1
|
Ishizaka N, Kinoshita T, Sakai M, Tanabe S, Nakano H, Tanabe S, Nakamura S, Mayumi K, Akamatsu S, Nishikata T, Takizawa T, Yamada T, Sakai H, Kaidu M, Sasamoto R, Ishikawa H, Utsunomiya S. Prediction of patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy using radiomics-based machine learning with dose distribution. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14215. [PMID: 37987544 PMCID: PMC10795425 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to develop machine learning models to predict the results of patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which were represented by several dose-evaluation metrics-including the gamma passing rates (GPRs)-and criteria based on the radiomic features of 3D dose distribution in a phantom. METHODS A total of 4,250 radiomic features of 3D dose distribution in a cylindrical dummy phantom for 140 arcs from 106 clinical VMAT plans were extracted. We obtained the following dose-evaluation metrics: GPRs with global and local normalization, the dose difference (DD) in 1% and 2% passing rates (DD1% and DD2%) for 10% and 50% dose threshold, and the distance-to-agreement in 1-mm and 2-mm passing rates (DTA1 mm and DTA2 mm) for 0.5%/mm and 1.0%.mm dose gradient threshold determined by measurement using a diode array in patient-specific QA. The machine learning regression models for predicting the values of the dose-evaluation metrics using the radiomic features were developed based on the elastic net (EN) and extra trees (ET) models. The feature selection and tuning of hyperparameters were performed with nested cross-validation in which four-fold cross-validation is used within the inner loop, and the performance of each model was evaluated in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS The RMSE and MAE for the developed machine learning models ranged from <1% to nearly <10% depending on the dose-evaluation metric, the criteria, and dose and dose gradient thresholds used for both machine learning models. It was advantageous to focus on high dose region for predicating global GPR, DDs, and DTAs. For certain metrics and criteria, it was possible to create models applicable for patients' heterogeneity by training only with dose distributions in phantom. CONCLUSIONS The developed machine learning models showed high performance for predicting dose-evaluation metrics especially for high dose region depending on the metric and criteria. Our results demonstrate that the radiomic features of dose distribution can be considered good indicators of the plan complexity and useful in predicting measured dose evaluation metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natsuki Ishizaka
- Department of RadiologyNiigata Prefectural Shibata HospitalShibata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Tomotaka Kinoshita
- Department of Radiological TechnologyNiigata University Graduate School of Health SciencesNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Madoka Sakai
- Department of RadiologyNagaoka Chuo General HospitalNagaokaNiigataJapan
- Department of Radiation OncologyNiigata University Medical and Dental HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Shunpei Tanabe
- Department of Radiation OncologyNiigata University Medical and Dental HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Hisashi Nakano
- Department of Radiation OncologyNiigata University Medical and Dental HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Satoshi Tanabe
- Department of Radiation OncologyNiigata University Medical and Dental HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Sae Nakamura
- Department of Radiation OncologyNiigata Neurosurgical HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Kazuki Mayumi
- Department of Radiological TechnologyNiigata University Graduate School of Health SciencesNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Shinya Akamatsu
- Department of Radiological TechnologyNiigata University Graduate School of Health SciencesNiigata CityNiigataJapan
- Department of RadiologyTakeda General HospitalAizuwakamatsu CityFukushimaJapan
| | - Takayuki Nishikata
- Department of Radiological TechnologyNiigata University Graduate School of Health SciencesNiigata CityNiigataJapan
- Division of RadiologyNagaoka Red Cross HospitalNagaoka‐shiNiigataJapan
| | - Takeshi Takizawa
- Department of Radiation OncologyNiigata University Medical and Dental HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
- Department of Radiation OncologyNiigata Neurosurgical HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Takumi Yamada
- Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical SupportNiigata University Medical and Dental HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Hironori Sakai
- Section of Radiology, Department of Clinical SupportNiigata University Medical and Dental HospitalNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Motoki Kaidu
- Department of Radiology and Radiation OncologyNiigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Ryuta Sasamoto
- Department of Radiological TechnologyNiigata University Graduate School of Health SciencesNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Ishikawa
