Real-world treatment patterns and survival of patients with ROS1 rearranged stage IV non-squamous NSCLC in the Netherlands

Population-Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Repotrectinib Among Patients with ROS1+ NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Head-to-head evidence comparing repotrectinib against other approved ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is not currently available. The objective of this study was to indirectly compare progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate (ORR), and the duration of response (DoR) for repotrectinib vs. crizotinib and vs. entrectinib in patients with TKI-naïve ROS1+ locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).

METHODS

Using evidence from a systematic literature review, unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were used to estimate population-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and DoR and odds ratios (ORs) for ORR for repotrectinib vs. crizotinib and vs. entrectinib among patients with TKI-naïve aNSCLC. The MAICs were adjusted for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics that were pre-specified as being prognostic or predictive of treatment effects. Weighted Cox (for PFS and DoR) and logistic (for ORR) regression models were fit. Supplementary analyses (SAs) explored the impact of missing data and modeling assumptions on effect estimates.

RESULTS

The evidence base was formed by TRIDENT-1 EXP-1 (repotrectinib; N = 71), a pooled set of five trials involving crizotinib (N = 273), and the pooled ALKA-372-001/STARTRK-1 and -2 trials (entrectinib; N = 168). After population adjustment, repotrectinib was associated with statistically significant improvements in PFS relative to crizotinib (HR = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29, 0.67) and entrectinib (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.91). Differences in ORR and DoR were not statistically significant but numerically favored repotrectinib. SAs were consistent with the main analyses across all comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis demonstrated the strong benefits of repotrectinib in PFS, which was robust across different SAs and supported by numerically favorable results for DoR (where available) and ORR. These results, alongside the published TRIDENT-1 clinical data, further support repotrectinib as a potential new standard of care for TKI-naïve patients with ROS1+ aNSCLC.

Targeted treatment and survival in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients - a nationwide and longitudinal study

Objectives

We aimed to describe treatment patterns, time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced non-squamous, EGFR+, ALK+ and ROS1+ NSCLC in Norway.

Materials and methods

We extracted data on patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with advanced non-squamous NSCLC between 2015 and 2022 from the Cancer Registry of Norway and data on cancer drug therapy from the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Prescribed Drug Registry. ToT was measured from the date treatment was collected or administered until the last dispensing was depleted or last hospital drug administration. OS was measured from date of diagnosis until death.

Results

In total, 5,279 patients were included, of whom 449 EGFR+, 131 ALK+ and 38 ROS1+. 75% of EGFR+ patients, 88% of ALK+ patients, and 58% of ROS1+ patients received at least one systemic treatment within the first three months after diagnosis. Median follow-up was 13, 19, and 4 months for EGFR+, ALK+, and ROS1+, respectively. The median ToT in first line (1L) for EGFR+ patients was 11 months for osimertinib (CI: 10.1-NA) and 9 months (CI: 8.2-11.2) for afatinib, dacomitinib, erlotinib and gefitinib. For ALK+ patients, median ToT in 1L was 20 months (CI: 14.7-23.7for alectinib, 11 months (CI: 4.7-NA) for brigatinib, and 7 months (CI: 2.9-21.6) for crizotinib. For the five ROS1+ patients treated with crizotinib in 1L, median ToT was 5 months (CI: 2.4-NA). For all patients with a targetable genomic alteration, unadjusted median OS was higher (p-value = 0.025) for patients diagnosed in 2020-2022 (median OS: 23 months, CI: 19.5-NA) compared to patients diagnosed in 2015-2019 (median: 19 months, CI: 16.5-21.2).

Conclusions

ToT for targeted therapies was shorter than progression-free survival in clinical trials. However, patients eligible for targeted therapy still had a survival improvement during the study period.

Transcriptomic analysis of ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer reveals an upregulation of nucleotide synthesis and cell adhesion pathways

Introduction

The transcriptomic characteristics of ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent a crucial aspect of its tumor biology. These features provide valuable insights into key dysregulated pathways, potentially leading to the discovery of novel targetable alterations or biomarkers.

