Prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) in locally advanced NSCLC treated with simultaneous radiochemotherapy in the randomized, multicenter, phase III German Intergroup lung Trial (GILT)

Spatial tertiary lymphoid structures imply response to anti-PD-1 plus anlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Despite breakthroughs of immunotherapy synergistically combined with blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, several patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience non-response or followed relapse. Organized lymphoid aggregates, termed tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), are found to be associated with improved response to immunotherapy. Here, we explore the landscapes of TLSs in tumour tissues from a real-world retrospective study. Our investigation showed that with a median follow-up of 11.2 months, the ORR was 28.6% (18/63, 95% CI 17.9-41.3) and the median PFS was 6.1 (95% CI 5.5-6.6) months in NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade combined with anlotinib. By multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) analysis, spatially, more TLSs and high CD20+ B-cell ratio in TLSs were associated with higher ORR. High density of intratumoral CD8+ T cells showed better ORR and PFS. The numbers of CD8+ T cells with a distance within 20 μm and 20-50 μm between tumour cells were higher in responders than non-responders. But responders had significantly higher TLSs within 20 μm rather than within 20-50 μm of tumour cells than non-responders. The inflamed immunophenotyping occupied higher proportions in responders and was associated with better PFS. Besides, tumour cells in non-responders were found more temporal cell-in-cell structures than responders, which could protect inner cells from T-cell attacks. Taken together, landscape of TLSs and proximity architecture may imply superior responses to PD-1 blockade combined with anlotinib for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Beyond PACIFIC: Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Durvalumab According to Treatment Received and PD-L1 Expression

Adjuvant durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A post hoc exploratory analysis of PACIFIC revealed no OS benefit in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup. This retrospective analysis assesses the real-world impact of durvalumab on OS according to PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). Patients with stage III, unresectable NSCLC treated by CRT, with available PD-L1 TPS, from 1 March 2018 to 31 December 2020, at BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada were included. Patients were divided into two groups, CRT + durvalumab and CRT alone. OS and PFS were analyzed in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% and <1% subgroups. A total of 134 patients were included in the CRT + durvalumab group and 117, in the CRT alone group. Median OS was 35.9 months in the CRT + durvalumab group and 27.4 months in the CRT alone group [HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83), p = 0.003]. Durvalumab improved OS in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% [HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.34-0.81), p = 0.003, n = 175], but not in the <1% subgroup [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.44-1.42), p = 0.4, n = 76]. This retrospective study demonstrates a statistically significant improvement in OS associated with durvalumab after CRT in PD-L1 ≥ 1%, but not PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Variables not accounted for may have biased the survival analysis. A prospective study would bring more insight.

Immunoscore immune checkpoint using spatial quantitative analysis of CD8 and PD-L1 markers is predictive of the efficacy of anti- PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies (mAbs) are approved immunotherapy agents to treat metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Only a minority of patients responds to these treatments and biomarkers predicting response are currently lacking.

METHODS

Immunoscore-Immune-Checkpoint (Immunoscore-IC), an in vitro diagnostic test, was used on 471 routine single FFPE-slides, and the duplex-immunohistochemistry CD8 and PD-L1 staining was quantified using digital-pathology. Analytical validation was performed on two independent cohorts of 206 NSCLC patients. Quantitative parameters related to cell location, number, proximity and clustering were analysed. The Immunoscore-IC was applied on a first cohort of metastatic NSCLC patients (n = 133), treated with anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 mAbs. Another independent cohort (n = 132) served as validation.

FINDINGS

Anti-PDL1 clone (HDX3) has similar characteristics as anti-PD-L1 clones (22C3, SP263). Densities of PD-L1+ cells, CD8+ cells and distances between CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells were quantified and the Immunoscore-IC classification was computed. Using univariate Cox model, 5 histological dichotomised variables (CD8 free of PD-L1+ cells, CD8 clusters, CD8 cells in proximity of PD-L1 cells, CD8 density and PD-L1 cells in proximity of CD8 cells) were significantly associated with Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (all P < 0.0001). Immunoscore-IC classification improved the discriminating power of prognostic model, which included clinical variables and pathologist PD-L1 assessment. In two categories, the Immunoscore-IC risk-score was significantly associated with patients' PFS (HR = 0.39, 95% CI (0.26-0.59), P < 0.0001) and Overall Survival (OS) (HR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.27-0.65), P < 0.0001) in the training-set. Further increased hazard ratios (HR) were found when stratifying patients into three-category Immunoscore-IC (IS-IC). All patients with Low-IS-IC progressed in less than 18 months, whereas PFS at 36 months were 34% and 33% of High-IS-IC patients in the training and validation sets, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Immunoscore-IC is a powerful tool to predict the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with NSCLC.