- Department of Radiology and Radiation OncologyNiigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| | - Satoru Utsunomiya
- Department of Radiological TechnologyNiigata University Graduate School of Health SciencesNiigata CityNiigataJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang S, Mai X, Liu H, Sun W, Zhu J, Du J, Lin X, Du Y, Zhang K, Yang X, Huang X. Plan quality and treatment efficiency assurance of two VMAT optimization for cervical cancer radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14050. [PMID: 37248800 PMCID: PMC10562038 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
To investigate the difference of the fluence map optimization (FMO) and Stochastic platform optimization (SPO) algorithm in a newly-introduced treatment planning system (TPS). METHODS 34 cervical cancer patients with definitive radiation were retrospectively analyzed. Each patient has four plans: FMO with fixed jaw plans (FMO-FJ) and no fixed jaw plans (FMO-NFJ); SPO with fixed jaw plans (SPO-FJ) and no fixed jaw plans (SPO-NFJ). Dosimetric parameters, Modulation Complexity Score (MCS), Gamma Pass Rate (GPR) and delivery time were analyzed among the four plans. RESULTS For target coverage, SPO-FJ plans are the best ones (P ≤ 0.00). FMO plans are better than SPO-NFJ plans (P ≤ 0.00). For OARs sparing, SPO-FJ plans are better than FMO plans for mostly OARs (P ≤ 0.04). Additionally, SPO-FJ plans are better than SPO-NFJ plans (P ≤ 0.02), except for rectum V45Gy. Compared to SPO-NFJ plans, the FMO plans delivered less dose to bladder, rectum, colon V40Gy and pelvic bone V40Gy (P ≤ 0.04). Meanwhile, the SPO-NFJ plans showed superiority in MU, delivery time, MCS and GPR in all plans. In terms of delivery time and MCS, the SPO-FJ plans are better than FMO plans. FMO-FJ plans are better than FMO-NFJ plans in delivery efficiency. MCSs are strongly correlated with PCTV length, which are negatively with PCTV length (P ≤ 0.03). The delivery time and MUs of the four plans are strongly correlated (P ≤ 0.02). Comparing plans with fixed or no fixed jaw in two algorithms, no difference was found in FMO plans in target coverage and minor difference in Kidney_L Dmean, Mu and delivery time between PCTV width≤15.5 cm group and >15.5 cm group. For SPO plans, SPO-FJ plans showed more superiority in target coverage and OARs sparing than the SPO-NFJ plans in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS SPO-FJ plans showed superiority in target coverage and OARs sparing, as well as higher delivery efficiency in the four plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sijuan Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Xiuying Mai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Hongdong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Wenzhao Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Jinhan Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Jinlong Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Xi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
- School of Biomedical EngineeringGuangzhou Xinhua CollegeGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Yujie Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | | | - Xin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Xiaoyan Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and TherapyGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
An effective and optimized patient-specific QA workload reduction for VMAT plans after MLC-modelling optimization. Phys Med 2023; 107:102548. [PMID: 36842260 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many complexity metrics characterize modulated plans. First, this study aimed at identify the optimal complexity metrics to reduce workload associated to patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for our equipment and processes. Second, it intended to optimize our MLC modelling to improve measurement and calculation agreement with expectation of further reducing PSQA workload. METHODS Correlation and sensitivity at specificity equals to 1 were evaluated for PSQA results and different complexity metrics. Thresholds to stop PSQA were determined. After validation of the optimal complexity metric and threshold for our equipment and process, the MLC modelling was reviewed with a recently published methodology. This method is based on measurements with a Farmer-type ionization chamber of synchronous and asynchronous sweeping gap plans. Effect on the PSQA results and the identified threshold was investigated. RESULTS In our center, the most appropriate complexity metric for reducing our PSQA workload was the Modulation Complexity Score for VMAT (MCSv). The optimization of the MLC modelling significantly reduced the number of controlled plans, specifically for one of our two Varian Clinac. Any plan with a MCSv >= 0.34 is treated without PSQA. CONCLUSION This study rationalized and reduced our PSQA workload by approximately 30%. It is a continuing work with new TPS, machine or PSQA equipment. It encourages centers to re-evaluate their MLC modelling as well as assess the benefit of complexity metrics to streamline their PSQA workflow. An easier access, at least for reporting, at best for optimizing plans, into the TPS would be beneficial for the community.
