Grape skin flour obtained from wine processing as an antioxidant in beef burgers

The utilisation of agricultural by-products in processed meat products: Effects on physicochemical, nutritional and sensory quality - Invited Review

Several plant-based materials are discarded by the food industry due to oversupply, lack of transport, and inappropriate storage. These materials contain valuable essential micronutrients such as minerals, vitamins and bioactive components (e.g., polyphenol, tocopherols, ascorbic acid, carotenoids) with antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory effects, among others. In the context of making our agriculture-food based economy more circular and sustainable, and to develop foods with clean labels and less E-numbers, fruits, vegetables, yams, cereal distillers, oilseeds and other plant by-products could be utilised and upcycled back into new food formulations. Meat products are a particularly suitable matrix for this purpose, due to their susceptibility to lipid and protein oxidation and microbial spoilage (which shorten their shelf life). This review brings together the latest (2020-23) reformulation efforts, preservative methods and other innovative pathways, including studies on by-products as plant-based additives and bio-actives. It will cover the use of plant-based by-products as natural additives into production of processed meat products such as burgers, fermented meats and sausages, produced from ruminant and monogastric animals (except poultry). The extraction methods, inclusion levels, processing methods used and the quality of the resulting meat products will be reported, including preservative effects (microbial growth, oxidative stability and shelf life) and effects on instrumental, nutritional and sensory quality. Furthermore, it will also critically discuss the gaps identified, recommendation of the most promising ingredients for quality enhancement, and provide directions for future research.

Application of White-Wine-Pomace-Derived Ingredients in Extending Storage Stability of Fresh Pork Burgers

White wine pomace, a by-product from winemaking, was stabilized after the application of thermal blanching (with the aim of deactivating the polyphenoloxidase enzyme), milling, and processing by hydrostatic high-pressure treatment (with the aim of reducing initial microbial loads while preserving phenolic compounds content). The valorized pomace (VP) ingredient was added at different proportions to pork burgers (0.5%, 1%, and 3% w/w) to improve their preservation, and the effect was compared to those produced by sulfites and with a control (without sulfites or VP). Burgers were vacuum-packed and refrigerated for 7 days. Microbiological, color, oxidation, and sensory parameters were analyzed. Neither sulfites nor VP reduced the microbial development of most microorganism groups evaluated (p > 0.05); however, both prevented coliform growth during storage (p < 0.01). The use of sulfites prevented the discoloration of burgers during storage, while VP had no effect (p < 0.001). On the contrary, VP limited lipid and protein oxidation development during storage (p > 0.05), while sulfites had no effect. Therefore, the use of VP from white wine production could have an antioxidant effect but a limited antimicrobial or color-protective effect for the preservation of pork burgers.

Development of chicken tender pops by utilizing pomegranate peel powder

Pomegranate peel powder (PPP) is a rich source of many bioactive components particularly polyphenols that are interlinked to various technological and functional properties. In the present study, chicken tender pops were developed with incorporation of PPP, and its effect on quality attributes and storage stability of the product were evaluated. The treatments were formulated using 0%, 3%, 6%, and 9% PPP in replacement of chicken. The physicochemical properties, texture profile, instrumental color, sensory attributes, and storage stability were assessed for 21 days at refrigeration temperature, at a regular interval of 7 days. The results indicated that the inclusion of PPP significantly (p < .05) increased the dietary fiber from 0.25% in T0 to 1.45% in T3 at Day 0 and WHC 43.60% ± 0.02 in T0 to 49.36% ± 0.02 in T3 at Day 0, whereas the moisture content significantly reduced from 60.05% ± 0.03 in T0 to 55.08% ± 0.01 in T3 at the start of the study. In addition, the values of TBARS were significantly (p < .05) reduced for treated samples 0.72 mg MDA/Kg in T3 as compared to control 1.17 mg MDA/Kg on the 21st day of storage, whereas a significant increase (p < .05) in TPC from 0.90 mg GAE/g to 3.87 mg GAE/g in T0 to T3 was observed at the start of the study. For TPA, a significant (p < .05) increase was noticed in hardness, chewiness, and gumminess, whereas cohesiveness and springiness showed a non-significant (p > .05) change in treated samples in relation to control, and the instrumental color (L* and a*) decreased significantly. However, pH, crude fiber, fat, ash, and protein content showed non-significant (p > .05) variations over time. The sensory evaluation suggested that chicken tender pops supplemented with 6% PPP (T2) presented high overall acceptability and balanced organoleptic properties. Hence, it can be concluded that PPP can be effectively utilized as a natural fiber source, antioxidant, and antimicrobial agent in novel functional foods.