FUNDING

Veracyte, INSERM, Labex Immuno-Oncology, Transcan ERAnet European project, ARC, SIRIC, CARPEM, Ligue Contre le Cancer, ANR, QNRF, INCa France, Louis Jeantet Prize Foundation.

TFG-β Nuclear Staining as a Potential Relapse Risk Factor in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Nowadays, the impact of the tumor-immune microenvironment (TME) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis and treatment response remains unclear. Thus, we evaluated the expression of PD-L1, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) in NSCLC to identify differences in TME, detect possible new prognostic factors, and assess their relationship. We retrospectively analyzed 55 samples from patients who underwent NSCLC surgery and had over a 5-year follow-up. PD-L1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry following standard techniques. The presence of TILs was evaluated at low magnification and classified into two categories, “intense” and “non-intense”. Cytoplasmic TGF-β staining visualization was divided into four categories, and unequivocal nuclear staining in >1% of viable tumor cells was defined as “present” or “absent”. Our aim was to identify differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumor stage was the only objective prognostic factor for OS. PD-L1 expression and the presence of TILs had no prognostic impact, neither their combination. There seems to be a lower expression of PD-L1 and a higher expression of TILs in early stages of the disease. Our TGF-β nuclear staining analysis was promising, since it was associated with worse DFS, revealing this protein as a possible prognostic biomarker of recurrence for resectable NSCLC.

Immunotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: state of the art and novel therapeutic approaches

The standard of care for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by 1 year of adjuvant durvalumab. Despite the survival benefit granted by immunotherapy in this setting, only 1/3 of patients are alive and disease free at 5 years. Novel treatment strategies are under development to improve patient outcomes in this setting: different anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-PD-(L)1] antibodies after CCRT, consolidation immunotherapy after sequential chemoradiotherapy, induction immunotherapy before CCRT and immunotherapy concurrent with CCRT and/or sequential chemoradiotherapy. Cross-trial comparison is particularly challenging in this setting due to the different timing of immunotherapy delivery and different patients' inclusion and exclusion criteria. In this review, we present the results of clinical trials investigating immune therapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC and discuss in-depth their biological rationale, their pitfalls and potential benefits. Particular emphasis is placed on the potential mechanisms of synergism between chemotherapy, radiation therapy and different monoclonal antibodies, and how this affects the tumor immune microenvironment. The designs and questions tackled by ongoing clinical trials are also discussed. Last, we address open questions and unmet clinical needs, such as the necessity for predictive biomarkers (e.g. radiomics and circulating tumor DNA). Identifying distinct subsets of patients to tailor anticancer treatment is a priority, especially in a heterogeneous disease such as stage III NSCLC.

Predictive value of post-treatment C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUNDS

The PACIFIC trial established durvalumab consolidation therapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, little is known about the predictive factors of durvalumab efficacy in this population. This study aimed to validate the predictive use of inflammation-related parameters in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CCRT plus durvalumab.

METHODS

We recruited 76 LA-NSCLC patients who received CCRT followed by durvalumab from 10 Japanese institutions. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) were measured before (pre-treatment) and 2 months after (post-treatment) durvalumab induction. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to examine prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) after durvalumab therapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 17 (range, 3.3-35.8) months. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 26.1 and 33.7 months, respectively. Durvalumab was discontinued in 47 (61.8%) patients, with non-infectious pneumonitis being the most common reason. Post-treatment CAR (cutoff, 0.2) was a significant stratifying factor in survival comparison (<0.2 vs. ≥ 0.2, median PFS, not-reached vs. 9.6 months. Log-rank, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model showed that post-treatment CAR was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio, 3.16, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that post-treatment CAR has predictive value for LA-NSCLC patients treated with CCRT plus durvalumab consolidation therapy.

Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps

Diminutive and small colorectal polyps are common findings during colonoscopies, and rarely contain dysplastic elements and progress to colorectal cancer. With improving technology and the advent of artificial intelligence, detection rates of small or diminutive polyps and adenomas are rising, resulting in increasing costs associated with colonoscopy. Incomplete resection rates are an outcome of interest because it correlates with interval colorectal cancer. More effort is warranted to standardize training programs and sensitize endoscopists to the importance of personal performance as a quality metric of colonoscopy. This article reviews indications, methods, and recent developments in polypectomy for small and diminutive polyps.