Collapse
|
4
|
Uncertainty-guided man-machine integrated patient-specific quality assurance. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
5
|
Ge C, Wang H, Chen K, Sun W, Li H, Shi Y. Effect of plan complexity on the dosimetry, delivery accuracy, and interplay effect in lung VMAT SBRT with 6 MV FFF beam. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:744-751. [PMID: 35486127 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01940-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of plan complexity on the dosimetry, delivery accuracy, and interplay effect in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with 6 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beam. METHODS Twenty patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer were included. For each patient, high-complexity (HC) and low-complexity (LC) three-partial-arc VMAT plans were optimized by adjusting the normal tissue objectives and the maximum monitoring units (MUs) for a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using 6 MV FFF beam. The effect of plan complexity was comprehensively evaluated in three aspects: (1) The dosimetric parameters, including CI, D2cm, R50, and dose-volume parameters of organs at risk were compared. (2) The delivery accuracy was assessed by pretreatment quality assurance for two groups of plans. (3) The motion-induced dose deviation was evaluated based on point dose measurements near the tumor center by using a programmable phantom. The standard deviation (SD) and maximum dose difference of five measurements were used to quantify the interplay effect. RESULTS The dosimetry of HC and LC plans were similar except the CI (1.003 ± 0.032 and 1.026 ± 0.043, p = 0.030) and Dmax to the spinal cord (10.6 ± 3.2 and 9.9 ± 3.0, p = 0.012). The gamma passing rates were significantly higher in LC plans for all arcs (p < 0.001). The SDs of HC and LC plans ranged from 0.5-16.6% and 0.03-2.9%, respectively, under the conditions of one-field, two-field, and three-field delivery for each plan with 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 cm motion amplitudes. The maximum dose differences of HC and LC plans were 34.5% and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION For lung VMAT SBRT, LC plans have a higher delivery accuracy and a lower motion-induced dose deviation with similar dosimetry compared with HC plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 130021, Changchun, China
| | - Huidong Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 130021, Changchun, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 130021, Changchun, China
| | - Kunzhi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 130021, Changchun, China
| | - Wuji Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 130021, Changchun, China
| | - Huicheng Li
- Jilin Province FAW General Hospital, 130011, Changchun, China
| | - Yinghua Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, 130021, Changchun, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xiao Q, Bai L, Li G, Zhang X, Li Z, Duan L, Peng R, Zhong R, Wang Q, Wang X, Bai S. A robust approach to establish tolerance limits for the gamma passing rate-based patient-specific quality assurance using the heuristic control charts. Med Phys 2021; 49:1312-1330. [PMID: 34778963 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Establishing the tolerance limits of patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) processes based on the gamma passing rate (GPR) by using normal statistical process control (SPC) methods involves certain problems. The aim of this study was threefold: (a) to show that the heuristic SPC method can replace the quantile method for establishing tolerance limits in PSQA processes and is more robust, (b) to introduce an iterative procedure of "Identify-Eliminate-Recalculate" for establishing the tolerance limits in PSQA processes with unknown states based on retrospective GPRs, and (c) to recommend a workflow to define tolerance limits based on actual clinical retrospective GPRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 1671 volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) pretreatment plans were measured on four linear accelerators (linacs) and analyzed by treatment sites using the GPRs under the 2%/2 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 3%/3 mm criteria. Normality testing was performed using the Anderson-Darling (AD) statistic and the optimal distributions of GPRs were determined using the Fitter Python package. The iterative "Identify-Eliminate-Recalculate" procedure was used to identify the PSQA outliers. The tolerance limits of the initial PSQAs, remaining PSQAs after elimination, and in-control PSQAs after correction were calculated using the conventional Shewhart method, two transformation methods, three heuristic methods, and two quantile methods. The tolerance limits of PSQA processes with different states for the respective methods, linacs, and treatment sites were comprehensively compared and analyzed. RESULTS It was found that 75% of the initial PSQA processes and 63% of the in-control processes were non-normal (AD test, p < 0.05). The optimal distributions of GPRs for the initial and in-control PSQAs varied with different linacs and treatment sites. In the implementation of the "Identify-Eliminate-Recalculate" procedure, the quantile methods could not identify the out-of-control PSQAs effectively due to the influence of outliers. The tolerance limits of the in-control PSQAs, calculated using the quantile of optimal fitting distributions, represented the ground truth. The tolerance limits of the in-control PSQAs and remaining PSQAs after elimination calculated using the heuristic methods were considerably close to the ground truth (the maximum average absolute deviations were 0.50 and 1.03%, respectively). Some transformation failures occurred under both transformation methods. For the in-control PSQAs at 3%/2 mm gamma criteria, the maximum differences in the tolerance limits for four linacs and different treatment sites were 3.10 and 5.02%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The GPR distributions of PSQA processes vary with different linacs and treatment sites but most are skewed. In applying SPC methodologies to PSQA processes, heuristic methods are robust. For in-control PSQA processes, the tolerance limits calculated by heuristic methods are in good agreement with the ground truth. For unknown PSQA processes, the tolerance limits calculated by the heuristic methods after the iterative "Identify-Eliminate-Recalculate" procedure are closest to the ground truth. Setting linac- and treatment site-specific tolerance limits for PSQA processes is necessary for clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Long Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Guangjun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Xiangbin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Zhibin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Lian Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Ruilin Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Renming Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Xuetao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Sen Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|