A phase II study of bevacizumab with carboplatin-pemetrexed in non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma patients with malignant pleural effusions: North East Japan Study Group Trial NEJ013A

First-line treatment of driver gene-negative metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with malignant pleural effusion: Should chemotherapy be combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor or bevacizumab?

Patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (MLA) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) without driver gene mutations have a poor prognosis. None of the standard treatment strategies is recommended for such patients. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of the first-line treatment for this specific population: standard platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (CT), CT plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor (CT plus ICI), and CT plus bevacizumab (CT plus Bev). A total of 323 eligible patients were enrolled: CT alone (n = 166), CT plus Bev (n = 72), and CT plus ICI (n = 85). Treatment efficacy assessments were performed every two cycles according to the RECIST guidelines. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier (K‒M) curves and the log-rank test were used to compare OS and PFS. p < 0.05 was the threshold of significance (statistical software: SPSS). The median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 2.1-49.6 months). PFS and OS in the CT plus ICI/CT plus Bev cohort were significantly longer than those in the CT group (PFS: 7.8/6.4/3.9 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 16.4/15.6/9.6 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). CT plus Bev had better PFS and OS than CT plus ICI/CT in PD-L1 < 1% patients (PFS: 8.4/5.0/3.8 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 15.6/12.9/9.3 months, p < 0.0001). Among patients with PD-L1 1-49%, CT plus ICI led to a longer PFS and OS (PFS: 8.9/5.8/4.2 months, p = 0.009; OS: 24.2/18.8/11.5 months, p = 0.03). In the cohort with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, CT plus ICI was still the best first-line treatment (PFS: 19.7/13.8/9.6 months, p = 0.033; OS: 27.2/19.6/14.9 months, p = 0.047). In driver gene-negative MLA with MPE, CT plus Bev or ICI better controlled MPE and significantly prolonged survival compared to CT alone. PD-L1 expression (negative/positive) may be a key factor influencing the choice of CT plus Bev or ICI.

Malignant pleural disease

Malignant pleural disease represents a growing healthcare burden. Malignant pleural effusion affects approximately 1 million people globally per year, causes disabling breathlessness and indicates a shortened life expectancy. Timely diagnosis is imperative to relieve symptoms and optimise quality of life, and should give consideration to individual patient factors. This review aims to provide an overview of epidemiology, pathogenesis and suggested diagnostic pathways in malignant pleural disease, to outline management options for malignant pleural effusion and malignant pleural mesothelioma, highlighting the need for a holistic approach, and to discuss potential challenges including non-expandable lung and septated effusions.

Development and validation of the CAIL prognostic score in non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) typically have poor prognoses, and predicting survival is challenging. The present study aimed to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with MPE in the time of immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

METHODS

Data of 344 consecutive NSCLC patients with MPE on clinical, radiological, and molecular characteristics and treatment options were collected. The risk factors in the training cohort were assessed using univariate and multivariate proportional hazards analyses. A clinical prognostic score was established and validated.

RESULTS

According to the results of the multivariable survival analysis, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (PS), antiangiogenic therapy, immunotherapy, and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) in pleural fluid (CAIL) prognostic score was developed (n = 275) and subsequently validated (n = 69). Patients who underwent risk stratification into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups had median OS of 46.1, 23.1, and 9.6 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) analysis showed the CAIL score to be superior at predicting survival compared with the LENT score at 6 (0.84 vs. 0.77, P < 0.01), 12 (0.87 vs. 0.82, P < 0.01), and 36 months (0.80 vs. 0.77, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC patients with MPE, the validated CAIL prognostic score integrates clinical characteristics and therapeutic modalities to predict survival.

Efficacy of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy for initially diagnosed lung cancer with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion

Initially diagnosed malignant pleural effusion (MPE) has different systematic treatments, and defining the best drainage regimen according to the responsiveness of MPE to different systematic treatments is important. This study compared the efficacy of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) and pleural catheter drainage (IPCD) for initially diagnosed lung cancer with symptomatic MPE. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of initially diagnosed lung cancer patients with symptomatic MPE between January 2018 and May 2022. The patients were treated with IPCD or HITHOC for local control of MPE after diagnosis. Systematic regimens were conducted during 1 month according to guidelines after local treatment. Intrathoracic MPE progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, Univariate and multivariable Cox-regression were used to identify factors associated with iPFS and OS. A total of 33 patients were evaluated; 10 (30.3%) patients received IPCD, and 23 (69.7%) patients received HITHOC. No difference in the MPE control rate at 1 month was found between the IPCD group (90%) and HITHOC group (95.7%). However, this control rate was significantly higher in the HITHOC group (69.6%) than in the IPCD group (30%) at 3 months (P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or chemotherapy was a significant protective factor for iPFS (HR = 0.376, 95% CI 0.214-0.659, P = 0.007) and OS (HR = 0.321, 95% CI 0.174-0.594, P < 0.001). According to subgroup analysis, among patients treated with TKIs, those who received HITHOC had longer iPFS and OS than those who received IPCD (P = 0.011 and P = 0.002, respectively), but this difference was not found in the palliative care subgroup. Moreover, no patients treated with chemotherapy showed reaccumulation of MPE. Systematic TKIs or chemotherapy prolonged iPFS and OS for those initially diagnosed with lung cancer with symptomatic MPE. HITHOC prolonged iPFS and OS for those treated with systematic TKIs.

