Novel signals mediating the functions of somatostatin: the emerging role of NO/cGMP

Somatostatin Mitigates Gastric Mucosal Damage Induced by LPS in a Male Wistar Rat Model of Sepsis

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding from erosive gastritis remains associated with high mortality in septic or postoperative patients. While stress ulcer bleeding has declined, it still occurs in septic patients and is considered a manifestation of intestinal failure within multi-organ failure syndrome. The integrity of the gastric mucosal barrier plays a crucial role in protection against this condition. Somatostatin (SS) appears as a biomolecule with cytoprotective properties. We aimed to investigate whether SS treatment protected the gastric mucosa in a rat model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis. Rats received LPS (10 mg/kg) intraperitoneally, followed by saline or SS (200 μg/kg; 5 mL/kg) treatment after 30 min (early treatment group) or 120 min (late treatment group). Control rats received only saline. Two hours after saline or SS administration (total procedure duration of 150 or 240 min), gastric lavage, gastric mucosa, and plasma samples were collected for analysis. SS treatment mitigated the LPS-induced gastric mucosal barrier disruption preserving phosphatidylcholine (PC) levels, as well as decreasing leukocyte infiltration marker myeloperoxidase (MPO), inflammation-related enzyme phospholipase A2 (PLA2), and lipid peroxidation indicator malondialdehyde (MDA). SS also reduced arachidonic acid-related metabolites thromboxane B2 (TXB2) and leukotriene B4 (LTB4) while increasing prostaglandin I2 (PGI2). SS treatment effectively maintained gastric mucosal integrity, reducing inflammation, and modulating arachidonic acid metabolites. These findings suggest that SS may serve as a therapeutic agent for preserving gastric mucosal integrity and reducing inflammation in LPS-induced gastric injury.

Crosstalk of TGF-β and somatostatin signaling in adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: a brief review

Although the vast majority of cancers affecting the human pancreas are pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), there are several other cancer types originating from non-exocrine cells of this organ, i.e., pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNET). Genomic analyses of PDAC and panNET revealed that certain signaling pathways such as those triggered by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) are frequently altered, highlighting their crucial role in pancreatic tumor development. In PDAC, TGF-β plays a dual role acting as a tumor suppressor in healthy tissue and early stages of tumor development but as a promoter of tumor progression in later stages. This peptide growth factor acts as a potent inducer of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a developmental program that transforms otherwise stationary epithelial cells to invasive mesenchymal cells with enhanced metastatic potential. TGF-β signals through both the canonical Smad pathway involving the receptor-regulated Smad proteins, SMAD2 and SMAD3, and the common-mediator Smad, SMAD4, as well as Smad-independent pathways, i.e., ERK1/2, PI3K/AKT, and somatostatin (SST). Accumulating evidence indicates an intimate crosstalk between TGF-β and SST signaling, not only in PDAC but, more recently, also in panNET. In this work, we review the available evidence on signaling interactions between both pathways, which we believe are of potential but as yet insufficiently appreciated importance for pancreatic cancer development and/or progression as well as novel therapeutic approaches.

Peptide receptor targeting in cancer: the somatostatin paradigm

Peptide receptors involved in pathophysiological processes represent promising therapeutic targets. Neuropeptide somatostatin (SST) is produced by specialized cells in a large number of human organs and tissues. SST primarily acts as inhibitor of endocrine and exocrine secretion via the activation of five G-protein-coupled receptors, named sst1–5, while in central nervous system, SST acts as a neurotransmitter/neuromodulator, regulating locomotory and cognitive functions. Critical points of SST/SST receptor biology, such as signaling pathways of individual receptor subtypes, homo- and heterodimerization, trafficking, and cross-talk with growth factor receptors, have been extensively studied, although functions associated with several pathological conditions, including cancer, are still not completely unraveled. Importantly, SST exerts antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects on cancer cells in vitro, and on experimental tumors in vivo. Moreover, SST agonists are clinically effective as antitumor agents for pituitary adenomas and gastro-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, SST receptors being expressed by tumor cells of various tumor histotypes, their pharmacological use is potentially extendible to other cancer types, although to date no significant results have been obtained. In this paper the most recent findings on the expression and functional roles of SST and SST receptors in tumor cells are discussed.

