations. Secondary outcomes included an analysis of potential risk factors for the development of ES, as well as an evaluation of overall length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

The incidence of ES for PG and PG-free melphalan did not differ significantly, 14/39 (35.9%) and 12/44 (27.3%) (P = 0.4), respectively. No potential risk factors for ES were identified on multivariate logistic regression analysis. A statistically significant difference in number of days to engraftment was identified for PG and PG-free melphalan, 15.56 vs. 13.82 days (P = 0.01), respectively; although, this did not translate to a decrease in LOS, 19.9 vs. 18.59 days (P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ES did not differ significantly between melphalan formulations. Future research is needed to determine whether the faster time to engraftment seen with PG-free melphalan may translate to a decrease in LOS.

Different transcriptome profiles between human retinoblastoma Y79 cells and an etoposide-resistant subline reveal a chemoresistance mechanism

Background

Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most frequent pediatric retinal tumor. In the present study, to elucidate chemoresistance mechanisms and identify potential biomarkers in RB, we utilized RNA sequencing (RNAseq) technological platforms to reveal transcriptome profiles and identify any differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between an etoposide drug-resistant subline (Y79/EDR) and parental Y79 cells.

Methods

To test whether Y79/EDR cells showed resistance to antineoplastic agents for RB, we treated the cells with etoposide, carboplatin and vincristine and analyzed them with a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8). Y79/EDR and parental Y79 cells were used for RNAseq and bioinformatics analysis to enable a genome-wide review of DEGs between the two lines using the DESeq R package (1.10.1). Then, DEG enrichment in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways was analyzed with KOBAS software. Next, real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real time QRT-PCR) and cytotoxicity assays were performed to experimentally and functionally validate the identified candidate biomarkers.

Results

Y79/EDR cells showed resistance to etoposide, carboplatin and vincristine at different concentrations. In total, 524 transcripts were differentially expressed in Y79/EDR cells based on analysis of fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM); among these, 57 genes were downregulated and 467 genes were upregulated in Y79/EDR cells compared to parental Y79 cells. We selected candidate DEGs, including ARHGAP9, HIST1H4H, RELN, DDIT4, HK2, STC1 and PFKFB4, for mRNA expression validation with real time QRT-PCR assays and found that the expression levels determined by real time QRT-PCR were consistent with the RNAseq data. Further studies involving downregulation of ARHGAP9 with a specific siRNA showed that ARHGAP9 altered the cellular sensitivity of Y79 cells to etoposide and carboplatin.

Conclusion

Our initial findings provided a genomic view of the transcription profiles of etoposide-induced acquired resistance in RB. Follow-up studies indicated that ARHGAP9 might be a chemoresistance biomarker in RB, providing insight into potential therapeutic targets for overcoming acquired chemoresistance in RB. These findings can aid in understanding and overcoming chemoresistance during treatment of RB in the clinic.

[High dose melphalan (HDM) is superior to cyclophosphamide plus etoposide and busulfan (CVB) as the conditioning regimen in autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma]

目的

比较大剂量美法仑（HDM）和环磷酰胺、依托泊苷联合白消安（CVB）预处理方案应用于新诊断多发性骨髓瘤（NDMM）患者自体造血干细胞移植（ASCT）的安全性、近期及远期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2017年8月期间接受PAD（硼替佐米+脂质体阿霉素+地塞米松）方案诱导治疗序贯ASCT的NDMM患者共123例，按接受预处理方案分为CVB组（82例）和HDM组（41例）。

结果

①非血液学不良反应方面两者无显著区别。②CVB组中性粒细胞植入和血小板植入较HDM组快，中性粒细胞植入时间为第10（9~35）天对第11（9~12）天（z=−3.433，P=0.001）；血小板植入时间为11（7~55）d对HDM组13（10~35）d（z=−3.506，P<0.001）；但CVB组也更早进入粒细胞缺乏（粒缺）及显著血小板减少，最终粒缺及显著血小板减少持续时间两组间尚未显示出差别；但CVB组的发热持续时间以及相应抗生素使用时间显著延长。③CVB组经过移植后获得传统疗效进步的患者比例显著低于HDM组（9/46对14/28，P=0.021）；而且移植后3个月CVB组的微小残留病（MRD）阴性率有低于HDM组的趋势（31.7%对48.8%，P=0.065）。④无论单因素还是多因素分析均显示两种预处理方案并不影响接受PAD诱导序贯ASCT及维持治疗的NDMM患者的至进展时间（TTP）（P= 0.619）及总生存（OS）时间（P=0.295）。