Malignant Pleural Effusions in the Era of Immunotherapy and Antiangiogenic Therapy

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) have historically been associated with a poor prognosis, and patients often require a series of invasive procedures and hospitalizations that significantly reduce quality of life at the terminus of life. However, advances in the management of MPE have coincided with the era of immunotherapies, and to a lesser extent, antiangiogenic therapies for the treatment of lung cancer. Landmark studies have shown these drugs to improve overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with lung cancer, but a paucity of phase III trial data exists for the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on lung cancers associated with MPE. This review will focus on the leading studies investigating the impact of ICI and antiangiogenic therapies in patients with lung cancer and MPE. The diagnostic and prognostic values of vascular endothelial growth factor and endostatin expression levels in malignancy will also be discussed. These advancements are changing the paradigm of MPE management from palliation to treatment for the first time since 1767 when MPE was first reported. The future holds the promise of durable response and extended survival in patients with MPE.

Successful treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with concurrent pleural and pericardial effusions: Case report

It is unclear whether pleural/pericardial drainage and pleurodesis/pericardiodesis should be performed before or after initiating chemotherapy in patients with chemotherapy-sensitive small-cell lung cancer. A 76-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with progressive dyspnea on exertion for a week. Chest computed tomography showed a mass shadow anterior to the left upper lobe, bilateral pleural effusions, and a circumferential pericardial effusion surrounding the heart. We diagnosed extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer based on the clinical course and pathological findings. We first performed pleurodesis and pericardial drainage and successfully initiated immune checkpoint inhibitor combined chemotherapy, with improved performance status. This case highlights the importance of aggressive drainage and pleurodesis/pericardiodesis, and suggests that drainage and pleurodesis/pericardiodesis should be considered before systemic chemotherapy in patients with concurrent pericardial or pleural effusions, even in patients with small-cell lung cancer that is sensitive to chemotherapy.

The Effect of Pleural Effusion on Prognosis in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Immunochemotherapy: A Retrospective Observational Study

Objectives: Combined immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pleural effusion (PE) is associated with poor outcomes among patients with NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy. However, minimal data exists on PE for patients undergoing combined ICI and chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated how PE affects survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC undergoing this combined therapy. Methods: We identified patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy and ICI therapy from the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group−Immune Chemotherapy Database (OLCSG−ICD) between December 2018 and December 2020; the OLCSG−ICD includes the clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC from 13 institutions. Then, we analyzed the treatment outcomes based on the presence of PE. Results: We identified 478 patients who underwent combined ICI therapy and chemotherapy; 357 patients did not have PE, and 121 patients did have PE. Patients with PE had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those without PE (median PFS: 6.2 months versus 9.1 months; p < 0.001; median OS: 16.4 months versus 27.7 months; p < 0.001). The negative effect of PE differed based on the patient’s programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status; with the effect being more evident in patients with high PD-L1 expression. In addition, PFS and OS did not differ between patients who did and did not undergo bevacizumab treatment; thus, bevacizumab-containing regimens did not improve the survival outcomes for patients with PE. Conclusion: PE is associated with poor outcomes among patients with NSCLC undergoing combined ICI therapy and chemotherapy.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Malignant Pleural Effusion May Require Primary Tumor Radiotherapy in Addition to Drug Treatment

PURPOSE

The impact of primary tumour radiotherapy on the prognosis for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with controlled malignant pleural effusion (MPE-C) (MPE-C-NSCLC) is unclear. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of primary tumor radiotherapy in patients with MPE-C-NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 186 patients with MPE-C-NSCLC were enrolled and divided into two groups. The patients in the D group were treated with only drugs. Those in the RD group were treated with drugs plus primary tumour radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the Log rank test was used for between-group analysis and univariate prognostic analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform multivariate analyses to assess the impacts of factors on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was matched based on clinical characteristics, systematic drug treatment and drug response to further adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for the RD group and D group were 54.4%, 26.8%, and 13.3% and 31.1%, 11.5%, and 4.4%, respectively; the corresponding MSTs were 14 months and 8 months, respectively (χ 2=15.915, p<0.001). There was a significant difference in survival by PSM (p=0.027).Before PSM, multivariate analysis showed that metastasis status (organ≤3 and metastasis≤5), primary tumour radiotherapy, chemotherapy cycles≥4, and drug best response (CR+PR) were independent predictors of prolonged OS. After PSM, primary tumour radiotherapy and drug best response (CR+PR) were independent predictors of prolonged OS were still independent predictors of prolonged OS. There were no grade 4-5 radiation toxicities.

CONCLUSION

For MPE-C-NSCLC, the response of systemic drug treatment plays a crucial role in survival outcomes, and we also should pay attention to primary tumour radiotherapy in addition to systematic drug treatment.

Two cases showing the effects of bevacizumab on recurrent cervical cancer with pleural effusion

The survival rate and quality of life of patients with recurrent cervical cancer and pleural effusion had been extremely poor until bevacizumab was approved. We report two cases of recurrent cervical cancer with remarkably decreased pleural effusion and a long survival rate after combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab. Case 1: A patient was diagnosed with stage IIB cervical adenocarcinoma and treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), total hysterectomy, and paclitaxel/carboplatin (TC) therapy as the primary treatment. After the first recurrence had been treated with irinotecan-cisplatin therapy and radiotherapy, symptomatic pleural effusion emerged. Paclitaxel-cisplatin-bevacizumab (Pac-Cis-Bev) was administered during 13 cycles of chemotherapy to promptly relieve pleural effusion, respiratory distress, and back pain. She survived for more than a year and a half after starting Pac-Cis-Bev therapy. Case 2: A patient was diagnosed with stage IIIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma and pulmonary recurrence after CCRT. After 21 cycles of TC or Pac-Cis-Bev therapy, pleural effusion emerged. Topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab (Topo-Pac-Bev) was administered for 12 cycles. Respiratory distress was relieved in 2 weeks and pleural effusion almost completely resolved after 2 months. We changed the treatment to ifosfamide and nedaplatin as pleural effusion exacerbated. However, this treatment was not effective; hence the patient was rechallenged with Topo-Pac-Bev therapy. Six cycles of Topo-Pac-Bev rechallenge therapy effectively suppressed pleural effusion. She survived for 2 years after pleural effusion appeared. Chemotherapy with bevacizumab is useful for both symptom relief and improvement in prognosis in patients with recurrent cervical cancer, despite being in the late phase.

Albumin Paclitaxel Combined with Intrapleural Infusion of Bevacizumab + Lobaplatin for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of albumin paclitaxel combined with intrapleural bevacizumab + lobaplatin for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and analyze prognostic factors.

Methods

A total of 126 NS-NSCLC patients were included in the study. Control group with 64 cases received intrapleural infusion of lobaplatin + intravenous albumin paclitaxel, and treatment group with 62 cases received additional intrapleural bevacizumab perfusion. Analysis was performed by collecting data about MPE, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and scores of quality of life.

Results

In the treatment and control groups, objective response rate (ORR) was 51.6% and 31.3% (χ² = 5.39, P=0.02), and disease control rate (DCR) was 91.9% and 71.9% (χ² = 8.49, P=0.004), respectively. The main adverse reactions (≥grade 3) in the treatment group were thrombocytopenia, peripheral neurotoxicity, proteinuria, neutropenia, and nausea/vomiting, and in the control group, they were weakness, nausea/vomiting, anemia, and peripheral neurotoxicity. In the control and treatment groups, the median PFS was 6.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.86–6.56) and 5.1 (95% CI: 4.956–5.191), and the median OS was 14.4 (95% CI: 12.681–16.113) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 8.759–12.391). The score of quality of life for treated patients was significantly higher than those before treatment and the control group, and the parameters included general health status (GH), role physical (RP), body pain (BP), social function (SF), and vitality (VT); pH, CD4+/CD8+ values, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the pleural effusion significantly affected the PFS and OS (P < 0.05). Bevacizumab administration in patients with bloody pleural effusion did not increase the risk of pleural hemorrhage.

Conclusion

The combination of albumin paclitaxel and intrapleural bevacizumab + lobaplatin is effective and may reverse the adverse events in patients with NS-NSCLC and MPE. The change of CD4+/CD8+ ratio before and after treatment is an independent and prognostic factor for patients with NS-NSCLC and MPE.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor With or Without Chemotherapy for Non–Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Introduction

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is associated with poor treatment outcome in patients with NSCLC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs and chemotherapy (ICI/Chemo) combination therapy is currently the standard therapy for NSCLC, and some ICI/Chemo regimens for nonsquamous (non-Sq) NSCLC contain bevacizumab (BEV), which is effective for controlling MPE and may enhance immune response. This study aimed to determine the optimal first-line treatment for this clinical population.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with non-Sq NSCLC with MPE who received ICI/Chemo or pembrolizumab monotherapy. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score more than or equal to 50% who were administered ICI/Chemo or pembrolizumab monotherapy (PD-L1 high cohort) and in patients with any PD-L1 status, treated with ICI/Chemo with or without BEV (ICI/Chemo cohort). We used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias.

Results

PD-L1 high and ICI/Chemo cohorts included 143 and 139 patients, respectively. In PD-L1 high cohort, 37 patients received ICI/Chemo. With PSM, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ICI/Chemo group than in the pembrolizumab group (11.1 versus 3.9 mo, respectively, p = 0.0409). In the ICI/Chemo cohort, 23 patients received BEV. With PSM, no significant difference occurred in median progression-free survival between BEV and non-BEV groups (6.1 versus 7.4 mo, p = 0.9610).

Conclusion

ICI/Chemo seemed more effective than pembrolizumab monotherapy for patients with non-Sq NSCLC with MPE. Nevertheless, the synergistic effect of BEV with ICI/Chemo may be limited. Further studies are needed to clarify the key factor in the tumor-induced immunosuppression environment in these patients.

Effectiveness of anlotinib in patients with small-cell lung cancer and pleural effusion: Subgroup analysis from a randomized, multicenter, phase II study

Background

The presence of pleural effusion is an independent predictor for poor survival in patients with small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with SCLC and pleural effusion.

Methods

This was a randomized, double‐blind, multicenter, phase II trial. Patients histologically diagnosed with SCLC and pleural effusion and had received at least two lines of chemotherapy were enrolled into the study. The patients received anlotinib 12 mg/day or a placebo.

Results

The overall response rate (ORR) was 3.7% for anlotinib (n = 27) and 0% in the placebo group (n = 15) (p = 1.000). The disease control rate (DCR) of the anlotinib group (63.0%) was higher than that of the placebo group (0%, p < 0.0001). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) increased in the anlotinib group (2.8 months) compared to the placebo group (0.7 months, HR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.03–0.28, p < 0.001). The median overall survival of the anlotinib group (6.5 months) was higher than that of the placebo group (2.8 months, HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.22–1.23, p = 0.1285). The incidence of any grade adverse events was 100% in both groups. The percentage of grade 3–4 adverse events in the anlotinib group was 44.4% (12/27) compared to 40.0% (6/15) in the placebo group. Hypertension (37.0%), fatigue (29.6%), and loss of appetite (29.6%) typically appeared in the anlotinib group.

Conclusions

In this post hoc analysis, anlotinib was associated with improved PFS in patients with SCLC and baseline pleural effusion. However, additional studies with a large sample size are necessary to substantiate the current findings.

Lenvatinib for poorly differentiated carcinoma of the anterior mediastinum

We describe a Case of a 74-year-old Japanese man with poorly differentiated carcinoma of the anterior mediastinum. The patient underwent anterior mediastinal tumor resection through median sternotomy. The tumor, 7.0 × 5.0 cm, had invaded surrounding tissues (pericardium, right lung, right and left brachiocephalic veins, and superior vena cava). Complete resection of the tumor was not performed. One month after the operation, the patient developed multiple pulmonary metastases, right pleural dissemination, and carcinomatous pleurisy. He was treated with lenvatinib, a novel multi-kinase inhibitor, to which the metastasis responded favorably. This case reports for the first time the clinical usefulness of lenvatinib for poorly differentiated carcinoma of the anterior mediastinum. Management of side effects by several methods, including suspending use of medication on weekends (called a weekends-off strategy), is another strong argument to continue lenvatinib administration.

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanism, pharmacokinetics and future treatment strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer globally and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although early-stage disease may be curable by resection, liver transplantation or ablation, many patients present with unresectable disease and have a poor prognosis. Combination treatment with atezolizumab (targeting PD-L1) and bevacizumab (targeting VEGF) in the recent IMbrave150 study was shown to be effective with an acceptable safety profile in patients with unresectable HCC. Herein, we discuss this novel combination in the context of the liver immune environment, summarize the mechanism and pharmacokinetics of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, and examine recent data on other immune checkpoint inhibitor combination strategies as well as future directions in the treatment of patients with advanced HCC.

Phase 2 study of bevacizumab plus carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel followed by bevacizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion

Objectives Vascular endothelial growth factor plays an important role in the pathogenesis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). We previously showed the efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev) plus carboplatin (CBDCA)/paclitaxel (PTX) in the treatment of non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC) with MPE. However, the toxicities were a little severe, and the efficacy was not satisfied sufficiently. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study for NSCLC with MPE to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bev plus CBDCA/nab-PTX, which is a new combination therapy. Methods Chemotherapy-naive non-squamous (SQ) NSCLC patients with MPE participated in the study. A single aspiration (not allowing chest tube drainage) was allowed before chemotherapy. Patients received a maximum of six cycles of Bev (15 mg/kg, day1) plus CBDCA (AUC 6, day1)/nab-PTX (100 mg/m², day1, 8) every 3 weeks followed by Bev (15 mg/kg, day1) plus nab-PTX (100 mg/m², day1, 8) every 3 weeks without disease progression or unacceptable severe toxicities. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results The study enrollment was ceased because of suspension of the registration period (as scheduled) after 12 of 20 planned patients were treated successfully between March 2014 and February 2018. The ORR was 58.3 % (95 % CI, 27.7-84.8 %), and the disease control rate was 100 % (95 % CI, 73.5-100 %). Eight patients received maintenance therapy. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 14.4 and 26.9 months, respectively. Most patients experienced hematological toxicities, including ≥ grade 3 neutropenia and anemia; none experienced severe bleeding events and grade 5 toxicities. Conclusion The combination of Bev plus CBDCA/nab-PTX, a novel combination, might have efficacy with acceptable toxicities in chemotherapy-naïve non-SQ NSCLC patients with MPE.Trial Registration University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (No. UMIN000013329) registered on 4th March 2014.

Clinically relevant prognostic and predictive markers for immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) either alone or in combination with chemotherapy have expanded our choice of agents for the palliative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Unfortunately, not all patients will experience favorable response to treatment with ICI and may even suffer from severe side effects. Therefore, prognostic and predictive markers, beyond programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status, are of utmost importance for decision making in the palliative treatment. This review focuses on clinical, laboratory and genetic markers, most of them easily to obtain in the daily clinical practice.

RESULTS

Recently, a number of prognostic and predictive factors in association to palliative ICI therapy have been described in NSCLC. Besides biometric parameters and clinical characteristics of the tumor, there are useful markers from routine blood sampling as well as innovative soluble genetic markers which can be determined before and during ICI treatment. Additionally, the level of evidence is noted.

CONCLUSIONS

These factors can be helpful to predict patients' outcome and tumor response to ICI. They should be implemented prospectively in ICI based clinical trials to develop reliable algorithms for palliative NSCLC treatment.

Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Therapies Including Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Molecular targeted therapy has greatly advanced the field of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for the majority of lung cancers. Indeed, gefitinib, which was the first molecular targeted therapeutic agent, has actually doubled the survival time of NSCLC patients. Vigorous efforts of clinicians and researchers have revealed that lung cancer develops through the activating mutations of many driver genes including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), and rearranged during transfection (RET) genes. Although ALK, ROS1, and RET are rare genetic abnormalities, corresponding tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can exert dramatic therapeutic effects. In addition to anticancer drugs targeting driver genes, bevacizumab specifically binds to human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and blocks the VEGF signaling pathway. The VEGF signal blockade suppresses angiogenesis in tumor tissues and inhibits tumor growth. In this review, we also explore immunotherapy, which is a promising new NSCLC treatment approach. In general, antitumor immune responses are suppressed in cancer patients, and cancer cells escape from the immune surveillance mechanism. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that target the primary escape mechanisms, immune checkpoints. Patients who respond to ICIs are reported to experience longlasting therapeutic effects. A wide range of clinical approaches, including combination therapy involving chemotherapy or radiation plus adjuvant therapy, are being developed.