Methods

From The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, all available ROS1+ (n = 10), ALK+ (n = 5) and RET+ (n = 5) NSCLC tumor and ROS1+ cell line (n = 7) RNA-sequencing files were collected. In addition, 10 healthy lung RNA-seq samples were included. Differential gene expression with DESeq2 (R package) and gene co-expression (WGCNA, R package) analyses were performed. Functional annotation was performed through Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) using Webgestalt and RNAseqChef, Over-Representation Analysis (ORA) through Enrichr. iRegulon was used to identify enriched transcription factors that regulate a gene co-expression module.

Results

ROS1+ NSCLC samples were significantly enriched for the nucleotide synthesis and cell adhesion KEGG pathways compared to ALK+ and RET+ samples. Moreover, NOTCH1 was significantly downregulated in ROS1+ NSCLC and PD-L1 was weakly expressed. When comparing ROS1+ tumor versus cell line transcriptomes, an upregulation of MYC and MET was found in cell lines together with a significantly decreased expression of HER3, HER4 and BRAF. Within ROS1-tumors, GJB2 was overexpressed in the CD74- and CLTC-ROS1+ subgroups. The differential expression of IL20RB and GJB2 in cell lines was confirmed through RT-qPCR. Finally, the gene co-expression analysis unveils a gene cluster involving cell cycle-related genes which significantly correlates with the disease stage of patients. In addition, we propose TFDP1 and ISL1 as key ROS1-specific transcription factors.

Conclusion

This study highlights cell adhesion and nucleotide synthesis as crucial signatures in ROS1+ NSCLC. The upregulation of GJB2 may serve as a prognostic biomarker, along with IL20RB, a known mediator of bone metastases. Furthermore, TDFP1 and ISL1 were identified as relevant transcription factors that could potentially regulate the biological processes in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC.

Association of mutation profiles with metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

This study focused on the analysis of the correlation between common gene mutation types and metastatic sites in NSCLC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 1586 NSCLC patients and used fluorescence Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect EGFR, ALK, ROS1, RET, MET, BRAF, HER2, KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA gene mutations, and also investigated sex, smoking status, age at diagnosis, histological type and TNM stage. In addition, we analyzed the site of metastasis in patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Results

The EGFR-mutation group more frequently metastasized to lung (18.9%, P = 0.004), brain (18.9%, P = 0.001) and bone (27.1%, P = 0.004) than wild-type patients. ALK-mutation group (71.0%, P < 0.001), BRAF-mutation group (82.4%, P = 0.005) and NRAS-mutation group (100%, P = 0.025) were more likely to metastasize than the wild-type group. In the ALK mutation, lung metastasis (24.2%, P = 0.013), brain (24.2%, P = 0.007), bone metastasis (32.3%, P = 0.024), liver metastasis (19.4%, P = 0.001), and pleural metastasis (29.0%, P = 0.021) were common. In the KRAS-mutation group, lung metastasis (21.7%, P = 0.012) and brain metastasis (23.3%, P = 0.001) were more common. Less metastasis occurred in the HER2-mutation group (28.3%, P = 0.014). There was no difference in the RET, MET and PIK3CA mutations.

Conclusion

Patients with ALK mutant, BRAF mutant or NRAS mutant were more prone to metastasis, while the HER 2 mutation group was less metastatic. Patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC are more likely to develop bone, lung, or brain metastasis.

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring ROS1 Rearrangement: Real World Testing Practices, Characteristics and Treatment Patterns (ROS1REAL Study)

ROS1 rearrangements are considered rare in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective real-world study aimed to evaluate first-line treatment with crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) standard of care vs. new generation ROS1 anti-cancer agents. Forty-nine ROS1-expressing NSCLC patients, diagnosed with advanced metastatic disease, were included. Molecular profiling using either FISH/CISH or NGS was performed on tissue samples. Twenty-eight patients were treated with crizotinib, while fourteen patients were administered newer drugs (entrectinib, repotrectinib) and seven patients received platinum-doublet chemotherapy in a first-line setting. Overall response rate and disease control rate for the crizotinib and entrectinb/repotrectinib cohort were 68% and 82% vs. 86% and 93%, respectively. Median progression free survival was 1.6 years (95% CI 1.15-2.215) for the crizotinib treatment vs. 2.35 years for the entrectinib/repotrectinib cohort (95% CI 1.19-3.52). Central nervous system progression was noted in 20% and 25% of the crizotinib and entrectinib/repotrectinib cohorts, respectively. This multi-center study presents real-world treatment patterns of ROS1 NSCLC population, indicating that crizotinib exhibited comparable results to entrectinib/repotrectinib in a first-line setting, although both response rate and survival was numerically longer with treatment with newer agents.

Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer: Recommendations and Update

Adoption of molecular testing in lung cancer is increasing. Molecular testing for staging and prediction of response for targeted therapy remain the main indications, and although utilization of blood-based testing for tumor is growing, the use of the diagnostic cytology and tissue specimens is equally important. The pathologist needs to optimize reflex testing, incorporate stage-based algorithms, and understand types of tests for timely and complete assessment in the majority of cases. When tissue is limited, testing should capture the most frequent alterations to maximize the yield of what are largely mutually exclusive alterations, avoiding the need for repeat biopsy.

Lung adenocarcinoma patients with ROS1-rearranged tumors by sex and smoking intensity

Background

ROS1 rearrangements (ROS1+) define a distinct molecular subset of lung adenocarcinomas. ROS1 + tumors are known to occur more in never-smokers, but the frequency and outcome of ROS1 positivity by sex and smoking intensity are not clearly documented.

Patients and methods

This patient cohort study included all never- (<100 cigarettes lifetime) and light- (100 cigarettes-20 pack-years) smokers, and a sample of heavy-smokers. ROS1 + rates by sex and smoking intensity were compared within and beyond our study. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Of the 571 total patients, ROS1 + was detected in 24 (4.2%): 6.4% in men and 3.0% in women; 5.1% in never-, 5.7% in light-, and 1.8% in heavy-smokers (P=0.05). Among the 209 stage IIIB-IV patients, men had much higher ROS1 + rate (11.1%) not only than women (1.7%, P=0.004) in our study, but also than men (0.4%-1.8%) in 8 published studies (Ps = 0.0019-0.0001). ROS1+ rates were similar between never- (9.3%) and light-smokers (8.1%) and significantly lower in heavy-smokers (1.2%, P=0.017), a finding confirmed by 6 published studies (Ps = 0.041-0.0001). Overall survival of ROS1 + patients were significantly better than the ROS1- (P=0.023) mainly due to targeted therapy. Among patients who exhibited resistance to crizotinib, follow-up treatment of entrectinib and lorlatinib showed remarkable survival benefits.

Conclusions

The ROS1 + rates were higher in men than in women, and similar in never- and light-smokers, more pronounced in stage IIIB-IV patients. Newer-generation ALK/ROS1-targeted drugs showed efficacy in a cohort of crizotinib resistant ROS1 + patients. These results, when validated, could assist efficiently accruing ROS1 + patients.

Overall survival and central nervous system activity of crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged lung cancer-final results of the EUCROSS trial

BACKGROUND

In 2019, we reported the first efficacy and safety analysis of EUCROSS, a phase II trial investigating crizotinib in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer. At that time, overall survival (OS) was immature and the effect of crizotinib on intracranial disease control remained unclear. Here, we present the final analysis of OS, systemic and intracranial activity, and the impact of co-occurring aberrations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EUCROSS was a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.1. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and efficacy in pre-defined subgroups.

RESULTS

Median OS of the intention-to-treat population (N = 34) was 54.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.3 months-not reached (NR); median follow-up 81.4 months] and median all-cause PFS of the response-evaluable population (N = 30) was 19.4 months (95% CI 10.1-32.2 months). Time on treatment was significantly correlated with OS (R = 0.82; P < 0.0001). Patients with co-occurring TP53 aberrations (28%) had a significantly shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 11; 95% CI 2.0-56.0; P = 0.006] and all-cause PFS (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2-15; P = 0.025). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement at baseline (N = 6; 20%) had a numerically shorter median OS and all-cause PFS. Median intracranial PFS was 32.2 months (95% CI 23.7 months-NR) and the rate of isolated CNS progression was 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our final analysis proves the efficacy of crizotinib in ROS1-positive lung cancer, but also highlights the devastating impact of TP53 mutations on survival and treatment efficacy. Additionally, our data show that CNS disease control is durable and the risk of CNS progression while on crizotinib treatment is low.