结论

HDM预处理方案血液学不良反应、减低MM肿瘤负荷以及使用方便性方面较CVB方案具有优势，但采用两种预处理方案的ASCT治疗MM的TTP和OS未见明显差异。

Multiple myeloma patients at various cytogenetic risks benefit differently from autologous stem cell transplantation as a consolidation therapy

Aim. To evaluate whether patients with multiple myeloma at various risks can still benefit the same from autologous stem cell transplantation consolidation in the era of novel agents. We retrospectively analyzed 67 consecutive myeloma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation after bortezomib and/or thalidomide based inductions. Totally 17 high-risk, 24 intermediate-risk, and 26 low-risk patients were enrolled, based on fluorescence in situ hybridization and ISS stage. Meanwhile, another 67 risk-, response depth-, and age-matched patients not proceeding to autologous stem cell transplantation were chosen as controls. Our preliminary data indicated that, in the high-risk subgroup, progression-free survival and overall survival were both significantly prolonged after autologous stem cell transplantation (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015) while, in the intermediate-risk subgroup, neither progression-free survival nor overall survival was prolonged significantly after autologous stem cell transplantation (P > 0.05), and in the low-risk subgroup, only progression-free survival was extended significantly (P = 0.012) after autologous stem cell transplantation. Multiple variables analysis further indicated that autologous stem cell transplantation and risk stratification were two independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Our results indicated that myeloma patients at different risks all benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation consolidation even in the era of novel agents.

Unmet needs in the treatment of autoimmunity: from aspirin to stem cells

As rheumatologic diseases became understood to be autoimmune in nature, the drugs used to treat this group of conditions has evolved from herbal or plant derived anti-inflammatory agents, such as salicylates, quinine and colchicine to the many recently approved biological response modifiers. These new drugs, especially the anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, have shown remarkable efficacy in autoimmune diseases, and there are new agents under investigation that will provide additional treatment options. In between, the world was introduced to cortisone and all of its derivatives, as chemical synthesis led to better, more efficacious drugs with lesser side effects. Disease modifying anti-rheumatic agents have actually been around since the first half of the 20th century, but only began to be used in the treatment of autoimmune diseases in the 1970s and 1980s. One advantage is that they have been invaluable in their ability to offer "steroid sparing" to decrease the adverse effects of steroids. Research over the past decade has resulted in a new class of drugs that influence cytokine regulatory pathways such as the Janus associated kinase inhibitors. The promise of personalized medicine now permeates current research into new pharmacological agents for the treatment of autoimmune disease. The new appreciation for the gene-environment interaction in the pathogenesis of most diseases especially those as heterogeneous as autoimmune diseases, has led to our focus on targeted therapies. Add to that the new knowledge of epigenetics and how changes in DNA and histone structure affect expression of genes that can play a role in immune signaling, and we now have a new exciting frontier for cutting edge drug development. The history of treatment of autoimmune diseases is really only a little over a century, but so much has changed, leading to increasing lifespans and improved quality of life of those who suffer from these ailments.

Efficacy and safety of busulfan-based conditioning regimens for multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a malignancy of B cells characterized by accumulation of abnormal plasma cells in the bone marrow. In the past 20 years, the use of high-dose therapies and novel agents has resulted in significant and meaningful improvements in survival. Autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) following a high-dose melphalan-conditioning regimen represents the standard of care for younger patients as well as older patients with a good performance status. A number of strategies have been proposed to improve the outcome of auto-SCTs, including the incorporation of new agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib into the induction regimen administered before auto-SCT; the administration of maintenance therapy after auto-SCT; the incorporation of novel agents into chemotherapeutic regimens after transplantation as consolidation therapy; and the use of reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation after an initial autograft. Although these approaches have demonstrated some success in improving responses after auto-SCT, none of these strategies are curative. An additional strategy to improve outcomes after auto-SCT is to enhance the immediate pretransplant conditioning regimens by either increasing the dose of melphalan or by incorporating novel agents, such as busulfan. This literature review focuses on the efficacy and safety of busulfan-based conditioning regimens for auto-SCT in patients with multiple myeloma.

Intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a matched comparison to a melphalan-only approach

Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (MEL200) is the standard conditioning regimen administered to newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Few alternatives have been explored in order to improve the antimyeloma activity of this conditioning. We compare i.v. busulfan (BU) 9.6 mg/kg and MEL 140 mg/m(2) (MEL140) versus MEL200 mg/m(2) as a conditioning regimen before ASCT for newly diagnosed patients with MM. For this purpose, 51 patients receiving i.v. BU plus MEL were compared to 102 patients receiving MEL200 mg/m(2) in a 1:2 matched control analysis. Matching criteria included age, clinical stage at diagnosis, and response to induction therapy. No differences in the overall and complete response (CR) rates were observed after ASCT between both groups. After a median follow-up of 63 and 50 months in control and BU plus MEL groups, progression-free survival (PFS) was 24 and 33 months, respectively (P = .10). Most frequent toxicities included mucositis and febrile neutropenia in both groups. No case of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was observed. Transplant-related mortality was 4% and 2% in BU plus MEL and control groups, respectively. ASCT conditioned with i.v. BU plus MEL may be considered an effective and well-tolerated alternative to a MEL-only approach as a conditioning regimen for patients with MM who are candidates for ASCT.

Multiple myeloma preparative regimens for high-dose therapy and autologous transplantation: what's new?

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation remains a standard procedure in relatively young and selected older patients with multiple myeloma. High-dose melphalan has remained the chemotherapeutic agent of choice based on earlier prospective randomized trials. Despite investigations involving different combinations of chemotherapeutics, radiation and novel agents with and without melphalan, none of these alternative preparative regimens have demonstrated superiority to high-dose melphalan used as a single agent in multiple published studies. In this article, we review the published literature regarding preparative regimens used in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimens for autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients included in the PETHEMA/GEM2000 study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) and melphalan 200 mg/m(2) as conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma in the GEM2000 study.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The first 225 patients received oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2); because of a high frequency of veno-occlusive disease, the protocol was amended and a further 542 patients received melphalan 200 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Engraftment and hospitalization times were similar in both groups. Oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) resulted in higher transplant-related mortality (8.4% versus 3.5%; P=0.002) due to the increased frequency of veno-occlusive disease in this group. Response rates were similar in both arms. With respective median follow-ups of 72 and 47 months, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer with busulfan plus melphalan (41 versus 31 months; P=0.009), although survival was similar to that in the melphalan 200 mg/m(2) group. However, access to novel agents as salvage therapy after relapse/progression was significantly lower for patients receiving busulfan plus melphalan (43%) than for those receiving melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (58%; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Conditioning with oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) was associated with longer progression-free survival but equivalent survival to that achieved with melphalan 200 mg/m(2) but this should be counterbalanced against the higher frequency of veno-occlusive disease-related deaths. This latter fact together with the limited access to novel salvage therapies in patients conditioned with oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) may explain the absence of a survival difference. Oral busulfan was used in the present study; use of the intravenous formulation may reduce toxicity and result in greater efficacy, and warrants further investigation in myeloma patients. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00560053).

Phase II trial of high-dose topotecan, melphalan and CY with autologous stem cell support for multiple myeloma

In spite of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic SCT multiple myeloma (MM) eventually recurs, highlighting the need for more effective treatment approaches. Patients received topotecan 3.5 mg/m(2) intravenously on days -6 to -2, melphalan 70 mg/m(2) intravenously on days -3 and -2 and CY 1 g/m(2) intravenously on days -6, -5 and -4. Overall response rate (ORR) consisting of complete response and partial response (CR+PR, PFS, OS and toxicity are reported. Between August 2002 to March 2004, 60 patients (34 men and 26 women) with a median age of 61 years (range 45-72) were enrolled. Forty-one patients were treated for consolidation of first remission, while 19 patients had relapsed/refractory disease. ORR was 85% (CR 12%, very good PR 43% and PR 30%). Median time to neutrophil (ANC>0.5 × 10(9)/L) and plt engraftment (>20 × 10(9)/L) was 10 (range 7-12 days) and 9 days (range 6-79 days), respectively. A majority of the common adverse events were grade 1-3 mucositis/stomatitis (65%), grade 1 or 2 nausea (59%) and grade 1 or 2 diarrhea (41%). Median PFS was 18.5 months and median OS has yet not been reached. In conclusion, topotecan, melphalan and CY is a safe and active conditioning regimen for auto hematopoietic SCT in MM. The ORR and PFS were comparable to high-dose melphalan.

Melphalan: old and new uses of a still master drug for multiple myeloma

The treatment of multiple myeloma has seen significant changes from the initial use of melphalan to the introduction of stem cell transplantation and, most recently, to the era of novel targeted agents. Melphalan still remains as a reference drug for combination regimens, including emerging newer therapeutic options, either used at a standard dose for initial or salvage treatments in patients who are not eligible for more intensive therapies, or in conjunction with new molecules within high-dose chemotherapy programs. In this review, the authors analyze old and novel regimens, including melphalan for the treatment of newly diagnosed or relapsed/resistant patients with multiple myeloma in the clinical settings of standard chemotherapy, as well as autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation.