To carry on as before: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies in lung cancer

"The Ability to Go Out into the World Is the Most Important Thing"-A Qualitative Study of Important Exercise Outcomes for People with Lung Cancer

Whilst existing quantitative research identifies outcomes believed to be important by researchers and clinicians, it may neglect outcomes that are meaningful to patients. This study aimed to explore the outcomes of exercise that are important to people with lung cancer and their carers. Data collection involved a qualitative methodology including semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Question guide development was informed by the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) framework. Data were analyzed by two researchers with NVivo (v12) software using a conventional content analysis process, followed by directed content analysis to map outcomes to the ICF. Conduct and reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines. Fifteen participants provided data. Most participants had received their diagnoses 24 months prior to study involvement (n = 9), and one-third had completed treatment (n = 5). Important outcomes were reported by participants across all domains of the ICF: activity and participation (n = 24), body function (n = 19), body structure (n = 5), environmental factors (n = 5), and personal factors (n = 1). Additional code categories pertained to the impacts of non-cancer factors such as age, frailty, and comorbidities; identifying barriers to exercise; and individualizing outcome measures. Clinicians and researchers should consider selecting outcomes from all relevant domains of the ICF, with a focus on the activity and participation domain, in addition to non-cancer factors such as ageing, frailty, and co-morbidities. Feedback should be provided to patients following outcome measures collection and reassessment.

Explaining how and why social support groups in hospice day services benefit palliative care patients, for whom, and in what circumstances

Background

Palliative care aims to provide holistic support for people with life-limiting illness, responding to psychological, social and spiritual needs, as well as to clinical and physical. In the United Kingdom, hospice day services (including day care, group interventions, group activities, and social events for palliative care outpatients) aim to provide opportunities for patients to gain social support, which is thought to improve their quality of life.

Objectives

This research explored social support within hospice day services, to explain in detail how and why social support obtained within a hospice day service could be beneficial to palliative care patients.

Design

Qualitative research using observations of hospice day services and interviews with service providers.

Methods

Data collection involved nineteen interviews with hospice service providers (n = 19) and researcher observations of hospice day services. The findings detail how patient and hospice context interact to produce mechanisms that lead to outcomes beyond the hospice day service.

Results

Practical, clinical and social aspects of the hospice day service are important for patients feeling welcome and safe in the setting. The opportunity to connect with other people and work towards personal goals can boost self-confidence for patients who have lost access to meaningful activity. New friendships between patients encourages reciprocal support and feelings of belonging. It is beneficial to have permission to speak freely about topics deemed inappropriate elsewhere, because honest communication is helpful in accepting and adapting to their circumstances.

Conclusion

Hospice day services facilitate group settings for reciprocal social support. This research proposes an initial programme theory that can be further developed and tested. It explains how and why, in some contexts, social support increases personal and practical resources to cope with illness and death, leading to changes outside of the hospice (to mood, interpersonal interactions and behaviour) that could improve quality of life.

Making meaning of everyday life in the context of lung cancer treatment-a qualitative study of outpatients' perspectives

BACKGROUND

The increasing survival after a lung cancer diagnosis implies that patients live longer with the disease, which means that symptoms and side effects of the treatment become part of everyday life.

AIM

The study explored how older adults make meaning of everyday life when undergoing treatment for their lung cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 12 older adults with lung cancer undergoing various treatments. The analysis followed Giorgi's phenomenologic five-step method.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed three partly overlapping themes: meeting the health care system, losing identity, and struggling for meaning in everyday life. The patients appreciate clear and coherent communication at the oncology clinic. They had different needs for support from organised support groups, friends, communities, or relatives to make meaning of everyday life.

CONCLUSION

Creating meaning in everyday life is essential despite the disease and the treatments' side effects. Interpersonal relationships create meaningfulness in everyday life through a salutogenic perspective that makes everyday life comprehensible and manageable.

SIGNIFICANCE

The patients need an everyday life perspective on the disease and the side effects, which a salutogenic approach in the encounter with the health care system could support.

"The challenge is the complexity" - A qualitative study about decision-making in advanced lung cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

The value of shared decision-making and decision aids (DA) has been well documented yet remain difficult to integrate into clinical practice. We wanted to investigate needs and challenges regarding decision-making about advanced lung cancer treatment after first-line therapy, focusing on DA applicability.

METHODS

Qualitative data from separate, semi-structured focus groups with patients/relatives and healthcare professionals were analysed using systematic text condensation. 12 patients with incurable lung cancer, seven relatives, 12 nurses and 18 doctors were recruited from four different hospitals in Norway.

RESULTS

The participants described the following needs and challenges affecting treatment decisions: 1) Continuity of clinician-patient-relationships as a basic framework for decision-making; 2) barriers to information exchange; 3) negotiation of autonomy; and 4) assessment of uncertainty and how to deal with it. Some clinicians feared DA would steal valuable time and disrupt consultations, arguing that such tools could not incorporate the complexity and uncertainty of decision-making. Patients and relatives reported a need for more information and the possibility both to decline or continue burdensome therapy. Participants welcomed interventions supporting information exchange, like communicative techniques and organizational changes ensuring continuity and more time for dialogue. Doctors called for tools decreasing uncertainty about treatment tolerance and futile therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests it is difficult to develop an applicable DA for advanced lung cancer after first-line therapy that meets the composite requirements of stakeholders. Comprehensive decision support interventions are needed to address organizational structures, communication training including scientific and existential uncertainty, and assessment of frailty and treatment toxicity.

Integrated Short-term Palliative Rehabilitation to improve quality of life and equitable care access in incurable cancer (INSPIRE): a multinational European research project

Background

Disability related to incurable cancer affects over a million Europeans each year and people with cancer rank loss of function among the most common unmet supportive care needs.

Objectives

To test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an integrated short-term palliative rehabilitation intervention, to optimise function and quality of life in people affected by incurable cancer.

Design

This is a multinational, parallel group, randomised, controlled, assessor blind, superiority trial.

Methods

The INSPIRE consortium brings together leaders in palliative care, oncology and rehabilitation from partner organisations across Europe, with complementary expertise in health service research, trials of complex interventions, mixed-method evaluations, statistics and economics. Partnership with leading European civil society organisations ensures citizen engagement and dissemination at the highest level. We will conduct a multinational randomised controlled trial across five European countries, recruiting participants to assess the effectiveness of palliative rehabilitation for people with incurable cancer on the primary outcome - quality of life - and secondary outcomes including disability, symptom burden and goal attainment. To support trial conduct and enhance analysis of trial data, we will also conduct: comparative analysis of current integration of rehabilitation across oncology and palliative care services; mixed-method evaluations of equity and inclusivity, processes and implementation for the intervention, at patient, health service and health system levels. Finally, we will conduct an evidence synthesis, incorporating INSPIRE findings, and a Delphi consensus to develop an international framework for palliative rehabilitation practice and policy, incorporating indicators, core interventions, outcomes and integration methods.

Scientific contribution

If positive, the trial could produce a scalable and equitable intervention to improve function and quality of life in people with incurable cancer and reduce the burden of care for their families. It could also upskill the practitioners involved and motivate future research questions. The intervention could be adapted and integrated into different health systems using existing staff and services, with little or no additional cost.

Experiences of Symptoms and Impact on Daily Life and Health in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Research

BACKGROUND

The incidence of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) has continually increased. To achieve optimal supportive cancer care for HCC patients, it is important to consider patients' experiences and preferences.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-synthesis aims to critically interpret how patients with HCC experience symptoms and the impact of the disease on daily life and health.

METHODS

Searches were performed in the following bibliographic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. In addition, searches were performed using Open Gray to identify relevant studies in the gray literature. The search was limited to studies published in English from 2009 to 2019. Five studies (124 participants) were identified, appraised, and ultimately interpreted and synthesized.

RESULTS

Receiving an HCC diagnosis was overwhelming and affected the patients' entire lives. Three themes were identified based on the meta-synthesis: (1) disrupted life, (2) living with uncertainty, and (3) a changed body. Patients with HCC experience disrupted lives because of the cancer's effect on health and multidimensional symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Available research on the experiences of HCC patients is limited. This meta-synthesis of available studies shows that being given a diagnosis of HCC is an overwhelming event. Our study findings show that an HCC diagnosis affected the individual's entire life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

It is important to identify the patients' physical, psychological, social, and existential needs during the investigation of their condition, during any curative treatment, and at the palliative stage of the disease.

Long term results of surgery for NSCLC and aortic invasion. A multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Aortic invasion from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) is a relative contraindication to surgery for oncological and technical reasons. Only a few studies have been published showing good results. Our aim was to evaluate short and long-term results of surgery for T4 NSCLC with aortic resection.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study including 47 patients (33 males and 14 females) who received a major lung resection with aortic surgery in our centers between January 2000 and December 2016.

RESULTS

Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 31 patients (66.0%). Induction therapy was used in 14 patients. Pneumonectomy was performed in 34 patients (72.3%). A subadventitial dissection with or without endovascular stent graft was carried out in 40 patients (85.1%), a cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 3 patients and left heart bypass in 4. Intraoperatively, two patients had bleeding (4.3%) and one ventricular fibrillation (2.1%). Twenty-three patients (48.9%) experienced at least one postoperative complication. A radical resection was achieved in 39 patients (83.0%). Thirty-day and 90-day mortality were 2.1% and 4.3%. One-, 3- and 5-year overall survival were 85.1%, 57.4% and 53.2%. Overall and disease-free survivals were significantly influenced by pathological lymph node status and R status that were independent predictive factors for poorer survival at the multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic resection during surgery for NSCLC is a challenging situation. Nevertheless, oncologic outcomes may be favorable in selected cases justifying a risky procedure that should be performed in experienced hands.

Modifiable factors associated with health-related quality of life among lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy

OBJECTIVE

The number of lung cancer survivors is increasing along with advances in screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Following curative intent therapy, many lung cancer survivors experience significant health-related quality of life (HRQL) impairments. We sought to identify potentially modifiable factors that contribute to the HRQL of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional observational study of disease-free, stage I-IIIA lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy, we used a conceptual model to examine factors that included behavioral, objective functional and physiologic, self-rated function and symptom burden, specific comorbidities, and non-modifiable demographic and clinical lung cancer-related characteristics. We assessed HRQL using the valid and prognostic European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) Core 30 global health/QoL subscale. We used univariable and multivariable linear regression modeling with backward elimination of potentially modifiable and non-modifiable factors, and interpreted clinically and statistically significant, consistent, and independent modifiable factors as meaningful.

RESULTS

Among 75 participants at a median of 12 months since treatment completion, the mean (standard deviation) C30 global health/QoL score was 62.7 (23.3) points (0-100 scale range). In multivariable analysis, with and without non-modifiable factors, we identified three clinically and statistically significant, consistent, and independent factors (unstandardized β range) associated with global health/QoL: 1) abnormal exercise-induced dyspnea (-9.23 to -10.0 points); 2) impaired self-rated role function (or inability to perform work or daily activities and pursuing leisure-time activities) (-12.6 to -16.4 points); and 3) abnormal insomnia (or trouble sleeping) (-12.6 to -16.4 points).

CONCLUSION

We identified meaningful modifiable factors associated with the HRQL of disease-free, stage I-IIIA lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy. Interventions to improve the HRQL of these patients should aim to reduce exercise-induced dyspnea, improve role function - the ability to perform work and other daily including leisure-time activities, and control insomnia.

Pneumonectomy for left-sided non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of 111 cases over 10 years

Background

Pulmonary resection is the preferred therapeutic option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the physiological insult, pneumonectomy (PN) may be unavoidable in patients with early-stage central tumors. This study aimed to analyze the management of early-stage left-sided NSCLC by PN.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study of patients with different stages of NSCLC who underwent left PN over a 10-year period. In-hospital morbidity and mortality and long-term survival were calculated.

Results

A total of 111 patients were enrolled (aged 46–80 years). Preoperatively, 53.2% of patients had stage IIIA, 32.4% stage IIB, and 14.4% had stage IIA disease. Postoperatively, the number of patients with stage IIA and IIB decreased while stage IIIA increased. All PNs were radical. The 5- and 10-year survival rates in stage IIA patients were 42.8% and14.2%, respectively, in stage IIB patients were 56.25% and 3.1%, and the 5-year survival in stage IIIA patients was 22. 5%. The overall 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 94.6%, 77.47%, 34.23%, and 2.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

The operative mortality, morbidity, and 5-year survival rates of patients with NSCLC after PN matched the international standards. Left PN might be unavoidable for patients with centrally located tumors.

Computer-assisted textual analysis of free-text comments in the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) survey

Background

Patient experience surveys are increasingly conducted in cancer care as they provide important results to consider in future development of cancer care and health policymaking. These surveys usually include closed-ended questions (patient-reported experience measures (PREMs)) and space for free-text comments, but published results are mostly based on PREMs. We aimed to identify the underlying themes of patients’ experiences as shared in their own words in the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) survey and compare these themes with those assessed with PREMs to investigate how the textual analysis of free-text comments contributes to the understanding of patients’ experiences of care.

Methods

SCAPE is a multicenter cross-sectional survey that was conducted between October 2018 and March 2019 in French-speaking parts of Switzerland. Patients were invited to rate their care in 65 closed-ended questions (PREMs) and to add free-text comments regarding their cancer-related experiences at the end of the survey. We conducted computer-assisted textual analysis using the IRaMuTeQ software on the comments provided by 31% (n = 844) of SCAPE survey respondents (n = 2755).