Bevacizumab plus cisplatin/pemetrexed then bevacizumab alone for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma: A Japanese safety study

Aims

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Cisplatin plus pemetrexed is the only approved first‐line treatment for patients with unresectable MPM. Recently, promising outcomes were observed with first‐line bevacizumab combined with cisplatin/pemetrexed, leading to the recommendation of this regimen as a first‐line treatment option for patients with MPM. Bevacizumab plus cisplatin/pemetrexed has been shown to be safe and effective in non–small cell lung cancer, however, there are no efficacy or safety data in Japanese patients with MPM treated with this regimen. We conducted a multicenter study to evaluate tolerability and safety for Japanese patients with chemotherapy‐naïve, unresectable MPM.

Methods

Eligible patients (n = 7) received bevacizumab plus cisplatin/pemetrexed (up to six cycles), then single‐agent bevacizumab until disease progression or onset of unacceptable adverse events (AEs), according to the 3+3 design analogy.

Results

One patient (14.3%) reported an AE (gastric ulcer) meeting tolerability criteria. All patients experienced gastrointestinal disorders, including nausea (grade 1/2 only, n = 6, 85.7%) and constipation (grade 1/2 only, n = 5, 71.4%). Five patients (71.4%) had grade 3 hypertension. Two patients discontinued treatment due to gastric ulcer (n = 1) and proteinuria (n = 1). At data cut‐off, four patients had stable disease, two had partial response and one had non‐complete response/non‐progressive disease due to the absence of target lesions.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab plus cisplatin/pemetrexed then bevacizumab was well tolerated in Japanese patients with MPM.

LINC00173.v1 promotes angiogenesis and progression of lung squamous cell carcinoma by sponging miR-511-5p to regulate VEGFA expression

Background

Anti-angiogenic therapy represents a promising strategy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but its application in lung squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) is limited due to the high-risk adverse effects. Accumulating evidence indicates that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) mediate in tumor progression by participating in the regulation of VEGF in NSCLC, which might guide the development of new antiangiogenic strategies.

Methods

Differential lncRNA expression in SQC was analyzed in AE-meta and TCGA datasets, and further confirmed in lung cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues with RT-qPCR and in-situ hybridization. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical correlation between LINC00173.v1 expression and survival characteristics. A tube formation assay, chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane assay and animal experiments were conducted to detect the effect of LINC00173.v1 on the proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells and tumorigenesis of SQC in vivo. Bioinformatics analysis, RNA immunoprecipitation and luciferase reporter assays were performed to elucidate the downstream target of LINC00173.v1. The therapeutic efficacy of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) against LINC00173.v1 was further investigated in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and high throughput data processing and visualization were performed to identify the cause of LINC00173.v1 overexpression in SQC.

Results

LINC00173.v1 was specifically upregulated in SQC tissues, which predicted poorer overall and progression-free survival in SQC patients. Overexpression of LINC00173.v1 promoted, while silencing LINC00173.v1 inhibited the proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells and the tumorigenesis of SQC cells in vitro and in vivo. Our results further revealed that LINC00173.v1 promoted the proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells and the tumorigenesis of SQC cells by upregulating VEGFA expression by sponging miR-511-5p. Importantly, inhibition of LINC00173.v1 via the ASO strategy reduced the tumor growth of SQC cells, and enhanced the therapeutic sensitivity of SQC cells to cisplatin in vivo. Moreover, our results showed that squamous cell carcinoma-specific factor ΔNp63α contributed to LINC00173.v1 overexpression in SQC.

Conclusion

Our findings clarify the underlying mechanism by which LINC00173.v1 promotes the proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells and the tumorigenesis of SQC, demonstrating that LINC00173.v1-targeted drug in combination with cisplatin may serve as a rational regimen against SQC.

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion uncontrolled by tube drainage or pleurodesis: A phase II study North East Japan Study group trial NEJ013B

Background

Pleurodesis is the standard of care for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion (MPE). However, there is no standard management for MPE uncontrolled by pleurodesis. Most patients with unsuccessful MPE control are unable to receive effective chemotherapy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of MPE. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the effects of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in nonsquamous NSCLC patients with unsuccessful management of MPE.

Methods

Nonsquamous NSCLC patients with MPE following unsuccessful tube drainage or pleurodesis received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) plus chemotherapy every three weeks. The primary endpoint was pleural effusion control rate (PECR), defined as the percentage of patients without reaccumulation of MPE at eight weeks. Secondary endpoints included pleural progression‐free survival (PPFS), safety, and quality of life (QoL).

Results

A total of 20 patients (median age: 69 years; 14 males; 20 adenocarcinomas; six epidermal growth factor receptor mutations) were enrolled in nine centers. The PECR was 80% and the primary end point was met. The PPFS and the overall survival (OS) were 16.6 months and 19.6 months, respectively. Patients with high levels of VEGF in the MPE had shorter PPFS (P = 0.010) and OS (P = 0.002). Toxicities of grade ≥ 3 included neutropenia (50%), thrombocytopenia (10%), proteinuria (10%), and hypertension (2%). The cognitive QoL score improved after treatment.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is highly effective with acceptable toxicities in nonsquamous NSCLC patients with uncontrolled MPE, and should be considered as a standard therapy in this setting.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is highly effective with acceptable toxicities in nonsquamous NSCLC patients with uncontrolled MPE.

