Genetic association of gemcitabine/carboplatin-induced leukopenia and neutropenia in non-small cell lung cancer patients using whole-exome sequencing

Enhancer mutations modulate the severity of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression

Non-small cell lung cancer is often diagnosed at advanced stages, and many patients are still treated with classical chemotherapy. The unselective nature of chemotherapy often results in severe myelosuppression. Previous studies showed that protein-coding mutations could not fully explain the predisposition to myelosuppression. Here, we investigate the possible role of enhancer mutations in myelosuppression susceptibility. We produced transcriptome and promoter-interaction maps (using HiCap) of three blood stem-like cell lines treated with carboplatin or gemcitabine. Taking advantage of publicly available enhancer datasets, we validated HiCap results in silico and in living cells using epigenetic CRISPR technology. We also developed a network approach for interactome analysis and detection of differentially interacting genes. Differential interaction analysis provided additional information on relevant genes and pathways for myelosuppression compared with differential gene expression analysis at the bulk level. Moreover, we showed that enhancers of differentially interacting genes are highly enriched for variants associated with differing levels of myelosuppression. Altogether, our work represents a prominent example of integrative transcriptome and gene regulatory datasets analysis for the functional annotation of noncoding mutations.

Microbiota-derived 3-IAA influences chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is expected to be the second most deadly cancer by 2040, owing to the high incidence of metastatic disease and limited responses to treatment1,2. Less than half of all patients respond to the primary treatment for PDAC, chemotherapy3,4, and genetic alterations alone cannot explain this5. Diet is an environmental factor that can influence the response to therapies, but its role in PDAC is unclear. Here, using shotgun metagenomic sequencing and metabolomic screening, we show that the microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolite indole-3-acetic acid (3-IAA) is enriched in patients who respond to treatment. Faecal microbiota transplantation, short-term dietary manipulation of tryptophan and oral 3-IAA administration increase the efficacy of chemotherapy in humanized gnotobiotic mouse models of PDAC. Using a combination of loss- and gain-of-function experiments, we show that the efficacy of 3-IAA and chemotherapy is licensed by neutrophil-derived myeloperoxidase. Myeloperoxidase oxidizes 3-IAA, which in combination with chemotherapy induces a downregulation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS)-degrading enzymes glutathione peroxidase 3 and glutathione peroxidase 7. All of this results in the accumulation of ROS and the downregulation of autophagy in cancer cells, which compromises their metabolic fitness and, ultimately, their proliferation. In humans, we observed a significant correlation between the levels of 3-IAA and the efficacy of therapy in two independent PDAC cohorts. In summary, we identify a microbiota-derived metabolite that has clinical implications in the treatment of PDAC, and provide a motivation for considering nutritional interventions during the treatment of patients with cancer.

Evaluation of cfDNA as an early detection assay for dense tissue breast cancer

A cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assay would be a promising approach to early cancer diagnosis, especially for patients with dense tissues. Consistent cfDNA signatures have been observed for many carcinogens. Recently, investigations of cfDNA as a reliable early detection bioassay have presented a powerful opportunity for detecting dense tissue screening complications early. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the potential of characterizing cfDNA as a central element in the early detection of dense tissue breast cancer (BC). Plasma samples were collected from 32 consenting subjects with dense tissue and positive mammograms, 20 with positive biopsies and 12 with negative biopsies. After screening and before biopsy, cfDNA was extracted, and whole-genome next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on all samples. Copy number alteration (CNA) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)/insertion/deletion (Indel) analyses were performed to characterize cfDNA. In the positive-positive subjects (cases), a total of 5 CNAs overlapped with 5 previously reported BC-related oncogenes (KSR2, MAP2K4, MSI2, CANT1 and MSI2). In addition, 1 SNP was detected in KMT2C, a BC oncogene, and 9 others were detected in or near 10 genes (SERAC1, DAGLB, MACF1, NVL, FBXW4, FANK1, KCTD4, CAVIN1; ATP6V0A1 and ZBTB20-AS1) previously associated with non-BC cancers. For the positive–negative subjects (screening), 3 CNAs were detected in BC genes (ACVR2A, CUL3 and PIK3R1), and 5 SNPs were identified in 6 non-BC cancer genes (SNIP1, TBC1D10B, PANK1, PRKCA and RUNX2; SUPT3H). This study presents evidence of the potential of using cfDNA somatic variants as dense tissue BC biomarkers from a noninvasive liquid bioassay for early cancer detection.

The association of four genetic variants with myelosuppression in gemcitabine-treated Japanese is not evident in gemcitabine/carboplatin-treated Swedes

Gemcitabine/carboplatin‐induced myelosuppressive adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are clinical problems leading to patient suffering and dose alterations. There is a need for personalised medicine to improve treatment effects and patients' well‐being. We tested four genetic variants, rs11141915, rs1901440, rs12046844 and rs11719165, previously suggested as potential biomarkers for gemcitabine‐induced leukopenia/neutropenia in Japanese patients, in 213 Swedish gemcitabine/carboplatin‐treated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. DNA was genotyped using TaqMan probes and real‐time PCR. The relationships between the risk alleles and low toxicity (non‐ADR: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grades 0) or high toxicity (ADR: CTCAE grades 3–4) of platelets, leukocytes and neutrophils were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. The risk alleles did not correlate with myelosuppression, and the strongest borderline significance (not withstanding adjustment for multiple testing) was for rs1901440 (neutropenia, p = 0.043) and rs11719165 (leukopenia, p = 0.049) where the risk alleles trended towards lower toxicity, contrasting with previous study findings. Risk alleles and higher risk scores were more common among our patients. We conclude that the genetic variants do not apply to Swedish patients treated with gemcitabine/carboplatin. However, they can still be important in other populations and cohorts, especially in a gemcitabine monotherapy setting, where the causal genetic variation might influence myelosuppressive ADRs.

JMJD1C knockdown affects myeloid cell lines proliferation, viability, and gemcitabine/carboplatin-sensitivity

OBJECTIVES

Chemotherapy-induced hematological toxicities are potentially life-threatening adverse drug reactions that vary between individuals. Recently, JMJD1C has been associated with gemcitabine/carboplatin-induced thrombocytopenia in non-small-cell lung cancer patients, making it a candidate marker for predicting the risk of toxicity. This study investigates if JMJD1C knockdown affects gemcitabine/carboplatin-sensitivity in cell lines.

METHODS

Lentiviral transduction-mediated shRNA knockdown of JMJD1C in the cell lines K562 and MEG-01 were performed using shRNA#32 and shRNA#33. The knockdown was evaluated using qPCR. Cell proliferation, viability, and gemcitabine/carboplatin-sensitivity were subsequently determined using cell counts, trypan blue, and the MTT assay.

RESULTS

ShRNA#33 resulted in JMJD1C downregulation by 56.24% in K562 and 68.10% in MEG-01. Despite incomplete knockdown, proliferation (reduction of cell numbers by 61-68%, day 7 post-transduction) and viability (reduction by 21-53%, day 7 post-transduction) were impaired in K562 and MEG-01 cells. Moreover, JMJD1C knockdown reduced the gemcitabine IC50-value for K562 cells (P < 0.01) and MEG-01 cells (P < 0.05) compared to scrambled shRNA control transduced cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that JMJD1C is essential for proliferation, survival, and viability of K562 and MEG-01 cells. Further, JMJD1C also potentially affects the cells gemcitabine/carboplatin-sensitivity. Although further research is required, the findings show that JMJD1C could have an influential role for gemcitabine/carboplatin-sensitivity.