Neuroendocrine alterations in the fragile X mouse

The expression of GABA(A) receptors in the fragile X mouse brain is significantly downregulated. We additionally found that the expression of somatostatin and voltage-sensitive calcium channels (VSCCs) is also reduced. GABA(A) and the VSCCs, through a synergistic interaction, perform a critical role in mediating activity-dependent developmental processes. In the developing brain, GABA is excitatory and its actions are mediated through GABA(A) receptors. Subsequent to GABA-mediated depolarization, the VSCCs are activated and intracellular calcium is increased, which mediates gene transcription and other cellular events. GABAergic excitation mediated through GABA(A) receptors and the subsequent activation of the VSCCs are critically important for the establishment of neuronal connectivity within immature neuronal networks. Data from our laboratories suggest that there is a dysregulation of axonal pathfinding during development in the fragile X mouse brain and that this is likely due to a dysregulation of the synergistic interactions of GABA and VSCC. Thus, we hypothesize that the altered expression of these critical channels in the early stages of brain development leads to altered activity-dependent gene expression that may potentially lead to the developmental delay characteristic of the fragile X syndrome.

Calcium and other signalling pathways in neuroendocrine regulation of somatotroph functions

Relative to mammals, the neuroendocrine control of pituitary growth hormone (GH) secretion and synthesis in teleost fish involves numerous stimulatory and inhibitory regulators, many of which are delivered to the somatotrophs via direct innervation. Among teleosts, how multifactorial regulation of somatotroph functions are mediated at the level of post-receptor signalling is best characterized in goldfish. Supplemented with recent findings, this review focuses on the known intracellular signal transduction mechanisms mediating the ligand- and function-specific actions in multifactorial control of GH release and synthesis, as well as basal GH secretion, in goldfish somatotrophs. These include membrane voltage-sensitive ion channels, Na(+)/H(+) antiport, Ca(2+) signalling, multiple pharmacologically distinct intracellular Ca(2+) stores, cAMP/PKA, PKC, nitric oxide, cGMP, MEK/ERK and PI3K. Signalling pathways mediating the major neuroendocrine regulators of mammalian somatotrophs, as well as those in other major teleost study model systems are also briefly highlighted. Interestingly, unlike mammals, spontaneous action potential firings are not observed in goldfish somatotrophs in culture. Furthermore, three goldfish brain somatostatin forms directly affect pituitary GH secretion via ligand-specific actions on membrane ion channels and intracellular Ca(2+) levels, as well as exert isoform-specific action on basal and stimulated GH mRNA expression, suggesting the importance of somatostatins other than somatostatin-14.

Somatostatin receptor biology in neuroendocrine and pituitary tumours: part 1--molecular pathways

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) may occur at many sites in the body although the majority occur within the gastroenteropancreatic axis. Non-gastroenteropancreatic NETs encompass phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas, medullary thyroid carcinoma, anterior pituitary tumour, broncho-pulmonary NETs and parathyroid tumours. Like most endocrine tumours, NETs also express somatostatin (SST) receptors (subtypes 1–5) whose ligand SST is known to inhibit endocrine and exocrine secretions and have anti-tumour effects. In the light of this knowledge, the idea of using SST analogues in the treatment of NETs has become increasingly popular and new studies have centred upon the development of new SST analogues. We attempt to review SST receptor (SSTR) biology primarily in neuroendocrine tissues, focusing on pituitary tumours. A full data search was performed through PubMed over the years 2000–2009 with keywords ‘somatostatin, molecular biology, somatostatin receptors, somatostatin signalling, NET, pituitary’ and all relevant publications have been included, together with selected publications prior to that date. SSTR signalling in non-neuroendocrine solid tumours is beyond the scope of this review. SST is a potent anti-proliferative and anti-secretory agent for some NETs. The successful therapeutic use of SST analogues in the treatment of these tumours depends on a thorough understanding of the diverse effects of SSTR subtypes in different tissues and cell types. Further studies will focus on critical points of SSTR biology such as homo- and heterodimerization of SSTRs and the differences between post-receptor signalling pathways of SSTR subtypes.