What this study adds

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy should be considered as a standard treatment option for patients with uncontrolled MPE.

Clinical trial registration

UMIN000006868 was a phase II study of efficacy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for the management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer patients with MPE unsuccessfully controlled by tube drainage or pleurodesis (North East Japan Study Group Trial NEJ‐013B) (http://umin.sc.jp/ctr/).

Prognostic factors of recurrence of malignant pleural effusion: what is the role of neoplasia progression?

Background

It is known that malignant pleural effusion (MPE) recurs rapidly, in a considerable number of patients. However, some patients do not have MPE recurrence. Since MPE is associated with an average survival of 4–7 months, accurate prediction of prognosis may help recognize patients at higher risk of pleural recurrence, aiming to individualize more intensive treatment strategies.

Methods

A prospectively assembled database of cases with pleural effusion treated at a single institution analyzed a subset of patients with symptomatic MPE. Prognostic factors for pleural recurrence were identified by univariable analysis using Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used for the comparison between the curves. Univariate and multiple Cox regression models were used to evaluate the risk (HR) of recurrence. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis determined the cutoff points for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 288 patients were included in the analysis. Recurrence-free survival was of 76.6% at 6 months and 73.3% at 12 months. Univariable analysis regarding factors affecting postoperative recurrence was: lymphocytes, platelets, pleural procedure, chemotherapy lines and number of metastases. The independent factors for recurrence-free survival were pleural procedure and chemotherapy lines. Patients who were submitted to pleurodesis had a protective factor for recurrence, with an HR =0.34 (95% CI, 0.15–0.74, P=0.007). On the other hand, patients submitted to the 1st and 2nd line of palliative CT had, respectively, an HR risk = 2.81 (95% CI, 1.10–7.28, P=0.034) and HR =3.23 (95% CI, 1.33–7.84, P=0.010).

Conclusions

patients receiving the first or second line of systemic treatment have a higher risk of MPE recurrence when compared to patients who underwent MPE treatment before starting the systemic treatment. The definitive treatment of MPE, such as pleurodesis, was associated with a lower risk of MPE recurrence.

Phase II study of ramucirumab and docetaxel for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion: Protocol of PLEURAM study

INTRODUCTION

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy has been shown to be effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE); however, there are no data to suggest that ramucirumab has the same effects.

METHODS

We therefore decided to conduct a phase II study of ramucirumab plus docetaxel for NSCLC patients with MPE. The MPE control rate at eight weeks after the start of treatment will be the primary endpoint, and the objective response rate, progression-free survival, one-year survival rate, overall survival, and toxicity profile will be secondary endpoints.

DISCUSSION

A previous study indicated that administering chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab was effective at controlling pleural effusion in patients with NSCLC with carcinomatous pleurisy. It is expected that ramucirumab will have a similar effect to the same group.

Phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin combined with bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (TCOG LC-1202)

BACKGROUND

S-1 plus cisplatin is a standard chemotherapy regimen for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The addition of bevacizumab has been shown to significantly improve overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-squamous (NSq) NSCLC who received carboplatin plus paclitaxel, however, failed to show an OS advantage in patients who received cisplatin plus gemcitabine.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with Stage IIIB, IV or recurrent non-SQ NSCLC were treated with a 3-week cycle of S-1 80 mg/m2 on days 1-14, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 8 and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 8 for 4-6 cycles. Patients without progressive disease (PD) received maintenance bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 with a 3-week cycle and S-1 80 mg/m2 every other day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), OS, toxicity profile and Quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

From June 2013 to January 2015, 39 eligible patients were enrolled from eight institutions. Thirty-one patients (79%) completed four cycles of induction chemotherapy, and maintenance chemotherapy was initiated in 23 patients (59%). Median PFS, OS and ORR were 7.3 months (95% CI: 5.9-8.7), 21.4 months (95% CI: 14.7-not reached) and 64%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (12.8%), neutropenia (23.0%) and hypertension (28.2%). QOL analyses showed detrimental effects after initiation of the regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus cisplatin in combination with bevacizumab met the primary endpoint in patients with advanced NSq-NSCLC. RR was anticipated to be high with acceptable toxicities.

Association between metastatic sites and first-line pembrolizumab treatment outcome for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

Associations between treatment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors and metastatic sites in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not well known. Therefore, this multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of metastatic sites after first-line pembrolizumab treatment for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. We retrospectively analyzed advanced NSCLC patients with a PD-L1 TPS ≥50% who underwent first-line pembrolizumab therapy at 11 institutions between February 2017 and April 2018. Clinical data collected from medical records included metastatic sites at the time of pembrolizumab treatment. Treatment outcomes of pembrolizumab were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. In total, 213 patients were included in the study. The median age was 71 years (range 39-91 years). Of the 213 patients, 176 (83%) were men and 172 (81%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) score of 0-1. The most common metastases were thoracic lymph node metastasis (77%), intrapulmonary metastasis (31%), bone metastasis (28%), and malignant pleural effusion (26%). On multivariate analysis, a poor ECOG-PS score (hazard ratio: 1.95, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.25-3.04; P = 0.003) and malignant pleural effusion (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.01-2.29; P = 0.043) were independent predictors of shorter progression-free survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab. For NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion, pembrolizumab monotherapy is not a suitable first-line treatment because of its insufficient effectiveness, even though their PD-L1 TPS was high.