Results

We identified five main thematic classes, two of which consisting of a detailed description of ‘cancer care pathways’. The remaining three classes were related to ‘medical care’, ‘gratitude and praise’, and the way patients lived with cancer (‘cancer and me’). Further analysis of this last class showed that patients’ comments related to the following themes: ‘initial shock’, ‘loneliness’, ‘understanding and acceptance’, ‘cancer repercussions’, and ‘information and communication’. While closed-ended questions related mainly to factual aspects of experiences of care, free-text comments related primarily to the personal and emotional experiences and consequences of having cancer and receiving care.

Conclusions

A computer-assisted textual analysis of free-text in our patient survey allowed a time-efficient classification of free-text data that provided insights on the personal experience of living with cancer and additional information on patient experiences that had not been collected with the closed-ended questions, underlining the importance of offering space for comments. Such results can be useful to inform questionnaire development, provide feedback to professional teams, and guide patient-centered initiatives to improve the quality and safety of cancer care.

Stable, fragile and recreated - a qualitative study of agency in everyday life with breast and prostate cancer

Purpose: This study aims to explore how agency is constructed in everyday life with cancer in relation to daily activities and habits. Agency is approached as a key element of daily life existence, and it is constructed in terms of "acting in the world", self-behaviour, changing routines, identity expectations and life course.Methods: The study is based on a social constructionist approach and the data of 32 participants were gathered through a public call for narratives on "everyday life with breast and prostate cancer" in Finland in 2009. The analysis was conducted by utilizing a discursive research approach and coding.Results: Three categories of agency were identified: stable-where agency continues fluently after cancer; fragile-where the ability to take care of daily activities has deteriorated; and recreated-where living with cancer adapts or creates a new basis for daily living.Conclusions: The findings of the study suggest that everyday life activities and habits define and (de)construct agency, and that these constructions are tightly linked to the ill person's overall life situation, physical abilities and cultural context. Having cancer can create new challenges to agency in daily life but does not suppress agency.

Unmet needs and opportunities for improving care for patients with advanced lung cancer on targeted therapies: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer is increasingly recognised as a heterogeneous disease. Recent advances with targeted therapies for lung cancer with oncogenic mutations have greatly improved the prognosis for this subset of patients, yet little is known about their experiences. This study aimed to identify the needs and explore the healthcare experiences of these advanced patients with oncogenic mutation driven lung cancer.

DESIGN

Qualitative interviews with patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with oncogenic alterations in anaplastic lymphoma kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor or c-ros oncogene 1.

SETTINGS

Patients were recruited from online lung cancer support groups within the USA. Interviews were conducted remotely or in person, transcribed verbatim and analysed using an iterative inductive and deductive process.

PARTICIPANTS

We included 39 patients (11 males and 28 females) with a median age of 48.

RESULTS

Two primary theme categories emerged: patients' unmet needs and improving healthcare experiences. Unmet needs are related to patients' desire to view their disease as a chronic illness, aspire to live a meaningful existence without financial devastation, desire for understanding along with emotional support and needing help with practical matters. Improving healthcare experiences involved patients' desire to trust the expertise of clinical providers, receive reliable care and be treated holistically and as informed partners.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lung cancer with oncogenic mutations live uncharted experiences. Targeted therapy brings hope, but uncertainty is daunting. Patients grapple with the meaning and purpose of their lives while day-to-day obligations remain challenging. Healthcare teams are instrumental in their care experiences, and patients desire providers who are up-to-date on advances in the field and treat them as whole persons.

Short-term integrated rehabilitation for people with newly diagnosed thoracic cancer: a multi-centre randomized controlled feasibility trial

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining patients recently diagnosed with thoracic cancer to a trial of short-term integrated rehabilitation; evaluate uptake of theoretically informed components targeting physical function, symptom self-management and participation; estimate sample size requirements for an efficacy trial.

DESIGN

Parallel group randomized controlled feasibility trial.

