Khandait H, Hanif M, Ramadan A, Attia AM, Endurance E, Siddiq A, Iqbal U, Song D, Chaudhuri D. A meta-analysis of outcomes of aspiration thrombectomy for high and intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.
Curr Probl Cardiol 2024;
49:102420. [PMID:
38290623 DOI:
10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102420]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Aspiration thrombectomy has gained popularity in patients with massive and sub-massive pulmonary embolism (PE) and having contraindications to thrombolysis.
METHODS
A meta-analysis was conducted including studies on aspiration thrombectomy in patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk PE. The pooled odds ratio for efficacy parameters, including change in heart rate, blood pressure and right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio, and safety parameters including major bleeding and stroke, was calculated using a random effects model.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis of 24 selected studies revealed that intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients demonstrated significant improvements: modified Miller score odds ratio of 10.60, mean pulmonary artery pressure reduction by 0.04 mm Hg, and an overall all-cause mortality odds ratio of 0.10. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in various outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Aspiration thrombectomy has success rates in both high-risk and intermediate-risk PE, however, procedural risks, including bleeding, must be anticipated.
Collapse