[Progress of Bevacizumab in Malignant Pleural Effusion Caused by Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) caused by advanced lung cancer seriously affect the patients' quality of life and prognosis. The management of MPE includes thoracentesis, pleurodesis, indwelling pleural catheters and drug perfusion in pleural cavity. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor are a group of important ligands and receptors that affect angiogenesis. They are the main factors controlling angiogenesis, and they play an important role in the formation of MPE. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized VEGF monoclonal antibody, competitively binding to endogenous VEGF receptor. Bevacizumab can inhibit new blood vessel formation, reduce vascular permeability, prevent pleural effusion accumulation and slow the growth of cancers. This review aims to discuss the progress of bevacizumab in the treatment of MPE caused by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and explore the clinical application, efficacy, safety and future direction of bevacizumab.
.

Malignant pleural effusion as a predictor of the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the presence of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) as a negative predictor of anti‐PD‐1 antibody efficacy.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients with advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer treated with an anti‐PD‐1 antibody between December 2015 and March 2018 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan, was conducted. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with and without MPE. Additional survival analysis according to PD‐L1 expression status was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 252 patients were identified before the commencement of anti‐PD‐1 antibody treatment: 33 with MPE and 219 without MPE. PFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with MPE than in patients without MPE (median PFS 3.0 vs. 5.8 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.7, P = 0.014; median OS 7.9 vs. 15.8 months, HR 2.1, P = 0.001). In patients with PD‐L1 expression in ≥ 1% of their tumor cells, the PFS of patients with MPE was significantly shorter than of patients without MPE (median PFS 3.1 vs. 6.5 months, HR 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0–3.5; P = 0.021). The presence of MPE was independently associated with a shorter PFS and OS in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

The presence of MPE in patients administered an anti‐PD‐1 antibody is associated with shorter PFS and OS, regardless of the presence of PD‐L1 expression ≥ 1% of tumor cells.

Effect of chemotherapy and aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer on glucose and insulin metabolism-A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. With increasing survival rates, focus has expanded to long-term adverse effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or aromatase inhibitors. Weight gain during chemotherapy has been well documented, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. A change in glucose and insulin metabolism is a possible consequence.

METHODS

We searched PubMed on the 4th of May 2018, and found eight articles that compared measurements of glucose and insulin before and after chemotherapy and/or aromatase inhibitors in woman with BC.

RESULTS

A general trend of increased glucose and insulin is seen and likely to be caused by weight gain and/or changes in body composition as a consequence of adjuvant treatment of BC.

DISCUSSION

Due to methodological limitations including short follow-up times and small sample sizes, further studies are required to better describe metabolic consequences of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or aromatase inhibitors. Future studies could help identify patients in high-risk of developing cardiometabolic disease after BC treatment.

The role of VEGF in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a severe medical condition, which can result in breathlessness, pain, cachexia and reduced physical activity. It can occur in almost all types of malignant tumors; however, lung cancer is the most common cause of MPE, accounting for ~1/3 of clinical cases. Although there are numerous therapeutic approaches currently available for the treatment of MPE, none are fully effective and the majority can only alleviate the symptoms of the patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has now been recognized as one of the most important regulatory factors in tumor angiogenesis, which participates in the entire process of tumor growth through its function to stimulate tumor angiogenesis, activate host vascular endothelial cells and promote malignant proliferation. Novel drugs targeting VEGF, including endostar and bevacizumab, have been developed and approved for the treatment of various tumors. Data from recent clinical studies have demonstrated that drugs targeting VEGF are effective and safe for the clinical management of MPE. Therefore, VEGF‑targeting represents a promising novel strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of MPE. The present review summarized recent advances in the role of VEGF in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management of MPE in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer.

Wet M1a non-small cell lung cancer: is it possible to predict recurrence of pleural effusion?

Background

The propose was to recognize risk factors of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) recurrence in patients with symptomatic M1a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

All patients with NSCLC and MPE submitted to pleural palliative procedures were enrolled in a prospective study. Group I contained patients who had pleural recurrence, and Group II with no pleural recurrence. Prognostic factors for pleural recurrence were identified by univariable analysis, using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test for quantitative variables. Afterwards the significant variables were entered into a multivariable logistic regression analysis (with P<0.05 considered significant). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis determined the cutoff points for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 82 patients were included in the analysis. There were 15 patients (18.3%) in Group I and 67 patients (81.7%) in Group II. Univariable analysis regarding factors affecting postoperative recurrence was: adenosine deaminase concentration in pleural fluid <16 mg/dL (P=0.04), albumin concentration in pleural fluid <2.4 mg/dL (P=0.03), administration of second-line palliative chemotherapy (P=0.018) and type of procedure [therapeutic pleural aspiration (TPA)] (P=0.023). At the multivariable analysis, only the type of procedure (TPA) (P=0.031) was identified as independent predictor of recurrence.

Conclusions

The identification of this factor may assist the choice of the optimal palliative technique; at the first episode of MPE in NSCLC patients and definitive procedure as pleurodesis or indwelling pleural catheter are recommended.

Outcomes of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma-induced malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

VEGF is critical in the pathogenesis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). To understand the clinical benefits of antiangiogenic agents, the efficacy of chemotherapy containing bevacizmab was investigated in patients with lung adenocarcinoma-induced MPE.

