Efficacy and surgical safety of sequential surgical resection after pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for initial unresectable stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

Successful conversion surgery following tislelizumab with chemotherapy in a patient with stage IIIC lung adenocarcinoma harboring RET fusions: A case report and review of the literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a beacon of hope for most patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are no longer surgical candidates. However, the literature on the use of immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC with rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions is scant. The present study reports the case of a 61-year-old female patient, diagnosed with stage IIIC lung adenocarcinoma, exhibiting two RET gene fusions and high programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Following four treatment cycles of tislelizumab in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin, the patient was successfully downstaged, enabling radical surgery. The post-operative pathology analysis indicated a major pathologic response. This case study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of ICIs in treating locally advanced NSCLC with RET gene fusions.

Anti-PD1 based precision induction therapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II umbrella clinical trial

The efficacy and safety of induction-immunotherapy followed by surgery for unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain challenging. In this open-label, single-center, phase II clinical umbrella trial (ChiCTR2000035367), 100 unresectable Stage III NSCLC patients are enrolled. Patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% but contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy receive immuno-monotherapy. Patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% and no contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy receive immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy. Patients with PD-L1 expression between 1% and 49%, contraindications to anti-angiogenic therapy, or negative/unknown PD-L1 expression receive chemoimmunotherapy. The primary endpoint is the major pathological response (MPR) rate. Among 47 surgically-treated patients, the MPR rate is 61.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.4%-75.5%), achieving the prespecified endpoint. For secondary endpoints, the objective response rate for all patients is 54.0% (95% CI: 43.7-64.0). The median event-free survival is 29.9 months (95% CI: 17.0-42.7). Most common adverse event is anemia (49.0%). Exploratory transcriptomic analyses reveal Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Antigen 1 (BST1) as a promising biomarker for response to chemoimmunotherapy. Generally, for unresectable stage III NSCLC patients, anti-PD1 based induction-therapy according to PD-L1 expression and contraindication to antiangiogenic therapy followed by surgery is a feasible option.

Toripalimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy as perioperative therapy for initially unresectable NSCLC: An open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Perioperative treatment with toripalimab combined with chemotherapy was efficacious and safe in resectable stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, little is known about whether this treatment regimen could convert unresectable NSCLC to resectable.

METHODS

This study enrolled 40 treatment-naive patients with initially unresectable stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC. Toripalimab (240 mg) and platinum-doublet chemotherapy were administered every 3 weeks for 2-4 cycles. Surgical resection was decided after assessing the efficacy of induction therapy. The primary outcome was the R0 resection rate. The secondary outcomes included safety, overall survival, disease-free survival, event-free survival, objective response rate, major pathological response (MPR), and pathological complete response (pCR). Available baseline tumor biopsy samples were used for molecular biomarker analyses, including bulk RNA sequencing and multiplex immunostaining. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04144608.

FINDINGS

Of the 40 patients who received induction toripalimab plus chemotherapy, 29 (72.5%) patients received surgery, and all achieved R0 resection (100% R0 rate). Of these patients, 17 (58.6%) achieved MPR, with 10 (34.5%) patients evaluated as pCR. With a median follow-up of 31.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.2-39.4), the median event-free survival and overall survival were not reached. Molecular analyses revealed highly expressed gene sets for germinal center B cells (signatures of tertiary lymphoid structure [TLS]) at baseline among patients with pCR compared to patients with non-pCR, suggesting that the TLS status of the patients was associated with the induction of immunotherapy responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Toripalimab-based induction treatment of initially unresectable NSCLC yielded a high R0 rate and MPR rate, with a good safety profile and encouraging survival outcomes.

FUNDING

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Perioperative immune checkpoint blockades improve prognosis of resectable non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint blockades (ICB) have been proven to improve prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer in the neoadjuvant setting, while whether its perioperative use could bring extra benefit remained unidentified. We aimed to demonstrate the prognostic benefit of perioperative ICB over preoperative-only use and investigate who could benefit from this 'sandwich ICB therapy'.

METHODS

Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery from 2018 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and were divided into 4 groups based on the perioperative regimens: pre-ICB + post-computed tomography (CT), pre-ICB-only, pre-CT + post-ICB and pre-CT-only. Treatment-related adverse events, surgical outcomes, therapeutic response, recurrence-free survival and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

Of 214 enrolled patients with preoperative therapy, 108 underwent immunochemotherapy and 106 underwent platinum-based chemotherapy. Compared with preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative immunochemotherapy was demonstrated with significantly higher major pathologic response (57/108 vs 12/106) and pathologic complete response (35/108 vs 4/106) rates with comparable adverse events. Regarding survival, perioperative ICB significantly improved the recurrence-free survival [versus pre-CT-only hazard ratio (HR) 0.15; 95% CI 0.09-0.27; versus pre-ICB-only HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15-0.88] and overall survival (versus pre-CT-only HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.68). In patients without major pathologic response, perioperative ICB was observed to decrease the risk of recurrence (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.83) compared with preoperative ICB, and was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.05) for recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative ICB showed promising efficacy in improving pathological response and survival outcomes of resectable non-small cell lung cancer. For patients without major pathologic response after resection followed by preoperative ICB, sequential ICB treatment could be considered.