SETTING

Three U.K. hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ⩽eight weeks of thoracic cancer diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-3, any cancer stage and treatment plan.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants randomly allocated (1:1) to short-term integrated rehabilitation and standard care or standard care alone over 30 days.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary: participant recruitment and retention, targeting ⩾30% of eligible patients enrolling and ⩾50% of participants reporting outcomes at 30 days. Secondary: intervention fidelity; missing data and performance of outcome measures for self-efficacy, symptoms, physical activity and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Of 159 eligible patients approached, 54 (34%) were recruited. A total of 44 (82%) and 39 (72%) participants reported outcomes at 30 and 60 days, respectively. Intervention fidelity was high. Rehabilitation was delivered across 3 (1-3) sessions over 32 (22-45) days (median (range)). Changes in clinical outcomes were modest but most apparent at 60 days for health-related quality of life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lung Cancer score median (interquartile range) change 9.7 (-12.0 to 16.0) rehabilitation versus 2.3 (-15.0 to 14.5) standard care.

CONCLUSION

A trial to examine efficacy of short-term integrated rehabilitation for people newly diagnosed with thoracic cancer is feasible. A sample of 336 participants could detect a meaningful effect on health-related quality of life as the primary outcome.

What does an oncology social worker deal with in patient consultations? - An empirical study

The oncology social worker is a core profession in the psychosocial care of cancer patients, and has been scrutinised according to its role, function, and delivery of care, primarily from an Anglo-Saxon perspective. There is, however, a lack of studies outside this context, and empirical studies based on individual data. This study is a contribution by exploring the variability in clinical practice from a Swedish perspective. It is based on documentation from one oncology social worker's (OSW's) patient contacts over the course of one year. The essence of the majority of contacts was counseling and the patients displayed a wide variety of motives for seeing an OSW. The function of the OSW is thus multifaceted, and the findings suggest that the OSW, in addition to guiding patients in social legislation issues, also should be prepared to act as an anchor in an acute crisis, contain despair in different phases of the trajectory, and facilitate the 'carrying on as before' or finding a 'new normal'. The paper discusses the importance of the OSW being acquainted with different counseling/psychotherapy perspectives in the illness context, but primarily the importance of having the ability to establish a 'working alliance' with their patients.

Longing to get back on track: Patients' experiences and supportive care needs after lung cancer surgery

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to describe surgically treated lung cancer patients' experiences of coming home after discharge from hospital to expand the knowledge about their supportive care needs.

BACKGROUND

Existing research reports that patients suffer from a high symptom burden after lung cancer surgery. Such burden has negative impacts on their physical, emotional and social wellbeing. Few studies have explored the surgically treated patients' supportive care needs after being discharged from hospital.

DESIGN

This study used a qualitative descriptive design, following the EQUATOR guidelines (COREQ).

METHODS

The information about 14 patients' experiences was collected from semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted in their homes within three weeks after their discharge from hospital. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The main theme of the study, "Longing to get back on track with their lives", consisted of four categories: "Burdened with problems related to postoperative symptoms and treatment", "Struggling for the needed support", "A pendulum between being in need of support and being independent", and "Striving to adapt to a new way of life". The participants experienced many problems related to postoperative symptoms and treatment. Information and support from healthcare professionals were deficient. Life was characterised by striving to be independent and adapting to a new lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate the supportive care needs of surgically treated lung cancer patients. Nurses and other healthcare professionals could offer more individualised support during the first few weeks after the patients' discharge by including them and their caregivers in the discharge planning.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Knowledge of patients' perspectives and experiences of everyday life at home after lung cancer surgery can provide hospital nurses with a better understanding of what is important for such patients beyond hospitalisation. This knowledge should be included in discharge planning.

Cancer patients' motives for psychosocial consultation-Oncology social workers' perceptions of 226 patient cases

OBJECTIVE

Although oncology social workers (OSWs) have emerged as a core profession in the provision of psychosocial services, there is a lack of empirical studies that describe their daily clinical work with patients. The overall aim of this study was to explore cancer patients' motives for consulting an OSW.

METHODS

From a nationwide survey, we used data from 226 patient cases that OSWs met face to face. The OSWs were asked to describe how the case was referred to them, the patient's characteristics, and what they perceived as the patient's motives for contacting them as well as additional motives that came up during the consultations.

RESULTS

Patients have different motives for consulting an OSW, and these motives change over the course of consultations; while feelings associated with being diagnosed with cancer were often the initial motive, questions associated with moving on in life and dealing with relationships and the overall life situation were added over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that Swedish OSWs' function is multifaceted and that the initial motives among patients rarely predict the content in consultations over time. Based on the diversity of motives, it seems obvious that OSWs (at least in Sweden) need a broad education in the psychology of counselling. It also seems obvious that even if patients initially were referred by health care staff to the OSW due to psychological reactions to being ill, staff should also be attentive to the fact that relational and socio-economic/juridical issues are of great concern for the patients.