METHODS

The data of lung adenocarcinoma patients with MPE treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy on day 1, every three weeks, for ≤ 6 cycles was retrospectively collected. Patients who achieved a response or stable disease were administered bevacizumab as maintenance therapy until progression. The primary outcomes of the study were MPE response rate (RR), MPE control rate, and pleural progression-free survival (PPFS), while the secondary outcomes were PFS, overall survival (OS), changes to the lung volume and thoracic cage, and safety profiles.

RESULTS

A total of 21 cases were collected, and all were evaluable for response, including 15 chemotherapy-naïve patients and 6 who experienced relapse. The median cycle of treatments was 7 (1-42) and 5 (2-6) for bevacizumab and chemotherapy, respectively. The MPE RR reached 81.0%. The MPE control rate at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 95.2%, 90.0%, 89.5%, 73.7%, and 43.8%, respectively. Median PPFS was significantly longer than PFS (22.2 vs. 7.8 months; P = 0.044), and median OS was 25.8 months. Nineteen (90.5%) patients experienced lung re-expansion after treatment. Only one (4.8%) patient suffered thoracic volume decrease during treatment and the follow-up period. No unexpected adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated efficacious, persistence, and safety in controlling lung cancer-induced MPE, indicating a potential superior therapeutic option.

Role of bevacizumab in the management of the patient with malignant pleural effusion: more questions than answers

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a feature of metastatic cancer associated with significant morbidity and cost. The typical management of MPE is systemic chemotherapy and mechanical intervention. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an inducer of vascular permeability, has been shown to mediate fluid formation. Therefore, bevacizumab, an inhibitor of VEGF, offers theoretical promise for abolishing fluid formation in MPE. Areas covered: This review begins with a summary of VEGF physiology and evidence of its role in MPE pathogenesis. This is followed by an overview of bevacizumab and major trials that put it on the map of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The majority of the article is devoted to a review of the current evidence base for the use of bevacizumab for MPE control in metastatic pleural malignancy. The review concludes with considerations of patient selection and toxicity. Expert commentary: Evidence in support of bevacizumab administration for MPE management remains flawed. Small studies suggest efficacy of both intravenous and intrapleural routes, but their design raises bias concerns. Bevacizumab appears to be safe in properly selected cases. The future of MPE management may de-emphasize VEGF inhibition in favor of precise molecular therapeutics that could address the root cause of tumorigenesis.

Bevacizumab for ramucirumab refractory malignant pleural effusion in non-small cell lung cancer: a case report and review of the literature

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a major problem associated with advanced non-small cell lung cancer for which an optimum treatment strategy has yet to be determined. Notably, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling has been found to influence MPE, and bevacizumab, a VEGF ligand inhibitor, can effectively control MPE. Ramucirumab, a human monoclonal antibody specific for VEGF receptor-2, has recently been approved for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, it remains unclear which of these agents more effectively control MPE.We describe a case of a 68-year-old man with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in whom ramucirumab plus docetaxel-refractory MPE was responsive to bevacizumab plus docetaxel combination therapy. The patient's MPE progressed after two cycles of ramucirumab plus docetaxel second-line chemotherapy. After switching to bevacizumab plus docetaxel, a computed tomography scan revealed a decreased MPE after two cycles of treatment.Bevacizumab may be more effective for treating MPE. However, further investigations are still warranted to determine the optimal VEGF-targeted agent for this condition.

Management of malignant pleural effusion: challenges and solutions

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a sign of advanced cancer and is associated with significant symptom burden and mortality. To date, management has been palliative in nature with a focus on draining the pleural space, with therapies aimed at preventing recurrence or providing intermittent drainage through indwelling catheters. Given that patients with MPEs are heterogeneous with respect to their cancer type and response to systemic therapy, functional status, and pleural milieu, response to MPE therapy is also heterogeneous and difficult to predict. Furthermore, the impact of therapies on important patient outcomes has only recently been evaluated consistently in clinical trials and cohort studies. In this review, we examine patient outcomes that have been studied to date, address the question of which are most important for managing patients, and review the literature related to the expected value for money (cost-effectiveness) of indwelling pleural catheters relative to traditionally recommended approaches.

[Application of Bevacizumab in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

At present, non-small cell lung cancer is one of the highest incidence of cancers in the world, and its incidence increased year by year, this situation prompted people to continue to seek a variety of treatment in order to extend the survival of patients and improve the quality of life of patients. This review aims to discuss the progress of bevacizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, through the clinical data so far to explore the clinical use of the drug, the choice of patients and the future direction of development.

Best Practices in Treatment Selection for Patients With Advanced NSCLC

Worldwide, lung cancer is the most prevalent form of cancer, and its non-small-cell subtype constitutes up to 85% of cases. Overall, lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States for both sexes, and its 5-year survival rate is 17%. It is a heterogeneous disease characterized by a variety of biomarkers and differing histologies. Non-small-cell lung cancer may be squamous or nonsquamous in nature and fueled by a number of oncodrivers. Obtaining sufficient tissue during biopsy to perform thorough biomarker testing is a challenge but essential for the modern, targeted therapeutic environment. Although platinum-based doublets still play a major role in first-line treatment, novel therapeutic agent targeting BRAF, EGFR, ALK, and ROS1, as well as agents targeting the T790M mutation, may offer options for patients whose disease fails to respond to initial therapy or relapses following an initial response. The emergence of immunotherapy as second-line standard therapy has changed the treatment paradigm. Some patients will have more favorable outcomes in the first-line setting with immunotherapy. However, managing lung cancer has become more complex than it was 15 years ago when the challenge of treatment was seen as being only binary, ie, small-cell vs non-small-cell disease.